counter strike 2 vs Counter Strike Source details and physics comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 авг 2024
- I'm building a better PC for improved videos! Your $2 Super Thanks donation can help me, and I appreciate your support!
In this video, we'll dive deep into the world of Counter-Strike and compare two of the most popular iterations of the game - CS 2 and CS: Source. We'll explore the differences in gameplay mechanics and physics between the two games, and see how they impact the overall gaming experience.
Timestamps
0:00 - Barrel vs grenade
0:31 - Bulb swinging
0:58 - Wood shavings
1:13 - Tire rolling
1:22 - Blood details
1:33 - Protagonist Legs
1:43 - Protagonist shadow
1:58 - Smoke vs bullets
2:23 - Bullets hole insane details
2:46 - Blowing guns physics
3:09 - Die animation
3:17 - Smoke disappearing with grenade
3:55 - Blowing with C4 explosion
4:28 - Bullet smoke
4:39 - Grenade vs terrorist
4:59 - Third person run jump crouch
5:25 - Guns spinning
5:54 - Flash bang Effects when you see
6:29 - Zeus detail
6:36 - Car windshield physics
6:55 - Double shot
7:05 - Molotov details
► • CSS vs CS-GO | Details...
► • counter strike 2 vs Co...
#CounterStrike
#cs2
#CSSource
#CSGO
#FPSGames 
Игры
A time when competition wasn't as famous. I think they didn't add many details, especially physics, due to the competitive nature, leaving players more focused on the target than on the details.
i personally prefer CS: S over CS2/GO
Yeah their game is now officially a competitive sport. If they add those barrel animations and bulb swinging or lights go off it could be unfair for the opposition teams hence they have kept it fair by disabling those things in csgo and cs2
E-sports is cancer.
@@oldtimer666 how is it unfair?
Just for the record - CSS takes around 4 GB, while CS 2 around 40GB.
У кс сурс самая лучшая физика предметов
Source is like GTA 4 of CS series
if I am not wrong, CS:GO used to have physic objects like barrels and boxes that can be shot around, they are eventually removed due to creating more issue in game and competition I believe
very early versions used to have that yep
these details are alsi missing in csgo
I think most of the physics that cs2 doesn't have is because of competitive reasons
I also appreciate that the props aren't moving
CS2: Goodbye physics
none of those physics were in csgo either. thats because valve made the conscious decision not to include them because objects that can move all over the place are really annoying in a competitive game
you are right
@@philipspitz2402Que competição é essa que precisa de fatores fora da realidade para permitir um ambiente favorável? O bom jogador é capaz de ter performance em um jogo realista.
the reason you can't move barrels and objects like that is because of baked lighting, Once an object is moved it will look completely off
@@philipspitz2402HOW TO BLOCK TOINEL ON DUST2 IN CS2 GUIDE belike:
Competitiveness vs fun with 2004 new tech
Brother it's not even finished yet you have to wait everyone said csgo was worst than css than it became the most played game ever
Its evolving, just backwards ( Michel Jackson style)
Looks like gta4 vs gta5
because its physics and details comparison
Adding environmental physics in a competitive game gets disadvantages in gameplay and optimization, so in my opinion CS2 had to keep it fair and remove it
But it's pretty lame that css used to be different to other game had a lot of different game mode and crazy physics but it's now just crouching and shooting on the same map over and over
disadvantages like what?
@@SirDrakeFrancisglitched hidden c4 barrel strat
I think they should add a separate mode similar to CS Source for CS2...like a Fun/Party mode where all things have physics.
@@jamesg8203 I can't because I'm not funny enough sadly.
@@jamesg8203 found the cs tryhard
physics matters in games
@@Game_Decide Not necessarily true but it do be nicer if you want more immersion and fun. I do get why they don't enable physics for certain objects because sometimes those objects can be your last line of defense.
Open Hammer > locate static props > change to physprop > compile. Done!
Though its a shame how hidden the legacy browser is.
oldie but goldie "fire in the hole" good old times with sleepless nights and tons of fun
That sound was so iconic
"the removal of physics is for competetive reasons tho" ☝️🤓
Yeah, sadly developers care about competitiveness, not *fun*.
