Paul McCartney’s TRIPLE PLAY: “McCartney III” 3x3 Edition

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @roywatson8133
    @roywatson8133 10 месяцев назад +8

    he puts this out and band on the run maybe someone should remind him he once recorded two albums one was called london town the other was back to the egg we need back in the cd and album racks

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +4

      Agree 100%

    • @kgeo753
      @kgeo753 10 месяцев назад +2

      It’s not as if London Town isn’t being released because they pressed a new variant of McCartney III. MPL wants to make money, they’re going to release whatever they feel is a good return on investment and Paul wants to release. Just because hardcore McCartney fans like London Town it doesn’t mean it will make money.

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад

      @kgeo753 Yes, also agree 100%

    • @roywatson8133
      @roywatson8133 10 месяцев назад

      good point @@kgeo753

  • @astrosjer822
    @astrosjer822 6 месяцев назад +2

    It has been nearly 4 years since the last Archive box set. Let’s get that in 2024!

  • @renaud_c_h
    @renaud_c_h 10 месяцев назад +3

    We only needed one version and that was the black vinyl. Anyone who bought any of the original coloured versions that came out in 2020 is directly responsible for this new useless release. If fans had refrained at the time, it would have sent the message and Capitol (AND McCartney!) would never have thought of these new coloured anniversary vinyls in the first place!

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +2

      It’s true. The main reason for this cash grab is that fans continue to demonstrate willingness to spend their money on anything Macca puts out. No one asked for this, and no one would have been disappointed if it had not happened.

  • @kingdicelille
    @kingdicelille 10 месяцев назад +3

    New archive releases or new music (ie new album for instance) are what I'm interest in. I already own 3 (!) different editions of this cool album (love it) but another one I just don't need.

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад

      I like this album a lot, but I’m quite happy with the one version I already have. If there were bonus tracks, I’d consider buying it again.

  • @jyutzler
    @jyutzler 10 месяцев назад +4

    You needed to deliver this important news with even more of a Ben Stein vibe.

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +3

      LOL! My sarcasm wasn't on point enough? :)

  • @peka7776
    @peka7776 10 месяцев назад +4

    ,, You never give me your money’’ … well i gave enough.. ‘I’ve had enough’ .. to say with your own song titles! 😡

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +2

      Paul always finds new ways to get fans to give him their money. He won’t be getting mine for this.

  • @JimmyV1530
    @JimmyV1530 10 месяцев назад +4

    UGH...Enough already......can't believe people are still buying this.

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +3

      Typical McCartney though

  • @elementrypenguin3116
    @elementrypenguin3116 10 месяцев назад +1

    It’s become McCartney XXIV now

  • @drewhughes9127
    @drewhughes9127 10 месяцев назад +3

    Listen I’m a fan of McCartney III. But this is ridiculous.

  • @trupax2210
    @trupax2210 10 месяцев назад +1

    I don’t know what to do if The Beatles of all people have lost the plot.

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад

      Paul has been doing this sort of thing with his solo stuff for a loooong time. He’s the one who lost the plot.

  • @davidellis5141
    @davidellis5141 10 месяцев назад +3

    This mediocre album needs no anniversary celebration. I won't be rolling the dice on it ! 🎲 🎲 🎲

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +2

      I like the album more than you but I won’t be rolling the dice again either.

  • @tedharrington5432
    @tedharrington5432 10 месяцев назад +1

    Are you being serious?

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад +1

      I’m serious that this is real, but if you detect sarcasm, it’s because I think yet another version of this album is silly.

    • @tedharrington5432
      @tedharrington5432 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@TrackXTrack Oh man! I really thought the video was a joke. Especially the tri-color album.

  • @triplejazzmusicisall1883
    @triplejazzmusicisall1883 10 месяцев назад +1

    At the risk of offending others I think this is just a disgusting plan to wrangle out as much profit as possible. Surely if an artist has some love for their fans and tehir massive support he/she etc would think about putting out material they have been crying out for, for many years. I know if it were me, I would want to thank the fans that have stuck by me for decades with a rerelease of something in the deluxe archives set that are crying out for. If London Town and Back to the Egg come out in 2024 I will be very happy and grateful. I hope Macca's next move is about appreciating his audience and not about gaining even more wealth. For goodness sake it only came out three years ago. The same album made available in eleven different coloured vinyls, plus cd, cassette, and every variation you can think up. Is this the future of captalism gone rife?

    • @TrackXTrack
      @TrackXTrack  10 месяцев назад

      I completely agree. This behavior is very typical for McCartney. He has a long history of putting out many variants or very expensive deluxe editions. I don’t believe for a moment this is all record company shenanigans. Paul has final sign off on all of it. He knows what he’s doing. And by the way, Taylor Swift is just as bad. They constantly push to find ways to get fans to spend more and more money. And the easiest way to do that is to recycle and repackage existing material. In Paul’s case, I feel like he’s already put out the most popular albums as archive releases. Die hard fans still want Egg and London, but I think we all know those would not sell as well as yet another Band on the Run reissue. That sucks.

    • @triplejazzmusicisall1883
      @triplejazzmusicisall1883 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@TrackXTrack Your words are like gold to me. That is a great point you make about Taylor Swift. I know nothing about her as a singer, but I know she and Pauk colluded together about the release dates of their albums so both had the opportunity of gaining the number one spot. Where is Paul's dignity these days. To employ all those vast marketing ploys alongside colluding with another artist to reach the number one position in truth simply means he did not deserve that prized outcome. Marketing and manipulation got to number one. Not an amazing album worthy of that placement. I quite like McCartney 3 but it did not deserve to go to number one. As for Taylor Swift I simply have no interest in her whatsoever. I am glad we agree too on McCartney being fully aware of everything that goes on under his umbrella MPL. He has always been a control freak and anyone who thinks he would let others make final decisions are naive at best. Have a top Christmas.

  • @markwade2530
    @markwade2530 10 месяцев назад +3

    Crap

    • @markwade2530
      @markwade2530 10 месяцев назад +2

      I don't mean the album is crap, just this waste of product.

    • @RAFchurchlawford4469
      @RAFchurchlawford4469 10 месяцев назад

      "crap noun (GAME) ... a game played with dice for money" Do you feel lucky, punk? Yeah, I do... D'oh!

  • @scottandrewbrass1931
    @scottandrewbrass1931 10 месяцев назад

    He's dead to me.😂