@@Martin-nl1dl Continental powers are targets of "invitation" to give the "island" power the ability to control and maintain dominance. The invitations are selective and depend upon the interests. The goal here is to keep ger. And russia divided so control is maintained across the water. This is clearly seen if you look at nordstream, sanctions, blocades, invasions ,wars over the past 300+ years
Since a week or so (I'm guessing Trumps win) I'm getting bombarded with news articles about Russian losses hitting a peak and other supposed failures, no mention of the extreme gains, just high lighting the losses. They're scared.
They're always claiming how ru side is losing 1-2k soldiers a DAY now. Just the footage missing. Sadly, many people don't need.any footage or proof to believe such nonsense, as long as it aligns with their hopes and wishes.
This is now 16th November, results of America's Election were known ten days ago, Donald J Trump moves in to the White House on January 20th 2025 - Russian Federation Forces have gained huge advances against Zelensky's Army!
Losses probably _are_ up. Because Russia is pushing to quickly occupy any territory it intends to claim before a possible ceasefire/treaty. So it's not so much that losses are up, but the pace of the war is up.
Zelensky didn't try to prevent the conflict through diplomacy because he lacks honor and integrity. In 2014 there was a coup. Soon after, there was a massacre in Odessa (dozens of people were burned alive). Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. A civil war broke out due to the rise in ethnic tensions. For 8 years the Ukrainian military was indiscriminately shelling civilians living in Donbas. If Zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality, none of this would have happened. The 8 year civil war would have ended and Donbas would have remained part of Ukraine. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy. Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements. Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time Russia's national security was compromised once NATO began to expand eastwards. Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining NATO was a red line (November 2021) and unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns. 20th September, 2021: Ukraine launched military drills with US and NATO. NATO is not a defensive alliance. NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the U.N. Charter). We should never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq etc. Who blew up the pipeline causing an environmental disaster? Zelensky banned all opposition and arrested a leading priest. Zelensky tried to invoke article 5 under false pretenses. Remember the incident in Poland. Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. Poroshenko said, “Our children will go to schools and kindergartens-theirs will hide in the basements”. Russians will never forget the 2014 Odessa massacre. The whole world needs to know about it. Why was Denis Kireev eliminated? He was a member of Ukraine's negotiating team during the peace negotiations. He wanted to help his country. Ukraine has a hit list. They target artists, journalists and ordinary citizens. Hundreds of children are on this list. 13 year old Faina Savenkova was placed on this list. Pink Floyd's Roger Waters is on this list. Jimmy Dore (American stand-up comedian, podcaster) and Aaron Maté (Canadian writer and journalist) are on this list. There is evidence that Ukrainian troops have been indiscriminately shelling civilians in Donbas (they used petal mines and targeted areas where there was no military presence). The azov troops trapped in the azovstal steelworks in Mariupol used human shields. They refused to allow civilians to leave despite of humanitarian corridors being present. Russia held a proposed cease fire in order for the civilians to leave, but azov would not allow the civilians to leave. Ukraine has committed many acts of terrorism (car bombs and other forms of assassination). Darya Dugina (journalist) R.I.P. The first terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed the truck driver and the individuals in the adjacent car (innocent civilian victims). The second terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed two parents and severely injured their young daughter. I have done a lot of research and it took me a long time to write this comment. I have stated a lot of facts and I have given my honest opinion. I have provided a brief summary of events that took place. In order to explain this whole situation in great detail, a book would need to be written. Hopefully someone will write an UNBIASED book, stating facts and allowing the readers to form their own judgments. Everything I said can be fact checked and verified.
NATO is not a defensive alliance. They illegally bombed Yugoslavia (direct violation of the UN Charter). We must never forget what they did to Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc.
0:47 PR-Moves, by the Russians? Unlikely as they never cared too much about the PR. This could be either a recon and combat mission or a distraction from something else. The question is how the Ukranians react to that and then we see the goal of that incursion.
