JUST IN: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Key Immigration Case 'Campos-Chaves v. Garland'
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 янв 2024
- The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Campos-Chaves v. Garland, a key immigration case.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
If they didn't wait in Mexico they shouldn't be allowed to be citizens. They are stepping in front of those that are waiting in Mexico like the law requires. IT'S NOT FAIR TO THOSE THAT ARE DO IT THE RIGHT WAY!!!
the fairness of it is irrelevant, they should be removed simply for the fact that their first action in the country was a crime. you should not be accepted in to a country that you do not respect the laws of.
When did the Supreme Court give more rights to illegals than it does to our border laws.If they did not come legally how do we have to serve them papers or rights.
That is not how the courts work. The legislator controls that.
The opposite of sotamayor's argument is, if you can't issue a removal order for not showing up, then the immigrant can just avoid all orders to appear, until "captured" and then it starts all over, they would issue another notice to appear for a hearing, and it could be ignored again until the next "capture" and then again, again, and again.
yes.
It’s a civil case! Legal counsel is not required, it’s up to the immigrant to get an attorney if they want one!
They can't be jailed unlike OUR civil cases where we don't get a lawyer.
It’s hard to grasp how many people think this is all a great idea! That won’t last much longer though. If they hate city cops, I can’t wait to see how they feel about migrant state police in tactical gear! 🤣
So the taxes of actual citizens are paying for free shelter, clothing, phone, food, medical, and now free repeated legal counsel and new court dates over, and over, and over, without end, every time the illegal finds another loop whole in a document in order to just keep staying in our country. It's like we the true citizens have acquired 1,000s of grown children we're responsible for supporting, only we were never asked if we wanted these foreign grown children. We were also never asked if we wanted to give up our Republic for an entirely Socialist form of government and culture.😔🙏🏽📖 🇺🇸
Trump 24
Fascinating! I’ve never sat through a SCOTUS hearing before. I should do this more often.
I always knew there were problems with the immigration system, but I didn’t know it was as complicated as it is. It definitely sounds like the NTAs need reformation. I wonder if they couldn’t make it so the non citizen has to sign for any such documents, thereby proving receipt, but also proving current address?
I see why the justices are asking the questions they ask. The system is so convoluted, and needs to be simplified.
Thank you for that clarification, and somehow it all seems to be to ambiguous and questionable, especially since just the fact that these people are trying to get their lives together and not giving rthem a definite time to appear just does not seem like there is any kind of target for them or for authorities to define a line for them to adhere to. It is no wonder that people generally do not apear because the system is definitely flawed.
@@guygi2011bs. if you have a claim for asylum that is legitimate (and ‘economic migrant’ is not legitimate) you would do everything in your power to make sure you show up and demonstrate your case.
A change is a change. I use the VA for medical and sometimes I'm told I'll have a future appointment. They call me or send me a letter telling me when the appointment is so that is a change to the original notice. I guess using her argument if I don't go to the appointment, I can argue that since they didn't give me the time and date at the beginning, they can't hold the missed appointment against me.
U don't come here the right way
Why not require people file for asylum prior to making the trip to any of our borber points of entry?
Usually take a few years before they get a hearing, it’s up to the immigrant to notify immigration of a change of address! The hearing is a review of why the immigrant is in the US! If they are requesting asylum, they must prove their case, if they don’t apoear the judge can issue NTD notice to deport, the can appeal that , but legal cost will not be paid by government! I’m assuming they have a time limit to appeal it.
These are not asylum seekers, these are economic migrants, and 99.999999% of them never have any intention to show up for NTA. They game our legal system, enter illegally, claim asylum, then just disappear.
@@AA-kj4icyes, and this woman is trying to argue that the court can’t rule they be deported if they don’t show up because the date on their notice to appear doesn’t count because the first time they were told the date would be tba.
who the Hell is this Lawyer that thinks he can over rule a supreme justice because he think he is correct..
From what I understand it is a garland pick.
lying already... outa here...lol
Id hope AMERICA IS A SOVEREIGN NATION and PROTECTION for PEOPLE UNDER CONSTITUTION and BILL of RIGHTS
why is SC wasting time on this? if im correct, the appeals court already got this right. theres got to be more important matters facing the court than whether we should reverse the court order and start letting off illegal immigrants based on technicalities
I am not a lawyer, but what good does it do to serve a NTPA without a time and place?
They have to notify immigration to schedule a time & date! Border patrol gives them the NTA and they have so many days to notify the courts of their address and if they move they have to update their new address, they also have free phones and can call the change in! Many never appear for hearing!
With us it is so they can say we didn't show and throw us in jail.
I love it !
Finally a Lawer calling out the P.E.A.'s.
If you have a polygraph and your tested you told the truth but you have test anxiety, you lied on the test, you lose your job peoples trust. You don’t have to be in court either for this to happen
TRUMP 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Amen!...going down in 2024. Aka going to jail in the US in 2024!
Trump Train 🚆 2024 🎉❤🎉❤😊
@@kathycottey nice! Unfortunately I think that train is about to derail
Already a backlog of 3 million, and there are at least 8 million new aliens, the majority of whom do not qualify to be here.
How would you know if they dont qualify or not? Are an immigration judge?
@@mikew764They’re claiming asylum only repeating what the UN is telling them to say. Wanting a better job or down on your luck does not apply for claiming asylum
@@gojobuddy You know they have to prove their asylum claims right? Its not like we are just taking their word for it. Again How would you know? Are you a judge?
