I only wish he could get the death penalty. He is one who deserves it! He put Julie through some horrific agony. Not to mention all the psychological torment. He's just a monster. I can't believe his son will testify for him...ughhh
I can picture the time period and what being around a grandiose narcissist (like Mark, imo) was like with the “boys club”. The trial has shown us that Julie was right to be scared and worried that Mark would come after her and never let her have custody of the children. Such a waste and very sad.
The prosecutor quietly and precisely dismantling the bias of the forensic pathologist is spellbinding! She worries me. Someone in her position with her bias and entrenched views is concerning to say the least.
Mark’s sister is a piece of work! She has the same personality as her brother! With him as her husband and Laura as her best friend my heat hurts for Julie!!!
So according to Mark's sister, Julie was not mentally well enough to be believed about her suspicions but was mentally well enough to take care of her kids instead of taking care of them herself? What a sad excuse for a woman.
Marks sister had pulled her child from Julie's care years prior to Julie talking about her suspicions. People utilize daycare services all of the time so that they can work/have a career. Some do it out of necessity and some do it for personal fulfillment. That makes her a sad excuse for a woman?
@@donnkeyesquire3088 I would never ever leave my child with anyone I had even the tiniest thought they may not be well physically, mentally or emotionally. Most good mother's or father's would agree with me. Work comes second every time when the safety of your children is at stake. You work around your children , you don't risk them.
@@shonabeggs4640 I agree with you 100 percent. I think Mark's sister made the correct call to pull her child from Julie's care. My reply was to clarify that she had removed her child well before the instability and to counter her assertion that she's a sad excuse of a woman for not taking care of her own child.
@@donnkeyesquire3088her dad is a felon and her brother is a murderer who killed her best friend. And she supports both of them by refusing to cooperate w police and lying on the stand. The whole family is trash.
@@honestbarsteward What?! He has shoved ALL of the evidence at these witnesses over and over. (Alongside what I agree is a narrative that he wants to reinforce to the jury).
She was trying to get his sister to lighten up and be likeable. They're both not likable. She is not a good litigator and one of the other defense attorneys couldn't have done worse.
The sister-in-law says they were ‘besties’ but there seems to be so many ‘holes’ in their conversations. She is leaving out a lot of details. ‘Besties’ have deep, detailed conversations - especially about affairs, job hunting, marital problems, lewd photos and emails, thinking your spouse is going to kill you! She said she would have called police if she thought Julie was being harassed but wouldn’t say anything to anyone when Julie told her she thought Mark was going to kill her? Hope we are not expected to believe her!
I watched the “judgement of mark Jensen” and that was a pretty good video of all the evidence and what happened with the first trial and the prosecutor said if mark ever got a retrial he’d try that one too! & he’s doing great. Defense seems to think without the letter mark is innocent & id like to know where? It’s just sad his kids don’t know any better than to believe their dad
That's not true, Douglas Jensen has cut off his Mark Jensen when he found his dad murdered his mother, David Jensen is the only son who still believes mark Jensen lies!!!!
the way that the prosecutor uses the witnesses to testify himself is a beautiful thing. he gets to repeat the facts of the case over and over while also making the defense’s witness look unprofessional and a fool.🎉😂
Agreed, I love when he says did you know?.... No? The jury knows that . I hope his female colleague knows how lucky she is to have him as her mentor. She will be fabulous too.
@@TheNewYorkie he could definitely teach a class called “the art of cross examination”. @shonabeggs4640 the ‘did you know…no? the jury knows that’ statements were pure gold. I absolutely have to remember to use this at the perfect moment in my life. about your mentorship comment, i completely agree. there is nothing more valuable than learning hands on and seeing actual real-life scenarios that will be experienced and he’s a master.👏🏽
I’m rewatching this. I watched it live at the time but it’s such a great cross I’m watching it again. I so wish they’d have showed Jensen’s reactions to this cross and the flailing expert as Jambois literally laid out the facts of the case.
The expert conveniently ignores or "does not understand the logic of" Mark's evil behavior before Julie's death. She just finds that Julie killed herself and was not murdered, with no basis in fact. Ridiculous.
When they were going over there was only Julie and Jensen in the house,Julie couldn't get out of bed and the prosecutor asked so who went on the computer.." I don't know" I was screaming it wasn't bloody Julie,she was dying up stairs in bed you biased old woman.😡😡😡😡
I have no patience for these lying, over paid 'experts' who will twist their opinion for money. They should be ashamed of themselves. And this Dr. sounds like ..what's the expression....a nincompoop.
Absolutely idiotic to put her on the stand. Makes the whole Jenson clan look bad. She seems mad irritated to be there. Like she's being bothered with questions. A normal sister would show emotion and look at jury to save their brother of injustice.
@@SingleMaltBuckeye I also did not like the way she tried to paint Julie as mentally ill. I don't buy that story Julie lied about her nephew smearing poo in the bathroom..I believe Julie cleaned it up and told the mother but her sister in law chose to be angry and in denial her child would do something like that..I think it's easier for her to be mad a Julie instead of accepting the fact that her brother is a murderer.