@@Kevineitor199 You are talking about the situation for more than 2 years when Izyum and Kupiansk were under russian control? That was even before Severodonezk. There were several breakthroughts until the ukranian tank brigade plus several mechanized brigade were allocated to the western forrests. There were many claims from bloggers as always, but i havent seen military actions for propaganda reasons from the russian side back then.
For that border in the north of Ukraine, it likely was set along the river a long time ago, but since some rivers move quite a lot over time you get an inconvenient border condition with sometimes many little islands of land on either side.
I don't think it's wrong for the US to support Taiwan. That's a small country that is directly threatened by a communist dictatorship, Taiwan is also economically VITAL due to their specialized industries that only really exist there at that scale. US should still support Taiwan but I agree with you on the other two. Israel and Ukraine should take care of their own problems.
The issue with siversk is not about Ukrainian commander of the region being good. From credible source it’s more to lies and incompetence of Russian commander in that region who writes “good reports” to high command when they are all BS. I’ve heard he’s incompetent at modern warfare planning and has no experience in manuever warfare. A lot of his subordinates and TG channels have called for him to be sacked for a long time
This could explain the "magnificent capture" of 3 settlements far West from the contact line some weeks back, South of Kriminnaya forest. That turned out to be not true. Snd now the latest claimed capture of one of those settlements just south of the forest is again invalidated. I think you might be on to something. Granted, Azov was in the region around that time so AFU has definitely put resources here too.
@ exactly, he at one point got soldiers killed for “good reports”. He lied to high command about capture of this same region Ukraine claim to have recaptured today. He lied in reports and later sent soldiers to capture the settlement so his reports can be collaborated. Because of his reports, the VKS couldn’t drop bombs or provide air cover on a settlement apparently already captured on later to Ukraine to use it as a PR stunt of a recapture today yet in actual sense, the settlement had never been captured by Russian force in that region only in “beautiful reports”
There are always clowns on both sides in wars. Germany in world war 2 had many brilliant generals but there were also generals who were less... "sharp" so to say. Paulus being a good example for not being the sharpest tool in the shed. The Soviets and the Americans had similar situations for various reasons.
I don't really understand how Russia isn't launching any major new large scale offensives by opening new fronts like Ukraine's Kursk offensive due to Ukraine's lack of manpower. Are artillery and drones really that much of a problem?
No, they simply don't overextend themselves like the Ukrainians do. They're more disciplined. Ukraine, on the other hand is like a junkie/street bum who just got $100 and plans to jack it all up in 1 session, then goes begging for more
Why would they do that? The objective is to destroy the UAF not territory. If they were to capture territory and had hostile people in it, which haven't been taken to the army yet, they would face an insurgency. They would be forced to ethnically cleanse Ukraine. Why do that when the ukranians are treating all men in Ukraine as meat?
I know most westerners do not understand Russian war techniques they are always looking for proven failed strategies. My advice to all of them is look and learn the Russian techniques are not written in any books or taught in western military academies.
The reason for that seem to be losses. Large scale operations lead to a much higher number of kia and the main concern of Russia is it's declining population, therefore they do everything to minimise losses. The preferred way to engage is not to even see the enemy, if possible engage them with artillery, FABs and whatever else that can be shot long distance, when positions are weakened move forward. In a large scale offensive this is not possible, you can't avoid troops facing each other, engaging at close distance. You can observe this at many places: the Russian army loves it if AFU tries to hold a position and pours in reserves, they deliberately put stronghold under pressure but make no effort in capturing them as long as reinforcements are sent in. Once Ukraine lost too many and slows down or stops sending replacements they capture it.
There cannot be a permanent border on soil like that. From the satellite imagery we can see oxbow lakes, meaning the river meanders or shifts over time due to the loose sediment. Its also why there is no construction on the lowland near the river. The river's path is therefore impermanent and used to travel where those now cut off lakes are.
