याने मैं गवाह बनके पहले साइन कर दूं फिर । किसी के मरने के बाद कह दूं मेने तो किसी और कारण से साइन किया था। इस एक बयान से मैं किसी का 35साल का वक्त पैसा बर्बाद करवा सकती हू😅😅😅😅😅😅
This case pertains to 1987. Nowadays while registering the will, witnesses have to be present in the registrar office their biometric is recorded, in such case if witness becomes hostile what happens
Simply Laughable and saddening state of Judicial interpretations. Surprised to know the judgement by Courts at different levels and each Court interpreting in it's own way. The various steps that were recommended by the Learned Advocate (in the video) are both complex and cumbersome. There could be circumstances where names of relatives to be mentioned in Lists of First, Second or Third preferences etc,. may not, even, be known or available to a Testater of a *WILL* . What used be said earlier, about WILL was that, it should be in a Written Form witnessed, duly, by Two Witnesses, who can testify, at any stage, the authenticity of the said written Statement. Suggestion to have the WILL *registered* is merely to fortify the written content and as a precautionary measure, to rule out any likelyhood of the said document being disputed at any time, for it's being fake or forged or otherwise. What should be of importance, is the INTENT of Testater and CONTENT of the written Statement- *(WILL)* The Judiciary and it's judgement should be aimed to aid Common Man rather than making these labyrinthal and complicate a matter further. Very disappointing state of affairs.
Laws must be in simple language, clearly understandable to general public. They mustn't be vague and there mustn't be any scope for imagination or interpretation according to level of ignorance of the authorised interpreters.
Our laws and acts are a joke. Act of 1925 and act of 1857 Which were enforced by the British is being followed that means we are still under the British law. Why these laws were not up dated to 1947 act? It's so very unlawful to follow it as indian constitution. Its the mistake of our government to have not updated it. Secondly a will if registered and still can be invalid due to witnesses not seen the person signing the will is again breaking the law. So it's the mistake of the witnesses and not of the validity of the will when genuinely singed under the presence of registrar. God save this country and it's people from this supreme court who interprets laws according to it's will.
@@PardeepKumar-vb2bu yes I have read Hindu succession act. Yes even an unborn child ithe n the womb is a beneficiary. But here the case is different. When a couple have no children and the husband died then the sole right goes to wife and moreover it's not ancestry property that the husband side of family are eligible for the share. So the wife has all the right to give the assets to anyone she likes.
This judgement is very surprising. What happens if the witnesses turn hostile or are no longer living nor can them remeber and neither is the registration authority or person alive or able to recall. Indian law and jurisdiction unnecessarily introduces uncertainty in this process. This goes against the spirit of making will. This judgement should be scrutinised very carefully
To my knowledge, a will remains valid as long as the will was signed by the property owner in front of two witnesses of sound mind and the property owner is of sound mind. Registration of a will is not mandatory. I don't want to comment on the Supreme court's judgement, but it seems strange that after all this juggling, the original intention of the property owner got lost. What kind of judgement is this? Interestingly, when a court case takes 40 years, the original witnesses may have died.b
Property owners' wishes should be respected and maintained and not left to court to interpret. Witness should not have any interest in the contents of the will. They are simply the witness of the owner signing the will. In UP, witnesses are confirmed by the biometrics and photographed.
What Standing do Witnesses have in the Execution of the Will. Witnesses do not have any Right to be contesting the Contents of the Final Wishes of the Executant. All they do is Certify/Verify with Knowledge that they know the Executant on a personal level & that He/They confirm that the Executant has signed the Will by the said Executant in his Presence.
@@anjumb9206 Yeah, par banks mei nominee ka bhi provision hai, which is less cumbersome(if one doesn't have a will). Source: Quick Googling, NAL(Not a lawyer).
It happens only in India 😂😂😂😂 Law order ka Jo majak Banta he yaha.... Attempt to murder wale bindas ghumte... Court me tarikh pe tarikh 😂.. complaint mar jaye but nyay nahi milta😢
आप बताइए कि झूठी वसीयत बनाकर जिसकी उम्र लगभग 100् वर्ष की हैं उससे वसीयत लिखवाया गया है वह बिमार आदमी है। एक आदमी सही है उसका नाम निकाल दिया है। उस पर आप का क्या विचार है, कृपया आप अपनी राय दें।
Sir it is a well known fact that witness need not be aware of contents of will .Witness is just testifying that document is only signed in their presence only Nothing beyond that please clarify ..
