The original Gladiator is a masterpiece...The sequal...not so much,there was no reason for a sequal,...The main reason was maybe money money money 😂😂😂😂
I saw Gladiator in the theatre in 2000 - Phenomenal. I saw Gladiator II in the theatre last week - Lacklustre. Furthermore, when did futuristic monkeys, trainable rhinos and sharks become part of Ancient Rome? Ancient Rome is not Middle Earth.
That shows you do not understand the extent / reach and power of the Roman Empire . This quite factual that the Romans did in fact import exotic animals into the Colleseum for battle entertainment value. I do think the feminization of the Roman Empire was not historically accurate. That was something the Romans ridiculed the Greeks for.
@ Yes, the Romans did import exotic wild animals (lions, tigers, and many others) but not futuristic monkeys like those in the film. Those monkeys did not exist in Ancient Roman times nor do they exist today. Rhinos are not trainable. You can’t saddle up a rhino. The sharks were not realistically portrayed either.
By far the best review I’ve seen yet. A lot of reviewers just give a summary of the movie. They don’t share any actual opinions. Great stuff man. Will be tuning in for more. You are doing it perfect
@@localprime8868 it was 100% unneeded and completely pointless: the story is finished, plot completed, both hero and villain are dead, Maximus reunited with his family.... there is not a single sane reason for this cringe 'sequel'. and no it's not 'good', it's absolutely terrible.... but I guess their target audience are people with a single digit I. Q. points.
Whilst I agree with most of what you said, it was entertaining. Some films are just entertainment and don't need over analysis. Gladiator was fantastic and didn't need a sequel but for a few hours break in life I was entertained.
Didn't understand why Lucius sought revenge for his dead wife in this movie. His wife was a soldier and fought along side him in battles. Getting killed in battles is a possibility that comes with the territory of being a soldier. If he truly loved her, then he wouldn't let her fight.
I think you were right on, I just saw the second one today and I saw the first one yesterday for the second time and they are just very similar. It’s like gladiator two is a mini me of gladiator one and after seeing gladiator one there wasn’t anything surprising except for the rhino but that was neat but not real surprising so I agree with you it was good, probably people would love it, especially if they weren’t old enough to see gladiator when it came out we’ll see what the Box office says but I did like your explanation and your reading.
1st Gladiator really hit home with me..Russel Crowe's emotions (All of the Love,Hate,Revenge,Compassion) really came out in that movie..And Joaquin was a great villain.. I haven't seen the sequel but it will be hard to beat the original.. Great analysis and editing of gladiator clips! You did a great job showing Maximus emotional motivation though out the movie.
Yeah when I read the plot synopsis for Gladiator 2 I was like this sounds exactly like the plot for the first movie TF ?! 😂, but after watching Gladiator 2 it's pretty damn good yeah definitely not better than Gladiator 1 but still awesome and in my opinion I would be down to see a Gladiator 3 but Ridley Scott desperately needs to do something radically different than man's wife and or kid gets killed , he gets sold to become a slave , he becomes a Gladiator and goes on a whole vengeance quest to avenge his family like at this point it's becoming boring and repetitive like c'mon Ridley let's spice things up for the third movie.
We need a prequel about proximo as a gladiator and him becoming a lanista id like a 3 hour movie the first half hes a gladiator the second hes a lanista kinda how he became who he see in the movie
Great video of your thoughts! I believe and feel Gladiator is a beautiful movie that didn’t warrant a sequel. For me it was so well done and holds up so amazingly! When I walked out of seeing Gladiator II, I just didn’t feel I gained anything nor walked away with something special, I understood to have flashbacks and use Gladiator footage to give context what happened but for me that was the weakness of II. The pacing was too fast as well, it just keep cutting from scene to scene, I couldn’t get emotionally invested in anyone that deep, it relied heavily too much on I, I mean of course it’s too good but this is an example when there is sequels, either they stand alone amazingly without having to ride the waves of the first so much or they just don’t have the same “never seen before” experience. I enjoyed it for what it tried to do, but I wouldn’t rewatch it to be honest, it just makes me want to watch the original more. I give it like ⭐️⭐️ and a half. Thank you all! 👍🙏😄
So many criticize G2 and not holding up to the "great" G1. Might it be more that you are now older and more jaded because I was 40 when G1 came out. Entertaining but on Citizen Kane. Let the kids of today have this one as their childhood epic. Lighten up, neither movie is a documentary.
its actually the first movie that was wrong. Once Rome became an empire, it never turned back to a republic, not that the first movie was historically accurate anyways.