Toretsk is important as it is a sizeable and defendable city in Donbas,siversk is interesting to say the least but Russia can overwhelm them at some point,it will collapse just like the other fortress cities although the siversk commander is Zaluzhny 2.0
Kyiv is heavily defended and is quite a distance from the border,it is even larger than Kharkiv and Ukraine is prepared to defend their capital, needless to say it is the most heavily defended piece of real estate in Ukraine,if it is so easy to take Kyiv the war will be over in a matter of weeks
Still to counter the pressure exerted by Russia at this phase of the war without reinforcement is some monumental feat,the commander must be very level headed and a master strategist a@@truthissacred
Toretsk is a mess. Russians must allocate more troops to Toretsk. It seems like Kursk is a good distraction for Russia since they cannot divert those troops to Toretsk front.
Russia will flank it I think, although as others have mentioned the height advantage is considerable,or Russia can take Chasiv Yar first and fight their way down
Don't be stupid. They live in that climate for hundreds and thousands of years. They know how to fight in summer, rain and snow. Don't believe to YT channels and media.
Seversk is the most successful defense to this day due to many advantage that defender exploited like terrain (high ground, thick forest and river), intel advantage, concentration of troops and high concentration of defensive fortifications. Ukrainian always did a pretty good job to clear those Russians soldiers out. But still in the end, it's still pretty useless battle in the grand scheme right now and still the southern offensive is still ongoing and kinna like they're not gonna stop in anytime soon. Meanwhile some pro-Ukrainian suggested or claimed that Russia might wanted to clear all of the remaining Ukrainiains out of Kursk before January, 20th 2025 (The day that Trump would be back into the office). In which might be not true at all. Since Kursk is the dead trap anyway for all of those Ukrainians and foreigners (aka NATO) soldiers that still wanted to fight in unfriendly territory. And they are still in the very disadvantage position in term of militarily wise
??? I doubt the Russians give a stuff about Trump. And why would they? They'll listen to him when in due time, but they won't be grovelling like a beggar in a green shirt.
When two neighboring countries fight each other, just know the USA visited one.
Every country invites the US to visit them. Stupid statement.
@@Martin-nl1dl Continental powers are targets of "invitation" to give the "island" power the ability to control and maintain dominance. The invitations are selective and depend upon the interests. The goal here is to keep ger. And russia divided so control is maintained across the water. This is clearly seen if you look at nordstream, sanctions, blocades, invasions ,wars over the past 300+ years
@@Martin-nl1dl You obviously don't understand geopolitics and the US hegemon c/w the petrodollar.
ok we get it i saw this before already
Since a week or so (I'm guessing Trumps win) I'm getting bombarded with news articles about Russian losses hitting a peak and other supposed failures, no mention of the extreme gains, just high lighting the losses. They're scared.
They're always claiming how ru side is losing 1-2k soldiers a DAY now. Just the footage missing.
Sadly, many people don't need.any footage or proof to believe such nonsense, as long as it aligns with their hopes and wishes.
Those losses are fake news too. They are reflecting on themselves.
I've noticed exactly the same.
This is now 16th November, results of America's Election were known ten days ago, Donald J Trump moves in to the White House on January 20th 2025 - Russian Federation Forces have gained huge advances against Zelensky's Army!
Losses probably _are_ up. Because Russia is pushing to quickly occupy any territory it intends to claim before a possible ceasefire/treaty.
So it's not so much that losses are up, but the pace of the war is up.
Virgin Syrsky losing every front he commands.
Chad Siversk commander holding and regaining ground for two years without begging for reinforcements
More like local US commander.
@@cdgncgn more like
chad Gamer who played every single RTS game
vs
virgin officer corps playing wargames at hq
@@cdgncgn No, it's Steiner.
Siverks commander is Steiner! 😄
Siversk has many natural barriers that give advantage! NOW that the stretching of AFU is working...the opportunities will come. Do not rush.
Zelensky didn't try to prevent the conflict through diplomacy because he lacks honor and integrity.