@@ivanonlyone7160 Because it's a game meant for competitive gameplay and not for attention to details
@@ivanonlyone7160it's might not fun for you but it do fun for other. All people wasn't robot man they have their own taste
BRUH wdym? The game from day 1 was focused towards competition thats why its a team vs team game. If you wanna have fun play Half Life.@@ivanonlyone7160
Yet they still have thousands of chicken running around. Smh.
CS2: graphics
CS SOURCE: physics
Source 2 has alot better physics engine. Its no news that for years in CS:GO they changed all prop_physics (like barrels) to prop_static because of gameplay reasons.
it's funny to think that, the same death sounds have been used all these years.
Has someone ever been killed by a flying barrel?
no
I should try it
Yes it has happened
man better you compared half life 2 and half life alyx cuz an eSports game does not need physical objects on the map
But it can be a fun shooter and also be a competitive shooter did you ever play css because that was actual fun, csgo felt more like a shitty cod ripoff with no good custom maps except for surf map but every game you went into people already knew every spot cause they just the play the basic maps
The CS series is end for players like me, who playing just for fun, removing physics kill the fun parts of the game. Valve need to add servers with physics enabled (on/off option)
wow man! not seeing wood shavings must really take away from the game
You can add alot more physics in the new hammer editor.
6:21 still the best sound
also fading effect and lightning behind the door is better on cs:s
A última vez que vi pernas nos jogos da valve foi no LEFT 4 DEAD
To satisfy every player Valve should add something like two game modes to CS2. One with maps for "competetiveness" and the other with maps that have actual physics for the nerds like me.
you should have added the smoke and molly combo in your comparison i think that would gravitate towards CS2 a little bit more but im not sure why, but hey, you're the one comparing games that are twenty years apart am i right
This warfare character on the preview
yes
4:28 looks like another game
I think this is given the fact that it is another game
Css: custom spray
Cs2: no custom spray, but you can pay for a 👍🏻or a 👌🏻 thats good i guess...
..
True, but also the cp and snuff sprays in css were not a fun time
Counter Source is compatible with a multitude of mods that make it even more realistic than CS2. For example, the weapon skins of the new modern warfare and their animations
насчёт пулевых отверстий ЕСЛИ машина не картонная то она не будет проминаться скорость пули не позволяет прогнутся корпусу
GTA IV - GTA V xddd
6:30 that terrorist Say nah i'm out
lmao
I hated that CS where i cant hide C4 and block my opponents with barrels
5:05 this is not true. apparently it's a bug of 3rd person view so you should have look it from another player's view to see how character walks. people may misunderstand who doesn't know how cs:s is.
True
IMO, CS2 is made for optimization and competition in a massive level. CSSource was made to impress.
Ngl, I wish the newer CSs had stuff like moving barrels. By the way, what does imo mean?
@@mrfoxyzin58Thank god it doesn't, it'd ruin lots of games in it. Specially in eSports, also imo means "in my opinion"
@@mrfoxyzin58 In My Opinion.
@@hellionglassocean How would it ruin games? Because it would require the activation of a few brain cells to play around a few moving barrels? Is it so bad having to use our brain in a video game?
@@mahikannakiham2477 someone hasn't played source it seems lmfao
Its almost like the reason why CSS was disliked initially was because of the object physics and the T side being able to hide the bomb with the objects
CSS not a game. Css is life ❤️ (+ %100 good community)
Ragdoll for CS source
Details for CS 2
believe me doesn't has that much details as 2023 games have by the way thanks for watching
CS2 : Graphics and some improvement
CSS : Environment Details
But Valve should add details to in CS2
games 2 decades apart from eachother 😭
cs2 is competitive so it wont have any of these because they're distractions.
very well said mister respect for that🙏
The moving barrels is a neat feature tho.
It gives player additional tactical option in bomb placement
CS2 is an competitive game with high price rewards championship. So there a reason to remove those unnecessary physics for optimization and fair play
i believe they will change that in the future to make it more realistic, as they change the granade and smoke combo, because thats more realistic
Agree, moving barrels in css is actually f up everytime 😂
@@diogoleite916grenade smoke was done not for realism, but for gameplay
They won't. Source engine easily has the best physics and ragdoll animations out of all engines, if CS doesn't use them anymore, it's purely because Valve doesn't want the game to have them, since they take away from the core of the game.
