I was just about to say that. What was just said is A LOT of hypotheses and very little actual evidence. And its such a coincidence that this "new evidence" comes to light as The Dyatlov Pass Incident is getting its second wind of attention. Case NOT SOLVED. Not by a long shot.
Exactly! They 'sort of explained' some things, but how long had the radiation survived on their clothing? Had they not washed their clothes? Had it not been checked during the nuclear accident cleanup? There's no way this can be called 'solved', but, alas, despite the title of the channel, there is often very little real information in their videos.
In light of all the speculation surrounding what happened at Dyatlov Pass, the only survivor, Yuri Yudin, was often asked what he thought happened to his companions. He maintained until his death in 2013 that the Soviet military had to be involved in the deaths. Yudin believed his friends stumbled across a military exercise and that the Soviet government bore responsibility for the loss of his companions. He said that all his companions were expert hikers and skiers and were well equipped to handle natural phenomena like avalanches or snowstorms. Yudin noted that after searchers found the campsite, the military was more concerned with what the skiers were doing in the area, not what had happened to them. After searchers found the hikers, Yudin was asked to identify the items collected at the campsite. Yudin said some items did not belong to his fellow hikers, including glasses, a pair of skis, fragments of a ski, and a piece of cloth he identified as part of a soldier's coat. In a journal that Yudin kept all his research of the event in, which came to light after his death, Yudin referred to "soldiers' tape" and wrote he was confident it was among the items he was asked to identify. Yudin claims in his journal that he tried to bring this to the colonel's attention who was with him at the time, but he ignored it. Yudin speculated that before the official search found the hikers' campsite, the military had already been there and pointed to these items as proof. Yudin also posed the rhetorical question: if something as mundane as an avalanche caused the death of his friends, why did the government close the case so quickly and mark it as classified? Yudin also noted in his journal that there was one factor at the site of his friends' deaths that none of the "normal" suggestions could explain: the mild radioactivity of the clothes and bodies of the deceased hikers.
@@damonhe585 Like how “special”? The kind that don’t leave any tracks? In case you weren’t being sarcastic, “Special” can cover some things, but it can’t cover the fact that there weren’t leaving tracks around.
A restaurant chain has popped up in Oklahoma because of that question. It’s named “I Don’t Care Bar and Grill” locations in Catoosa and Muskogee. And from a Google search, it looks like some other restaurants have also used the same name.
Is it possible they moved quickly but carefully in order to not insight a larger and more inescapable avalanche? I know there wasnt one but I'm speaking from their perspective according to the theory
@@-Umbrella. there were pictures of the footprints and the indentations in the snow mentioned and calm and orderly fashion in no rush. It wasn’t fast and if there was an avalanche it would have covered the tracks
The tent was found with the poles still in the ground. How could some snow that was not strong enough to take a tent out of the ground be strong enough to scare them that much?
@@reesespieces5850 I still think that tribe knows more than they're telling. Impossible that they claim they know everything that goes on in the mountains but have no knowledge of this?? I call BS.
The snow on the tent doesn't look right,either. I was raised near Lake Michigan and familiar with every form snow can take. High winds do not produce chunks clumps like those on the tent in the photo. It looks like some had taken clumps of snow and thrown them on the tent. Why?
@@reesespieces5850 And had reported seeing strange lights regularly, including that might. It seems something was being tested out there. The camera had been put on a stand near the tent, the last two pictures it took are curious.
Exactly and the fact that a WW2 veteran believed to be KGB was added to the trip on the last minute raise more red flags...it's easy to determine that the Government knew there was something out there and this is why they wanted to have a presence in the trip...the radiation thing is even more suspicious made you think that this attack was carried by a Soviet Experiment gone wrong or they were murdered by the KGB and made this whole BS story to cover it up...
What about the food laid out perfectly? You would think snow strong enough to crush a skull would have definitely moved it some. Even if this is the most logical explanation, there are some big gaps and this is still such a weird tragedy.
@@Moosemoose1 it specifically said it wasn't an avalanche and that the party mistook what happened as such. In reality a bunch of snow built up on the side of their tent collapsed on top of half it. Based on the description here
It's such a crazy story. The first time I heard about this I was a lot younger and it freaked me out. I imagined all manner of horrors happening to these poor people. It really does sound like the plot to a horror film, these hikers go to a place literally called "Dead Mountain" and they never return, and for decades, no one knows what happened to them. Even now like the narrator states; We don't REALLY know what happened to these hikers. This is just the most realistic possibility based on the data we have, and of course, new technology and methods not available in the '50s when this occurred.
One of the better explanations. But if I’m not wrong, one of the women was missing her tongue and due to blood found in her stomach, it’s believed that she lost her tongue while she was still alive. This doesn’t line up with it being scavengers that gave her her wounds.
@@LandryRobbinsI've heard that inhaling smoke can make you cough blood and they used some homemade furnace I think. About the tounge: Who was it and how much of the tounge
Outside of a yeti or Russian radiation monster, major dissension within the group itself is the only thing that can explain these circumstances. It’s just that no one really won so we are left guessing what happened
Was it, A: A slab avalanche that accounts for around 90% of avalanche fatalities. B: Aliens, that visited from at least a 100 light years away only to go all GTA on a small group and then go back.
@The13thRonin the worst example of something going wrong is conspiracy theories based on wrong facts by random people on the internet. Half of this comment section keeps trying to present questions which have already been answered, like the radiation ans rhe missing eyes/tongues
And also a bit of "I dont what else it could've but this seems like it could make sense." If you have all the details this theory doesn't quite seem to solve it. For more detail on the actual story I'd recommend finding the video MrBallen did on the subject.
Everything is a theory and we'll probably never know what happened. But just know that an avalanche doesn't cause radiation burns. I suggest looking into the actual KGB files on the incident. Several people have translated them and this video missed alot of details about the bodies injuries
The simplest and most plausible explanation of what actually happened out there. The one thing can I have the hardest time imagining myself dealing with if I were them, would have been the extremely cold torturous conditions while trying to survive up until death.
Not to mention how Hypothermia can have several effects such as confusion, disorientation, and aggression. Thus explaining their weird and frantic behavior.
It’s no more plausible than the other theories, it’s just that people like to put themselves at ease with an oversimplification when they can’t make sense of evidence. All we know for sure is that it was a “compelling external force” that led to their deaths
the Russians made a docco in the 90s pretty much saying this is what happened, so this isn't anything new, though its doesn't explain why they camped on the snow, its was agreed by all no camper would leave the trees to camp in the open,apparently, all those in the know said nobody with a days experience at camping would set the tent away from the woods protection that's why this docco didn't fly back then
@@therandomkingofanything4654 this is exactly what im saying what was in the woods,I too don't camp but Bob Gymlan has a video on this and he explains in detail why nobody would ever camp out in the snow when the woods are just there, its like rule #1 of snow camping
@@pollyg562 I’d imagine the most reasonable situation was they came across something like a bear in the woods, which may have been the dark figure one of them got a picture of, “the yeti”, and figured it wouldn’t go out of its way to attack them if they stayed away from its land and trees.
Umm if there's strong winds being under the woods isn't safe bud. They were probably hoping to avoid having a tree come down on then in the night. Campers have died in the PNW here at night from trees falling in wind storms
You didn’t mention the fact that a dude used Disney’s snow physics from frozen to figure out that an avalanche is in fact possible there. The Russian government blamed an avalanche but none had ever happened there before, yet the cgi snow shows that it would be possible
@@p38lightning97 to get out of a tent covered in snow, or if the tent caught fire then an avalanche happened. I duno, plenty of reasons if you use your brain
@@paddington1670 it was other group of white people who attacked them. Thinking that the people in the text were black so they can enslave them but when they found out they were white, they were useless to them and so they killed them.