In 2014 there was a coup. Soon after, there was a massacre in Odessa (dozens of people were burned alive). Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. A civil war broke out due to the rise in ethnic tensions. For 8 years the Ukrainian military was indiscriminately shelling civilians living in Donbas.
If Zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality, none of this would have happened. The 8 year civil war would have ended and Donbas would have remained part of Ukraine. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy.
Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements.
Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time
Russia's national security was compromised once NATO began to expand eastwards. Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining NATO was a red line (November 2021) and unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns.
20th September, 2021: Ukraine launched military drills with US and NATO.
NATO is not a defensive alliance. NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the U.N. Charter).
We should never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq etc.
Who blew up the pipeline causing an environmental disaster?
Zelensky banned all opposition and arrested a leading priest.
Zelensky tried to invoke article 5 under false pretenses. Remember the incident in Poland.
Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed.
Poroshenko said, “Our children will go to schools and kindergartens-theirs will hide in the basements”.
Russians will never forget the 2014 Odessa massacre. The whole world needs to know about it.
Why was Denis Kireev eliminated? He was a member of Ukraine's negotiating team during the peace negotiations. He wanted to help his country.
Ukraine has a hit list. They target artists, journalists and ordinary citizens. Hundreds of children are on this list. 13 year old Faina Savenkova was placed on this list.
Pink Floyd's Roger Waters is on this list. Jimmy Dore (American stand-up comedian, podcaster) and Aaron Maté (Canadian writer and journalist) are on this list.
There is evidence that Ukrainian troops have been indiscriminately shelling civilians in Donbas (they used petal mines and targeted areas where there was no military presence).
The azov troops trapped in the azovstal steelworks in Mariupol used human shields. They refused to allow civilians to leave despite of humanitarian corridors being present.
Russia held a proposed cease fire in order for the civilians to leave, but azov would not allow the civilians to leave.
Ukraine has committed many acts of terrorism (car bombs and other forms of assassination). Darya Dugina (journalist) R.I.P.
The first terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed the truck driver and the individuals in the adjacent car (innocent civilian victims).
The second terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed two parents and severely injured their young daughter.
I have done a lot of research and it took me a long time to write this comment. I have stated a lot of facts and I have given my honest opinion.
I have provided a brief summary of events that took place. In order to explain this whole situation in great detail, a book would need to be written.
Hopefully someone will write an UNBIASED book, stating facts and allowing the readers to form their own judgments. Everything I said can be fact checked and verified.
Brainwashed
better comment i readed, good info sir, TY
Look at this ruSSian bot 😊
NATO is not a defensive alliance. They illegally bombed Yugoslavia (direct violation of the UN Charter). We must never forget what they did to Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc.
Don't post other bot's copypasta ffs
@@arostwocents mimimi
There is no international law so nothing they do is illegal
@@arostwocents What you got against bots? Jeez...
@@Ghastly_Grinner I'm down with that if we remember that "int law" is what created "isreal".
0:47 PR-Moves, by the Russians? Unlikely as they never cared too much about the PR. This could be either a recon and combat mission or a distraction from something else. The question is how the Ukranians react to that and then we see the goal of that incursion.
so we are gonna forget the kupyansk and izyum breaktrough pr campaign?
@@Kevineitor199 You are talking about the situation for more than 2 years when Izyum and Kupiansk were under russian control? That was even before Severodonezk. There were several breakthroughts until the ukranian tank brigade plus several mechanized brigade were allocated to the western forrests. There were many claims from bloggers as always, but i havent seen military actions for propaganda reasons from the russian side back then.
Thanks for the update 🎉🎉🎉
For that border in the north of Ukraine, it likely was set along the river a long time ago, but since some rivers move quite a lot over time you get an inconvenient border condition with sometimes many little islands of land on either side.
Any one else notice that all the western leaders are not even talking about their respective countries but instead "isreal"?
Par for course. We're not supposed to notice this.