"The bare bones story and plot about after maximus died." "What was she doing?" The real woman lost her entire family to smallpox and had to re marrie. Do they even re search the history of the story before they even shit on it? The real women was killed at the age of 36. So was all of Marcus aruris entire blood line!!!
Major difference: Glad 1 the emporer's story has tragic elements and the full context of how and why he became Emporer is important. Glad 2 these 2 guys show up as joint emporers with near zero context or any real relevance. Second major difference far higher quality acting in Glad1, Crowe, Reed, Harris, Phoenix. Glad 2 Denzel Washington is good but rest of cast is ok only
The original Gladiator was amazing & didn't need a sequel--true. However, Gladiator II was a great success. Many interesting points & plot twists. Great actors & great acting.
Lol that's sarcasm?? Completely nonsensical story badly trying to imitate the first movie, mediocre miscast actors, and cringe combat. Not to mention historical fantasies .
@bdleo300 You're not 100% wrong, but with the quality of movies Hollywood has been putting out the past 10yrs from nearly every genre, Gladiator II was a warm welcome. We've been getting straight trash for a long time. At least this was somewhat worth a cinematic screening.
@@DyliciousTakes what's more crazy and hilarious is that they asked Russell Crowe in a interview was is he gonna be in Gladiator 2 and his only response was I'm dead , 😂😂😂
One issue is r/s is lazy. Now’s rushing his movies. All multiple digital cameras, then all digital effects and cleaned up post production. Lazy scrips and character development .
No, I disagree with you. I LOVED the first movie, so did the world! Gladiator 2 was a poor shadow of the first one. Characters were half developed, plot is meh, Lucious “commanding” the legions- that’s just funny. No prior ties to Rome (in battle), no real connections to shaken, ugh! Just lazy writing. No, Gladiator 1 is a true epic. Gladiator 2 I could have never watched and been just fine. :/ PS. It is LuciLLA, not Lucia.
I did really like G#II. However, I have to kind of agree with you on your analysis. G#1 set the bar so high that I don’t think a sequel could have surpassed it by any stretch.
A sequel was unneeded. But we got one and it was great. The director knew he couldn't make Gladiator ever again and decided to just make a great movie in tribute to the first. The original is one of the greatest films ever ever ever........so the intention was never to make Gladiator 2 on par with the Original and yet by itself and as a fond tribute and afternote to the plot of Maximus.........muah 😘
Also F to the U for anyone that hates on G2, criticize it all day long, but seriously man, show some love for the finer points and how it served as tribute and a follow-up note to the original, and just a really good film on its own. All hail Maximus
@@derricksmith3948 it's not a tribute lol, it's a cringe uncreative imitation, but done so badly and without any logic like most Hollywood cr4p today. They dig up Maximus corpse and **** on it. I guess some people/sheepIe don't deserve any better, made by brainIess corpos for brainIess Marvel audience. and F to the U and all Ridley Scott simps.
Gladiator 2 wasn’t bad I think people were expecting a 2000 repeat.. but honestly all bad reviews aside the story and or narrative is still there from the first one the dream of a free rome for the people also we had no idea what happened to the boy which is why Scott wanted a sequel
I enjoyed both. I think I enjoyed Gladiator 2 even more. Paul’s performance is more physical, and he portrays both strong and vulnerable beautifully. Russell is all strong, no light and dark, just strong.
G2 was entertaining but not the equal of G1. G2 needed better writers. In all of Hollywood they couldn’t have found someone closer in looks to be Maximus son? I’m sure Denzel must have enjoyed playing villain but they didn’t flesh out his story. The 16 year interval needed more explanation because Maximus gave his life for a better Rome. What happened? WHO dropped the ball? I like Pasquale but I didn’t like him in this role.