R.I.P to the hikers,may they rest in peace, hopefully this case gets solved so the families have answers,and like my wife says this case left many people Baffled,such an Odd and mysterious case..may they all rest in paradise after this tragedy
I don’t think it will get solved I think they were testing some sort of explosive on a random isolated part of wilderness and didn’t expect anyone in there right mind to be out there. But there just happen to be world class hikers camping there. Most likely got covered up and will remain that way. I don’t buy this explanation they would’ve known that their snow base was the problem it would’ve been their first thought and the snow would’ve crushed the tent.. but there was food left out, and it was still standing.
You take off your boots and fold your gear before you sleep. Avalanche happens AFTER you've gone to sleep. You cut your way out of the tent, and escape the area, unable to retrieve your still-neat boots and gear, now buried under buttloads of snow. When the snow eventually thaws, the gear and boots are still neat, folded, where you last put them. (Not saying this DID happen, but it's a plausible scenario. The only loose end I see is the radiation measurements)
Actually the issue with that theory of an avalanche is that they could only believe that one could actually happen but they descended the mountain in a calm orderly fashion which doesn’t make sense. The only explanation would be a threat inside the tent otherwise they wouldn’t have to cut it but it couldn’t be something outside because there would be no reason to cut it and if it was because of an avalanche they would of rushed down the hill in a panic
@@bluebandit5586 stop the lies.that was not said and how can you use a lighter in the wind to light small branches.youve never been in the woods and done that I know.
Let me point out a few things: 1. The guy attached was, as you say, an agent sent to spy on the group. During the cold war era this was a common practice in the SSSR and the eastern block. University students were distrusted and many people wanted to defect to the west. Also, if you had 2 people involved in nuclear power generation, they would be watched carefully. 2. If you take a look at the wikipedia page about the incident, you will see a picture of the tent. It would be quite impossible to mistake the amount of snow on it to be mistaken as an avalanche. 3. Wiki.: 'There were no animal tracks and the group would not have abandoned the relative security of the tent' - and so the missing parts of the bodies were usually attributed to decay caused by running water. If you ever tried walking on snow barefoot, you wouldn't assume that you can run so far in it just because you're scared. Someone would have turned back. Also, why cut the tent? They all made it out, but one person starts wasting time like that? 4. The last 4 bodies where seriously mauled, 15 feet of snow won't crush a human skull.
Yes and why all the secrecy around the case. I believe the lights in th sky bad something to do with it. If there was something outside wouldn't you want to be inside the tent
Wasn’t tre a piece of paper found with the words snowmen exist? Running into the snow undressed meant certain death they would of known this. Why even bother trying to dress if they were ready to get squashed at a moment’s notice Also why camp away from the safety of the nearby trees under a mountain that wasn’t that steep in the open? Also the place is called the mountain of the dead because other people were also found killed 🤷🏻♂️ Not convinced by this quick explanation at all Even the guys who found the scene said other tracks were present and not disclosed.
It’s amazing how helpful the animation is. I’ve seen many videos about this incident, and I’ve always had trouble imagining it- the way the bodies were found, how they looked, the different scenarios to what might’ve happened. The animation helped so much. Best video on the topic I’ve ever seen! This theory is very believable to me. And logical.
There are spots in the Dyatlov Pass region the locals have avoided venturing into for thousands of years, because they were similar incidents in the past..
@@J3RD Google it. There is a very clear picture that was the last one taken, of a huge bipedal creature looking directly at them from just inside the tree line….very unnerving!
I have studied every piece of evidence on this case and this is the mostly likely explanation I have ever heard and the only one that answers all of the questions.
@@bronzewaffle2310 anyway to everyone, my fault for mishearing that. But in the video it said that the tent supposedly moved from its spot…doesn’t that mean the gear should’ve moved as well? also it has been said that they ran out of the tent because of fear and seemed to have been chased. and the people that were supposedly injured by that collapsed snow wouldn’t have been running from the tent. If it was just collapsed snow why would everyone run away as far as they could get? Like the snow just fell on the tent. they would get out and see that and carry on, but the clues say they ran away from something. idk i don’t think it’s solved or will ever be solved.
When the snow landed on the tent it didn’t completely crush it because tents have things to hold themselves ( like metal poles you put up ) up even in storms hence why it wasn’t crushed and then you also have to about the stuff they had in their tent could also keep it atleast a little bit up and from the way it was explained it wasn’t propped up but barely standing up and you also have to consider some snow would fall off the tent and go on its sides making it more stable so this is the most likely theory
@@jackbower8671 maybe that yeti figure like? In the full video (discussing the real goresome images also can be found online) by Nick Crowley , he covered all the scenarios
Why would you say that you were perfectly fine leaving it to be a yeti or aliens but now people have a solid theory of unfortunate events and you won’t believe it?
I don't know. Some details left out. Very logical though. I just don't think this is it. A rudamentery explanation with a cute cartoon doesn't really give a realistic frame if reference. They leave out that their faces were twisted and contorted.
For everyone complaining about a false-solve click bait, Infographics did not claim it was solved. The title of this segment is a question not a statement.
I just clicked on Mr Ballens video he did on this incident and not even 2 seconds later this video gets uploaded and I get a notification, weird timing.
One major problem with this silly theory is that -according to another source- their footprints in the snow are consistent with people WALKING, not running. This crushes the new theory. Also the body parts missing were consistent with being ‘surgically removed.’ So unless the animals wore lab coats & had med school training, this also punches holes in the new theory. Perhaps rename this title?
The fact that there were prints at all is suspicious. Massive blizzard, huge wind gusts and snow drift, and 3 weeks before an attempt was even made. yet they found and followed ski tracks to their tent for a single day withought issue and recovered each body by again following tracks. It doesn't even show much here and if your out in snow your tracks will disappear in 30 minutes.... yeah right. They knew exactly where they were the whole time
If you want to see a really good video on the Dyatlov Pass, look up Lemmino. Don’t like advertising a youtuber on another’s video, but Lemmino is really great at this kind of thing. One of my favourite channels
@@KidCit.y just a note that that video was made before the 2019 discovery, so Lemmino proposes a couple of theories but that video is ultimately inconclusive.
8:30 The avalanche theory is highly unlikely - this kind of avalanche is 100% a real thing and also no rare sight in the Ural mountains, but is only physically possible to form on MUCH STEPER HILLS by far, than the one the tent was built on. Also another mistery - the irradiated clothes were examined for radiation, then washed by cold water and then examined again - and the 2nd rad "value" was only about half as high as the 1st one. Even the 9000 units (rtg I believe but I am not sure) , measured during the 1st test, are almost double the value of natural radiation - and before the tests the clothes were exposed to cold fluid water for 15 DAYS. While the water decreases the irradiation by these exact particles in such a short period of time... PS: I am just pointing out the obvious facts but I am no nuclear physicist, so feel free to correct me if you are better informed than me. Thank you
@The13thRonin There probably was no avalanche - neither real, nor fake. Did you even read the replies? Read anything else except this video? The injuries on their bodies, namely Dyatlov, Doroshenko and Krivonoshchenko indicate blunt force trauma. The kind tied to close combat. Also with serious/life threatening hypothermia, a lot of urine "accumulates inside your bladder, which is not the case. The tent has clearly been moved by someone inexperienced, mbe someone trying to cover up a crime...