Registration is done in subregistrar office where witnesses also are present and sign in front of subregistrar.Then how can witnesses going hostile matter?
Now Will is registered in court itself with recording in front of judge so all is well . And these are old time problems the things and system are upgraded.
I think the Hon'ble Supreme Court order is erroneous, The Registrar examines the witness before the registration, The Hon’ble SC opens door for the witness to become hostile after receiving quid pro quo from the new beneficiary. The role of the Registrar need to be underscored. The witness cannot be permitted to become hostile after a limitation period. NOT HAPPY WITH THE SC ORDER.
Sir, I have two queries as follows: (1) To whom does the "Letter of Probate" issued by the Court of Law? Benificiary or Executor? (2) Are Letter of Administration and Letter of Probate same?
The willfor registration is generally submitted to Registration dept. personally. The sub-registrar certifies itand generally witnesses sign in presence of him. Hence such problem should not occur. Even if the witness doesn't retify it, as the person submitting will has signed the same in presence of the sub-registrar, it should be considered valid. In fact witnesses are necessary if it is not registered. Sir, Pl clarify.
Agar witness ko baad me dusra paiso ka lalach de kar kharid le tab kya. Aisi vyavastha honi chahiye ki sahi se will ka registration ho aur baad me fir koi change na kar sake, chahe witness palat jaye ya witness ki death ho jaye. Will banane ke samay jo faisla hua wahi full and final hona chahiye Supreme court itna bewkuf hai Agar will ke registration karte sayam do gawah ne registrar ke samne sign kar diya to fir kya problem hai Agar witness baad me jakar bole ki ham nahi jante to ye nahi mana jana chahiye
In many states now, will registration is done via biometric Aadhaar authentication of the witnesses as well as the property owner making the will in front of the registrar at the same time. Which means section 71 of the evidence act is fully satisfied. In fact, it could also be argued that the biometric record is sufficient proof of witnesses being valid under section 63 of Succession Act. Does this mean that a modern will duly registered with aadhaar biometrics will not face this problem? It will be good to confirm that such modern registered wills are indeed 'pucca'
Bhai after seeing all these chutiya judgements, especially against Hindus(succession law) , do you think still think there is anything that is pucca? The best solution for the property owner is to transfer the property to the beneficiary via gift deed. So that chutiya courts can be kept away from interfering in our property transfer.
Bhot hi galat judgement di SC ne Jo is property ko deserve krta tha aur sbse bdi baat deceased ne jise property dena chaha use to nhi de payi, isko bhi challenge krne ka koi way hona chahie
Make nomination a valid document by attaching a photo of the nominee that will make the work easier instead going through costly legal process and troubling the people and similarly in a will,too
Kamse kam hai jisaki kamayi thi jo mar gaya hai usaki aakhari ichha ko to respect karo.usane khud jo likhawaya tha wohi hona chahiye.witnesses koun hote hai usaki kamayi k baare me decesion lenewale????ussaki apani khoob paseene ki kamayi wo jisse chahe usse de usape na relatives hak jata sakte hai na beta-beti na maa baap wo khud decide karega usse kya karna hai Jyada se jyada kuchh hissa wifeko mil sakta hai kyun k wife ghar sambhalati hai tabhi to bahar husband tension free ho k kaam karata hai aur jayadaat banati hai.lifelong unpaid labor hai jate jate kuchh le b le toh konsa kam hoga baki saari kamai maranewala jaise aur jaha chahata tha with jani chahiye taake usaki aatma ko shanti mile
श्रीमान अगर दोनों गवाह हस्ताक्षर करते समय यह लिख दें कि मैं अपने पूर्ण होशोहवास में इस प्रपत्र पर हस्ताक्षर कर रहा हूँ तथा रजिस्ट्रार महोदय भी यह प्रमाणित करदे कि दोनों गवाहों ने मेरे सामने हस्ताक्षर किए हैं तो क्या वह वसीयत मान्य रहेगी ?
I thought the witness only witnesses the signature and not the contents as that can require legal advice. A winess can not turn hostile in these situations as they can not deny that they witnessed the signature. If the law is too prorous about this, then it is a bad law that allows manipulations and abuse.
Kanoon andha hei kanoon ki aakgein kholni chahiye agar gvah bayaan badal le to uske khilaafh bhi kaarvahi honi chahiye gavahi ke vakht register vibhag ki jimmedaari honi chahiye
Can't the registrar himself be treated as good witness? Nowadays even live photo, registration process is in place where the witnesses hav to identify and remain present...