Instead of arming Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness etc.
easiest way to rule over poor people is to keep them poor.
these people in Washington want to rule and they do not care about people.
I don't think it's wrong for the US to support Taiwan. That's a small country that is directly threatened by a communist dictatorship, Taiwan is also economically VITAL due to their specialized industries that only really exist there at that scale. US should still support Taiwan but I agree with you on the other two. Israel and Ukraine should take care of their own problems.
Thanks a lot for your Great work.
I was disappointed that there is not even a word about the Russian attack and occupation of the eastern part of Kupjansk.
"shhhhhhh we are winning!" -Napoleon
Thanks Weeb 🙏
Chernigov front got moved first time since April 2022
The issue with siversk is not about Ukrainian commander of the region being good. From credible source it’s more to lies and incompetence of Russian commander in that region who writes “good reports” to high command when they are all BS. I’ve heard he’s incompetent at modern warfare planning and has no experience in manuever warfare. A lot of his subordinates and TG channels have called for him to be sacked for a long time
This could explain the "magnificent capture" of 3 settlements far West from the contact line some weeks back, South of Kriminnaya forest. That turned out to be not true. Snd now the latest claimed capture of one of those settlements just south of the forest is again invalidated.
I think you might be on to something.
Granted, Azov was in the region around that time so AFU has definitely put resources here too.
@ exactly, he at one point got soldiers killed for “good reports”. He lied to high command about capture of this same region Ukraine claim to have recaptured today. He lied in reports and later sent soldiers to capture the settlement so his reports can be collaborated. Because of his reports, the VKS couldn’t drop bombs or provide air cover on a settlement apparently already captured on later to Ukraine to use it as a PR stunt of a recapture today yet in actual sense, the settlement had never been captured by Russian force in that region only in “beautiful reports”
There are always clowns on both sides in wars.
Germany in world war 2 had many brilliant generals but there were also generals who were less... "sharp" so to say. Paulus being a good example for not being the sharpest tool in the shed. The Soviets and the Americans had similar situations for various reasons.
Tak for opdatering
I don't really understand how Russia isn't launching any major new large scale offensives by opening new fronts like Ukraine's Kursk offensive due to Ukraine's lack of manpower. Are artillery and drones really that much of a problem?
No, they simply don't overextend themselves like the Ukrainians do. They're more disciplined. Ukraine, on the other hand is like a junkie/street bum who just got $100 and plans to jack it all up in 1 session, then goes begging for more
Why would they do that? The objective is to destroy the UAF not territory. If they were to capture territory and had hostile people in it, which haven't been taken to the army yet, they would face an insurgency. They would be forced to ethnically cleanse Ukraine. Why do that when the ukranians are treating all men in Ukraine as meat?
I know most westerners do not understand Russian war techniques they are always looking for proven failed strategies. My advice to all of them is look and learn the Russian techniques are not written in any books or taught in western military academies.
@@DontWorryBeHappy75 lol, great comment.
The reason for that seem to be losses. Large scale operations lead to a much higher number of kia and the main concern of Russia is it's declining population, therefore they do everything to minimise losses. The preferred way to engage is not to even see the enemy, if possible engage them with artillery, FABs and whatever else that can be shot long distance, when positions are weakened move forward. In a large scale offensive this is not possible, you can't avoid troops facing each other, engaging at close distance. You can observe this at many places: the Russian army loves it if AFU tries to hold a position and pours in reserves, they deliberately put stronghold under pressure but make no effort in capturing them as long as reinforcements are sent in. Once Ukraine lost too many and slows down or stops sending replacements they capture it.
Another good update Mr Weeb
There cannot be a permanent border on soil like that. From the satellite imagery we can see oxbow lakes, meaning the river meanders or shifts over time due to the loose sediment. Its also why there is no construction on the lowland near the river. The river's path is therefore impermanent and used to travel where those now cut off lakes are.
Thank you for the update. We'll see what happens before the Trump inauguration.