@@seth131 I know about these, I am just not sure if they are so very likely to happen in the height and stepeness we've been looking at regarding the Dyatlov pass (I'm not saying you're wrong. If you have some calculations on slab avalanches that will prove me wrong, I'll be very glad to see them). There are also more inconsistencies suggesting that someone might have moved things around, i.e. it's very likely that the tent was actually on the top of the mountain and had been moved by someone afterwrds (KGB mbe?).
@michalvorel9150 slab avalanches can happen around an angle 30º where there tent was found was around 28º not impossible. Could very well be why they exited the tent, assuming after hearing cracking that a full avalanche was coming. You don't want to be pinned under one, that would be certain death. They left the the tent, retreated to the forest, only to find out there was no full blown avalanche. Stuck without the proper clothes and no sure way to find the tent. Certain doom
“Sasquatch” is unique to the Pacific Northwest in North America. If it was an attack by a undiscovered humanoid animal, which isn’t out of the question, it would’ve been a Yeti.
This incident genuinely feels like something out of the Predator franchise. Burns, mangled bodies, something moving through the trees, etc. It’s so bizarre the fashion in which they died, and I still don’t think an avalanche or something similar did it… I still think it was some sort of yeti like creature that liked to move through the trees
The wolves did not mess with the bodies, the missing tongue was seen to be removed while the person was still alive as the autopsy reports showed a lob of blood and mucus inside the body from swallowing blood after the tongue was removed while they were alive.
@@g.williams2047 I believe the CIA has committed way worse atrocities, and has a very dark role to this day. Like...profoundly dark and evil. One of the worst organizations to ever exist on this planet. Idk if you agree with that, but that's how I feel. KGB relative to the CIA still is a youngster
The best theory I have heard which covers all the who, what, and why is that it was the Russian military and either accidentally or purposely dropped a type of compression bomb on them in a training exercise. There are a couple really good videos on RUclips that explains this in detail. It answers most of the questions with logical, scientific, and documented facts of this case. I mean why this decades long cover-up over an avalanche?
I believe the radiation to be from a disaster is Kyshtym some 500 miles south of the pass. The disaster was in 1957 and the pass incident 1959. Its not far fetched that the material matter that had drifters north east could have had some drift north west. We know how long nuclear material can affect surrounding areas for.
Kyshtym incident was HUGE. Effected LARGES amounts of people, and during all the investigations of this event, no one knew it had even happened. First legit explanation for the radiation I ever heard.
If you look at original photo of the tent at the scene, There are are 2 snow skis next to either side of the tent, standing at perfect 90 degree angle from the snow. If their tent moved an inch , due to a snow fall or avalanche, it’s impossible for those skies to still be upright. “Scavenger” don’t explain why a women’s tongue was removed while she was still alive; and the only way the nuclear accident could account for the massive amounts of radiation found at the scene was if the campers were camping in the same clothes they wore the day of the accident, and didn’t wash them at all. The accident occured 2 years before they left for the trail. This version also doesn’t explain why the tops of 3 survivors heads and the top 50cm of surrounding trees were burnt to a crisp.
To the people complaining it isn't solved; this same sort of event happened to a bunch of Swedish Hikers. Ask A Mortician has a video on it, and I would recommend that as further sourcing. This event is about as solved as a historic case like this _can_ be solved with present evidence.
I’m glad you mentioned that odd photograph of the shadowy figure - most people forget about that. Question is - was it just one of the group or the person who ended their lives?
10:30 nice theory except you forgot the part where her eyes and tongue were missing left blood clots indicating these injuries were done while she was alive. A scavenger would have to be pretty desperate. Not to mention her body was found on the outer bank of the creek going in not with the rest of those found in the creek.
I love this explanation. It explains a lot! But, of there was a blizzard that night how did investigators find their footprints??? It doesn't take a heavy snow storm to cover your tracks. If the storm had stopped before the impact on the tent. Then they could've returned. Fog & wind maybe. Moreover, was there evidence that a mass corresponding to their injuries found at the tent?
Okay, give any funded government agency 50 years to come up with a story that wraps things up neatly, and it’s gonna happen... *cough* Now give us something better than a weather balloon for Roswell.....
"The last photo shows flares, but this is typical for a fim camera." I grew up in the age of fim cameras. This has literally never been true about any film camera.
it's in the autopsy reports, but it's not a "chunk of flesh", it's a tiny bit of skin from the back of his hand, the guy probably bit it to wake it up when he was hypothermic.
It's sad, but I do not think they were "well prepared", nor were they experienced to deal with the extreme cold.Not sure how someone could tell if a tent was cut from the inside or outside. But the best guess is that they heard an avalanche and fled the tent, then tried to stay warm and succumbed to the elements...
"this explanation is weak AF, if it was fear of an avalanche , after their fear subsided and they could clearly see that that it was Not an avalanche , right after they cut themselves from to outside the tent, also avalanches are fast, you can not out run them, so their no mistaken one
After their fear subsided, they would be 100s of meters/yards away from their tents. Such a large amount of snow falling over on such a steep hill, which in itself is actually called a slab avalanche, would surely make many be afraid that a larger snow avalanche was coming. A wet snow avalanche actually only moves about 10 to 40 km/h (6.2 - 25 mph) so you could actually outrun them if you had a head start. You would want to get out of there and especially after the panic set in and realising their friends had been crushed to death. so Even if they didn't know about wet snow avalanches and they would still know that unstable snow would likely lead to one very soon. So at least that part of the explanation holds up. No other explanation would explain the cut from inside the tent, the extreme crushing of the bodies and also have every other piece of evidence fit so nicely. What do you think happened, and please try a bit harder to write at least a partially grammatically correct comment, because I had a hard time reading this comment
I believe that theory! Wow that's a great one! I keep coming back to this storyline to see if any updates every 2 years or so. Finally.. I think we're pretty close if not there!👍💯🤝
They (and also at least one other group further away) witnessed testing of weaponry. The problem was the bombs hit them. The avalanche theory was dismissed by researches the moment they visited the place where the tent was. The Dyatlov group had a camera and photographed the planes circling around the mountain, these pictures were developed only when one had the right technology a couple of years ago. When researches were inspecting the place, they needed to ask the military to stop shooting, otherwise they would also be hit. The researches knew the reason why they died, but couldn't officially state it, because it was the Soviet Union and the military wanted to keep the weapons secret. That's why they made sure they did their work good, so all wrong theories could be dismissed and by deduction only the theory of the cover up would remain. The people in de Soviet Union at the time knew it was a cover up.
Just something i thought i would mention when the subject goes on to the radiation theory, that between these events happening there is a 2 year gap between both incidents, i'm no nuclear scientist or anything remotely close, but if he was exposed to radiation to any level wouldn't he have become sick long before the incident of the hike, especially after 2 years ??
.... So if anything to do with snow crushing the tent in any sort of manner exists, then why were the frame posts of the tent still standing? Crushed someone skull to the point of being inhumanely capable yet the posts of the tent still stand?
I can see where this makes sense but for it to take this long to come out with this theory I'm not sure this was all the truth or truth at all. Anyone who honestly work this case could have came to this conclusion but for it to take this long something is being covered up.
But the case was reopened in 2019.... They weren’t investigating it since it happened, and the USSR probably didn’t care much what happened, cause they were all dead, and finding out what happened wasn’t gonna revive them. That’s the mentality most USSR police shared.