I definitely mispronounced names in this one...
Gladiator is one of the best films ever made. A sequel was unneeded
Questionable. It was good too
Speak 4 urself I loved it. ❤❤❤
Totally agreed. Gladiator was a complete movie. It ended. Period. Ridley is getting more demented than Biden.
I agree with You
The original Gladiator is a masterpiece...The sequal...not so much,there was no reason for a sequal,...The main reason was maybe money money money 😂😂😂😂
The original Gladiator is a masterpiece...there was no need for a sequal
the original gladiator is one of the greatest movies ever made
It’s very good
I saw Gladiator in the theatre in 2000 - Phenomenal. I saw Gladiator II in the theatre last week - Lacklustre. Furthermore, when did futuristic monkeys, trainable rhinos and sharks become part of Ancient Rome? Ancient Rome is not Middle Earth.
That shows you do not understand the extent / reach and power of the Roman Empire . This quite factual that the Romans did in fact import exotic animals into the Colleseum for battle entertainment value. I do think the feminization of the Roman Empire was not historically accurate. That was something the Romans ridiculed the Greeks for.
@ Yes, the Romans did import exotic wild animals (lions, tigers, and many others) but not futuristic monkeys like those in the film. Those monkeys did not exist in Ancient Roman times nor do they exist today. Rhinos are not trainable. You can’t saddle up a rhino. The sharks were not realistically portrayed either.
Gladiator needed no sequel
By far the best review I’ve seen yet. A lot of reviewers just give a summary of the movie. They don’t share any actual opinions. Great stuff man. Will be tuning in for more. You are doing it perfect
thanks so much for watching! I appreciate the kind words
Gladiator was perfection! Thank you for saving me the time with this unneeded sequel. Awesome video, really enjoyed this one.
Exactly
Wasn’t unneeded. Was good too.
@@localprime8868 it was 100% unneeded and completely pointless: the story is finished, plot completed, both hero and villain are dead, Maximus reunited with his family.... there is not a single sane reason for this cringe 'sequel'.
and no it's not 'good', it's absolutely terrible.... but I guess their target audience are people with a single digit I. Q. points.
@@bdleo300 that’s a lot of crying. It was good.
i just watched Gladiator for the first time. A perfect movie. I don't need to watch the reboot - the plot sounds duplicative of the original.
Gladiator:👍🏼
Gladiator 2:👎🏼
Whilst I agree with most of what you said, it was entertaining. Some films are just entertainment and don't need over analysis. Gladiator was fantastic and didn't need a sequel but for a few hours break in life I was entertained.
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??!!
I'm entertained by any dylicioustakes video
The music was wonderful in first gladiator
Didn't understand why Lucius sought revenge for his dead wife in this movie. His wife was a soldier and fought along side him in battles. Getting killed in battles is a possibility that comes with the territory of being a soldier. If he truly loved her, then he wouldn't let her fight.
Bruh lmao
WTF !!!!!!
Yep, they tried to imitate the plot from the first movie, but they failed even that: this story makes no sense.
@@bdleo300 must have the attention capacity of a middle schooler
I think you were right on, I just saw the second one today and I saw the first one yesterday for the second time and they are just very similar. It’s like gladiator two is a mini me of gladiator one and after seeing gladiator one there wasn’t anything surprising except for the rhino but that was neat but not real surprising so I agree with you it was good, probably people would love it, especially if they weren’t old enough to see gladiator when it came out we’ll see what the Box office says but I did like your explanation and your reading.
1st Gladiator really hit home with me..Russel Crowe's emotions (All of the Love,Hate,Revenge,Compassion) really came out in that movie..And Joaquin was a great villain.. I haven't seen the sequel but it will be hard to beat the original..
Great analysis and editing of gladiator clips! You did a great job showing Maximus emotional motivation though out the movie.
