Communication was his greatest asset.. taking incredibly difficult concepts of different theorists and comparing and contrasting with a conservation of verbiage holds the attention and is pretty awe inspiring
Feynman had a curiousity. He wanted to know how everything worked. He wasn't only a theorist. He loved tinkering. And, as has been noted, he was an excellent communicator. Wish there were more of him around.
If there was one scientist from history that I could meet then kick back and have a beer with it would be Mr Feynman. i wish he could come back and teach some science to the flat earth people.
“Gravitation” should be re-named to “Attraction” because at the end of the day the behaviors observed are akin to 2 magnets with like ends, like orientated. This would make the concept much more understandable.
No; in space-time, gravity works through _attraction;_ in time-space, gravity works through _repulsion._ See Dewey Larson. The guy who discovered the unified theory mainstream science claims to be searching for.
If you looked at the comments and wonder about what appears to be random listing of names by different youtubers, every one of them joined youtube at the same time.
I have been to America. They never criticize you. May be I am different. Coming back to feynman's lecture, it lacks quantitative aspects. I really do not know why. Btw: 38:31 attracted to me vs interested in me-> man's problems.
This was for a lay audience. Feynmans ability as a theorist was legendary but he judged this perfectly so they learned and stayed engaged. He managed this without being patronising.
Gravity, just got the idea of what it is. Surplus electrons or their absence. What is the net charge of a planet as opposed to a newton star with its degenerate electrons that help support it against collapse? Gravity is proportional to mass but something is wrong. Think of a dielectric effect that mass has on the electric permittivity of free space. Gravity is weak but it could still be a just a weakened electrostatic or dynamic force. There are examples of sub atomic particles where laws of attraction are not 1/R^2. Feynman said something and I immediately agreed and started typing this. To conclude, mass is not the cause of gravity even though its true that its a straight linear relations ship. It's the residue of electric and magnetic fields of each object causing the attraction. The spooky forces of attraction are what make physics so hard to comprehend as Dr. Feynman has noted. Observation with cause and effect are not usually truth about why it is the way it is. It's like mass is the dark area of the Mandelbrot set, an infinite set of points completely is disconnected from the other infinite domain of points in color. We have photons and kilograms. One collects spontaneously, the other is doing its best to never rest for a nanosecond at least until it get's too close to a nucleus, neutron star or black hole. Is it not rational to think that if energy wants to scatter then mass will respond by collecting. It's a balance between potential and Kinetic energy's.
Atoms will be seen to attract like atoms of the same kind and type with the force we call gravity even on intergalactic and cosmic scales. In this my theory, all hydrogen atoms everywhere, even these on earth, are aware of each other even to the farthest known limits of space, and this is what we see as entanglement. and also call "gravity".
i dont believe there us anything "magical" about a hydrogen atom, other than its quantity in the universe, better to ask why is "lead" "heavier" than hydrogen
Issac Newton, who invented calculus and gave us the laws of gravity, couldn't say why. Albert Einstein's laws of general relativity tells us that the planets aren't attracted to each other. Gravity is actually mass's distortion of space-time. Mass creates a curvature in space-time and objects that travel through the curvature are only following the curve. Einstein's field equations describe the effects mathematically. The equations are a little bit too much to include here but can be found elsewhere on the web.
Communication was his greatest asset.. taking incredibly difficult concepts of different theorists and comparing and contrasting with a conservation of verbiage holds the attention and is pretty awe inspiring
Feynman had a curiousity. He wanted to know how everything worked. He wasn't only a theorist. He loved tinkering. And, as has been noted, he was an excellent communicator. Wish there were more of him around.
I always love how he sounded like a NYC cab driver.
He thanks you for this.
This lecture demonstrates what would happen if Art Carney taught physics.
What a legendary person!❤
Once upon a time when a intellect was actually valued.
I watched this on the toilet.
yea what happened to that? Now the currency is big lips and incoherent speech..
"an" not "a"
@@jadonlawrence4909 good for you, the rest of us understood anywayzz, blir correct that 🤣
@@KevlarSammy but did you learn something?
Professor Richard Feynman's theory of Quantum Electrodynamics is really dynamic.
...And electrifying...
Nobody in the lecture caught his joking innuendo at 23:20...crickets chirping in the silence...
start at 6 :00
6:00
Amazing Lecture !!
If there was one scientist from history that I could meet then kick back and have a beer with it would be Mr Feynman. i wish he could come back and teach some science to the flat earth people.
“Gravitation” should be re-named to “Attraction” because at the end of the day the behaviors observed are akin to 2 magnets with like ends, like orientated. This would
make the concept much more understandable.
More understandable but wrong, since the force between magnets is completely different from gravitation.
No, because gravitational attraction is not the only kind of attraction there is.
No; in space-time, gravity works through _attraction;_ in time-space, gravity works through _repulsion._
See Dewey Larson. The guy who discovered the unified theory mainstream science claims to be searching for.
If you looked at the comments and wonder about what appears to be random listing of names by different youtubers, every one of them joined youtube at the same time.
So y did they list the names
We still avalaching in high speed..in the 60's it was true...nowadays Physics is in trouble. We do need new Feynmans and Einsteins...
