Видео

Dose this youtube video use creative commons?

Hi Rowan, I'm trying to access your calculator but your website isn't loading, is there anyway to download this elsewhere? Thank you!

I hope that your videos find traction, I have been watching for a while and while I have little knowledge of how youtube works, snappy and informative videos like this really should do better.

Gevinchi my queen I am alone but I want to get back to my senses asap rescue me luv Gevinchi Gevinchi my queen I am alone but I want to get back to my senses asap rescue me luv

Why you only at 400 subscribers?

So it's like Communism?

Great video Rowan by the way I have a question It is possible to clone the Indohyus,which is similar to a deer by extracting DNA from an artiodactyl such as a chevrotain to compare it with the DNA of the whale to find out if it matches modifying the genome through generations and thus giving shape to its ancestors, which also includes reviving the mesonychians since they played a very important role in the ecosystem but is it possible that their ecosystems continue to exist?Greetings,this is my opinion ❤

js came by your channel i really like it man i thought it was one of those ai videos but no lol. anyways keep it up bro hope theres new content as well

swim

This is the exact kinda video that should be pretty popular right now, I wonder if people might be thinking new science videos from not-yet-established channels are just AI spam? Anyways, good vid and very informative!

Hey, I just stumbled across your channel yesterday and I love your videos! What made you choose the stick figure style? It looks similar to CGP Grey (In a good way). P.S. I vote for flood myths!

Why don't we use 13 month a year and 28 day a month? It's more make sense for modern society, hence we'll have 13 times payday per year 😅, every month you always start on sunday and end on Saturday

Intersting video I loved it but why do we want to know the seasons in a calendar xD like just look out the window or keep some form of calculating how many days left for the next winter.

Thanks, this is such a useful tool, where did you find the graphs to determine the Q value though?

This video is fire

Good stuff!

Where have you been all my life? This is a great video!

you’re gonna blow up, this is an crazy amount of quality for a small channel

i can't belive you don't have more subs this is amazing

am I finally one of those commenters that find a youtube channel before it blows up

Nice video. Keep it up!

Why are there like no views?(this might not age well)

interesting, i haven't heard of solar-lunar calendars before :D i was expecting to reference the chinese calendar and glancing over the wikipedia it says its lunisolar as well, nice!

Hi, what should I do if the Temperature is above 300C.

So full of useful information!! Love it!

ah yes, another clone. Your content is good but change up the style

you like cgp grey? i like your cadence!

creative commons ftw !!!

creative commons ftw !!!

This was interesting

Has anyone managed to use the "Canadian Water Quality Index 1.0 Calculator"?

Hi, Could you change the license to CC-BY-SA-3.0? Thanks,

what if I dont have coliform??

This was such a good watch; well researched and you have a great voice for narrating. Keep these coming!

Comments are good for the algorithm, right? Good work on the video!

Wonderful alliteration bud!

In high school I had a teacher use tapeworms to make the same point.

Hair dye is a bad example. By the same token we can consider physical location to be a trait. One which most organisms pursue teleologically and for which and acquired change is almost always inherited. If Alice moves from Belarus to Chile, her offspring after reproducing in Chile will be born in Chile, not Belarus. She will likely then go to a hospital in Chile to give birth, an example of teleologically striving to have her child born in the best possible location, and then probably move with that child to a neighborhood with food educational opportunities, low crime, etc. More teleology. Physical location acts in a way that is heritable, acquired, and teleological. The important thing here is that neither dyed hair or physical location are genetically encoded traits. Lamarck does not claim that EVERY trait is subject to acquired heritability or teleology. He claims that adaptions to genetically encoded traits are. So just like physical location is not proof of Lamarckian evolution, hair dye is not disproof. The fundamental assertion of Lamarckian acquired heritability is that adaptions within an organism's lifetime alter the germ line genome and pass down the encoding for these adaptations to the offspring. Not that if you break a limb in an accident or wear clothes that your offspring will genetically produce clothes or broken limbs. If anything Lamarck would predict that the adaption in response to breaking a bone (healing a bone and reinforcing it with additional bone growth) would signal to the genome that their offspring should have a predisposition to reinforcing that bone. Likewise, it predicts that a tanned farmworker will gain a genetic predisposition to produce darker-skinned children, while a pale aristocrat will heroin a genetic predisposition towards lighter-skinned children. It predicts that a reptile which has acclimated to producing high activity enzymes for a cold environment will produce offspring with a genetic predisposition towards working with those types of enzymes, rather than thermostable enzymes. It also predicts that genetic predispositions can be acquired without a change to the organism's body. i.e. never using the hind legs would be predicted to mean not just muscle atrophy and a predisposition towards low muscle mass but offspring with reduced hindlimb bones and pelvis because these went unused in the organisms' life. That is, the bone loss in the offspring teleologically extrapolating from the muscle loss in the parent. Lamarckism is much harder to disprove by thought experiment than it is often given credit for, which is why Darwin didn't even reject it. It took until decades after Darwin's death to actually rule these things out, except of course that they are only even ruled out for genes themselves. That is, the things that tell a cell what molecules it can produce. Gene regulation and expression, however, that is, the things that tell a cell which of those molecules it actually should produce and when, not only don't rule out these kind of mechanisms, but actively rely on them to at least some extent, though this is been overstated by some.

Ah. This aspect of whales disproves teleological guidance toward land-dwelling. It doesn't disprove teleological guidance in general. Even his original formulation of life teleologically striving to be more like god does not seem to be contradicted here. Are whales closer to being an omnipotent omniscient benevolent omnipresent divine being than their ancestors? What kinda question even is that? All it proves is that teleology towards living on land isn't a thing. Further, it does nothing to disprove heritability of acquired traits or teleological germ line mutation based on life experience. Don't get me wrong whales probably aren't doing any of that (well, except through mate selection and epigenetics and DNA repair mechanisms and such) but simply going from land to water over evolutionary timescales doesn't disprove either teleology or heritable acquired traits.

New to this channel. Are the incessant alliterations irritating? Not on your nelly!

Brieanne McHorse writing an essay on Equarius limb mechanics is awesome.

if the limits of illiteration are ligitimate you've perhaps progressed past the point of it.

If I put data in a table it will give me QWI

But the UN says climate change is what humans do so it can't ever have happened before. Its right there under the video.

I dispute that it was just simply natural selection that caused the change. knowing what I know, Natural selection weeds out the unfit, it does not generate structures. Mutation, as far as we know, generates changes is RANDOM and is successful only in the midst of natural selection. This randomness does not explain the cetacean's auditory improvements as in able to echolocate with middle ears that are air filled and originally designed for life on land.

sure cant disagree with that

Whale disprove any evolution: ruclips.net/video/wq_oYftA2ow/видео.html ruclips.net/video/5ErLGxrSdw0/видео.html ruclips.net/video/dCM1MjEFvqE/видео.html

Rowan is part of a hidden agenda. Not surprised if someone paid him to do this hilarious video. "Climate change is normal, buy more Shell"

B U L L S H I T Intelligent design. Flat earth was commonly accepted for about 100 years. We have believed in Darwin for longer. We teach Darwin on the highest educations. Global Stupidity.

Ya its weird because its obviously false. How did this land animal go into the ocean, if it couldnt breathe underwater. Did it tread water for years at a time.