3 part uh eduthurukalam..... it will be just nice... characters innum justified pannirukalam.... but Ashwin n poinggulazhi deserved more screen space bcoz sendhan amudhan is such a pure character. I respect mani sir and thanks for ponniyin selvan🥰🥰🥰
History fine 👍 I personally feel sorry for him as he's a good actor. Mani sir didn't even give him a major scope that viewers would be remembered just like poonguzhali's character in the film. Book readers have him in their hearts but non readers...😕 for instance, the family tree posted by imdb_in they represented poonguzhali as a part of the tree, she was equally a minor character just like sendhan amudhan according to mani sir's ponniyin selvan "film". Why did they cast him if they had some other plans for the climax? Feeling good to hear him talking maturely and he adapted it in a different perspective, an actor with positive thoughts will go places ❤❤
Ha... Somebody give him money... He spent 40 years getting the budget... And that was enough for just 2 films.... So he did the best out of what he could do
You guys should improve quality of your thoughts and interest. Ps was amazingly made and 100% justice has been done to the novel. Lot of confused parts of the novel was excellently omitted and scripted apt by mani sir. Kudos to the team and actors my God... everybody nailed it and Ash was on top of all. I love the movie so much.
It's mani sir loss to not use you properly, if he took as book written story then the story would have been super , now we were disappointed with climax
Actually, Chetan Amudan character was not completely cut... Ashwin was given lot of screen space.. infact Manimekalai character was not even mentioned... but I understand the reason , because the character is fictional & only readers will enjoy Manimekalai character... as the book ends with Manimekalai lying mad in a pathetic state..
It’s not about cutting the portion, it’s about having the character in the movie and the character travels along with PS as in the novel then why alone the climax was changed? Baseless and meaningless! Feels like Mani Ratnam have importance to the actor than being true to the character.
In real history rahman's character was the king after ponniyan slevan but in book ashwins characters gets crowned to be next king. Mani megalai character was not there because it would lengthen the movie even more .
Web series will not have the same effect of big screen.. It was wonderful to see the multi starrer film on big screen.. PS was wonderfully made & people will definitely enjoy historical movies only in theatres ... with sound effects & visuals..
Kgf movie part 3 vara kondu potanga but inthu evlo perya story itha part 2 layee finish pannittanga Entha movie ya ouru part -3 or 4 vara kondu poirukellam ethoo start pannitom epdiyachu complete pannanum nu panna Mari irruku... So atha book readers ku ellarkum kastama irruku.... Ivanga real story solliruka vendam book la irrukurathaa apdiyye eduthurunthal kuda super ha irrukum... Ivanga ithu illa ithuu tha real story nu onnu solla ps -2 la athuvum mukiyama மணிமகுடம் சீன் la pathuu naraya perku ..yenda entha padathaa eduthha nu ahitu
Common everyone, lets take novel perspective itself. please answer two points. 1) Senthan amuthan is born in chozha family. Madhuranthakan is adopted son. Who will be dear to a mother? Birth or Adopted son? Just to please birth son, will any mother ignore and hurt adopted son? 2) Senthan Amuthan is not having quality to be the king. Not even desired for it. Why want to show nepotism? Madhuranthakan is atleast known to the country and having support from small kings.
1) in the novel madhurantakan is not just any adopted son. HE IS NANDHINI'S TWIN AND VEERA PANDYAN'S SON. Tell me how will a queen act in such a situation? Will she allow a pandiyan king's son to rule her kingdom? That is why the real son sendhan amudhan is crowned.
Hmm showing that sub imaginary plot will have some bad impact to the rest of India on chola Dynasty. Suddenly, a flower boy becomes king for great Chozha land. I truly understand the book reader's disappointment of missing the interesting twist. But in my opinion, that will create misconception of true history happened in reality.
@Snegha K As a book reader, I agree with you about Sembiyan Madhevi's decision as Amarabujanga Nedunchezhiyan is a Pandiyan prince by blood. But were you really satisfied with his end in the book? Personally, I was not. From my perspective, even in that conversation between Kunthavai and Vandiyathevan after the coronation (before Manimegalai's death), Amarabujangan received only a mocking remark and there was only pity for Pazhuvettaraiyar's daughter (his wife). What is his fault? Yes, he wanted the throne, and fell into Nandhini's ploy. But not just because of his greed, I felt he fought for the throne as yearned for respect, recognition and accceptance more than anything, which he clearly didn't get in the novel. At last, it is also revealed that he also knew how to hold and fight with a sword. But he was still tagged as a coward throughout the novel. When he realized the truth about his birth, he still didn't turn all evil. But his end? I thought he didn't deserve anything this bad. I would love to know your perspective on this. Did you like Madhuranthakan Alias Amarabujangan's end and stabbing in the book?