@@Kullberg74 Wow, I doubt you’d be able to Pick up on that BUT NOT THE FACT THEY SAID THERE NEVER WAS AN AVAÆANCHE IN THE VIDEO! THEY SAID THE HIKERS T H O U G H T THERE WAS AN AVALANCHE COMING
Welcome Zack D Fans!
@@TheInfographicsShow yoo 1 min agoo hahah yess exactlt he bought me here
frr lol he bought me here
Lol that's the same reason I came to watch this 😂
😂
hahah ya know
Theories are fine, but you do these people a disservice by calling this 'solved'.
Yeah, especially when they clearly denied the explanation so it isn’t officially solved
This is why I came to the comments before watching the video. Thanks
I was just about to say that. What was just said is A LOT of hypotheses and very little actual evidence. And its such a coincidence that this "new evidence" comes to light as The Dyatlov Pass Incident is getting its second wind of attention. Case NOT SOLVED. Not by a long shot.
Exactly! They 'sort of explained' some things, but how long had the radiation survived on their clothing? Had they not washed their clothes? Had it not been checked during the nuclear accident cleanup? There's no way this can be called 'solved', but, alas, despite the title of the channel, there is often very little real information in their videos.
It was probably a clickbait.
One of my favorite unsolved oddities of history.
Mine too
No Comrades. I American believe Russia 🇷🇺 investment on such crime. Very sad, but foul play no.
Yetti Maybelline yes. I'm American, ya
Man of medan is mine, this is a cool one tho
@@jimboindamix6232 you mean ourang medan? the ghost ship
@@minatozach4698 yeah, loved the story as a kid
It wasn't solved! Its a theory. The fact is they still don't know
Thx saved me 11min.
Alright then we will never know because it happened decades ago I’ll be taking this piece of mind thanks, besides it’s better than aliens
Well no shot. The only people who know for sure died
A GAME THEORYYYY, THANKS FOR WATCHING
You mean Hypothesis. As it can not be tested or confirmed, it can never be a Theory
7:33 for those who don't need a recap of the entire incident.
Much appreciated
Thanks
Thank you
Thank you 🙏🏽
Thanks
In light of all the speculation surrounding what happened at Dyatlov Pass, the only survivor, Yuri Yudin, was often asked what he thought happened to his companions. He maintained until his death in 2013 that the Soviet military had to be involved in the deaths. Yudin believed his friends stumbled across a military exercise and that the Soviet government bore responsibility for the loss of his companions. He said that all his companions were expert hikers and skiers and were well equipped to handle natural phenomena like avalanches or snowstorms.
Yudin noted that after searchers found the campsite, the military was more concerned with what the skiers were doing in the area, not what had happened to them.
After searchers found the hikers, Yudin was asked to identify the items collected at the campsite. Yudin said some items did not belong to his fellow hikers, including glasses, a pair of skis, fragments of a ski, and a piece of cloth he identified as part of a soldier's coat. In a journal that Yudin kept all his research of the event in, which came to light after his death, Yudin referred to "soldiers' tape" and wrote he was confident it was among the items he was asked to identify. Yudin claims in his journal that he tried to bring this to the colonel's attention who was with him at the time, but he ignored it. Yudin speculated that before the official search found the hikers' campsite, the military had already been there and pointed to these items as proof.
Yudin also posed the rhetorical question: if something as mundane as an avalanche caused the death of his friends, why did the government close the case so quickly and mark it as classified?
Yudin also noted in his journal that there was one factor at the site of his friends' deaths that none of the "normal" suggestions could explain: the mild radioactivity of the clothes and bodies of the deceased hikers.
So why is there no foot prints of any third-party then
Wow! Thanks!
@@respectttt12345 Soviet agency who tried to clean it up could’ve been wearing special boots
@@damonhe585 Like how “special”? The kind that don’t leave any tracks? In case you weren’t being sarcastic, “Special” can cover some things, but it can’t cover the fact that there weren’t leaving tracks around.
@@voraciousreader3341 I mean they have nukes and stuff so I won’t be surprised if they have some way to cover this up
This is as solved as trying to ask my wife what she wants for dinner....
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Where'd you wanna eat?
How did you manage to turn this into a wife slam?
"I don't care, anything really" ..... 2hrs later and suggested every place to eat in the entire universe.
A restaurant chain has popped up in Oklahoma because of that question. It’s named “I Don’t Care Bar and Grill” locations in Catoosa and Muskogee.
And from a Google search, it looks like some other restaurants have also used the same name.
9:00 they didn’t panic and run. Their footsteps were in a calm and orderly fashion with no evidence or running. I’ve done a lot of research myself
Did you see them or something?
@@koiravessi evidence showed they walked
@@koiravessi from reports, they walked would be fair. Trackers can tell from your foot steps how your traveling.
Is it possible they moved quickly but carefully in order to not insight a larger and more inescapable avalanche? I know there wasnt one but I'm speaking from their perspective according to the theory
@@-Umbrella. there were pictures of the footprints and the indentations in the snow mentioned and calm and orderly fashion in no rush. It wasn’t fast and if there was an avalanche it would have covered the tracks
The tent was found with the poles still in the ground.
How could some snow that was not strong enough to take a tent out of the ground be strong enough to scare them that much?
He doesn't he mention the tribe of ppl who reside in these mountains.. although they are friendly they are protective of the mountains...
@@reesespieces5850 I still think that tribe knows more than they're telling. Impossible that they claim they know everything that goes on in the mountains but have no knowledge of this?? I call BS.
The snow on the tent doesn't look right,either. I was raised near Lake Michigan and familiar with every form snow can take. High winds do not produce chunks clumps like those on the tent in the photo. It looks like some had taken clumps of snow and thrown them on the tent. Why?
@@reesespieces5850 And had reported seeing strange lights regularly, including that might. It seems something was being tested out there. The camera had been put on a stand near the tent, the last two pictures it took are curious.
@@tablescissors Aliens don't need to conduct tests; they already have the answers.
Almost scared to death about this looked like a cover up
It actually is a cover up.
It's Soviet, you really can't trust them, let's be real.
Exactly and the fact that a WW2 veteran believed to be KGB was added to the trip on the last minute raise more red flags...it's easy to determine that the Government knew there was something out there and this is why they wanted to have a presence in the trip...the radiation thing is even more suspicious made you think that this attack was carried by a Soviet Experiment gone wrong or they were murdered by the KGB and made this whole BS story to cover it up...
I just saw a really great documentary about this on amazon - "An Unknown Compelling Force" goes into way more detail!!!
true
What about the food laid out perfectly? You would think snow strong enough to crush a skull would have definitely moved it some. Even if this is the most logical explanation, there are some big gaps and this is still such a weird tragedy.
Right? And the clothing and gear being neatly laid out, impossible if there was an avalanche
@@Moosemoose1 there wasn't an avalanche remember? that would have destroyed the tent.
@@williammckay1351 If the avalanche destroyed the tent, why was their gear neatly laid out in front? An avalanche would have strewn it around
@@Moosemoose1 As William Mckay said: There WASN'T an avalanche...
@@Moosemoose1 it specifically said it wasn't an avalanche and that the party mistook what happened as such. In reality a bunch of snow built up on the side of their tent collapsed on top of half it. Based on the description here
It's such a crazy story. The first time I heard about this I was a lot younger and it freaked me out. I imagined all manner of horrors happening to these poor people.
It really does sound like the plot to a horror film, these hikers go to a place literally called "Dead Mountain" and they never return, and for decades, no one knows what happened to them. Even now like the narrator states; We don't REALLY know what happened to these hikers. This is just the most realistic possibility based on the data we have, and of course, new technology and methods not available in the '50s when this occurred.