Wait...she told people she thought she was going to be poisoned but because the day before she injested poision she didn't ask for help, that means she poisoned herself and didn't actually want help? Wow. That's some "logic". You're not paranoid if they're actually after you, right?
Both the forensic pathologist and Mark’s sister need a couple stiff drinks after today, holy smokes they were exposed. The bias on the defense side is filthy. Dude is guilty.
I find these trials so interesting to watch. We are in a position of privilege to have this kind of access, whether it is for the purposes of education or interest. I am enjoying learning about law and court room proceedings.
@@annnicholson6066 I'm British too 😊🧡 yeah i agree it would be interesting to be able to watch uk trials too. Not sure if theres some law that prevents it. Grateful we get to watch these though 😊
@@annnicholson6066I’m in England too. The Scottish courts have recently allowed a couple of trials to be filmed. They’re on the BBCiPlayer. One involves the disappearance and alleged murder of a vulnerable adult and the other is the alleged murder of a woman and her young son. Very interesting and very different to the US trials. I don’t understand why our British barristers still wear the wigs and gowns. 🤷🏻♀️
@@alisonjones4947 I don't understand about the wigs either, they should have abolished the wigs along with the death penalty, I also wish the justice system was much more transparent, as I think it makes us look shady. . We need more cameras in courtrooms
@@annnicholson6066 definitely. I watch a lot of the televised trials from the US. The 2 I was most engrossed in recently were the murdaugh and Jensen trials. I still rewatch bob Jambois crossing the defence expert witnesses to see the expressions on Bev Jambois’ face. The Jensen trial and story behind it is gripping. To see the Jensen family disparage Julie’s family was heartbreaking. Especially as Jensen’s father was jailed for burglary and jensen’s sister committed perjury in her fathers trial by providing an alibi for him. Yet, the prosecution weren’t allowed to question her credibility. Fortunately the jury cut through to the truth. He deserves what he got.
Does anyone else want to smack that smirk of his right off of his face? Even if he were completely innocent, any decent person would have more respect to the memory of his wife and the seriousness of the situation but he just acts like he's at the country club and flirting with the waitress from time to time! Ugh, seriously makes me want to lose my lunch 🤢
I think a big motivate for Mark to murder Julie was that he didn't want to pay child support and he wasn't being successful with making her appear to be an unfit mother. I also think she was getting ready to leave her creepy husband due to job hunting and he had to murder her before she filed for divorce.
Defence pathologist lives in a witness box and has zero credibility . Dreadful example of sacrificing ethics for a paycheque. Her testimony in the eyedrops case is another example. So glad that Jambo took her apart without breaking a sweat.
Wow that forensic pathologist is so way off 😯 She is making claims about things she doesn’t know much about 😟 This again shows that doctors can be totally wrong
@@SJC49 she is drawing conclusions as she goes, I don’t know if she has been watching the trial but she doesn’t seem to be up to date with the statements of the other witnesses
@@lonie3100 she is way off?? on the facts??? she has the medic reports lol.... you are paying attention on what a con-man and an exworker said 12 years later lol
They probably contract her on a daily basis. I think she did the best job explaining what the pathologist’s role is and how the different disciplines (i.e. law enforcement) work together.
@@debbiekottmann3085 I'm just referring to this particular incident. It seemed to be excessive smiling towards the front of the room, not to the side where the jury is located.
No one was calling him brilliant when he got into an unprovoked physical altercation with another lawyer or the time when he publicly belittled and attacked a homeless man.
@@SingleMaltBuckeye It's true. A simple search will prove that. He was the District Attorney in a courtroom when he decided to start slinging mud with another attorney and then he shoved him. Professional conduct is part of being a good lawyer. Anyone else would have been taken into custody for those actions inside of a courtroom! But you find that excusable behavior? The other attorneys name is Sfasciotti. Look it up for yourself and see "if it's true".
Finally watching Saturday night. I’m floored with the testimony of Mark’s sister because she really seems like a state witness right now. Probably won’t need a lengthy cross!
I think they've burned a lot of valuable time by not having witnesses ready to go and to dismissing the jury instead of having simple sidebars. Have they worked 'late' even one day so far?
I don’t know why they miss the jurors - maybe because it’s such a small courtroom the jurors would hear what they were saying at the sidebar?? They do like their breaks!
I am thinking the defence didn’t expect the prosecution to end this soon and had previously arranged witnesses to appear on Monday. They did say, I think yesterday, the witnesses were unable to rearrange their travel.
I am amazed at the passion and impressed with the skill of this prosecution team in this trial. Julie certainly has a strong voice for justice speaking for her. The defense is trying every trick in the book except the truth to win this case. And all three defense attorneys are insufferable and unprofessional with irritating voices. 😡
Sister seems to be lying. When did you meet your " best friend" can't remember, do you know when they got married, when you were her maid of honour? No, do you know where she lived after college? No, did she confide in you about her mother? No, did you ever speak to her about her mother after the wedding? No. Go home lady, you're a fraud. Defence team are useless bring all these liars which only adds to his guilt. Should have rested right after the prosecution, more chance the jury would have reasonable doubt.