Logic is simple, book il be read only by a few, so anything can be mysterious in it… but visual media has wider scope and powerful, it will be seen by many and for generations… information shud be write when it comes to filming. According to history the climax is correct and thats what the crew wanted to showcase to the generations, instead of giving a fictional climax and confusing future audience… PS book is historical fiction , not real, mani sir adopted tat fiction to show case love of karikalan and nandhini… and dynamics of love revenge and war… but adopted climax from history to give right incident to people… one might say nandhini is also fictional character, yes since he adopted that character this movie is named PS… his area of interest is love bit in that book… if anyone wants to film other gists they can do it with their creativity… I feel he made justice for both novel and history by drawing distinguishing line… brilliant screenplay, writing and thought process, instead of just going with what kalki bluffed… remember kalki had to prolong the story as much as he wanted cos this was coming weekly in vikatan, so he had liberty to say anything he wanted to keep people reading it. When it comes to filmmaking such dragging il make audience get bored… the crew has used their perspective lens to finish this film… book left nandhini character without justification, film has given beautiful finish to it… as a book reader I understand PS Novel lovers agony, but for film saying truth is important to educate the audience rightly about history… lets us respect the making and efforts from the crew, lets support this initiative rather than criticizing so more such films will come in Tamil industry…
3 part uh eduthurukalam..... it will be just nice... characters innum justified pannirukalam.... but Ashwin n poinggulazhi deserved more screen space bcoz sendhan amudhan is such a pure character. I respect mani sir and thanks for ponniyin selvan🥰🥰🥰
Lyca didn't accept it
I really loved Ashwin as Sendhan Amudhan. Impressive presence. Wish him lots of luck for future projects.
History fine 👍
I personally feel sorry for him as he's a good actor. Mani sir didn't even give him a major scope that viewers would be remembered just like poonguzhali's character in the film. Book readers have him in their hearts but non readers...😕 for instance, the family tree posted by imdb_in they represented poonguzhali as a part of the tree, she was equally a minor character just like sendhan amudhan according to mani sir's ponniyin selvan "film". Why did they cast him if they had some other plans for the climax? Feeling good to hear him talking maturely and he adapted it in a different perspective, an actor with positive thoughts will go places ❤❤
It's not an insult for Ashwin...as a book reader I feel disappointed for cheating senthan amudhan
Very true. Felt the same
But When we took real incident.Sendhan amudhan is not there
S crt
@@LP23280Ps movie title bottom le based on kalki's ponniyin selvan thaane poturukku apporom yen maathanum😕😢
@@nurmuhammad1670 🤷♂️
Agree with Ashwin. 2 movie is not enough & web series is better. Disappointed Maniratnam didn't follow LOTR or Hobbits style made in 3 movies
Budget was an issue. A spinoff can still happen
Ha... Somebody give him money... He spent 40 years getting the budget... And that was enough for just 2 films.... So he did the best out of what he could do
You guys should improve quality of your thoughts and interest. Ps was amazingly made and 100% justice has been done to the novel. Lot of confused parts of the novel was excellently omitted and scripted apt by mani sir. Kudos to the team and actors my God... everybody nailed it and Ash was on top of all. I love the movie so much.
It's mani sir loss to not use you properly, if he took as book written story then the story would have been super , now we were disappointed with climax
Actually, Chetan Amudan character was not completely cut... Ashwin was given lot of screen space.. infact Manimekalai character was not even mentioned... but I understand the reason , because the character is fictional & only readers will enjoy Manimekalai character... as the book ends with Manimekalai lying mad in a pathetic state..
It’s not about cutting the portion, it’s about having the character in the movie and the character travels along with PS as in the novel then why alone the climax was changed? Baseless and meaningless! Feels like Mani Ratnam have importance to the actor than being true to the character.
In real history rahman's character was the king after ponniyan slevan but in book ashwins characters gets crowned to be next king. Mani megalai character was not there because it would lengthen the movie even more .
Ivlo selavu pani avasara avasarama two parts la eduthadhuku padhil mani ratnam webseries ah eduthurukalam
Web series will not have the same effect of big screen..
It was wonderful to see the multi starrer film on big screen..
PS was wonderfully made & people will definitely enjoy historical movies only in theatres ... with sound effects & visuals..
