Replacement Rules 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 янв 2025

Комментарии • 7

  • @samidib10
    @samidib10 Год назад

    absolute GOD SEND. You have saved my Modern Logic grade and it was extremely important for me to pass for my GPA. Thank u so much for making videos out of what u love to do even though the views can be low. This video really helped so much, words cant describe it thank u thank u thank u

    • @ALittleBitofPhilosophy
      @ALittleBitofPhilosophy  Год назад

      Hi Sami. Thanks for the kind words. I'm so glad you found the video helpful in your studies. Keep it up!

  • @celinegrasdal8858
    @celinegrasdal8858 Год назад

    Thank-you. Both this video and the previous video explained what my reading assignments could not!

    • @ALittleBitofPhilosophy
      @ALittleBitofPhilosophy  Год назад

      Hi Celine. I'm glad you found this video helpful. It's nice to get positive feedback. Keep learning!

  • @paulcarello6390
    @paulcarello6390 Год назад +1

    In reference to the Tautology Replacement Rule: p :: (p v p) :: (p . p)
    one could argue that ALL replacement rules are tautologies:
    For example, the Transposition Replacement Rule, (p ⊃ q) :: (~q ⊃ ~p), can be rewritten as
    (p ⊃ q) ⊃ (~q ⊃ ~p) .... (1)
    The truth table for (1) above confirms that the Transposition Replacement Rule is also a tautology.
    Given that all replacement rules are tautologies, why is the name reserved for one specific replacement rule ---- viz p :: (p v p) :: (p . p) ?

    • @jmike2039
      @jmike2039 Год назад

      I've wondered this exact same thing and never got an answer.

  • @kamwefu4921
    @kamwefu4921 2 года назад

    ...Read the discussion on Inductive Inference in Unit 5 of the module, and develop an essay serving as your presentation on Causation and Causal Inference..
    How I answer this?