@@mikew764 we know because the statistics simply dont work out. half of the continent isnt refugees. and even if they are, they can settle in the countries between their own and the US. they dont need to be in the US specifically to be safe
Because they moved through Mexico. Which means it wasn't about asylum, but getting into the US. You must apply for asylum at the first safe port. This all bull. We all know it. Some hundreds of thousands flew from Africa to Ecuador, then made their way through several safe ports. All have spent lots of money to do it. Costra Rica is a safe port, as is Panama and Mexico. These FOREIGNERS do not belong here. Even the Chinese coming here from the dictatorship, violated the Asylum agreement.
If you can’t prove noticed to arrive in country you don’t need official notification to be deported. The undocumented persons should bare the burden of providing documentation of entry approval otherwise to respect of deportation and a national emergency. One notice it sent to last address on file this is documented suffice and works the same as posted notices of a hearing on matters of court hearing dates should and does suffice, they know they are residing illegally and should bare the burden seeking any court hearing hanging over their heads and should constitute a matter of law, like looking over your shoulder baring the burden being caught and hauled out of the country. A passport would and could clarify any rights deferring deportation.
This is convoluted mayhem and stalling tricks to keep this mayhem continued. They have no problems of no notice of hearing property served when its child support or divorce until it’s contested and then it usually happens after the facts of a absentee hearing, they can’t unring the bell concerning arrears and children moving out of the country without the parent consent. Please!
You clearly dont understand what this case is about
Literally nothing to do with how they arrived into the country... 16 years ago
@@mikew764 shew troll!
@@JohnDonutHoles Cant handle the truth eh?
Someone told him he was smart, and he believed them… probably his welfare recipient mom…
" The alien has no control of receiving reasonable notice." So how does the government serve a request for the "non-citizen's current address" in order to serve the NTA?
Public Notice Board, like in any other normal country. As such, you can't claim you haven't received an official memo, the fact that you don't follow public notice boards its on your own recognizance, its not a defense
It’s up to them to go to an immigration office within so many days once entering the US! Many mmigrants never show up !
Notice is given at the border! That how they get released into the country! It’s up to the immigrant to notify immigration with their address!
Hear what is it too be heard
Why does Justice Jackson keep saying absTentia? Does she not know the word absentia? Is this the Supreme Court?
the big issue is why they dont talk to each one and send them back if they dont qualify, do the Disney test if you are not tall enough you dont ride..
So, if an illegal moves, without a forwarding address, they get to stay. If they are allowed to enter, without a set in stone court date, they get to stay. Question, since they are leaving countries that are much larger than ours, with more natural resources, can US Citizens take Their place?
saying 9th circus should be all you need to demonstrate it is a wrong decision.
Nathaniel security
Sounds like, CHANGE IS THE SAME THING???
Filling out of the nashaulil defiance
Well these courts & each and every other courts are not to be used for immigration hearings nor immigration cases. Please do a security check on him, please. Thank you your case is dropped (dismissed) allegedly.
And "Mexico is gonna' pay for it".🤭
But bidumb reversed all of it.
@@aperson3046 That Israeli $3.5 BILLION "Smart wall" aka "Iron fence" did not work so well huh.
Mexico did pay for it. Trump implemented a "Remain in Mexico" policy, which Biden reversed.
@@yepyep340 meanwhile the Mexican president just told Biden yeah, maybe we'll help and cooperate with you (AKA actually follow international laws) but you have to be nice to Cuba and Venezuela and then maybe I'll play nice.
The bussing of illegals to chicago, nyc etc. was not only hilarious but a genius move. Look up all the videos of people living in the Bronx or inner city Chicago who are now begging for Trump to come save them.
Ok
N9 dukitmen is no erimen - is no ruel is no lew
Illegals should not get the legal protections us citizens do. Streamline the process in a just way and end the shenanigans.
If you study on how L is made, or if you study how to use L
Witch is more potent.
Which
Just say please
I am on calendar
Why does this person seem to only state the Justice's name before speaking when it is a conservative Justice? 🤔
It just seems for you. I read your comment later, but I made some marks. He named justices after he jumped answering from one to another one. For example, at 18.30 he jumped from Gorsuch to Sotomayor. He called her justice Sotomayor. After he called her Your Honor.
At 22.06 he started to reply to justice Kagan and he called her justice Kagan. After Berrett was talking and he called her Your Honor.
In general he called justices by their names in the beginning much more. At 27.30 Alito started to ask questions and the lawyer didn’t even said You Honor to him. At 28.25 Kagan started to speak, he called her Justice Kagan. After Gorsuch again and the lawyer just said Your Honor. Justice Jackson started to speak at 41.20, she asked the question and he started his answer with calling her Justice Jackson. ETC.
So… no… there is no hidden agenda
lol, southern church
So you never heard of the "Southern strategy of politics" huh.😮💨
Watevel anyting i inn walking to wourld global holring asser property holring comunity mas do rite data paymen selery
❤ Trump
Can someone talk Abbot what the constitution says?
Abbott knows the constitution, you dont.
Stay out of the water amigo.
I hefe slery i hefe basit pay slery wael tu global inlink flqtfom us uk bank patner my ditel flatfom traring my draft dukimen mega traring global ip home id bank ritel insader