Yeah when I read the plot synopsis for Gladiator 2 I was like this sounds exactly like the plot for the first movie TF ?! 😂, but after watching Gladiator 2 it's pretty damn good yeah definitely not better than Gladiator 1 but still awesome and in my opinion I would be down to see a Gladiator 3 but Ridley Scott desperately needs to do something radically different than man's wife and or kid gets killed , he gets sold to become a slave , he becomes a Gladiator and goes on a whole vengeance quest to avenge his family like at this point it's becoming boring and repetitive like c'mon Ridley let's spice things up for the third movie.
We need a prequel about proximo as a gladiator and him becoming a lanista id like a 3 hour movie the first half hes a gladiator the second hes a lanista kinda how he became who he see in the movie
Original is always the best. We all know that lol
Il Gladiatore ❤; il resto ,cioè Gladiator II è solo spazzatura .Grazie per questo video . !
Awesome review
Glad you enjoyed it!
NO RUSSEL CROW, NO GLADIATOR!!!!! Nuff said!!!!:)
Good job. I would gave Gladiator 1 a 15
maximus fighting commodus is such a good scene
Gladiator is a masterpiece while the second one is a pile of doggie do-do.
Great video of your thoughts! I believe and feel Gladiator is a beautiful movie that didn’t warrant a sequel. For me it was so well done and holds up so amazingly! When I walked out of seeing Gladiator II, I just didn’t feel I gained anything nor walked away with something special, I understood to have flashbacks and use Gladiator footage to give context what happened but for me that was the weakness of II. The pacing was too fast as well, it just keep cutting from scene to scene, I couldn’t get emotionally invested in anyone that deep, it relied heavily too much on I, I mean of course it’s too good but this is an example when there is sequels, either they stand alone amazingly without having to ride the waves of the first so much or they just don’t have the same “never seen before” experience. I enjoyed it for what it tried to do, but I wouldn’t rewatch it to be honest, it just makes me want to watch the original more. I give it like ⭐️⭐️ and a half. Thank you all! 👍🙏😄
I loved how it weaved in part 1 to part 2... Nothing changes in most governments or democracies...
Original rating is 14 or 15 and second is a 5
gladiator 2 should've been way better honestly
It’s fine 🤷
So many criticize G2 and not holding up to the "great" G1. Might it be more that you are now older and more jaded because I was 40 when G1 came out. Entertaining but on Citizen Kane. Let the kids of today have this one as their childhood epic. Lighten up, neither movie is a documentary.
its actually the first movie that was wrong. Once Rome became an empire, it never turned back to a republic, not that the first movie was historically accurate anyways.
Oddly, the character that Maximus is (very) loosely based on is Marcus Macrinus, who was a Senator and friend of Marcus Aurelius .
Gladiator is a masterpiece. Gladiator 2 feels more like a knockoff than a sequel.
The minute you said Spider-Man I was gone
"The bare bones story and plot about after maximus died." "What was she doing?" The real woman lost her entire family to smallpox and had to re marrie. Do they even re search the history of the story before they even shit on it? The real women was killed at the age of 36. So was all of Marcus aruris entire blood line!!!
Well that’s life in powerful empires that decline , things stay the same or get worse. So that’s actually realistic. Look at the US for example
Major difference: Glad 1 the emporer's story has tragic elements and the full context of how and why he became Emporer is important. Glad 2 these 2 guys show up as joint emporers with near zero context or any real relevance. Second major difference far higher quality acting in Glad1, Crowe, Reed, Harris, Phoenix. Glad 2 Denzel Washington is good but rest of cast is ok only
Denzel acted like a slimy cop in training day and American gangster.
Never mind the film this chat is no Barry Norman
This can't be a serious question
You with your ginger hair could play Nero in Gladiator 3:) Gladiator 2 is a bad remake od its predecessor. The plot is very bad and unconvincing.
The original Gladiator was amazing & didn't need a sequel--true. However, Gladiator II was a great success. Many interesting points & plot twists. Great actors & great acting.
Lol that's sarcasm?? Completely nonsensical story badly trying to imitate the first movie, mediocre miscast actors, and cringe combat. Not to mention historical fantasies .
@bdleo300 You're not 100% wrong, but with the quality of movies Hollywood has been putting out the past 10yrs from nearly every genre, Gladiator II was a warm welcome. We've been getting straight trash for a long time. At least this was somewhat worth a cinematic screening.