बहुत ही अच्छे से आपने सारी जानकारी दी hai. कानूनी कार्यवाही में किसी छोटे से case में भी कितना समय और धन लगता है, इसे साफ होता है, पर निचली अदालते पहले हो क्यों नहीं, सभी लागल कोडस को फॉलो कर निर्णय कर पाती, उनके गलत या अधूरे निर्णय पर आम और खास लोग भी बहुत हैरान होते है और अपना बहुत सा कजसिन चैन, धन समय खोटे हैँ. क्या ऐसे इनकम्पलीट आर्डर करने वालो के विरुद्ध कार्यवाही, और कोर्ट के खर्च को वसूलने हेतु कोई कानूनी भी हैँ. जिनसे इन जजों को भी नासियत मिल सके. कानूनों में भी बहुत सी धाराएं बनी हैँ, हार धारा कि अलग परिभाषाये हैँ, कानूनी ऐसा होना चाहिए कि हर एक सामान्य आदमी समाज में आये,. यहाँ तो न्याय कि कुर्सी पर बैठे भी, इनका पूरा ध्या नहीं रख पर रहे रहे. वकील अपने क्लाइंट के लिए उसके फायदे वाली धाराव ओ पर जीराह करते हैँ जो संभवताये जजों को मालूम ही तभी होती हैँ.
The judiciary has always complicated issues. They don’t understand their own judgements after some time. They confuse and talk in a jalebi so that they can carry on making money
Sir Will is the intention of the individual and registration is done to buy peace and the question in this case was involved that the property was bequeathed by the teastor to the person of her choice whereas she also inherited the property of het husband. So she was required to detail the reason of denying class II legal heirs and giving the same to her close person.
Ager couple expired hota hai aur unko koi child nahi hai .fir is case m jis ko jati hai property. 1st benefishery nahi hai toh 2nd kaun hoga ..pahle husband jata hai baad m wife jati hai ..sb wife k naam hota hai to wife k side se hote hai ya husband k side se .
SC judgement is totally wrong, This means witness can turn hostile any time in future and can invalidate a valid will. 2. The witness signs under the line- signed by the testator in my presence. The Will is also usually notarized and at that time, the testator as well as witnesses sign in the presence of notary.
सर नमस्कार सर एक प्लाट खरीदा पेपर मे रजिस्टर वसियत, और फुल पेमेंट रजिस्टर अग्रीमेंट रजिस्टर पावरटोनी के बाद रजिस्ट्री या मुटेशन हो सकती है। बेचने वाले के पुत्र प्लाट देने से मना कर रहे हैं। जिसने प्लाट बेचा है उसके ले लो।ऐसा कह रहे है । गवाही मे उसका एक लड़का है।
Hamaare case main tan hamaare father key jhoothe signature kerke bo galat aadmi case Jeet Gaye distric court panchkula main case thaa Jo jameen thee bo cha ndigarh😢
Kee thee ek judge ne kaha ye case panchkula court main chal nahi sakta tan hamain court main aaney ke liye manaa ker diya lekin ek doosre judge Ney jo apne aap ko bahut samajdaar samajta thaa oodne 15 din main hee case ka faisla ker diya aur oos order ko galat hee likhwa diyaa ab bataao oos judge kaa Kiya karain baise hamne case high court Chandigarh main daal Diya hai lekin 2017 ke baad oos case kaa koi ataa pataa nahi lekin bo admit ho giya thaa ab hum 72 year key ho Gaye Hain Keya bo case hamaare marne ke baad shoori hoga
सर सम्पति लीलावती के मृतक पति के बाद, उनकी सारी संपति लीलावती के नाम हो गयी थी। तो लीलावती के मृत्यु के बाद यह सम्पति लीलावती के भाईओ के पास जानी चाहिये थी तो फिर लीलावती के पति के भाई या उनके बेटे के पास कैसे वापस जा सकती है?
सर यही कहानी हमारे साथ है विपक्ष के पास भी एक झूठी वसीयत है लेकिन जब हमरा केस तहसीलदार के यहां तो विपक्ष ने वसीयत का कोई जिक्र नहीं किया और तहसीलदार के यहां से केस हार गया लेकिन कुछ समय बाद अपील सिविल में लगाकर और झूठी वसीयत तैयार कर लिया और केस जित गया अब हमने भी अपील किया है क्या हमारे साथ भी ऐसा ही होगा क्या। सलाह बताओ
Very informative video. Sir, Please inform whether the PDF copy of all the pages of the registered will is preserved with the registering authority so that nobody can alter the contents of the will.