The lady doctor said she" was kinda struggling with all the factors here" That's an understatement, considering she just sat there informing the courtroom about her magnificent brain and lack of bias. She's not struggling to understand the factors here, she's struggling to hold her massive ego in check before she makes an even bigger fool of herself.
This doctor will say anything just to make sure she gets that 30,000 and head home. She don’t care about what happened to Julie she’s just there to make a paycheck
I have yet to see the defense call a witness or cross a witness and come ahead on a single point. Jambois has them so outclassed! He turns every one of their witnesses into a witness for prosecution.
Hostile to who? She is the defence’s witness and has stated her professional opinion as have the other testifying pathologists. Just because she is not backing down when being cross-examined by the prosecution does not mean she is hostile. Trying to be fair here even though I hope the POS Mark finally goes away for the rest of his life.
This prosecuter is phenomenal! He is asking all the right questions and winning each one of them. Its SOOOO obvious the female doctor doesn't want to answer his questions 'honesty' because she is 'working' for the defense and is being paid over 20k to do so.
i honestly think the cross examination of the defense experts is better than the evidence the State put before the court (not saying the evidence is bad), but Jambois put on a clinic
Definitely. I don’t think she even wanted to help the defence. She was very lukewarm towards jensen. I noticed he kept looking over her when they stood for the jury leaving/entering and mouthed hi a few times but I’m not sure if she returned his greeting. He did it for the benefit of the jury, trying to make the jury think his sister supports him and believes in his innocence.
The examiner's remarks that she couldn't believe that someone in 1998 couldn't use a computer.. I didn't even own one, never mind know how to turn one on. She believes what a doctor says that gives the husband sleeping tables for one of his patients without even seeing them face to face. I'm shocked that the doctor hasn't been struck off. They need to stop getting these retired examiners as experts.she was so biased. Julie couldn't get out of bed There was only Julie and Jensen in the house but she stated i don't know who went on the computer. Oh my giddy Aunt give me strength, I was screaming it could only have been JENSEN..
She committed perjury in the trial of her father for burglary in the late 1980s. She provided him with an alibi that was disproved and he was found guilty at a jury trial. So, half the jensen family are convicted criminals and the other 2 have either promised to do anything to help their family member or have perjured them self. Poor Julie married into a nest of vipers. The son killed her then the rest of his family murdered her reputation.
Dr. Lindsey Thomas, forensic pathologist- everything she says is contradictory to anything i've heard from other forensic pathologists. and apparently has never heard of a pill crusher. she did nothing to raise a doubt
Just a question for the forum. I try to keep my mind as open as possible when watching a trial. Although it certainly appears that Mark Jensen is guilty. I would welcome ideas about why Julie would not have left this man who she thought was trying to kill her? What are some theories?
Guilt about the affair - trying to make it up to Mark. Perhaps really believing the ex-boyfriend was sending the pics and emails and feeling bad for Mark.
I believe she was in the dark for years that it was her vile husband making the calls & bringing in the D pics, she wasn’t happy ( hence the brief fling ) but then she seemingly felt guilt over it & tried to make the marriage work for her 2 children. I also believe she definitely was catching on to her husband around the time of her murder- she had suspicions about him having the affair with KL, she was distraught & upset about “ marital problems” at her Dr. appointment 2 days before. If she hadn’t been murdered she may very well have discovered the affair & finally left this grotesque man. Poor woman. So sad for her and her boys.
@@JM_-ix7yh when the judge sentencing, but the first trial, he said, this is one of the most despicable cases he’s ever come across he tortured this woman for years and years, and the judge said he wished he got sentenced him to more than just a time in prison, the judge was nearly in tears
Am I the only one watching who is getting very angry at the defense team, as well as some of the witnesses? Maybe I have some anger issues lol. But watching these people trying so hard to get this murderer out of jail makes me sick to my stomach. The doctors who have refused to admit there is more to this than their medical knowledge years later should be ashamed at the fact that as hard as the guy tried, the prosecutor couldn't get it through their heads that there is more evidence than just the examinations and tests they do after the death. Arrogant idiots. Do they honestly believe this guy is not guilty? His sister trying to free him is not surprising, but I think she is lying. I think she knows he did it. I hope to GOD that there are no idiots on this jury.
This trial has touched me deeply. I felt so sorry for Julie. I hope the jury keeps Mark where he deserves to be for the rest of his life, in prison.
I only wish he could get the death penalty. He is one who deserves it! He put Julie through some horrific agony. Not to mention all the psychological torment. He's just a monster. I can't believe his son will testify for him...ughhh
I can picture the time period and what being around a grandiose narcissist (like Mark, imo) was like with the “boys club”. The trial has shown us that Julie was right to be scared and worried that Mark would come after her and never let her have custody of the children. Such a waste and very sad.
I am totally with you!
In the very least who would ever touch the creep with a 60 ft barge pole?!
I hope this jury rights this miscarriage of justice.
This prosecutor is masterfully using every opportunity to reiterate every single piece of evidence.
The prosecutor quietly and precisely dismantling the bias of the forensic pathologist is spellbinding! She worries me. Someone in her position with her bias and entrenched views is concerning to say the least.