One of the better explanations. But if I’m not wrong, one of the women was missing her tongue and due to blood found in her stomach, it’s believed that she lost her tongue while she was still alive. This doesn’t line up with it being scavengers that gave her her wounds.
@@LandryRobbins she could’ve bit her own tongue off while suffering from hypothermia
History is exactly that. Most agreed upon explanation due to the most evident.
@@LandryRobbinsI've heard that inhaling smoke can make you cough blood and they used some homemade furnace I think. About the tounge: Who was it and how much of the tounge
Outside of a yeti or Russian radiation monster, major dissension within the group itself is the only thing that can explain these circumstances. It’s just that no one really won so we are left guessing what happened
I'm not saying it was aliens, but it wasn't not aliens.
Same thoughts 🤫
🤯 genius it was right in front of me the whole time I wonder if the investigators check their buttholes see if any problem went down
Strange case tbh
Was it, A: A slab avalanche that accounts for around 90% of avalanche fatalities. B: Aliens, that visited from at least a 100 light years away only to go all GTA on a small group and then go back.
@@bobthegoat7090 💀
Nice theory, definitely not “solved”..
Except a avalanche wouldn't have left the tents standing, gear lined up neatly and food at the ready to be discovered later. 👌
@@CrazyPalidin57 it was a snowpile that feel over
@@CrazyPalidin57 no see my comment
yeah, see my comment
@@CrazyPalidin57 Did you watch the video? They THOUGHT there was an avalanche coming, but they were wrong.
In a nutshell: Everything that could go wrong at one point of the expedition, did go wrong.
Don't forget Doner cannibal accidents
@@afdalridwan3813 here we go I keep moving from scary story to scary story
And then some
Newton’s Law, for sure!
@The13thRonin the worst example of something going wrong is conspiracy theories based on wrong facts by random people on the internet. Half of this comment section keeps trying to present questions which have already been answered, like the radiation ans rhe missing eyes/tongues
This sounds to me like a bit of a perfect storm of nearly everything that can go wrong in a situation.
And also a bit of "I dont what else it could've but this seems like it could make sense." If you have all the details this theory doesn't quite seem to solve it. For more detail on the actual story I'd recommend finding the video MrBallen did on the subject.
A storm caused by a nuke 🙂
Too perfect.
@@GoetzimRegen 💀
they did die after all..
finally solved? doubt it but I'll give it a watch
Everything is a theory and we'll probably never know what happened. But just know that an avalanche doesn't cause radiation burns. I suggest looking into the actual KGB files on the incident. Several people have translated them and this video missed alot of details about the bodies injuries
@@moreplease394
I agree with JWayne here. Lots of stuff is left out that doesnt paint the entire picture of what couodve happened...
@@moreplease394 how do i find the files
@@RCLBWD google or reddit
Click bait title
The simplest and most plausible explanation of what actually happened out there. The one thing can I have the hardest time imagining myself dealing with if I were them, would have been the extremely cold torturous conditions while trying to survive up until death.
Not to mention how Hypothermia can have several effects such as confusion, disorientation, and aggression. Thus explaining their weird and frantic behavior.
It’s no more plausible than the other theories, it’s just that people like to put themselves at ease with an oversimplification when they can’t make sense of evidence. All we know for sure is that it was a “compelling external force” that led to their deaths
the Russians made a docco in the 90s pretty much saying this is what happened, so this isn't anything new, though its doesn't explain why they camped on the snow, its was agreed by all no camper would leave the trees to camp in the open,apparently, all those in the know said nobody with a days experience at camping would set the tent away from the woods protection that's why this docco didn't fly back then
Not much of a camper, especially in snow, but is there ever a reason to fear trees or think they might cause harm in such drastic conditions?
@@therandomkingofanything4654 this is exactly what im saying what was in the woods,I too don't camp but Bob Gymlan has a video on this and he explains in detail why nobody would ever camp out in the snow when the woods are just there, its like rule #1 of snow camping
@@pollyg562 I’d imagine the most reasonable situation was they came across something like a bear in the woods, which may have been the dark figure one of them got a picture of, “the yeti”, and figured it wouldn’t go out of its way to attack them if they stayed away from its land and trees.
Umm if there's strong winds being under the woods isn't safe bud. They were probably hoping to avoid having a tree come down on then in the night. Campers have died in the PNW here at night from trees falling in wind storms
Snow falls ever come to mind?
You didn’t mention the fact that a dude used Disney’s snow physics from frozen to figure out that an avalanche is in fact possible there. The Russian government blamed an avalanche but none had ever happened there before, yet the cgi snow shows that it would be possible
I remember years ago people theorized that it was an avalanche.
From what I understand the indigenous people from that area never ever recorded an avalanche in that particular area What about the orange orbs
Why would they cut open the tent for an avalanche
@@p38lightning97 to get out of a tent covered in snow, or if the tent caught fire then an avalanche happened. I duno, plenty of reasons if you use your brain
@@paddington1670 it was other group of white people who attacked them. Thinking that the people in the text were black so they can enslave them but when they found out they were white, they were useless to them and so they killed them.
R.I.P to the hikers,may they rest in peace, hopefully this case gets solved so the families have answers,and like my wife says this case left many people Baffled,such an Odd and mysterious case..may they all rest in paradise after this tragedy
got what they deserved. literal russians.
I don’t think it will get solved I think they were testing some sort of explosive on a random isolated part of wilderness and didn’t expect anyone in there right mind to be out there. But there just happen to be world class hikers camping there. Most likely got covered up and will remain that way. I don’t buy this explanation they would’ve known that their snow base was the problem it would’ve been their first thought and the snow would’ve crushed the tent.. but there was food left out, and it was still standing.
@@fufhxufje8379 You don’t think "some sort of explosive" would leave substantial evidence?
The most plausible theory I've heard but still it has many holes and leaves some questions still open for interpretation and discussion.
Then how would the boots and equipment mentioned earlier be stacked neatly like previously mentioned
Snow folded it
Because it wasn't an avalanche it was a pile of snow that fell on to the tent. The snow fell onto the tent and not the snow.
You take off your boots and fold your gear before you sleep. Avalanche happens AFTER you've gone to sleep. You cut your way out of the tent, and escape the area, unable to retrieve your still-neat boots and gear, now buried under buttloads of snow. When the snow eventually thaws, the gear and boots are still neat, folded, where you last put them. (Not saying this DID happen, but it's a plausible scenario. The only loose end I see is the radiation measurements)
Actually the issue with that theory of an avalanche is that they could only believe that one could actually happen but they descended the mountain in a calm orderly fashion which doesn’t make sense. The only explanation would be a threat inside the tent otherwise they wouldn’t have to cut it but it couldn’t be something outside because there would be no reason to cut it and if it was because of an avalanche they would of rushed down the hill in a panic
@@theupperroom6567 Snow still fell on the tent, and could have been covering the door opening.
8:47
The foot prints were imprinted into the snow as if calmly walking not running.
Source of this information?
Never go hiking into the deep woods without a 12 gauge.
How were they able to start the fire in a blizzard especially if they fled in terror?
I think one was found with a lighter in his pocket
They didn’t flee in terror. The tracks in the snow showed that they walked away from the tent at a normal walking pace.
@@bluebandit5586 Obviously, planted. They do that, you know?
@@bluebandit5586 stop the lies.that was not said and how can you use a lighter in the wind to light small branches.youve never been in the woods and done that I know.