Validity of a registered will should not be diluted on frivolous grounds because the registering authority, having collected the prescribed fee and charges, is deemed to satisfy itself about essential legal requirements in the matter. Any person who comes up to challenge a registered will must be required to prove that the registration authority had failed to do its duty.
The moot point in the case is witness. Since the witness failed to validate the document, the issue had arisen. Had the document met validity in all respects, the Registration would not have been challenged.
Bapre
Humne to will regiser kervane ke 11,000 diye.
Uperse kitni zerox, photo, court me dhakea khaye, sab 👎
याने मैं गवाह बनके पहले साइन कर दूं फिर ।
किसी के मरने के बाद कह दूं मेने तो किसी और कारण से साइन किया था।
इस एक बयान से मैं किसी का 35साल का वक्त पैसा बर्बाद करवा सकती हू😅😅😅😅😅😅
What if witnesses are no more ( dead) ?
Kya befkoof log hain ..to registrar office kyon khol rakha hai ??
This case pertains to 1987. Nowadays while registering the will, witnesses have to be present in the registrar office their biometric is recorded, in such case if witness becomes hostile what happens
रजिस्ट्रार जिसने विल रजिस्टर की उसको बताना चाहिए था कमी के बारे में। Penalty should be imposed on registrar ek आम आदमी इतने पेच कहां समझता है
WHAT HAPPENS IF BOTH THE WITNESSES DIES & REGISTRAR ALSO RETIRES & DISAPPEARS…(could not find as left the city or doesn’t remember due to age issue)?
Simply Laughable and saddening state of Judicial interpretations. Surprised to know the judgement by Courts at different levels and each Court interpreting in it's own way.
The various steps that were recommended by the Learned Advocate (in the video)
are both complex and cumbersome.
There could be circumstances where names of relatives to be mentioned in Lists of First, Second or Third preferences etc,. may not, even, be known or available to a Testater of a *WILL* . What used be said earlier, about WILL was that, it should be in a Written Form witnessed, duly, by Two Witnesses, who can testify, at any stage, the authenticity of the said written Statement. Suggestion to have the WILL *registered* is merely to fortify the written content and as a precautionary measure, to rule out any likelyhood of the said document being disputed at any time, for it's being fake or forged or otherwise. What should be of importance, is the INTENT of Testater and CONTENT of the written Statement- *(WILL)*
The Judiciary and it's judgement should be aimed to aid Common Man rather than making these labyrinthal and complicate a matter further. Very disappointing state of affairs.
Laws must be in simple language, clearly understandable to general public.
They mustn't be vague and there mustn't be any scope for imagination or interpretation according to level of ignorance of the authorised interpreters.
सीधा सीधा बोलो, जमीन किसी की नहीं है, केवल सरकार की है आप खरीद कर भी किरायदार की तरह है ।
Our laws and acts are a joke. Act of 1925 and act of 1857 Which were enforced by the British is being followed that means we are still under the British law. Why these laws were not up dated to 1947 act? It's so very unlawful to follow it as indian constitution. Its the mistake of our government to have not updated it. Secondly a will if registered and still can be invalid due to witnesses not seen the person signing the will is again breaking the law. So it's the mistake of the witnesses and not of the validity of the will when genuinely singed under the presence of registrar. God save this country and it's people from this supreme court who interprets laws according to it's will.
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊
half knowledge is very dangerous plz read Hindu succession Act and also read class of legal heirs after tht u will know right or wrong law
What's the use of those registrars and thumb impressions and photographs, when everything is dependable on the integrity of witnesses only
@@PardeepKumar-vb2bu yes I have read Hindu succession act. Yes even an unborn child ithe n the womb is a beneficiary. But here the case is different. When a couple have no children and the husband died then the sole right goes to wife and moreover it's not ancestry property that the husband side of family are eligible for the share. So the wife has all the right to give the assets to anyone she likes.
Whole power given to witnesses who can be manipulated any time by money nonsense low
Agar gawah Dara dhamka kar disturb kar diya jaye to yahi isthiti hogi???