Timestamps (updating as I go)
19:08 Dr. Lindsey Thomas, forensic pathologist
1:26:33 Cross
2:08:22 Break
2:26:20 Cross resumes
3:34:40 Lunch break
5:01:29 Laura Koster (Mark's sister)
6:06:47 Cross
Thank you so much for this. Most helpful.
Thank you for this! 🥰
Thank you
THANK You!💕
You're the best 👌
When he was originally sentenced the judge call ☎️ him evil for torturing his wife and wish he could sentence him to more than life in prison
He is the creepiest guy I’ve ever seen on trial for murder
sinister and diabolical. his counsel really should have told him not to look at the jury or camera.😅
He surely gives Jeffrey Dahmer a run for his money.
Mark’s sister is a piece of work! She has the same personality as her brother! With him as her husband and Laura as her best friend my heat hurts for Julie!!!
That "expert" truly thinks she's judge and jury. Can't stand her.
So according to Mark's sister, Julie was not mentally well enough to be believed about her suspicions but was mentally well enough to take care of her kids instead of taking care of them herself? What a sad excuse for a woman.
Marks sister had pulled her child from Julie's care years prior to Julie talking about her suspicions. People utilize daycare services all of the time so that they can work/have a career. Some do it out of necessity and some do it for personal fulfillment. That makes her a sad excuse for a woman?
@@donnkeyesquire3088 I would never ever leave my child with anyone I had even the tiniest thought they may not be well physically, mentally or emotionally. Most good mother's or father's would agree with me. Work comes second every time when the safety of your children is at stake. You work around your children , you don't risk them.
@@shonabeggs4640 I agree with you 100 percent. I think Mark's sister made the correct call to pull her child from Julie's care. My reply was to clarify that she had removed her child well before the instability and to counter her assertion that she's a sad excuse of a woman for not taking care of her own child.
@@donnkeyesquire3088her dad is a felon and her brother is a murderer who killed her best friend. And she supports both of them by refusing to cooperate w police and lying on the stand. The whole family is trash.
I love how the Jammer takes every opportunity, in cross, to restate the important facts for the jury. A masterclass!
He's a genius 👏
He’s fighting to save his name.
Seriously?... That guy can't stop thinking about the p*** pictures himself
@@jodievukmir3187 😁
He should have crossed the sister. I love watching him
If Mark sister wasn’t concerned about the comments that Julie made about him trying to kill her why did she offer so many places for her to live?
Brilliant point !!
She gave Julie many options on where and how to leave and advised her not to stay. Even after Julie decided to stay she went to check on her.
@Uboob Shanel but Julie most likely didn't trust her in confiding in the brother's sister either ...just saying
@@Zhana808 That’s what she claims. I don’t believe anything that woman says.
@@snipermanizationify and you’re entitled to your opinion as am I and I found her very credible.
One of the best prosecutors I've ever had the pleasure to witness. He got him convicted once and he's going to do it again.
IKR, hes no angel but you really cant fault his performance here.
He just keeps repeating his narrative, literally saying the same words over over and failing to provide any evidence to back it up.
@@honestbarsteward What?! He has shoved ALL of the evidence at these witnesses over and over. (Alongside what I agree is a narrative that he wants to reinforce to the jury).
@@Vendetta-ta4224 there's NO evidence whatsoever, as evidenced by him constantly reiterating his story.
@@honestbarsteward The wife-murdering loser would undoubtedly agree with you. But let's let's see what the jury thinks.
Why does this defense atty. do the fake smile when she’s asking questions to her witness?? Makes me cringe.
Not sure if you meant the one that questioned the sister but her kindergarten “soothing” tone was bugging me!
If you mean the one with the nose stud, it bugs me too.
She spoke to her like she was trying to coax a child to do something.
Sugar syrup sweetness fake
She was trying to get his sister to lighten up and be likeable. They're both not likable. She is not a good litigator and one of the other defense attorneys couldn't have done worse.
Wow, the defense's little girl voice while questioning Mark's sister is so annoying.
The sister-in-law says they were ‘besties’ but there seems to be so many ‘holes’ in their conversations. She is leaving out a lot of details. ‘Besties’ have deep, detailed conversations - especially about affairs, job hunting, marital problems, lewd photos and emails, thinking your spouse is going to kill you! She said she would have called police if she thought Julie was being harassed but wouldn’t say anything to anyone when Julie told her she thought Mark was going to kill her? Hope we are not expected to believe her!
The BEST PROSECUTOR EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!
I watched the “judgement of mark Jensen” and that was a pretty good video of all the evidence and what happened with the first trial and the prosecutor said if mark ever got a retrial he’d try that one too! & he’s doing great. Defense seems to think without the letter mark is innocent & id like to know where? It’s just sad his kids don’t know any better than to believe their dad
I've purposely not researched anything prior so I can be unbiased
That's not true, Douglas Jensen has cut off his Mark Jensen when he found his dad murdered his mother, David Jensen is the only son who still believes mark Jensen lies!!!!
