Radiated Emissions Testing

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 6

  • @ahmeta6367
    @ahmeta6367 4 года назад

    How close are these measurements to a far field test?

    • @RigolTech
      @RigolTech  4 года назад

      Near field measurements are great for identifying areas of concerns on a board and repeatably testing those points but they are not a replacement to far field measurements.

  • @gahlanaventis
    @gahlanaventis 7 лет назад

    why mostly all Oscope manufacturers make channels ground referenced ?

    • @rigoltechUSA
      @rigoltechUSA 7 лет назад

      It is a simpler and less expensive design and works with most of the signals we use on a daily basis. There are certainly differential probes or scopes that can be purchased but they tend to be more expensive. We find most customers prefer less expensive ground referenced options.

    • @gahlanaventis
      @gahlanaventis 7 лет назад

      so it is simpler for the manufacturer but not for the user?
      the user have to afford another budget for making floating measurement. i mean probes differential
      ground referenced measurement is not easier for the user ,may cause damage to the equipment (oscope) and may cause injury too
      so it is a matter of manufacturer interest over the user customer

    • @rigoltechUSA
      @rigoltechUSA 7 лет назад +1

      There are plenty of floating oscilloscopes for customers who need that capability. RIGOL doesn't produce any, but if that is what you need then they can be a great investment. It is something we look at in our product efforts, but as I said we find demand to be fairly small for this capability.