They were all experienced hikers and explorers so I’m die they had all started tons of fires each
Let me point out a few things: 1. The guy attached was, as you say, an agent sent to spy on the group. During the cold war era this was a common practice in the SSSR and the eastern block. University students were distrusted and many people wanted to defect to the west. Also, if you had 2 people involved in nuclear power generation, they would be watched carefully. 2. If you take a look at the wikipedia page about the incident, you will see a picture of the tent. It would be quite impossible to mistake the amount of snow on it to be mistaken as an avalanche. 3. Wiki.: 'There were no animal tracks and the group would not have abandoned the relative security of the tent' - and so the missing parts of the bodies were usually attributed to decay caused by running water. If you ever tried walking on snow barefoot, you wouldn't assume that you can run so far in it just because you're scared. Someone would have turned back. Also, why cut the tent? They all made it out, but one person starts wasting time like that? 4. The last 4 bodies where seriously mauled, 15 feet of snow won't crush a human skull.
Yes absolutely 💯 so many holes in the story. There was definitely more to the story. This wasn't just a mistaken avalanche theory.
There’s definitely more to this story
Yes and why all the secrecy around the case. I believe the lights in th sky bad something to do with it. If there was something outside wouldn't you want to be inside the tent
Also there's a famous picture depicting something big in the woods. Is that real or made up ?
Wasn’t tre a piece of paper found with the words snowmen exist?
Running into the snow undressed meant certain death they would of known this.
Why even bother trying to dress if they were ready to get squashed at a moment’s notice
Also why camp away from the safety of the nearby trees under a mountain that wasn’t that steep in the open?
Also the place is called the mountain of the dead because other people were also found killed 🤷🏻♂️
Not convinced by this quick explanation at all
Even the guys who found the scene said other tracks were present and not disclosed.
It’s amazing how helpful the animation is. I’ve seen many videos about this incident, and I’ve always had trouble imagining it- the way the bodies were found, how they looked, the different scenarios to what might’ve happened. The animation helped so much. Best video on the topic I’ve ever seen! This theory is very believable to me. And logical.
There are spots in the Dyatlov Pass region the locals have avoided venturing into for thousands of years, because they were similar incidents in the past..
@Гоша Ватюнга we have none.
It's definitely not my yeti cousins
I missed seeing you in my woods
Yetis are probably just Himalayan Bears and I didn't know Yetis existed in Siberia.
The biggest wtfs for me here are the high radiation levels and some of the wounds. They are totally out of place.
They aren't actually especially if they found an orphan source
The KGB at the time is probably like "this time it wasn't us, we swear. It was the ali---"
Or the dreadful CIA!!
@@chrisantusmachuka7507 WEST SPIES
AAAAAAAAAAAAA BLYAAATTT
What about the picture of the hulking figure along the treeline? Can't help but feel like we just glossed over that.
There's actually a picture? Where can I find that
Read my comment
@@timglazner1519 no… wait what…?
@@J3RD Google it. There is a very clear picture that was the last one taken, of a huge bipedal creature looking directly at them from just inside the tree line….very unnerving!
Possible a person apart of the team
I have studied every piece of evidence on this case and this is the mostly likely explanation I have ever heard and the only one that answers all of the questions.
You are wasting your time commenting. Better do something productive.
@@cheerful_crop_circle Bite me.
Yeti.
The boots and gear were neatly stacked but an “avalanche” wasn’t able to mess up the neatly stacked gear? This explanation doesn’t explain very well
There wasn’t an Avalanche
U don't listen is what I learned from this video
There was no avalanche smart guy
If the snowbank collapsed vertically onto the tent, there would’ve been no force to knock over the boots and stuff…
@@bronzewaffle2310 anyway to everyone, my fault for mishearing that. But in the video it said that the tent supposedly moved from its spot…doesn’t that mean the gear should’ve moved as well? also it has been said that they ran out of the tent because of fear and seemed to have been chased. and the people that were supposedly injured by that collapsed snow wouldn’t have been running from the tent. If it was just collapsed snow why would everyone run away as far as they could get? Like the snow just fell on the tent. they would get out and see that and carry on, but the clues say they ran away from something. idk i don’t think it’s solved or will ever be solved.
This case is snow joke and the events that took place that night remain tent-ative.
Lol
Get out right now
😆
Very very pun-ie
@@archaichermit3566 🤦🤦🤦
The infrasound theory is not only interesting but actually very plausible. Whatever happened to them hikers though must have been so terrifying.
Tbh I don't believe this because the tent was still propped up and not crushed 🙃
When the snow landed on the tent it didn’t completely crush it because tents have things to hold themselves ( like metal poles you put up ) up even in storms hence why it wasn’t crushed and then you also have to about the stuff they had in their tent could also keep it atleast a little bit up and from the way it was explained it wasn’t propped up but barely standing up and you also have to consider some snow would fall off the tent and go on its sides making it more stable so this is the most likely theory
It wasn’t a avalanche
@@undeadhero2828 then why cut your way out and run?
@@jackbower8671 maybe that yeti figure like?
In the full video (discussing the real goresome images also can be found online) by Nick Crowley , he covered all the scenarios
@@justaguywholikeshentai9019 Almas definitely fit or even a bear (quite large in Russia) seem more likely.
This ran pretty close to my theory on what happened
Should've just asked you in the first place! ✌️😉
@@5amH45lam that's what I told them! But they were all like "who are you, why are you in my house?
@@justoneman1681 lol “why are you in my closet” is always my favorite one
@@arizonaranger2333 right!? Like, ask the real questions! We're solving Dyatlov pass, bro
That actually makes a the most sense by a lot. Thank you.
This title isn't merely clickbait, IT'S A LIE. THIS ISN'T SOLVED.
It has been
Finally caught one early! Great stuff
I don't know if this counts as solved but I'll say this is one of the best most plausible answers I have heard
I'm calling BS on that explanation it sounds like a Scooby Doo plot
And they would have gotten away with it if it weren't for these meddling kids and their pesky RUclips channel.
Why would you say that you were perfectly fine leaving it to be a yeti or aliens but now people have a solid theory of unfortunate events and you won’t believe it?
Ah, yes, because the KGB targeting random teens, or aliens murdering all of them, that sounds completely realistic.
@@undeadhero2828 because these conspiracy theorists are using too much drugs. Their brains cant handle reality
@@scoper7897 Lol, facts. Apparently aliens coming to attack doesn't seem like it comes from a cartoon, but a very plausible theory does.
The way you said this story in detail is actually pretty plausible I was just huge conspiracy theorist on this one before hearing your explanation
I don't know. Some details left out. Very logical though. I just don't think this is it. A rudamentery explanation with a cute cartoon doesn't really give a realistic frame if reference. They leave out that their faces were twisted and contorted.
by far the most plausible theory i have heard
For everyone complaining about a false-solve click bait, Infographics did not claim it was solved. The title of this segment is a question not a statement.
No they said it was solved in the vid
I just clicked on Mr Ballens video he did on this incident and not even 2 seconds later this video gets uploaded and I get a notification, weird timing.
Ah yes a fellow Ballen Fan
Life is weird like that
He's awesome
And I thought I'm the only one
One major problem with this silly theory is that -according to another source- their footprints in the snow are consistent with people WALKING, not running. This crushes the new theory. Also the body parts missing were consistent with being ‘surgically removed.’ So unless the animals wore lab coats & had med school training, this also punches holes in the new theory. Perhaps rename this title?
Zombies.
