Common sense is intellectual, in the purest application. Sophistry is intellect applied to dismantling sense. Emotive predominance is one of the keys to achieving the legal win from a fragile position. The fact that people's liberty often rests on this system is lamentable, yet the closest adherence to Constitutional English Common Law is the least lamentable process so far conceived by man. The Napoleonic (European) alternative of accredited practice, that holds exclusive power to make judgements according to arcane qualification, is the ideal where political power seeks total authority over a beholden population. Thank God America still clings to its heritage, though there is a Progressive prying of that grip.
Excellent Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you heard the talk about - Schallingora Publicity Extracting Scheme (search on google)? It is a good one of a kind guide for learniing amazing eulogy speeches minus the hard work. Ive heard some interesting things about it and my mate finally got excellent success with it.
i wish these lawyers worked more on their public speaking especially if they r suppose to be professionally the choppiness shows that its un practiced un rehearsed. since this is a video id expect a higher level of “acting” memorized story without such need for powerpoint or notes. he almost sounds nervous to be there. seems like u tubers or ted ex talkers would be better giving a closing statement than a lawyer. blah
(This comment pertains to the judge giving jury instructions after both sides have finished with there closing arguements) (orruption in the American criminal court system is more common then most people would like to believe. I took a felony case to trial before and the judge in my case, ( -Judge- -Gail- -Z- -Bardach- )( -superior- -courtroom#6- -hamilton-county- IN ) she added a new charge to my case & she did this after both sides finished there final arguements! (((So final arguements had allready took place, the trial was over, all that was left, was for the judge to read jury instructions to the jury regarding how they should conduct or go about the process of deliberation to decide innocent or guilty.))) In the process of reading & explainning jury instructions to the jury for jury deliberation. She litterately took part of my defense that my lawyer used to prove my innocents and turnt it into a new charge. I started the trial facing 2 felonies & by the end of trial, just before the jury was to deliberate. I was facing three felonies. Every charge that someone faces in a criminal case. Each one has a cause# So how is the judge adding a new charge to my case during the jury trial not corruption. especially giving the timing of when she decided to add it. She added the new charge at the end. She added it at a time, when there was no chance for me & my lawer to defend my innocents against it, explainning my side of the situation. Her adding the new charge at anytime during the jury trial would have been criminal malpractice but the fact that she added a new charge to my case at the end of my trial proceeding. A new charge that had no cause# attached to it. WELL THATS CRIMINAL The inntensions of that act by the judge, even though probably not PREMEDITATED before the initial trial proceedings started. WAS CRIMINAL The intennsions were carefully thought out, it was criminal & unmoral. the intennsions were Purpossed & intended towards unjustly & wrongfully convicting a citizen. Her intennsions were purposed & intended towards taking away a innocent citizen's freedom & his right to a fair & unbiased trial hearing to prove his innocents. but speaking of PREMEDITATED I did find it odd that a bar tender from the very bar that called the law on me in the very case that I was fighting was selected to come in for possible jury duty on my case. 0utta around 330,000 residents of -hamiltoncounty- whats the odds of that happening? (American_Intermediary) I Thank God & I THANK MY PEERS, (((the citizens that were on my jury))) because they saw through the judges unjust behavior & her decision to try and trick the jurors. Ultimately finding me to be not guilty of all charges, even the one that she added in at the end of the trial. Thankyou also to my paid attorney Lawerence M. Hansen ! Without him & instead if I would have had to have had a public defender. I would have been forced to admit guilt to crimes that I didnt commit.
Even though I was not guilty & was found to be not guilty by my peers in that court room sitting on the jury !!!! THIS IS CORRUPTION THAT HAS GOT TO BE EXPOSED TO THE PUBLIC ! IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED by the legal court system ! ( sealed & withheld from the public , TRANSCRIPTS of the jury trial proceedings ) This is an example of corruption that can be proven through evidence. Evidence thats being held and unlawfully seized from the publics view at the -Hamilton County- IN. Court House. ( sealed & withheld from the puclic , TRANSCRIPTS of the jury trial proceedings ) ( -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- -superior- -courtroom#6- -HamiltonCounty- IN. ) She has recently retired from being a judge. (American_Intermediary) ( -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- -superior- -courtroom#6- -HamiltonCounty- IN. ) she has recently retired ( 7/1/2022 ) from being a judge. -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- gave a interview to the The -Noblesville- -Times- on june 22 2022 This is a quote that she gave in that interview & I quote "Another thing that has been especially rewarding has been conducting jury trials, I love interacting with people & letting them see how the system really works. Jurors often tell me, after our trials, what a positive and educational experience their jury duty has been." End quote
![Natti Natasha - Quiéreme Menos [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R57RrTjRGxk/mqdefault.jpg)
I am surprised that only less than 8000 are subscribing to this channel, I am not even an attorney and I subscribed!
I love the way you relate this to music!