Jambois is a Bloodhound! Possibly, the best cross I've ever seen.
the way that the prosecutor uses the witnesses to testify himself is a beautiful thing. he gets to repeat the facts of the case over and over while also making the defense’s witness look unprofessional and a fool.🎉😂
Agreed, I love when he says did you know?.... No? The jury knows that . I hope his female colleague knows how lucky she is to have him as her mentor. She will be fabulous too.
Mastery. I love this guy!
@@TheNewYorkie he could definitely teach a class called “the art of cross examination”. @shonabeggs4640 the ‘did you know…no? the jury knows that’ statements were pure gold. I absolutely have to remember to use this at the perfect moment in my life. about your mentorship comment, i completely agree. there is nothing more valuable than learning hands on and seeing actual real-life scenarios that will be experienced and he’s a master.👏🏽
I’m rewatching this. I watched it live at the time but it’s such a great cross I’m watching it again. I so wish they’d have showed Jensen’s reactions to this cross and the flailing expert as Jambois literally laid out the facts of the case.
Agreed! 😂
This lady's middle name should be BIASED!!
100%
Defense is paying her earnings so that could be a reason 🤢
The expert conveniently ignores or "does not understand the logic of" Mark's evil behavior before Julie's death. She just finds that Julie killed herself and was not murdered, with no basis in fact. Ridiculous.
She is a paid witness , she will say whatever the money tells her to
@@KJ-dk9io she was the states witness during their case in chief so….for which side is she being paid?
When they were going over there was only Julie and Jensen in the house,Julie couldn't get out of bed and the prosecutor asked so who went on the computer.." I don't know" I was screaming it wasn't bloody Julie,she was dying up stairs in bed you biased old woman.😡😡😡😡
I have no patience for these lying, over paid 'experts' who will twist their opinion for money. They should be ashamed of themselves. And this Dr. sounds like ..what's the expression....a nincompoop.
I have no idea why the defense thinks Marks sister is helpful to them 😐
Absolutely idiotic to put her on the stand. Makes the whole Jenson clan look bad. She seems mad irritated to be there. Like she's being bothered with questions. A normal sister would show emotion and look at jury to save their brother of injustice.
@@SingleMaltBuckeye I also did not like the way she tried to paint Julie as mentally ill. I don't buy that story Julie lied about her nephew smearing poo in the bathroom..I believe Julie cleaned it up and told the mother but her sister in law chose to be angry and in denial her child would do something like that..I think it's easier for her to be mad a Julie instead of accepting the fact that her brother is a murderer.
I did not believe that story either@@CandaceRanee
I think the sister over stayed her welcome with the day care, took advantage for sure in my eyes
Exactly my thoughts
Exactly. Like the fact she tries to play it off like Julie was sooo mentally unwell yet trusted her to watch her kids every day? Just wild
Wait...she told people she thought she was going to be poisoned but because the day before she injested poision she didn't ask for help, that means she poisoned herself and didn't actually want help?
Wow. That's some "logic". You're not paranoid if they're actually after you, right?
Defense is talking to Marks sister like she’s a scared 3 year old. It’s nauseating.
That prosecutor is having his way with defense witnesses. . And no objections......poor, poor defense.
Such a great prosecutor.
Both the forensic pathologist and Mark’s sister need a couple stiff drinks after today, holy smokes they were exposed. The bias on the defense side is filthy. Dude is guilty.
I don’t want to be ‘best friends’ with Laura!
She's trying to help her brother. He creeps me out!
I find these trials so interesting to watch. We are in a position of privilege to have this kind of access, whether it is for the purposes of education or interest. I am enjoying learning about law and court room proceedings.
I wish we had access to trials here in the UK. I'm so glad I have access to all these LIVE trials
@@annnicholson6066 I'm British too 😊🧡 yeah i agree it would be interesting to be able to watch uk trials too. Not sure if theres some law that prevents it. Grateful we get to watch these though 😊
@@annnicholson6066I’m in England too. The Scottish courts have recently allowed a couple of trials to be filmed. They’re on the BBCiPlayer. One involves the disappearance and alleged murder of a vulnerable adult and the other is the alleged murder of a woman and her young son. Very interesting and very different to the US trials. I don’t understand why our British barristers still wear the wigs and gowns. 🤷🏻♀️
@@alisonjones4947 I don't understand about the wigs either, they should have abolished the wigs along with the death penalty, I also wish the justice system was much more transparent, as I think it makes us look shady. . We need more cameras in courtrooms
@@annnicholson6066 definitely. I watch a lot of the televised trials from the US. The 2 I was most engrossed in recently were the murdaugh and Jensen trials. I still rewatch bob Jambois crossing the defence expert witnesses to see the expressions on Bev Jambois’ face. The Jensen trial and story behind it is gripping. To see the Jensen family disparage Julie’s family was heartbreaking. Especially as Jensen’s father was jailed for burglary and jensen’s sister committed perjury in her fathers trial by providing an alibi for him. Yet, the prosecution weren’t allowed to question her credibility. Fortunately the jury cut through to the truth. He deserves what he got.
