Видео

Matt delivers these one liners that leave me breathless ;what a Sage. Thank you both for this priceless teachings.

A bit above my pay grade so to speak but I appreciate content like this being made, thank you.

Great listen and very interesting 👌

One of my favourites so far, heard of Matt’s work before!

Great listen as always. Thank you

Interesting. He ends up pointing to time, or a persistence in time, at the bottom. Maybe I'm misinterpreting though. This challenges some of my own understanding.

You your lineage inception has already manifested from the elements of the universe and transcended. That means your source that FORMED from elements was not BORN ( biology), however both are in a symbiotic relationship. There is no such thing for your Formed source that requires QUALIA for a subjective conscious experience. Why you may ask. Because your Formed source already knows what an apple tastes like on that point when you taste the apple, even if you have never tasted an apple. You can say your Formed source is a sensor equipped to know, once Formed. It cant be Qualia for subjective consciousness experience because consciousness is only a tool that was implemented as a recall for awareness to give an awareness that was experienced some thought at a later date. Consciousness can only be implemented when the Formed source of elements and the biology become a symbiotic Form for survival and evolving. If something such as the Universe does not require to survive nor evolve, then consciousness is not required because awareness is not required. Given that the Universe is random events, there is no Universal Consciousness because random means, " done without conscious decision". Therefore there is no hard problem of consciousness because there is no Qualia and that means there is no panpsychism of consciousness of/on everything material. You cannot confuse material reaction as panpsychism simply because you see matter do something.

Faggin at work Game changer NBR 1

True scientist using the scientific method to describe divinity. Religion is an attempt to explain. Science describes religion perfectly as we are seeing now.

All these quantum fields are also information!

Great listen! Thank you!

Thanks homie great vid

The interviewer is terrible......stop stuttering, get to the point, ask clear questions.

Understand and have experienced this love and peace. ✌🏻 ❤

In the East in religion and in philosophy the Universe and God are synonymous so it can be assumed as having omniscience it already knows itself. It is more likely that it wants us to know it, and align with it rather than being in opposition and creating grief for ourselves.

Thanks for this ❤God bless you

Thank you!

Thompson Christopher Hall Nancy Johnson Maria

Excellent guest and really enjoyed the show

Random number generator are guided by environment

You can use bots to stack decks

Numbers can be manipulated to determine the outcome

No such thing as AI, just more numbers

I’m trying to make a linkage between reality and assumptions

Like a boat on the water where the water is the conscious and the boat free to react as it wills upon it but still at the mercy of the water.

Personal consciousness

The world may just be a stage and we mere actors. But the assumption that people have free will and react to the same information being received as yourself is in itself an assumption

Consciousness is the ability to receive information and act upon the perception of the information. Why does the perception of elapsed time change between us as organisms. Without the reference of the position of the earth

Consciousness is the ability to receive information and act upon the perception of the information.

Just as we cannot prove the existence of consciousness is the presence of a soul

True is relative and a moving target depending upon the observation being made

I honestly think that there’s polar opposite forces acting upon the other dimensions influencing our outcomes whether the whole of the matter has one or the other information

We break everything down into numbers or states and then we need to move on with assumptions . We only think it’s impossible because we don’t understand what measurements to make next

We break everything down into numbers or states and then we need to move on with assumptions

Energy related

How do you confirm that the exchange of information is finite? You need to heed to that assumption until you can prove that it is otherwise

It exists in another dimension but not physically unless it’s actually duplicated at separation. Without the loss of any information.

When you quantify the physical properties of states of matter. You have to make assumptions beyond what we can prove as an observer. If assumptions aren’t made then proving them is very difficult. One must test the waters with assumptions.

It’s not just assuming when you have actually experienced the results as an observer. But it all depends on how much you can compare yourself with other dimensions of existence.

The measurements of a system depend on the understanding of the principles that create the results. Some assumptions can be made about certain things. And entanglement is a complex system that needs a proof that people cannot understand without direct measurements and assumptions need to be made in physical measurements.

They will soon be rejoined as the original state if the parameters of entanglement are reversed.