So Ridley remade his own movie? The aging director should probably retire.
Russell Crowe didnt even know this film was coming out until the first trailer lol
That’s insane
@@DyliciousTakes what's more crazy and hilarious is that they asked Russell Crowe in a interview was is he gonna be in Gladiator 2 and his only response was I'm dead , 😂😂😂
Mate you look like one of them emperors
You saw the movie only a few months ago probably wasn’t even born in 2002
One issue is r/s is lazy. Now’s rushing his movies. All multiple digital cameras, then all digital effects and cleaned up post production. Lazy scrips and character development .
I dont care. I loved gladiator 2. I know there wasnt any need for a second movie but it was worth the watch
No, I disagree with you. I LOVED the first movie, so did the world! Gladiator 2 was a poor shadow of the first one. Characters were half developed, plot is meh, Lucious “commanding” the legions- that’s just funny. No prior ties to Rome (in battle), no real connections to shaken, ugh! Just lazy writing. No, Gladiator 1 is a true epic. Gladiator 2 I could have never watched and been just fine. :/ PS. It is LuciLLA, not Lucia.
Loved Gladiator 2🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 loved it ❤❤❤❤
Gladiator 2 is not bad..but..The Original had a beter story and fibe
I did really like G#II. However, I have to kind of agree with you on your analysis. G#1 set the bar so high that I don’t think a sequel could have surpassed it by any stretch.
A sequel was unneeded. But we got one and it was great. The director knew he couldn't make Gladiator ever again and decided to just make a great movie in tribute to the first. The original is one of the greatest films ever ever ever........so the intention was never to make Gladiator 2 on par with the Original and yet by itself and as a fond tribute and afternote to the plot of Maximus.........muah 😘
Also F to the U for anyone that hates on G2, criticize it all day long, but seriously man, show some love for the finer points and how it served as tribute and a follow-up note to the original, and just a really good film on its own. All hail Maximus
@@derricksmith3948 it's not a tribute lol, it's a cringe uncreative imitation, but done so badly and without any logic like most Hollywood cr4p today. They dig up Maximus corpse and **** on it. I guess some people/sheepIe don't deserve any better, made by brainIess corpos for brainIess Marvel audience. and F to the U and all Ridley Scott simps.
Gladiator 2 was a piece of s*** glad 81 wasn't that good either I saw it when it first came out but Wrigley Scott needs to quit this is the worst
Gladiator 2 wasn’t bad I think people were expecting a 2000 repeat.. but honestly all bad reviews aside the story and or narrative is still there from the first one the dream of a free rome for the people also we had no idea what happened to the boy which is why Scott wanted a sequel
I enjoyed both. I think I enjoyed Gladiator 2 even more. Paul’s performance is more physical, and he portrays both strong and vulnerable beautifully. Russell is all strong, no light and dark, just strong.
I have never seen more tears and snot than Russel crying over his hanging wife.......that was very vulnerable, not just ‘strong’
@@mandyclark6602 You made a good point.
Arguably the most stupid title in the history of questions...tongue in cheek or not.
ACTUALLY I LIKED IT . TWO THUMBS UP 👍👍
up in your arr$e
Gladiator 1 is a remake. Watch the original film Fall Of the Roman Empire 1964
lmao total bs. Nothing in common but Romans.
Too many made up characters. Caracalla existed and there are baths named after him throughout Italia. The others? never heard of them
Gladiator is a brilliant film, Gladiator 2 is a really good film
Gladiator is a brilliant film, Gladiator 2 is a cringe mediocre tr4$h
The sequels action was so very mid. Rest were alright.
G2 was entertaining but not the equal of G1. G2 needed better writers. In all of Hollywood they couldn’t have found someone closer in looks to be Maximus son? I’m sure Denzel must have enjoyed playing villain but they didn’t flesh out his story. The 16 year interval needed more explanation because Maximus gave his life for a better Rome. What happened? WHO dropped the ball? I like Pasquale but I didn’t like him in this role.
No.
No
Basically it was crap