Common sense is intellectual, in the purest application. Sophistry is intellect applied to dismantling sense. Emotive predominance is one of the keys to achieving the legal win from a fragile position. The fact that people's liberty often rests on this system is lamentable, yet the closest adherence to Constitutional English Common Law is the least lamentable process so far conceived by man. The Napoleonic (European) alternative of accredited practice, that holds exclusive power to make judgements according to arcane qualification, is the ideal where political power seeks total authority over a beholden population. Thank God America still clings to its heritage, though there is a Progressive prying of that grip.
Very good sir, I liked it very much
Excellent Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you heard the talk about - Schallingora Publicity Extracting Scheme (search on google)? It is a good one of a kind guide for learniing amazing eulogy speeches minus the hard work. Ive heard some interesting things about it and my mate finally got excellent success with it.
i wish these lawyers worked more on their public speaking especially if they r suppose to be professionally the choppiness shows that its un practiced un rehearsed. since this is a video id expect a higher level of “acting” memorized story without such need for powerpoint or notes. he almost sounds nervous to be there. seems like u tubers or ted ex talkers would be better giving a closing statement than a lawyer. blah
dude are you okay?
the sports story sucks he assumes everyone likes or knows sports and or are men obsessed with sports. if on jury hed totally lose me with that bs
It was an example, you can use what ever you like
(This comment pertains to the judge giving jury instructions after both sides have finished with there closing arguements)
(orruption in the American criminal court system is more common then most people would like to believe. I took a felony case to trial before and the judge in my case,
( -Judge- -Gail- -Z- -Bardach- )( -superior- -courtroom#6- -hamilton-county- IN )
she added a new charge to my case & she did this after both sides finished there final arguements!
(((So final arguements had allready took place, the trial was over, all that was left,
was for the judge to read jury instructions to the jury regarding how they should conduct or go about the process of deliberation to decide innocent or guilty.)))
In the process of reading & explainning jury instructions to the jury for jury deliberation.
She litterately took part of my defense that my lawyer used to prove my innocents and turnt it into a new charge.
I started the trial facing 2 felonies & by the end of trial, just before the jury was to deliberate.
I was facing three felonies.
Every charge that someone faces in a criminal case. Each one has a cause#
So how is the judge adding a new charge to my case during the jury trial not corruption.
especially giving the timing of when she decided to add it.
She added the new charge at the end.
She added it at a time, when there was no chance for me & my lawer to defend my innocents against it, explainning my side of the situation.
Her adding the new charge at anytime during the jury trial would have been criminal malpractice but the fact
that she added a new charge to my case at the end of my trial proceeding. A new charge that had no cause# attached to it. WELL THATS CRIMINAL
The inntensions of that act by the judge,
even though probably not PREMEDITATED before the initial trial proceedings started. WAS CRIMINAL
The intennsions were carefully thought out, it was criminal & unmoral.
the intennsions were Purpossed & intended towards unjustly & wrongfully convicting a citizen. Her intennsions were purposed & intended towards taking away a innocent citizen's freedom & his right to a fair & unbiased trial hearing to prove his innocents.
but speaking of PREMEDITATED
I did find it odd that a bar tender from the very bar that called the law on me in the very case that I was fighting was selected to come in for possible jury duty on my case.
0utta around 330,000 residents of -hamiltoncounty- whats the odds of that happening?
(American_Intermediary)
I Thank God & I THANK MY PEERS, (((the citizens that were on my jury))) because they saw through the judges unjust behavior & her decision to try and trick the jurors. Ultimately finding me to be not guilty of all charges, even the one that she added in at the end of the trial.
Thankyou also to my paid attorney Lawerence M. Hansen !
Without him & instead if I would have had to have had a public defender. I would have been forced to admit guilt to crimes that I didnt commit.
Even though I was not guilty & was found to be not guilty by my peers in that court room sitting on the jury !!!!
THIS IS CORRUPTION THAT HAS GOT TO BE EXPOSED TO THE PUBLIC !
IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED by the legal court system !
( sealed & withheld from the public , TRANSCRIPTS of the jury trial proceedings )
This is an example of corruption that can be proven through evidence. Evidence thats being held and unlawfully seized from the publics view at the -Hamilton County- IN. Court House.
( sealed & withheld from the puclic , TRANSCRIPTS of the jury trial proceedings )
( -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- -superior- -courtroom#6- -HamiltonCounty- IN. ) She has recently retired from being a judge.
(American_Intermediary)
( -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- -superior- -courtroom#6- -HamiltonCounty- IN. ) she has recently retired
( 7/1/2022 ) from being a judge.
-judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- gave a interview to the
The -Noblesville- -Times- on june 22 2022
This is a quote that she gave in that interview
& I quote
"Another thing that has been especially rewarding has been conducting jury trials,
I love interacting with people & letting them see how the system really works.
Jurors often tell me, after our trials, what a positive and educational experience their jury duty has been."
End quote
what?