Видео

Go White! Thank you!

So the Spider Proto got benched back in August as it let me down during my guys weekend. Mezz.1 Max finished out the weekend for me and kept me in some matches! But feel wise I think the Spider Proto is slightly softer than the OZ.1i, not by much. I thought I did a season ending WITB a few weeks ago.

@@golfwrxradio thanks ill be sure to hunt it down

So this one was kind of rushed out and I didn't get to pick the alignment on it. I like the longer site lines that run to the back of the putter for me.

Mallet without long alignment is pretty much a blade with more clunkiness.

Is that the 3 dots and the toe to heel line? Similar to mine, the T alignment on top. I don't mind the dots as I loved the old Odyssey #7 t hat had those. Should be a sweet stick!

Appreciate it!

I am willing to bet we will see some additional inserts and milling with these heads. I don't know anything, but I feel like LAB will bring us a lot of options like they always do!

Thank you! And no way, go GREEN!

I think somewhat similar really. Feel might be a touch softer with the SB2 as those horizontal grooves don't put a ton of steel on the ball. The SB2 might have just a touch more stability to it, but it isn't as soft of a shape.

Thank you!

As I mentioned I have that one as well with a SuperStroke grip on it. I like the ability to put your favorite grip on the putter as it opens up more options for golfers. Personally I like the feel at setup of the forward shaft lean.

@@golfwrxradio yes it does

I agree, getting the right specs makes a big difference in the LAB putters. I did the remote video fitting and I think it worked great. Putters feel very nice and balanced to me, while some friends haven't liked it as much as they think it is to short and flat!

@ LAB knows what they’re doing, I wouldnt question thier decision especially on lie angle ! Only have to focus on line and speed and the LAB does the rest !

Thank you! Sam is a very smart guy, and darn funny too!

Thank you, I really appreciate that!

Happy New Year to you as well!

DONE! It will be an end of year celebration!

I agree, the PXG ball is very underrated as well!

Thank you! I was just outside taking some pics of some new gear! Can't wait to start swinging with it

Man, that is really hard to say. For me it might be the Titleist GT2 16.5* fairway. It is really hard for me to find a 3 wood that I can hit high off the turf and not overspin off the tee. So far the GT2 has been really solid in both spots.

@golfwrxradio I've been thinking of trying a high lofted 3w. GT2 is definitely on my radar.

Thank you! Happy new year to you!

I hope you don’t really believe that!

@terrypeeples1942 I’ve tested both. Newton dispersion is nowhere near as tight, and absolutely nowhere near as long as Hypersonic. Newton is short by almost 100 yards. The only people using the Newton are older players seeking “improved” dispersion. Every forum has confirmed my numbers as well. I believe in numbers, not marketing bs. I don’t believe it’s nice or professionally moral to recommend the Newton, knowing damn well it’s an inferior product to 100% of the shafts on the market. The Hypersonic by Kinetixx was released the same time Newton was, in the same time frame Hypersonic EARNED two world records that still stand today. Fastest ball speed, and longest distance. Newton has won no awards and no world records… and nobody winning WLD. Meanwhile, Kinetixx has the record for most shaft by most winners in all of WLD history. Newton was born by the same company that made some “good” putters. They are seeking to expand by getting into the shaft market by paying their way in… paying “players” to “review” it. No namers were selected to talk about the shaft… but nobody is using it that is worth mentioning. Unlike you, I’m serious about which company I put in my bag, and I research everything. I want top engineers working on my gear… not marketing executives.

@@terrypeeples1942 Tested against the Newton, it’s 100 yards shorter than the Hypersonic and the dispersion is very poor in comparison. It’s not a good product… Newton is paying its way into the market. Newton came out the same time Hypersonic did, yet Hypersonic holds two world records and tons of wins with the company’s shafts. I believe in numbers and top engineers, not marketing executives and bs. This shaft is designed for very slow swingers and those who are happy with hitting 260 on a good day. I average 346 yards… this product is being pushed hard for exposure, but it has already been mulled over and forgotten by the best in the game. This is not a pro level shaft, full stop. Those that tell you it’s good, have skin in the game to profit it from via kick backs. It’s business… but I believe it’s immoral to trick consumers into buying snake oil. I believe in numbers… and the numbers say this thing sticks. Every forum talking about it says the same thing. No distance gained and not much change in dispersion. Plus this thing is one of the heaviest shafts in the market, that already tells you this thing is at least 10 years outdated. Better materials exist that are way lighter and stronger… an unmatched advantage for distance.

@ Tested against the Newton, it’s 100 yards shorter than the Hypersonic and the dispersion is very poor in comparison. It’s not a good product… Newton is paying its way into the market. Newton came out the same time Hypersonic did, yet Hypersonic holds two world records and tons of wins with the company’s shafts. I believe in numbers and top engineers, not marketing executives and bs. This shaft is designed for very slow swingers and those who are happy with hitting 260 on a good day. I average 346 yards… this product is being pushed hard for exposure, but it has already been mulled over and forgotten by the best in the game. This is not a pro level shaft, full stop. Those that tell you it’s good, have skin in the game to profit it from via kick backs. It’s business… but I believe it’s immoral to trick consumers into buying snake oil. I believe in numbers… and the numbers say this thing sticks. Every forum talking about it says the same thing. No distance gained and not much change in dispersion. Plus this thing is one of the heaviest shafts in the market, that already tells you this thing is at least 10 years outdated. Better materials exist that are way lighter and stronger… an unmatched advantage for distance.

@ Tested against the Newton, it’s 100 yards shorter than the Hypersonic and the dispersion is very poor in comparison. It’s not a good product… Newton is paying its way into the market. Newton came out the same time Hypersonic did, yet Hypersonic holds two world records and tons of wins with the company’s shafts. I believe in numbers and top engineers, not marketing executives and bs. This shaft is designed for very slow swingers and those who are happy with hitting 260 on a good day. I average 346 yards… this product is being pushed hard for exposure, but it has already been mulled over and forgotten by the best in the game. This is not a pro level shaft, full stop. Those that tell you it’s good, have skin in the game to profit it from via kick backs. It’s business… but I believe it’s immoral to trick consumers into buying snake oil. I believe in numbers… and the numbers say this thing sticks. Every forum talking about it says the same thing. No distance gained and not much change in dispersion. Plus this thing is one of the heaviest shafts in the market, that already tells you this thing is at least 10 years outdated. Better materials exist that are way lighter and stronger… an unmatched advantage for distance.

$?

😂😂