रोज रोज फैसले बदले जा रहे हैं । कहीं तो टीको । जनता को मत मारो ।
This judgement is very surprising. What happens if the witnesses turn hostile or are no longer living nor can them remeber and neither is the registration authority or person alive or able to recall. Indian law and jurisdiction unnecessarily introduces uncertainty in this process. This goes against the spirit of making will. This judgement should be scrutinised very carefully
To my knowledge, a will remains valid as long as the will was signed by the property owner in front of two witnesses of sound mind and the property owner is of sound mind. Registration of a will is not mandatory.
I don't want to comment on the Supreme court's judgement, but it seems strange that after all this juggling, the original intention of the property owner got lost. What kind of judgement is this?
Interestingly, when a court case takes 40 years, the original witnesses may have died.b
Very true and valid
Property owners' wishes should be respected and maintained and not left to court to interpret. Witness should not have any interest in the contents of the will. They are simply the witness of the owner signing the will. In UP, witnesses are confirmed by the biometrics and photographed.
सर, मेरा एक सवाल है कि अगर किसी कारण से दोनों गवाहों की भी मौत(आकस्मिक या नेचुरल) हो जाती है तो उस सूरत में क्या होगा ?
How to make life difficult for common man and increase the number of cases by millions in courts: The master plan of Indian Supreme Court
What Standing do Witnesses have in the Execution of the Will. Witnesses do not have any Right to be contesting the Contents of the Final Wishes of the Executant. All they do is Certify/Verify with Knowledge that they know the Executant on a personal level & that He/They confirm that the Executant has signed the Will by the said Executant in his Presence.
गवाह मुकर कैसे सकते हैं जबकि रजिस्ट्रार के सामने विल करने वाला और दोनों गाव बैठकर ही हस्ताक्षर करते हैं और साथ साथ वीडियो रिकॉर्डिंग भी होती है
😅 15:19
So the court has 4 levels, and every level overturned the decision of the previous level!!!
This shows the incompetence of our Judiciary.
अगर ऐसा है तो will बनाने का मतलब हिंक्या सरकार को सिर्फ पैसा हिं चाहिए 😮😖😖ऐसे की तैसे कानून की
Bech daalo immovable property, merte time. No will, no problem
Bech dalenge phir us paise ke liye bhi toe will ki zaroorat parne waali hai
@@anjumb9206 Yeah, par banks mei nominee ka bhi provision hai, which is less cumbersome(if one doesn't have a will).
Source: Quick Googling, NAL(Not a lawyer).
The laws must be very simple and not complicated like in this case. Indian laws are horrible.
हर judge अपने अपने मूड के हिसाब से फैसला दे रहा है 😂
Excellent
It happens only in India 😂😂😂😂
Law order ka Jo majak Banta he yaha.... Attempt to murder wale bindas ghumte... Court me tarikh pe tarikh 😂.. complaint mar jaye but nyay nahi milta😢
Sahi hai. It will be easy by a claimant to buy out witnesses and challenge the will.
Mood मतलब ₹ है क्या ?
एसे ही होता हैं..
आप बताइए कि झूठी वसीयत बनाकर जिसकी उम्र लगभग 100् वर्ष की हैं उससे वसीयत लिखवाया गया है वह बिमार आदमी है। एक आदमी सही है उसका नाम निकाल दिया है। उस पर आप का क्या विचार है, कृपया आप अपनी राय दें।
What if witnesses are bribed to turn hostile by the party challenging the will
The Indian judiciary takes so many years to come to a wrong decision 😢.
The worst part of our democracy
Very bad judgment. One can't remain at peace even after death. Even after complying with due legal course.
Supreme court interpretion about the law is very often inconsistent.
Our judges are great.
They are inconsistent fools
It means that only a person executing a Will can execute it in favour of his relatives and not to others.Then the word WILL is an idiocy.😂😂
In case both witness died?
30 साल लाग गये...इसे तो अच्छा राहता dono आपस ने बाट लेते
आम आदमी को मा, नयायालय को मान्य रजिस्टर्ड को उसी समय बता दे तो जनता को विवादो से निजात मिल,,,,,,,,,,,,, है
Sir it is a well known fact that witness need not be aware of contents of will .Witness is just testifying that document is only signed in their presence only Nothing beyond that please clarify ..
Registration is done in subregistrar office where witnesses also are present and sign in front of subregistrar.Then how can witnesses going hostile matter?
SC Kab apna hi order badal dega, koi nahi janta.
अगर वसीयत के कागजों में कोई भी कमी है तो तो रजिस्ट्रार की जिम्मेदारी होनी चाहिए कि वह उस कमी को बताए
Yes exactly
It's a old Case, Now all signature happened digitally in registrar office
biomaterials finger print or photo scan ko bhi jhootha saabit kaise kar diya gya😮😮😮
Is there any official sample of a will showing the list of mandatory ìnformation essential?