The fact that there were prints at all is suspicious. Massive blizzard, huge wind gusts and snow drift, and 3 weeks before an attempt was even made. yet they found and followed ski tracks to their tent for a single day withought issue and recovered each body by again following tracks. It doesn't even show much here and if your out in snow your tracks will disappear in 30 minutes.... yeah right. They knew exactly where they were the whole time
I didn’t even know this existed. But I’m Glad it’s solved.
If you want to see a really good video on the Dyatlov Pass, look up Lemmino. Don’t like advertising a youtuber on another’s video, but Lemmino is really great at this kind of thing. One of my favourite channels
@@hamdoggyy7844 Oh Okay Thanks
@@KidCit.y just a note that that video was made before the 2019 discovery, so Lemmino proposes a couple of theories but that video is ultimately inconclusive.
@@hamdoggyy7844 he is the best.
@@hamdoggyy7844 ive seen the nick Crowley vid
I'm happy with this explanation given, sometimes it takes a number of years to see what nobody else can see.
8:30 The avalanche theory is highly unlikely - this kind of avalanche is 100% a real thing and also no rare sight in the Ural mountains, but is only physically possible to form on MUCH STEPER HILLS by far, than the one the tent was built on.
Also another mistery - the irradiated clothes were examined for radiation, then washed by cold water and then examined again - and the 2nd rad "value" was only about half as high as the 1st one. Even the 9000 units (rtg I believe but I am not sure) , measured during the 1st test, are almost double the value of natural radiation - and before the tests the clothes were exposed to cold fluid water for 15 DAYS. While the water decreases the irradiation by these exact particles in such a short period of time...
PS: I am just pointing out the obvious facts but I am no nuclear physicist, so feel free to correct me if you are better informed than me.
Thank you
@@ezeztztztz I think they got ambushed - even the wounds indicate combat...
@The13thRonin There probably was no avalanche - neither real, nor fake. Did you even read the replies? Read anything else except this video? The injuries on their bodies, namely Dyatlov, Doroshenko and Krivonoshchenko indicate blunt force trauma. The kind tied to close combat. Also with serious/life threatening hypothermia, a lot of urine "accumulates inside your bladder, which is not the case. The tent has clearly been moved by someone inexperienced, mbe someone trying to cover up a crime...
Slab avalanches. look it up. very possible
@@seth131 I know about these, I am just not sure if they are so very likely to happen in the height and stepeness we've been looking at regarding the Dyatlov pass (I'm not saying you're wrong. If you have some calculations on slab avalanches that will prove me wrong, I'll be very glad to see them). There are also more inconsistencies suggesting that someone might have moved things around, i.e. it's very likely that the tent was actually on the top of the mountain and had been moved by someone afterwrds (KGB mbe?).
@michalvorel9150 slab avalanches can happen around an angle 30º where there tent was found was around 28º not impossible. Could very well be why they exited the tent, assuming after hearing cracking that a full avalanche was coming. You don't want to be pinned under one, that would be certain death. They left the the tent, retreated to the forest, only to find out there was no full blown avalanche. Stuck without the proper clothes and no sure way to find the tent. Certain doom
The likes is currently at 666 so I click it to make it 667. Now the demon can't get you, you're welcome.
A true honest to goodness hero!
but you will be chased by him for trashing his brilliant plan.
You've made someone angry.... Very, very angry.......
Sasquatch beat the tar out of them...an unknown compelling force.
I wanted to believe that one, though, they were able to find the tracks of the hikers and no tracks of a squatch.
Nice solve! Case closed
. . . they found Bigfoot and all He could say was " I dont know why You call me Big Foot , Among Us Yeti a Foot isn't considered Big , Trust Me " .
No, that doesn't sound realistic, I believe that radioactive communist Superman got drunk on vodka and mistake them for capitalist pigs.
“Sasquatch” is unique to the Pacific Northwest in North America. If it was an attack by a undiscovered humanoid animal, which isn’t out of the question, it would’ve been a Yeti.
This incident genuinely feels like something out of the Predator franchise. Burns, mangled bodies, something moving through the trees, etc. It’s so bizarre the fashion in which they died, and I still don’t think an avalanche or something similar did it… I still think it was some sort of yeti like creature that liked to move through the trees
Hard to believe all these experts reacted like this.
And KGB superweapons used on them all or aliens killing all of them is easier to believe?
The picture of something VERY LARGE, and BIPEDAL is VERY CLEAR! The tribe that they encountered along the way begged them not to go up there.
Can you link some source to the pictures.
@@cptromero5595 go on google and simply type in, dyatlov pass yeti photo. It's not hard to find
But that was taken during the day...
It’s fake
Ofc the tribe would warn them, its a dangerous place even without yetis or aliens around
The wolves did not mess with the bodies, the missing tongue was seen to be removed while the person was still alive as the autopsy reports showed a lob of blood and mucus inside the body from swallowing blood after the tongue was removed while they were alive.
Obviously it was Aliens or the abominable snowman!
*Minecraft Iceologers have entered the chat*
Ehhh yeah I think it was the abominable snowman…
@@emilm3056 the abominable snow man is an alien
Abominable snowaliens!
@@benpeters5851 mhm just like me :3
Likely a coverup. Still think that they either saw something they weren't supposed to see or the KGB wanted them to go bye bye.
KGB is like a less terrifying CIA
@@dunzhen KGB is like the CIA if the CIA acted less covertly. Honestly I hate the CIA way more than the KGB.
@@g.williams2047 I believe the CIA has committed way worse atrocities, and has a very dark role to this day. Like...profoundly dark and evil. One of the worst organizations to ever exist on this planet. Idk if you agree with that, but that's how I feel. KGB relative to the CIA still is a youngster
@@dunzhen CIA is definitely more evil.
They didn't mention a note left behind by one of the hikers "now we know the snowman exists"
It wasn't a note, it was diary and the snow man story was a running gag amongst the group.
I remember that, too, along with the picture they took of the yeti.
@@steph6453that “yeti” was clearly a human. its one of the hikers
The best theory I have heard which covers all the who, what, and why is that it was the Russian military and either accidentally or purposely dropped a type of compression bomb on them in a training exercise. There are a couple really good videos on RUclips that explains this in detail. It answers most of the questions with logical, scientific, and documented facts of this case. I mean why this decades long cover-up over an avalanche?
The injuries and equipment locations are so vast and different dosent seem like an accident
You're forgetting about the perfectly laid out food and supplies. The falling ice would've crushed that.
I believe the radiation to be from a disaster is Kyshtym some 500 miles south of the pass. The disaster was in 1957 and the pass incident 1959. Its not far fetched that the material matter that had drifters north east could have had some drift north west. We know how long nuclear material can affect surrounding areas for.
Kyshtym incident was HUGE. Effected LARGES amounts of people, and during all the investigations of this event, no one knew it had even happened. First legit explanation for the radiation I ever heard.
This case was "solved" as it happened but we'll never know the "who, how and why"
So it’s not solved *facepalm*
@@salumtummundi9462 exactly
@@salumtummundi9462 Kinda slow for a "Jenis"."SLAP TO THE FACE".
Maybe the yeti ...
Thank you for your work!
it's a theory. and one that doesn't account for all the details
Nah it was solved already
It's seems they have. What didn't they account for.
What details?
Seems like the video accounts for everything pretty well. What did they miss?
What details, it is solved they mistake the snow file falling as avalanche, it was accident my misjudgement.