@@vladimir8035 thats why source was more fun. I really believe in the future they Will add that because the games need to be more realistic no matter what. And people want that
out of all CS, source have the best head hitbox ong
because it has the biggest one?
To be fair, physic is extremely expensive in video games, every calculation requires computing power and it will kill FPS.
From the demo, we have seen where CS 2 emphasize their physics at, smoke grenade, water, etc. So they had to make these interactable mesh as static mesh for optimization.
Expensive, hard blah blah blah... Valve are *hella* rich. They most definietly have the time and resources to add physics, optimize the game and fix bugs.
He means expensive for your computer's computational capacity
@@theprinceofdarkness3250lol go back to school
@@fdevaa If you want to correct me or tell a different opinion then do it instead of using high school insults.
@@theprinceofdarkness3250 nah i just wanted to insult
Idk why its so hard to actually use a picture of CS Source in your thumbnail for this video lol.
gforce is from CSS
@@Game_Decide ok but the thumbnail though
@@Game_Decide i could easily remake the same thumbnail and use a actually screenshot of a model on CSS.
BRO WHY YOU PLAY ON LOW GRAPHIC WHEN YOU SHOW COUNTER STRIKE SOURCE
i forgot the settings but in new video it full ghrapic
Los detalles de las piernas en cs2 son excelentes , le faltó eso al css😢 , pero aun así es uno de mis favoritos.😊
Feels like they spent all budget on molotov and smoke
😅
Imagine that cs source was out in 2004, i guess only one thing that is better in cs2 is smoke disappearing after granade explosion
Css on source engine bruh impresive physics even after 19 years its also same as my age 😮😮😮
They didn't want to add physics to the new one because it is pointless and does require more resoures. And anyone can make a game with more realistic physics.
thats also true but its different from now like adding physics to a 2004 game and now a ubisoft game
Competitive shooters is the real reason why video games are all about skins and there's no real innovation in the gaming industry
CS2 has a new physics engine, but as you say compeditive maps dont use prop_physics. Although you can still make custom maps with physics objects.
@@Nyllsor I wonder if there'll be custom map servers, it's more fun when people don't know the maps makes gameplay more interesting
@@mathieupoissant7525 of course there'll be custom servers, not only with custom maps
i can't believe that valve will decide cs2 doesn't need community servers, it just will ruin the game
These are the guys behind Half Life Alyx. If they decided to change that IS FOR A REASON.
it's like GTA 4 and GTA 5
The best part of CS:S is how friendly is to community modding
Yet it has less mods than cs1
6
@@polorchen1592 still more quality mods than cs 1.6, almost every zombie server in cs 1.6 is awful because of the vips and new weapons its impossible to win against a VIP even if you use cheats because they have infinite amount of antidotes and jetpack and bazookas and run 1.8 times faster than you you usually need to stab them around 8 times for them to get infected , on public servers around 40% of servers edit your config file and if you try to stop them from doing it they'll ban you , and they force you to use they're skins yatayata... , There are so many stupid text on the screen there are so many ads on maps and the skins,
We are evolving 🔙
No 😂
If Valve wanted to, they could add what CSS has. They just didn't do it to optimize the game and make it competitive. That's why CS1.6 has more players than Source.
Cs2 is still an upgrade. The only problem is dust 2 being dust 2. Cs2 custom maps will be able to run more stable when it comes to making maps with physics and dynamic lighting. Just takes time to learn how to make maps for the new engine.
i like cs source more
Back when some roll the barrel over the bomb so it wont get spotted easily.
CS SOURCE GTA 4 - CS GO GTA 5 - CS 2 GTA 6
Cs1.6 GTA SA
@@_D-A-T Definitely
the third terrorist in the zeus comparison was not having any of that
в cs:source были тени, причем полноценные (в версии v34 точно были), просто в настройках игры надо поискать
в ней нет теней как в кс го или кс2
back then csgo had to remove things not just for competitive reasons but i believe it has to do with the engine limitations and game's optimazations too, but in cs2 i think some things that doesnt affect the gameplay can be brought back
I heard the physics were shut off for competitive play.