God bless India. Common man at mercy of unnecessarily complicated legal system.
Now Will is registered in court itself with recording in front of judge so all is well . And these are old time problems the things and system are upgraded.
मुकदमेबाजी बढाने वाला गलत निर्णय
I think the Hon'ble Supreme Court order is erroneous, The Registrar examines the witness before the registration, The Hon’ble SC opens door for the witness to become hostile after receiving quid pro quo from the new beneficiary. The role of the Registrar need to be underscored. The witness cannot be permitted to become hostile after a limitation period. NOT HAPPY WITH THE SC ORDER.
Sir, I have two queries as follows:
(1) To whom does the "Letter of Probate" issued by the Court of Law? Benificiary or Executor?
(2) Are Letter of Administration and Letter of Probate same?
All judges must hv knowledge of all acts or they must readbit before giving court order
Very valuable information. थँक्स.
गवाह अगर लालच, धमकी से पलट जाये तो क्या होगा |
Andheri nagri chopat raja.
The willfor registration is generally submitted to Registration dept. personally. The sub-registrar certifies itand generally witnesses sign in presence of him. Hence such problem should not occur. Even if the witness doesn't retify it, as the person submitting will has signed the same in presence of the sub-registrar, it should be considered valid. In fact witnesses are necessary if it is not registered. Sir, Pl clarify.
If the property is self acquired of first deceased then how it will go to nefew of Sohanlal. He can give his property to anyone.
Kul milake ye hua ki kanoon bhi bharose k kaabil nhi hai
A witness can be bribed to become hostile. In such a case how can it be proved.
दोनो गवाह बिक चुके है।
Agar witness ko baad me dusra paiso ka lalach de kar kharid le tab kya.
Aisi vyavastha honi chahiye ki sahi se will ka registration ho aur baad me fir koi change na kar sake, chahe witness palat jaye ya witness ki death ho jaye. Will banane ke samay jo faisla hua wahi full and final hona chahiye
Supreme court itna bewkuf hai
Agar will ke registration karte sayam do gawah ne registrar ke samne sign kar diya to fir kya problem hai
Agar witness baad me jakar bole ki ham nahi jante to ye nahi mana jana chahiye
With such a stand of the courts it appears the courts also are making mockery of their status.May God save people from such judges..
Correctly said ! I wonder about the calibre and probity quotient of the judges/ court !
I am sorry to say many people are making fake wills.
So precautions taken is necessary.
If both the witnesses dye then . What will be the status of will
Sir I have only one daughter is it necessary to write a will.She is the only legal heir to the property.My wife passed away two years back.
In many states now, will registration is done via biometric Aadhaar authentication of the witnesses as well as the property owner making the will in front of the registrar at the same time. Which means section 71 of the evidence act is fully satisfied.
In fact, it could also be argued that the biometric record is sufficient proof of witnesses being valid under section 63 of Succession Act.
Does this mean that a modern will duly registered with aadhaar biometrics will not face this problem? It will be good to confirm that such modern registered wills are indeed 'pucca'
Bhai after seeing all these chutiya judgements, especially against Hindus(succession law) , do you think still think there is anything that is pucca? The best solution for the property owner is to transfer the property to the beneficiary via gift deed. So that chutiya courts can be kept away from interfering in our property transfer.