It is the manirathnam direction. . do all remember the movie " iruvar " in that film aishwarya rai character was dead.. But reality hahaha
Inspired vs biopic is different
Kgf movie part 3 vara kondu potanga but inthu evlo perya story itha part 2 layee finish pannittanga
Entha movie ya ouru part -3 or 4 vara kondu poirukellam ethoo start pannitom epdiyachu complete pannanum nu panna Mari irruku...
So atha book readers ku ellarkum kastama irruku....
Ivanga real story solliruka vendam book la irrukurathaa apdiyye eduthurunthal kuda super ha irrukum... Ivanga ithu illa ithuu tha real story nu onnu solla ps -2 la athuvum mukiyama மணிமகுடம் சீன் la pathuu naraya perku ..yenda entha padathaa eduthha nu ahitu
Budget problem.
Common everyone, lets take novel perspective itself. please answer two points.
1) Senthan amuthan is born in chozha family. Madhuranthakan is adopted son. Who will be dear to a mother? Birth or Adopted son? Just to please birth son, will any mother ignore and hurt adopted son?
2) Senthan Amuthan is not having quality to be the king. Not even desired for it. Why want to show nepotism? Madhuranthakan is atleast known to the country and having support from small kings.
U clearly haven't read the novel!
@@madhumithaanandakumar132 Please explain.
1) in the novel madhurantakan is not just any adopted son. HE IS NANDHINI'S TWIN AND VEERA PANDYAN'S SON. Tell me how will a queen act in such a situation? Will she allow a pandiyan king's son to rule her kingdom? That is why the real son sendhan amudhan is crowned.
Hmm showing that sub imaginary plot will have some bad impact to the rest of India on chola Dynasty. Suddenly, a flower boy becomes king for great Chozha land. I truly understand the book reader's disappointment of missing the interesting twist. But in my opinion, that will create misconception of true history happened in reality.
@Snegha K As a book reader, I agree with you about Sembiyan Madhevi's decision as Amarabujanga Nedunchezhiyan is a Pandiyan prince by blood. But were you really satisfied with his end in the book? Personally, I was not. From my perspective, even in that conversation between Kunthavai and Vandiyathevan after the coronation (before Manimegalai's death), Amarabujangan received only a mocking remark and there was only pity for Pazhuvettaraiyar's daughter (his wife). What is his fault? Yes, he wanted the throne, and fell into Nandhini's ploy. But not just because of his greed, I felt he fought for the throne as yearned for respect, recognition and accceptance more than anything, which he clearly didn't get in the novel. At last, it is also revealed that he also knew how to hold and fight with a sword. But he was still tagged as a coward throughout the novel. When he realized the truth about his birth, he still didn't turn all evil. But his end? I thought he didn't deserve anything this bad. I would love to know your perspective on this. Did you like Madhuranthakan Alias Amarabujangan's end and stabbing in the book?
12:53 listen
So nice to see other artis are also been interviewed..
sendhan amudhan ku reality la yum nyayam illa,
indha padathulayum nyayam illa!
chei
Director thought book readers are fools . If he change movie then y he put Ponniyin selvan title ?
Logic is simple, book il be read only by a few, so anything can be mysterious in it… but visual media has wider scope and powerful, it will be seen by many and for generations… information shud be write when it comes to filming. According to history the climax is correct and thats what the crew wanted to showcase to the generations, instead of giving a fictional climax and confusing future audience… PS book is historical fiction , not real, mani sir adopted tat fiction to show case love of karikalan and nandhini… and dynamics of love revenge and war… but adopted climax from history to give right incident to people… one might say nandhini is also fictional character, yes since he adopted that character this movie is named PS… his area of interest is love bit in that book… if anyone wants to film other gists they can do it with their creativity… I feel he made justice for both novel and history by drawing distinguishing line… brilliant screenplay, writing and thought process, instead of just going with what kalki bluffed… remember kalki had to prolong the story as much as he wanted cos this was coming weekly in vikatan, so he had liberty to say anything he wanted to keep people reading it. When it comes to filmmaking such dragging il make audience get bored… the crew has used their perspective lens to finish this film… book left nandhini character without justification, film has given beautiful finish to it… as a book reader I understand PS Novel lovers agony, but for film saying truth is important to educate the audience rightly about history… lets us respect the making and efforts from the crew, lets support this initiative rather than criticizing so more such films will come in Tamil industry…
Serndhan Amuthan than reader aana King 👑