Mark has creepy beady eyes it’s quite off putting how he scans the court room & stares down people; weird
🤣 the defence attorney didnt want to redirect the doctor because he was afraid of the recross from jambois.
😮💨the prosecutor just gave a masterclass. bravo.👏🏽
Does anyone else want to smack that smirk of his right off of his face? Even if he were completely innocent, any decent person would have more respect to the memory of his wife and the seriousness of the situation but he just acts like he's at the country club and flirting with the waitress from time to time! Ugh, seriously makes me want to lose my lunch 🤢
I do so bad lol
Why do you think his sister is giving Mark Jensen all that money when his commissary money has such a high balance?
I think a big motivate for Mark to murder Julie was that he didn't want to pay child support and he wasn't being successful with making her appear to be an unfit mother. I also think she was getting ready to leave her creepy husband due to job hunting and he had to murder her before she filed for divorce.
I agree. I also think that even though he wanted her out of his life, he couldn't stand the thought of her being intimate with another man.
This kind of thinking is common for a narcissistic selfish individual. Mark Jensen fits the mold!
It’s killing me how this creep looks at the jury when they exit and enter 🤬🤬🤬
One of most ignorant, wormy, yet creepy looking men ever!!!!
Yeah he looks down and up all weird. He is weird and just gross
He creeps me out with his sly side looks at his female lawyer.
He wasn't happy when the male lawyer sat next to him
Defence pathologist lives in a witness box and has zero credibility . Dreadful example of sacrificing ethics for a paycheque. Her testimony in the eyedrops case is another example. So glad that Jambo took her apart without breaking a sweat.
I couldn’t agree more. I saw her in the eye drops trial too. I truly don’t know how they sleep at night. She has sold her soul to the devil.
Judge: Mr. Jambois, are you doing cross?
Jambois: Yes sir
Judge: Oh, bless her heart. 💜🤣
She clearly lied about the conversation with Paul Ratzburg.
I would believe him before the sister who pays MJ hundreds of dollars.
His sister is a bad liar and everyone can see it.
Horrible woman no heart
Well said.
Sometimes people can be so smart and educated yet still lack an ounce of common sense.
Wow that forensic pathologist is so way off 😯
She is making claims about things she doesn’t know much about 😟
This again shows that doctors can be totally wrong
How do you know?
@@SJC49 she is drawing conclusions as she goes, I don’t know if she has been watching the trial but she doesn’t seem to be up to date with the statements of the other witnesses
or paid. She is making $400 per hour.
@@lonie3100 she is way off?? on the facts??? she has the medic reports lol.... you are paying attention on what a con-man and an exworker said 12 years later lol
She was paid 30k to say what the defense asked her to say
Defense speak up already!!! This prosecutor is giving closing arguments
Two more days and hopefully the jury gets the case and they come right back with guilty.
Could the defence witness in the purple jacket be prolonging her testimony to make more money?
She's not prolonging it, the prosecution is. He went over some things two or three times in hopes that he could change her mind.
They probably contract her on a daily basis. I think she did the best job explaining what the pathologist’s role is and how the different disciplines (i.e. law enforcement) work together.
I like how the prosecution ensured the defense would have a big bill to pay today.
He's making eyes at the jury eww creepy
No, he's not. He's smiling at his sister, who he thinks is going to get him off the hook.
@@SandyOhNo his sister isnt there there everday ..he does daily several times when jury comes in
@@debbiekottmann3085 I'm just referring to this particular incident. It seemed to be excessive smiling towards the front of the room, not to the side where the jury is located.
@@SandyOhNo he does this whenever jury comes in or out
I find it very concerning that Mark and his lawyers are always smiling….. like why
I watch these trials the next day as I can fast forward the past education and experience boring part.
Same 🤣
His sister is awful on the stand, not going to help him at all, she also comes across very arrogant also.
Hard to believe she is a witness for the defence. Ice cold.
@@charlesburton4022 i agree.
Judge just cut off prosecutions cross súper abruptly! Weird
I know…..he did it several times! It was so irritating, because he would do it when the prosecutor was on a roll.
The prosecutor is brilliant! This man is so good at what he does. I am in awe of him!
No one was calling him brilliant when he got into an unprovoked physical altercation with another lawyer or the time when he publicly belittled and attacked a homeless man.
@@donnkeyesquire3088 yeah if that's true then he's probably a jerk but a jerk can still be good at their trade.
@@donnkeyesquire3088 I’m obviously referring to his lawyering skills!
@@SingleMaltBuckeye Absolutely correct.
@@SingleMaltBuckeye It's true. A simple search will prove that. He was the District Attorney in a courtroom when he decided to start slinging mud with another attorney and then he shoved him. Professional conduct is part of being a good lawyer. Anyone else would have been taken into custody for those actions inside of a courtroom! But you find that excusable behavior? The other attorneys name is Sfasciotti. Look it up for yourself and see "if it's true".
Did anyone notice Laura Costa asked for the media not to take shots of her but she's sitting on TV getting viewed all over the world.
Hi Laura from 🇬🇧
Finally watching Saturday night. I’m floored with the testimony of Mark’s sister because she really seems like a state witness right now. Probably won’t need a lengthy cross!