@@kiranbabu5938pata nahi usme b kucchh Kand kar sakte he😢
Bhot hi galat judgement di SC ne
Jo is property ko deserve krta tha aur sbse bdi baat deceased ne jise property dena chaha use to nhi de payi, isko bhi challenge krne ka koi way hona chahie
Make nomination a valid document by attaching a photo of the nominee that will make the work easier instead going through costly legal process and troubling the people and similarly in a will,too
Intention of will maker should be taken in to account and not witness issue.There is no guarantee witness person s need not alive after so many years
You are right but then ex muder says that will was 6:12 made under influence or pressure of the beneficiary. Indian judiciary system is waste of time
Very very useful knowledge Sir Ji many many thanks
Kamse kam hai jisaki kamayi thi jo mar gaya hai usaki aakhari ichha ko to respect karo.usane khud jo likhawaya tha wohi hona chahiye.witnesses koun hote hai usaki kamayi k baare me decesion lenewale????ussaki apani khoob paseene ki kamayi wo jisse chahe usse de usape na relatives hak jata sakte hai na beta-beti na maa baap wo khud decide karega usse kya karna hai
Jyada se jyada kuchh hissa wifeko mil sakta hai kyun k wife ghar sambhalati hai tabhi to bahar husband tension free ho k kaam karata hai aur jayadaat banati hai.lifelong unpaid labor hai jate jate kuchh le b le toh konsa kam hoga baki saari kamai maranewala jaise aur jaha chahata tha with jani chahiye taake usaki aatma ko shanti mile
Witness bhi bik jate hai , to phir kya kare
श्रीमान अगर दोनों गवाह हस्ताक्षर करते समय यह लिख दें कि मैं अपने पूर्ण होशोहवास में इस प्रपत्र पर हस्ताक्षर कर रहा हूँ तथा रजिस्ट्रार महोदय भी यह प्रमाणित करदे कि दोनों गवाहों ने मेरे सामने हस्ताक्षर किए हैं तो क्या वह वसीयत मान्य रहेगी ?
Yes sir
वसीयत के bare me kuch puchna hai to call kar lo 8650000408
I thought the witness only witnesses the signature and not the contents as that can require legal advice. A winess can not turn hostile in these situations as they can not deny that they witnessed the signature. If the law is too prorous about this, then it is a bad law that allows manipulations and abuse.
Mutation nehi karne se kya problem hoga.?
If no one challenge the Will than that registered Will be valid.
Kanoon andha hei kanoon ki aakgein kholni chahiye agar gvah bayaan badal le to uske khilaafh bhi kaarvahi honi chahiye gavahi ke vakht register vibhag ki jimmedaari honi chahiye
If both the witnesses die and thus can not confirm then legal position
If witnesses expired,then what the status of registered will
Sir , video banaya gaya ho
Like signature witness etc.?
Then what is the purpose of registering the will.
Can't the registrar himself be treated as good witness?
Nowadays even live photo, registration process is in place where the witnesses hav to identify and remain present...
बहुत ही अच्छे से आपने सारी जानकारी दी hai.
कानूनी कार्यवाही में किसी छोटे से case में भी कितना समय और धन लगता है, इसे साफ होता है,
पर निचली अदालते पहले हो क्यों नहीं, सभी लागल कोडस को फॉलो कर निर्णय कर पाती, उनके गलत या अधूरे निर्णय पर आम और खास लोग भी बहुत हैरान होते है और अपना बहुत सा कजसिन चैन, धन समय खोटे हैँ.
क्या ऐसे इनकम्पलीट आर्डर करने वालो के विरुद्ध कार्यवाही, और कोर्ट के खर्च को वसूलने हेतु कोई कानूनी भी हैँ. जिनसे इन जजों को भी नासियत मिल सके.
कानूनों में भी बहुत सी धाराएं बनी हैँ, हार धारा कि अलग परिभाषाये हैँ, कानूनी ऐसा होना चाहिए कि हर एक सामान्य आदमी समाज में आये,. यहाँ तो न्याय कि कुर्सी पर बैठे भी, इनका पूरा ध्या नहीं रख पर रहे रहे. वकील अपने क्लाइंट के लिए उसके फायदे वाली धाराव ओ पर जीराह करते हैँ जो संभवताये जजों को मालूम ही तभी होती हैँ.
The judiciary has always complicated issues. They don’t understand their own judgements after some time.
They confuse and talk in a jalebi so that they can carry on making money
पैसा खाकर फैसला करनेवाली ज्युडीशियरी से और ज्यादा क्या उम्मीद कर सकते है?
Sir Will is the intention of the individual and registration is done to buy peace and the question in this case was involved that the property was bequeathed by the teastor to the person of her choice whereas she also inherited the property of het husband.
So she was required to detail the reason of denying class II legal heirs and giving the same to her close person.
Sir Witness ka agar death ho Jata hai to supreme court Kya adesh deta, please give your opinion. Thanks.
Ager couple expired hota hai aur unko koi child nahi hai .fir is case m jis ko jati hai property. 1st benefishery nahi hai toh 2nd kaun hoga ..pahle husband jata hai baad m wife jati hai ..sb wife k naam hota hai to wife k side se hote hai ya husband k side se .
It is very necessary information everyone must know... I have shared this with everyone
Sir will ko 12 saal tak he challange kar saktehein
All these obviously basically flawed issues are discussed UNNECESSARILY discussed to propagate BUSINESS of Lawyers like in U. S.
