It is argued, that children are dependent on parents and their consent. If thats the case, then it would be a contradiction to let children (i.e. humans under 18) abort babies without parents consent
@@Markussiemens658 and at 21 is when you can finally drink alcohol. And at 25 you can finally rent a car. And blah, blah ad nauseum. What isn't a social construction, therefore language is a social construction too. "Child" is only a word and can be seen as anything from A to Z by people and already is. Terrorism, homicidal, good, bad, only words which are only social constructs and can be subjectively perceived to be anything from A to Z...and again, already are. Everything, literally everything, good, bad, psychiatry, reality, fantasy, free will, and etc, is a social construct at the end of the day. It's all one big matrix of lies.
What is the social construction of childhood?
I don't get this 'internal contradiction' that seems to be explained in the first minute. Can someone explain?
It is argued, that children are dependent on parents and their consent. If thats the case, then it would be a contradiction to let children (i.e. humans under 18) abort babies without parents consent
@@Markussiemens658 and at 21 is when you can finally drink alcohol. And at 25 you can finally rent a car. And blah, blah ad nauseum. What isn't a social construction, therefore language is a social construction too. "Child" is only a word and can be seen as anything from A to Z by people and already is. Terrorism, homicidal, good, bad, only words which are only social constructs and can be subjectively perceived to be anything from A to Z...and again, already are. Everything, literally everything, good, bad, psychiatry, reality, fantasy, free will, and etc, is a social construct at the end of the day. It's all one big matrix of lies.
@@Markussiemens658 teenagers are close enough to 18 and over and therefore permitted at least some freedoms.