If you look at original photo of the tent at the scene, There are are 2 snow skis next to either side of the tent, standing at perfect 90 degree angle from the snow. If their tent moved an inch , due to a snow fall or avalanche, it’s impossible for those skies to still be upright. “Scavenger” don’t explain why a women’s tongue was removed while she was still alive; and the only way the nuclear accident could account for the massive amounts of radiation found at the scene was if the campers were camping in the same clothes they wore the day of the accident, and didn’t wash them at all. The accident occured 2 years before they left for the trail. This version also doesn’t explain why the tops of 3 survivors heads and the top 50cm of surrounding trees were burnt to a crisp.
I think the burns and radiation are from the ships of moon Nazis
Whether or not the case has been "solved", it's a neat explanation which comes closer to accounting for all the evidence than any other I've heard.
Then why was the tent not flattened by snow... ?
It was due to this unfortunate event that Murphy finally decided to pass a law.
Fascinating theory 😮
To the people complaining it isn't solved; this same sort of event happened to a bunch of Swedish Hikers. Ask A Mortician has a video on it, and I would recommend that as further sourcing. This event is about as solved as a historic case like this _can_ be solved with present evidence.
So far this is the greatest theory I've ever came across. Thank You
I’m glad you mentioned that odd photograph of the shadowy figure - most people forget about that. Question is - was it just one of the group or the person who ended their lives?
the person was part of the group, they were not really killed by any human in particular.
“Solved” BS its a theory. That’s like people that call their opinion, “fact” ..
Change that title bruh.....
Fam it’s clickbait what else do u think
It literally says “Is” it solved not that it is solved
@@adamlee9474 they added it
Not gonna lie, that's actually a pretty solid explanation.
10:30 nice theory except you forgot the part where her eyes and tongue were missing left blood clots indicating these injuries were done while she was alive. A scavenger would have to be pretty desperate. Not to mention her body was found on the outer bank of the creek going in not with the rest of those found in the creek.
To me, Infographics's videos aren't videos, they're an addiction.
What is ur profile picture?
True or not, may they rest in peace....
And may their families move on too....
If you don't have anything to contribute, then let's farm these deaths for upvotes. Makes me sick tbh, Luigi.
I love this explanation. It explains a lot!
But, of there was a blizzard that night how did investigators find their footprints??? It doesn't take a heavy snow storm to cover your tracks.
If the storm had stopped before the impact on the tent. Then they could've returned. Fog & wind maybe.
Moreover, was there evidence that a mass corresponding to their injuries found at the tent?
Okay, give any funded government agency 50 years to come up with a story that wraps things up neatly, and it’s gonna happen...
*cough*
Now give us something better than a weather balloon for Roswell.....
To save others some time at 11:10, "Ultimately, the only people who know the truth tragically died in the prime of their lives,'
This sounds like something the government would say if they wanted to hide something lol
yeah i personally think the government did something and is tryna cover it up
"The last photo shows flares, but this is typical for a fim camera." I grew up in the age of fim cameras. This has literally never been true about any film camera.
is it possible the flares were caused by radiation exposure to the film?
Or it's just a photo taken on accident that could've been of literally anything.
"Chunk of flesh in their mouth?" How did you know that? I've never heard this being mentioned in any documentaries or online articles before.
Agree.
Was it amongst the autopsy reports? The original reports were put online a long time ago.
it's in the autopsy reports, but it's not a "chunk of flesh", it's a tiny bit of skin from the back of his hand, the guy probably bit it to wake it up when he was hypothermic.
It's sad, but I do not think they were "well prepared", nor were they experienced to deal with the extreme cold.Not sure how someone could tell if a tent was cut from the inside or outside. But the best guess is that they heard an avalanche and fled the tent, then tried to stay warm and succumbed to the elements...
"this explanation is weak AF, if it was fear of an avalanche , after their fear subsided and they could clearly see that that it was Not an avalanche , right after they cut themselves from to outside the tent, also avalanches are fast, you can not out run them, so their no mistaken one
did you even listen to the video?
@@DanEraser Did you even read his comment?
The avalanche theory makes me roll my eyes
After their fear subsided, they would be 100s of meters/yards away from their tents. Such a large amount of snow falling over on such a steep hill, which in itself is actually called a slab avalanche, would surely make many be afraid that a larger snow avalanche was coming. A wet snow avalanche actually only moves about 10 to 40 km/h (6.2 - 25 mph) so you could actually outrun them if you had a head start. You would want to get out of there and especially after the panic set in and realising their friends had been crushed to death. so Even if they didn't know about wet snow avalanches and they would still know that unstable snow would likely lead to one very soon. So at least that part of the explanation holds up. No other explanation would explain the cut from inside the tent, the extreme crushing of the bodies and also have every other piece of evidence fit so nicely. What do you think happened, and please try a bit harder to write at least a partially grammatically correct comment, because I had a hard time reading this comment
It was an avalanche, simple as that
I believe that theory! Wow that's a great one! I keep coming back to this storyline to see if any updates every 2 years or so. Finally.. I think we're pretty close if not there!👍💯🤝
Thank you Zack !
They (and also at least one other group further away) witnessed testing of weaponry. The problem was the bombs hit them. The avalanche theory was dismissed by researches the moment they visited the place where the tent was. The Dyatlov group had a camera and photographed the planes circling around the mountain, these pictures were developed only when one had the right technology a couple of years ago. When researches were inspecting the place, they needed to ask the military to stop shooting, otherwise they would also be hit. The researches knew the reason why they died, but couldn't officially state it, because it was the Soviet Union and the military wanted to keep the weapons secret. That's why they made sure they did their work good, so all wrong theories could be dismissed and by deduction only the theory of the cover up would remain. The people in de Soviet Union at the time knew it was a cover up.
And your proof of this?
@@kingarthur1367 Do a bit research yourself buddy. Some websites published the pictures and contain documents about the initial inquiry.
@@dragonmartijn so you don't have any trusted sources hacking you up
*"What a once in a lifetime experience!"*
"The last in a lifetime experience".
Just something i thought i would mention when the subject goes on to the radiation theory, that between these events happening there is a 2 year gap between both incidents, i'm no nuclear scientist or anything remotely close, but if he was exposed to radiation to any level wouldn't he have become sick long before the incident of the hike, especially after 2 years ??
.... So if anything to do with snow crushing the tent in any sort of manner exists, then why were the frame posts of the tent still standing? Crushed someone skull to the point of being inhumanely capable yet the posts of the tent still stand?
And this is exactly what the Yeti's want you to believe
I would pay anything to see actually what happened there with my own eyes
Even with your own life?
I can see where this makes sense but for it to take this long to come out with this theory I'm not sure this was all the truth or truth at all. Anyone who honestly work this case could have came to this conclusion but for it to take this long something is being covered up.
But the case was reopened in 2019.... They weren’t investigating it since it happened, and the USSR probably didn’t care much what happened, cause they were all dead, and finding out what happened wasn’t gonna revive them. That’s the mentality most USSR police shared.
@@NaN-noCZ I can agree to this
Moral of the story, don’t go on 16 day winter mountain hikes.
The avalanche theory seems rather mundane, even if it is official. The truth is still out there.
I research this for decades and the indigenous people have never recorded an avalanche in that area period.
@@Kullberg74 Wow, I doubt you’d be able to Pick up on that BUT NOT THE FACT THEY SAID THERE NEVER WAS AN AVAÆANCHE IN THE VIDEO! THEY SAID THE HIKERS T H O U G H T THERE WAS AN AVALANCHE COMING
@@NaN-noCZ and your Illegible point is?
@@Kullberg74 That what you said doesn’t makes this theory less likely.
@@Kullberg74yes
I’m no expert. But I’ve seen avalanches. They’re not the most difficult thing to spot even after months
It was night and they feared an avalanche was c o m i n g.