Marvelous explanation 👌
Feynman lectures❤
Amazing!
Absolutely fascinating...
I am too much dopaministic😢 but i love physics😅
In this day and age, is it not possible to up-scale 360p to something actually watchable?
Nope
That was informative
Ralph about to yell from the crowd, lol
Art Carney comment hammered it, lol
His lectures are priceless. Is it possible to render them in HD? I've seen old charlie chan films that look better. Thanks.
Yeah those film were probably filmed on a movie grade film. That is why it is easier to restore.
@@RanEncounter thanks
@RanEncounter yes, probably on 8mm. Not the 35mm of a movie. At least it isn't an optical soundtrack.
He is the king of the Bongo,he could be the king of the Congo and all girls
from Katongo... we save him..
Mastermind !
I have been to America. They never criticize you. May be I am different. Coming back to feynman's lecture, it lacks quantitative aspects. I really do not know why. Btw: 38:31 attracted to me vs interested in me-> man's problems.
This was for a lay audience. Feynmans ability as a theorist was legendary but he judged this perfectly so they learned and stayed engaged. He managed this without being patronising.
Gravity, just got the idea of what it is. Surplus electrons or their absence. What is the net charge of a planet as opposed to a newton star with its degenerate electrons that help support it against collapse? Gravity is proportional to mass but something is wrong. Think of a dielectric effect that mass has on the electric permittivity of free space. Gravity is weak but it could still be a just a weakened electrostatic or dynamic force. There are examples of sub atomic particles where laws of attraction are not 1/R^2. Feynman said something and I immediately agreed and started typing this. To conclude, mass is not the cause of gravity even though its true that its a straight linear relations ship. It's the residue of electric and magnetic fields of each object causing the attraction. The spooky forces of attraction are what make physics so hard to comprehend as Dr. Feynman has noted. Observation with cause and effect are not usually truth about why it is the way it is. It's like mass is the dark area of the Mandelbrot set, an infinite set of points completely is disconnected from the other infinite domain of points in color.
We have photons and kilograms. One collects spontaneously, the other is doing its best to never rest for a nanosecond at least until it get's too close to a nucleus, neutron star or black hole. Is it not rational to think that if energy wants to scatter then mass will respond by collecting. It's a balance between potential and Kinetic energy's.
The first RUclipsr?
?
Can a spectogram capture a numerical sequence of the forces of a ship going to orbit -from earth too the space station
😢😢
They speak portuguese in Brazil.
💙
Boom
Atoms will be seen to attract like atoms of the same kind and type with the force we call gravity even on intergalactic and cosmic scales. In this my theory, all hydrogen atoms everywhere, even these on earth, are aware of each other even to the farthest known limits of space, and this is what we see as entanglement. and also call "gravity".
So you just conflated gravity with entanglement. That is not how it works.
@@RanEncounter Giggle
Gravity is not a force.
Soitenly! Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!!
i dont believe there us anything "magical" about a hydrogen atom, other than its quantity in the universe, better to ask why is "lead" "heavier" than hydrogen
Wouldn't it be incredible if his wife's name happened to be "Trixie" :)
Great lecture. But I believe he did not understand the tides himself
Isnt he the one who quoted if someone thinks they understand, thats the first piece of evidence that they dont?
no one understands tides....superimposition of multiple gravitaional pull force that are non-coincident sine waves
I don't see any wokies! The good ol' days.
the good old days were ruined by y'all lol. Reagan and his trickle down economics ruined everything
Write in google: Singularity sphere in the heart of a black hole
😊😊😊😊😅😅 🎉
Isn't it amazing how human beings believe we can explain the unexplainable with simple words. I prefer to just enjoy the workings of IT ALL.
If it has just been explained, then its not unexplainable. 😊
@@jeancondon9836 It's been speculated.
@@nowhereman9463 you have to speculate to accumulate. Also, you can't get locked up for breaking the laws of motion.
@@roberthorwat6747 OK, then.
Science is not about belief.
Williams Jennifer Rodriguez Joseph Brown Barbara
I would be to embarrassed to call this lecture child's play...⚫️👽...damn!
Why is the planet attracted
A body of mass has a gravitational pull proportional to its mass. We observe this effect with planets as they orbit the Solar System.
Issac Newton, who invented calculus and gave us the laws of gravity, couldn't say why. Albert Einstein's laws of general relativity tells us that the planets aren't attracted to each other. Gravity is actually mass's distortion of space-time. Mass creates a curvature in space-time and objects that travel through the curvature are only following the curve. Einstein's field equations describe the effects mathematically. The equations are a little bit too much to include here but can be found elsewhere on the web.
@@joshuarose3186 That is incorrect. The gravitational pull is proportional to its mass not density.
@@RanEncounter ty, comment has been updated.
Sounds Like a con artist. That’s how most of these so called scientists sound.
Found the flattard.
"so called" hahahaha!🎉😂❤🎉😂❤ this man is prolly the greatest scientist and human mind to have ever existed, created
"feyman" diagrams
T
Anderson Michelle Walker Joseph Thomas Anna
37:46 BAM 🤩😄
Lopez Elizabeth Thomas Steven Jackson Sandra