SC judgement is totally wrong, This means witness can turn hostile any time in future and can invalidate a valid will. 2. The witness signs under the line- signed by the testator in my presence. The Will is also usually notarized and at that time, the testator as well as witnesses sign in the presence of notary.
सर नमस्कार सर एक प्लाट खरीदा पेपर मे रजिस्टर वसियत, और फुल पेमेंट रजिस्टर अग्रीमेंट रजिस्टर पावरटोनी के बाद रजिस्ट्री या मुटेशन हो सकती है। बेचने वाले के पुत्र प्लाट देने से मना कर रहे हैं। जिसने प्लाट बेचा है उसके ले लो।ऐसा कह रहे है । गवाही मे उसका एक लड़का है।
This is ridiculous.If the will is registered,it has to be accepted.Witnesses can turn hostile.
3:18 - in matter of "Dhani Ram Legal Representatives & Others vs Shiv Singh (SC). Civil Appeal no 8172 of 2009 . Date of order : 6.10.2023
इस देश में कानून नाम की कोई चीज नहीं है।
गवाहोंको खरीदना आसान है।गवाहोंको खरीदकर किसीभी रजिस्टर्ड दस्तावेजको आसानीसे झूठला जा सकता है14:07।और अगर रजिस्ट्रार उपलब्ध नही हुवा या मर गया तो?
Are we living in free India? Sr.citizens dont earn so much cant afford costly lawyers.
Bas judge ko khareed lo fir uske hisab se new law baki logo ke case par bhi apply karne lagte sala Kya bakwaas Ho rhi apne desh me
Bhrashtachar, milavat, Hindu muslim yehi sab
Hamaare case main tan hamaare father key jhoothe signature kerke bo galat aadmi case Jeet Gaye distric court panchkula main case thaa Jo jameen thee bo cha ndigarh😢
Kee thee ek judge ne kaha ye case panchkula court main chal nahi sakta tan hamain court main aaney ke liye manaa ker diya lekin ek doosre judge Ney jo apne aap ko bahut samajdaar samajta thaa oodne 15 din main hee case ka faisla ker diya aur oos order ko galat hee likhwa diyaa ab bataao oos judge kaa Kiya karain baise hamne case high court Chandigarh main daal Diya hai lekin 2017 ke baad oos case kaa koi ataa pataa nahi lekin bo admit ho giya thaa ab hum 72 year key ho Gaye Hain Keya bo case hamaare marne ke baad shoori hoga
अगर गवह 17साल का हैं तो aur विल bananevalene विल मै झूठा काहा तो.पत्नी होकार नाही हैं aur bache hokar nahi nai to ye vil rad hoga.
I request lawyers community to help sr. Citizen free of cost or with very less fees on a humanity ground..
सर सम्पति लीलावती के मृतक पति के बाद, उनकी सारी संपति लीलावती के नाम हो गयी थी। तो लीलावती के मृत्यु के बाद यह सम्पति लीलावती के भाईओ के पास जानी चाहिये थी
तो फिर लीलावती के पति के भाई या उनके बेटे के पास कैसे वापस जा सकती है?
सर यही कहानी हमारे साथ है विपक्ष के पास भी एक झूठी वसीयत है लेकिन जब हमरा केस तहसीलदार के यहां तो विपक्ष ने वसीयत का कोई जिक्र नहीं किया और तहसीलदार के यहां से केस हार गया लेकिन कुछ समय बाद अपील सिविल में लगाकर और झूठी वसीयत तैयार कर लिया और केस जित गया अब हमने भी अपील किया है क्या हमारे साथ भी ऐसा ही होगा क्या। सलाह बताओ
Omg 😯 registration ke baad bhi dhyan dene ki jarurat hai
Very informative video. Sir, Please inform whether the PDF copy of all the pages of the registered will is preserved with the registering authority so that nobody can alter the contents of the will.
Now video recoding will should be registered. So no question of witness.
Validity of a registered will should not be diluted on frivolous grounds because the registering authority, having collected the prescribed fee and charges, is deemed to satisfy itself about essential legal requirements in the matter. Any person who comes up to challenge a registered will must be required to prove that the registration authority had failed to do its duty.
The moot point in the case is witness. Since the witness failed to validate the document, the issue had arisen. Had the document met validity in all respects, the Registration would not have been challenged.
Then what is the right legal procedure of transferring property ?
Jab will ki koi value ha nahi toye kanun hi kyo