The observers intelligence can enable the skipping of steps as assumptions

Garcia Ruth Rodriguez Ruth Perez Brian

This talk is a big yawn. Awais' main job appears to be justifying the existence of psychiatry. Basically, treating human distress with medication. Doesn't heal, but prolongs suffering. Maybe good for the short term, yet doesn't heal a broken heart or a broken spirit. Therefore, the reins need to be passed onto psychologists and therapists. Psychiatry was invented to remove undesirables from society. It is still that, but hides behind these diagnoses that can destroy one's life. Just a bunch of mumble-jumble disguised as real science or medicine.

Hello Mr. Holiday, for the ultimate theory, I am the person. All others leave you in the middle.

Some still think we are a soul or spirit. The idea that we *are* our brains is very new, so I'm not surprised that many think of our consciousness as separate from our brain. Our brain continues working while we are not conscious so this makes some logical sense. I think Roger Penrose may be on to something. I also think that consciousness may be an emergent property of packing enough neurons into the right configuration. This produces a spectra of awareness. However, I think this may have something to do with the double slit experiment, which I do not completely comprehend.

.#zZz#.⚡⬆️⬇️💀☢☣ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ПРИНЦИПА,КАК НЕКОГО ЗВЕНА ДОГОВОРА И ВЗАИМОПОНИМАНИЯ В ДИСКУССИЯХ НЕПРАВОМЕРНО!.Т.К.ПРИНЦИП ПРЕПОДНОСИТСЯ,КАК ФОРМА АГРЕССИИ И СТАНОВЛЕНИЯ МНЕНИЯ,ВО ЧТОБЫ НИ БЫЛО....ПРИНЦИП,НЕУМЕСТЕН И НЕКОРРЕКТЕН ПО ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЮ,КОГДА РЕЧЬ ИДЁТ О ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫХ/ЯДЕРНЫХ ПРОЦЕССАХ В СИСТЕМЕ ОЗВУЧИВАНИЯ...ПОЭТОМУ,ПРИНЦИП - ЭТО НЕ ФОРМА ПОДАВЛЕНИЯ МНЕНИЯ И СУЖДЕНИЯ УБЕЖДЁННОСТИ,В ЧЁМ ТО НИ БЫЛО...,Т.К.ПРИНЦИП - ЭТО НЕ СТОЛЬКО ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЙ ТЕРМИН ДОГОВОРА,А НАВЯЗАННЫЙ/ИЗМЕНЁННЫЙ/АБСОЛЮТНО МАНИПУЛИРОВАННЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ГИПНОТИЧЕСКОГО УБЕЖДЕНИЯ И ЛАБИЛЬНОСТИ МАССОВОГО СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЯ!.ИБО КАКОЙ ПРИНЦИП МОЖЕТ БЫТЬ,В ТОТАЛЬНО ИЗМЕНЁННОЙ,ЯДЕРНО РАССКРЫТОЙ И ЯДЕРНО РАЗРУШЕННОЙ СИСТЕМЕ/ПЕРЕНАПРАВЛЕНИЯ???!.ЗДЕСЬ НУЖНО ПОНИМАНИЕ И КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТЬ СУЖДЕНИЯ О ПРИНЦИПЕ,В ФОРМЕ ВСЕЙ СИСТЕМЫ/СВЯЗЕЙ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ КЛЕТКИ!.ПРИНЦИП - В ЯДЕРНО ИЗМЕНЁННОЙ СИСТЕМЕ ПЕРЕНАПРАВЛЕНИЯ - ЭТО СУИЦИД,Т.К.САМА СИСТЕМА ЯДЕРНОГО ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ ЭП УНИЧТОЖАЕТ И ЗАБИРАЕТ ЭП/НАЛОЖЕНИЯ ЗАКОНА НАЛОЖЕНИЯ СВЯЗЕЙ!.ПРИНЦИП,НЕ МОЖЕТ БЫТЬ ТАМ,ГДЕ ВСЯ СИСТЕМА ОПРЕДЕЛЕНА ПОГЛАЩЕНИЕМ И ИЗМЕНЕНИЕМ,ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКОНА ЭП/НАЛОЖЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ МАТЕРИИ СВЯЗЕЙ И ПРОЦЕССОВ ПОЛНОЦЕННОСТИ!.💀⚡🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡

Im trying to verify Solms claims about the brainstem being the seat of consciousness. Are there specific articles that specifically confirm his findings? Im looking over the articles that you posted. They don't seem specific enough.

Thank you for such a broad and interesting conversation

32:44 1:09:10