At this rate Russia will be half complete by the time trump comes,what will happen is anyone's guess
Top Work
I think the fighting in Toresk and Siversk are just pinning operations
Toretsk is important as it is a sizeable and defendable city in Donbas,siversk is interesting to say the least but Russia can overwhelm them at some point,it will collapse just like the other fortress cities although the siversk commander is Zaluzhny 2.0
Slava Weeb Union
Afternoon everybody.😊
Good morning
Good evening here.@@CHANGER147
Hiyo frein
It is story of comedians fall and catastrophe.
the comedian's*
I'm here faster than NAFO bots tears😂
Thank you :)
I bet Russia is going to make a move towards Kyiv, thus forcing Ukranian troops to withdraw from Kursk to protect the capital. I would do the same.
Kyiv is heavily defended and is quite a distance from the border,it is even larger than Kharkiv and Ukraine is prepared to defend their capital, needless to say it is the most heavily defended piece of real estate in Ukraine,if it is so easy to take Kyiv the war will be over in a matter of weeks
😂😂😂You, poor guy! The Ukrainians have recaptured? What?😂😂😂😂😂
It was only joke!
They retook a gray zone village which Russians claimed. Nothing too impressive...
Still to counter the pressure exerted by Russia at this phase of the war without reinforcement is some monumental feat,the commander must be very level headed and a master strategist a@@truthissacred
Toretsk is a mess. Russians must allocate more troops to Toretsk. It seems like Kursk is a good distraction for Russia since they cannot divert those troops to Toretsk front.
I think it's just Ukraine getting 200 APCs and now they're gonna attack wherever they can until they run out of stuff again.
Translation: invert the message to get truth of US claims.
Cheers Weeb.
The Ukies are surprisingly strong in Toretsk
Like in Bahmut.
They have the high ground.
Russia will flank it I think, although as others have mentioned the height advantage is considerable,or Russia can take Chasiv Yar first and fight their way down
Any news in Kharkiv frontline or is that just frozen ?
Hello Weeb , is there any further advancement of Russians in Kupiansk?
🇷🇸❤️Weeb
Zelensky blackmailing the US for aid. Threatens to go nuclear on Russia. - The Duran
What about Siversk ??
Free the J6 US political prisoners now.
What do yall know about Jinky Minus???
Trying too gain as much ground before winter snows
Don't be stupid. They live in that climate for hundreds and thousands of years. They know how to fight in summer, rain and snow. Don't believe to YT channels and media.
it's ukrover
Ukraine? Mycraine - Putin
Western Supply stopped
Želenský Bad luck starts 😂
Quick upload ngl
Hello
Whats the point of making all of that😂stuff Never Again New York is so rich now
Seversk is the most successful defense to this day due to many advantage that defender exploited like terrain (high ground, thick forest and river), intel advantage, concentration of troops and high concentration of defensive fortifications. Ukrainian always did a pretty good job to clear those Russians soldiers out. But still in the end, it's still pretty useless battle in the grand scheme right now and still the southern offensive is still ongoing and kinna like they're not gonna stop in anytime soon. Meanwhile some pro-Ukrainian suggested or claimed that Russia might wanted to clear all of the remaining Ukrainiains out of Kursk before January, 20th 2025 (The day that Trump would be back into the office). In which might be not true at all. Since Kursk is the dead trap anyway for all of those Ukrainians and foreigners (aka NATO) soldiers that still wanted to fight in unfriendly territory. And they are still in the very disadvantage position in term of militarily wise
Chernihiv?!
on a map bruh
lets go
Nice to see that Russia and Ukraine are fighting for Trump’s heart.
??? I doubt the Russians give a stuff about Trump. And why would they? They'll listen to him when in due time, but they won't be grovelling like a beggar in a green shirt.
Yeah right, whatever...
Pretty sure his heart is already fully captured by we all know who.
Z
O
M
O
V
😎
First!
First
What about Kupiansk?