That female defence is being very sarcastic smiling at inappropriate things
If only the dead could speak…. There wouldn’t have been a Jensen 2 or 3.
She did speak, but they threw out the letter she had written and given to the neighbor to hold onto.
Who is Jensen smiling at when the jurors walk back in
His sister
He smiling all the time l think he so confident he going to walk.His Sister is a chip off the old block.
No I think he was trying to flirt with one of the jurors! 🤮
His sister who is on the witness stand.
His "smile" looks forced and scary actually.
I think they've burned a lot of valuable time by not having witnesses ready to go and to dismissing the jury instead of having simple sidebars. Have they worked 'late' even one day so far?
I don’t know why they miss the jurors - maybe because it’s such a small courtroom the jurors would hear what they were saying at the sidebar?? They do like their breaks!
I am thinking the defence didn’t expect the prosecution to end this soon and had previously arranged witnesses to appear on Monday. They did say, I think yesterday, the witnesses were unable to rearrange their travel.
Many witnesses have to come in from out of state or couldn't rearrange their life.
At the pre trial it was requested that all sidebars be televised. That was an agreement that was made.
I'm not seeing the value in Marks witnesses, they kind of just support the prosecution.
They give the prosecutor a great opportunity to drive his theories home all over again.
Yuppers
No way is he walking away this time
He never walked away he’s been in prison this whole time
This defence would be costing a fortune ! Expensive lawyers and 2 of their own forensic scientists
Us taxpayers are paying for both sides. This is like a bad joke.
This defence is no match for Jambois, barely an objection. I think theyve either given up or just taking a nap lol
So the def atty is trying to insinuate that David's tick was caused by Julie! So sad!
I am amazed at the passion and impressed with the skill of this prosecution team in this trial. Julie certainly has a strong voice for justice speaking for her. The defense is trying every trick in the book except the truth to win this case. And all three defense attorneys are insufferable and unprofessional with irritating voices. 😡
Sister seems to be lying. When did you meet your " best friend" can't remember, do you know when they got married, when you were her maid of honour? No, do you know where she lived after college? No, did she confide in you about her mother? No, did you ever speak to her about her mother after the wedding? No. Go home lady, you're a fraud. Defence team are useless bring all these liars which only adds to his guilt. Should have rested right after the prosecution, more chance the jury would have reasonable doubt.
I can't stand mark's sister she seems like a liar
The acorn doesn't fall from the tree ..👍
Well rehearsed answers without any emotion. Awful
@@beth5630 spot on !
She could be a sociopath like him
no personality.
The lady doctor said she" was kinda struggling with all the factors here"
That's an understatement, considering she just sat there informing the courtroom about her magnificent brain and lack of bias. She's not struggling to understand the factors here, she's struggling to hold her massive ego in check before she makes an even bigger fool of herself.
This doctor will say anything just to make sure she gets that 30,000 and head home. She don’t care about what happened to Julie she’s just there to make a paycheck
If anyone kills me...I want this prosecutor!
Him or Juan Martinez.
Same
Juan can’t practice law anymore disbarred dientonjodia case
@@workingonmyroar7944 yep. I know.
I have yet to see the defense call a witness or cross a witness and come ahead on a single point. Jambois has them so outclassed! He turns every one of their witnesses into a witness for prosecution.
WOW!Look up Mark jensen verdict and watch what the judge dishes out on him. The son David was there too.
Are you talking about the first trial?
@@ritayammouni2803 yes
@@joemagri2018 I watched the first trial but can’t remember it all. Do you remember what day it was?
@@ritayammouni2803 look up "judge delivers mark jensen sentence 2008" ! It goes for 4.08 sec.
@@joemagri2018 Thank you
Dr. Thomas looks familiar, did she testify already or an I remembering her from another case I watched..
Chauvin trial.
Get rid of the plexiglass, reflections unnecessary.
Let's talk about common sense Dr!!!
A hostile witness she should be called out as that
Hostile to who? She is the defence’s witness and has stated her professional opinion as have the other testifying pathologists. Just because she is not backing down when being cross-examined by the prosecution does not mean she is hostile. Trying to be fair here even though I hope the POS Mark finally goes away for the rest of his life.
How is she a hostile witness?
@@donnkeyesquire3088 .....how is she NOT?
@@ohitsclemenTIME I might be mistaken. I thought the OP was talking about his sister being a hostile witness. Who was the OP talking about?
@@donnkeyesquire3088 I also imagine it was the sister. Because the sister was hostile.
The only one speaking about drug interactions was the sketchmaster. She is getting that from him.
Wow, Julie also raised his sister’s child for years?! Without pay? And the sister seems completely ungrateful.
This prosecuter is phenomenal! He is asking all the right questions and winning each one of them. Its SOOOO obvious the female doctor doesn't want to answer his questions 'honesty' because she is 'working' for the defense and is being paid over 20k to do so.
Why are there chain in front of Wi. State emblem?
Holding up a light fixture.
When people start a sentence with “So …” I tend to switch off.
And even now with all the evidence the sister isn't convinced mark killed her
If they bring in one more forensic pathologist to testify I’m going to barf up some stomach contents for them!