“engine limitations”
source and go are the same engine. they removed physics bc it hurts balance and competitive play. CS2 has physics support too, I bet you’ll see it a lot in custom levels
The RAGDOLLS of CSS are on the highest level possible ... I wish we could've got the same physics in CSS ... the Barrels , tires and other stuff flying all around the map is actually changing the reality and creating new obsticles and tactical advantages.
it was removed because it was ruining cs tactic aspect
one of the reasons why css is less popular than cs 1.6 are the ragdolls
BUT if the detail Barrel vs grenade, Bulb swinging add to CS 2 the game size is more bigger
CS2:We improve graphics,shaders and weapons
CS SOURCE:WE GOT FLYING BARRELS
К бочкам вопросов нет, но не сделать вменяемые декали и частицы - это банальная лень разработчиков
but thats obviously an unfair and very biased comparison, how can you compare the very old CS2 against the next gen CSS
But still CSS won
@@Game_Decidehow? Just cuz of the physics? Css looks dogshit compared to cs2. Sure css has better performances but thats because that game is like old as shit.
@@wiselyxcss won by physics, and cs2 won by graphics and details
@@Game_Decidebc u literally found the only relatively more logical part of css and included
Now: playing on dust 2 with ball
Then: playing on dust 2 with barrel
My friend and I still play source in the weekend.
It's still the better version after all this time
wow
1:30 aint no way in hell
"Fire in the hole!"
- The counter strike source character’s possible catchphrase
and in the more older cs games was like that to if i remember good i remember playing big time 1.6 and in this cs was the same for that i think maybe was in all old cs games like that with voice is terrable i hate that and i love we not have it anymore in cs2 bc that to saying fire in the hole with this voice was super annoyig im happy they just remove that thing
More people need to see this fr
Чел на превью поставил модельку из варфейса и написал 2004.Бл шо за долбаящер?
Source the best cs
0:40 what is this map name
CS:Source all the way.
Any time, any day. GOAT.
I like the fact how I can see my legs in CS2
Best thing they ever done
Fr and the smokes are amazing
@@mohepicpro7790Yes, I’ve already experienced this mechanic in games. Now with XM you can very easily shoot through the smoke, while your teammate shoots enemies through the resulting holes. Interesting to see how this will be used on the pro stage
Fun fact:bullet and trowable object came out from your eye
why does the blood particle in cs2 have red blood gas in it or something
Blood boils from the heat of the bullet probably
Your smokes look so nasty dude, what did you do to them?
The CrowbCat gamer brain rot is strong with the first half of the video.. Most physics interactions are not gone but disabled on that particular map.
That's a bit mean, but I like your "crowbcat gamer brain rot" term.
"CLEAR IN THE HOLE"🗣🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥‼️
I don't know why but I really like low graphics game for a competitive nature
Zawg the game isn’t even out yet 😭
Someone check out the Global operations game. There are probably the best crafted weapons sounds I've ever seen. Especially shooting into walls and windows. The guns sound like the real thing.
CS:S IS STILL GOOD
Esports kill the casual gaming 😢
Thank you exactly everyone in these comment are complaining that you can't have both but you can still have a competitive game with a community for fun with custom maps for game mode like surf zombie jail mini game
Esports is gay
CS source is Legend
glass on the office map didn 't show
Video dosent acually show much of source 2 physics, only static props. I guess you get more views jumping on some hate train than acually showing optimistic improvments.
if we add more details to cs2 i believe that would fuck up the game for good
Если в кс сурс добавить ноги, то сурс станет более реалистичным чем кс 2...
source details are the best especially in dust 2 map
Это там чувак из варфэйс?
И правда, я тоже это приметил)
Just give cs2 some time. It will be the GOAT of competitive shooters (though css was waaay ahead of its time)
they took 10 years to create this game
@@Game_Decide yeah but csgo was also kinda rushed
@@Game_Decidenah because the development probably started in arpund 2020
@@Game_Decide not 10, source 2 was made in 2015
CS SOURCE definitive Edition 2025
CSGO 2 need this physics
csgo 2?? maybe cs2?
thats not a game
CSS still the best
that is what I say
Next gen games or even mid-gen games like counter strike these days require a lot of processing power to maintain a steady FPS and good performance so they remove moveable objects such as barrels and lights to help with that. Cool details but unnecessary & not needed.
Good video bro
THE source feel more cs
they all removed because of competitive reasons
Автор тупо взял чела из варфейс, для обложки видоса 😂
Those who played source know is best to not let the objects move