Will you be selling tickets? 🤮
Then don’t watch?
@@anomoly6414 Such a pedestrian comment!
i honestly think the cross examination of the defense experts is better than the evidence the State put before the court (not saying the evidence is bad), but Jambois put on a clinic
His sister is a hostile witness.
Definitely. I don’t think she even wanted to help the defence. She was very lukewarm towards jensen. I noticed he kept looking over her when they stood for the jury leaving/entering and mouthed hi a few times but I’m not sure if she returned his greeting. He did it for the benefit of the jury, trying to make the jury think his sister supports him and believes in his innocence.
The examiner's remarks that she couldn't believe that someone in 1998 couldn't use a computer..
I didn't even own one, never mind know how to turn one on.
She believes what a doctor says that gives the husband sleeping tables for one of his patients without even seeing them face to face.
I'm shocked that the doctor hasn't been struck off.
They need to stop getting these retired examiners as experts.she was so biased.
Julie couldn't get out of bed There was only Julie and Jensen in the house but she stated i don't know who went on the computer.
Oh my giddy Aunt give me strength, I was screaming it could only have been JENSEN..
I think she only works as a consultant for trials and seminars these days. Thank goodness.
She says that Julie was her best friend, but can recall any of Julie’s special moments …
Marks sister is proof you can lie under oath and nothing happens.
She committed perjury in the trial of her father for burglary in the late 1980s. She provided him with an alibi that was disproved and he was found guilty at a jury trial. So, half the jensen family are convicted criminals and the other 2 have either promised to do anything to help their family member or have perjured them self. Poor Julie married into a nest of vipers. The son killed her then the rest of his family murdered her reputation.
Dr. Lindsey Thomas, forensic pathologist- everything she says is contradictory to anything i've heard from other forensic pathologists. and apparently has never heard of a pill crusher. she did nothing to raise a doubt
What DID this 'expert witness' read???
Another murder case in Wisconsin were the defendant escapes the death penalty because Wisconsin doesn’t have the death penalty
The defense must be paying this witness well!
She looks like the 🦁 lion man from wizard of ozz
Just a question for the forum. I try to keep my mind as open as possible when watching a trial. Although it certainly appears that Mark Jensen is guilty. I would welcome ideas about why Julie would not have left this man who she thought was trying to kill her? What are some theories?
Guilt about the affair - trying to make it up to Mark. Perhaps really believing the ex-boyfriend was sending the pics and emails and feeling bad for Mark.
@@SJC49 could be. That makes sense.
I think Mark Jenson had Julie terrified that she would lose her children.
@@penneywoods5146 that's a good thought also
I believe she was in the dark for years that it was her vile husband making the calls & bringing in the D pics, she wasn’t happy ( hence the brief fling ) but then she seemingly felt guilt over it & tried to make the marriage work for her 2 children. I also believe she definitely was catching on to her husband around the time of her murder- she had suspicions about him having the affair with KL, she was distraught & upset about “ marital problems” at her Dr. appointment 2 days before. If she hadn’t been murdered she may very well have discovered the affair & finally left this grotesque man. Poor woman. So sad for her and her boys.
Sister lies obviously and badly, in my opinion. 🤔
She puts $3000 in his jail money 💴 every year
sibling love is unconditional, nothing wrong with that.
That’s a lot of noodles in a cup! Sorry, can’t feel sorry for Mark.
Wait til they find out in the prison how much money he has on his commissary! 😅
@@JM_-ix7yh when the judge sentencing, but the first trial, he said, this is one of the most despicable cases he’s ever come across he tortured this woman for years and years, and the judge said he wished he got sentenced him to more than just a time in prison, the judge was nearly in tears
@@kellycal124 he has 4000 in his jail account
julie did not stay up to husband and he control her
Did the defense attorney not say "She doesn't want to be filmed" referring to Mark's sister?
Yes but judge ruled she was to be treated like all other witnesses.
Yes, but too bad. She's not special....AND she's a liar.
@@Raccoon_Mama. She was not likeable that's for sure...
@@dre0969 100%.
@@SJC49 But the guy she had an affair with didn’t want to be filmed and he wasn’t 🤷♀️
Am I the only one watching who is getting very angry at the defense team, as well as some of the witnesses? Maybe I have some anger issues lol. But watching these people trying so hard to get this murderer out of jail makes me sick to my stomach. The doctors who have refused to admit there is more to this than their medical knowledge years later should be ashamed at the fact that as hard as the guy tried, the prosecutor couldn't get it through their heads that there is more evidence than just the examinations and tests they do after the death. Arrogant idiots. Do they honestly believe this guy is not guilty? His sister trying to free him is not surprising, but I think she is lying. I think she knows he did it. I hope to GOD that there are no idiots on this jury.
Was that the same Pathologist that was in the Waukeshaw/Darrell Brooks trial?
Finally figured it out! She testified for the George Floyd case.
@@jenlaz61 Thank you, that was driving me nuts lol.
I’m going to miss this judge’s ‘nuttin but the truth’
I really love this judge
😊