Видео

It s a feeling of the referee... The referee feels very quickly when the ball is not right.

Great video ! Lots of players even international players don't know all the rules... They don't know official referees or the referees are too lazy to give all info for all players.

Very sick how the ref immediately moved away as well!

This is it! I m gonna argue with everyone about it

Maybe it was adresser in the video. Can you set on first touch?

So many grey area rules. Some people can be so insufferable with them too.

Nice with the screenshots thanks

At some point this channel is going to light up from this amazing content. I hope you make more!!

On a double that has no spin... your 1st touch could make the ball spin for a fraction of a second, and then your 2nd touch stabilizes the ball to no spin. I think that's the case in 99% of double hits that have no spin.

Surely, if John Mayer's play was called a double... then the guy in the red shirt at the ten second mark in the video would've been called for double, right?

1:14 Looked no double Judgment is crazy about open hands. Refs are ready to call every open hands receive as double. So uneducated

Ref said "lift" instead of "catch and/or throw". There is a slightly but still existing different. It may mislead him in judgment

So many people play volleyball for years, even at advanced level and never made that kind of easy research

1:09

In regards of one handed action at 1:13 Would this be considered an attack or a block if this was indoors? I'm challenging consistency between FIVB rules for definition of block versus an attack.

As a hand set, I would call foul. The balls movement was more to the right and back of the setters body. That would indicate one's hand was still touching the ball. If it was bump set, no foul.

This person ain't even squared with her shoulders LOL ruclips.net/video/7TkKMDHMJv8/видео.html

2:24 lol sooooooo.... Is that a lift or not? Or are you agreeing with all the refs calls as being correct in the video?

Great video except remove the language about a "Lift". There is no such thing as a "lift"in the rule book. The contact is either a "Catch" or a "Throw"

The neverending question on what is considered a hard driven spike goes back even to the AVP 1980s.

Coming from old-school 1980s AVP tour player..I can see the confusion. Offensive tipping should then become a legal play

What's the difference between that one hand block vs a one handed offensive tip? The o- tip is illegal..however the defensive tip considered legal..when essentially they are the same play?

you can also direct where you hit and serve.. and dig.. this just sounds too obvious to me.

Can we jump and attack using an overhand pass while in the trajectory of our shoulders ?

I don't understand the commentators. IMHO, there is no debate about this. Nothing about new rules or whatever. The ball had crossed the plane of the net; therefore, the player can hit the ball. Whether he's blocking or not is irrelevant.

This exception is awesome and makes sense. Why it should be any different than bump overset? This would be the perfect set for the blocker most of the time, it extends the lenght of the rallies and creates more spectacular plays! For anyone crying for not able to judge intent let me tell you - referee judges intent in MANY situations: • During first hit of the team, when not using overhand finger action, how do you know if consecutive contact was incidental or INTENTIONAL (same action)? • During hard driven ball defence how do we know if defending players action was to play defensively without INTENT to go over on one? • For blocker actions close to the net, how do we know if INTENT was to intercept the ball and not to attack? (to know if his second contact would be legal if the ball says on his side) • When player touches the net how do we know if it happened during his INTENT to play the ball? • When player kick the ball with his foot how do we know if he was just INTENDING to playing the ball, or was it aggressive deliberate kick with INTENT to release his anger that should be sanctioned? Don't be confused there is not a single use of the word INTENT in the rules, but that doesn't mean we don't judge it to make decisions. Referee must be 100% sure the fault has been committed before they blow the whistle, if you are not able to judge intent when you need to then just KEEP THE BALL FLYING

Straight gangster

Dane thank you for all your videos. Are you planning on making any more? We will be featuring all these videos on our beach volleyball website that is going to be launching soon.

HI, thanks for the video! We just had a discussion last night in a league about setting over. The part I want clarification on is when someone sets over purposefully, can do they do it forcefully (is this considered a "throw"?) or does it have to put a set similar to many of the ones in your video where it has more of an arc?

If the Ball pass below the ned in the recepción is the same that happend in the 2 video?

Omg! Watching it in 2021 and I am a semi-pro beach volleyball player and a teacher; all I can say is that it’s the best educational beach volleyball video that could ever be… I just came here to check one single rule(the very last rule) but I watched it all and enjoyed the language, simplicity and the no missing of any single rule… well done! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

what a great vid. do you know if the same rules apply for indoor?

Theyre letting a TON of bad sets go in FIVB

Man... that ball WILL spin IF its DOUBLED People...

Would love a video on dinks and technicality of illegal tipping! (My rec group keeps arguing about slappy/cutty open hand attacks that land short) Thanks!

Would love a video on dinks and technicality of illegal tipping! (My rec group keeps arguing about slappy/cutty open hand attacks that land short) Thanks!

If I'm a ref outdoors and you hand set that first ball, that set better be magical or I'm calling you for a double. No ref? Always a double in my book. Part 2 of the video was great!

Sooooo now we have to be candid on measuring what the setter intended to do. And Skylar is a bad example. He is so good, he can mask whether he intended to do it or not. Hahahaha

Doesn't the rule exist as it does to factor wind, or earthquake for that matter which would put an otherwise legal set off it's mark?

Wowsa. So glad I found this video, Dane. We just had this controversy at our beloved, getting too old, call your own, outdoor rec play. It's rare, but when it's used in our group, it's usually the third hit. I accept the rule (now) but as someone who can't get to 95% of those "set overs" when we're playing 2v2 or even 3v3, I'm amazed it's not used more often. As long as the hit is clean and square to the shoulders, it could be played short over the net or all the way to the court marker. What puzzles me is, apparently, good, fast players are wary of and capable of covering all that ground. So that's why you rarely see it, because good players can get to those balls ?? tnx again

at the 9 second mark the attacker pushes a tight set into the block initiating a joust. This is incredibly common. its also a fault, aka open-hand dink

Amazing! But so complicated

😎

GREAT topic! Could you do a video discussing legal vs illegal hits. I’ve heard recently underhand open palm hits are legal as long as ball isnt held. Is this true? I was always under the impression that all open underhanded hits were lifts…

10/10

4:55 Imma start setting over the net tight and pretend I was trying to set my teammate LOL

Lots of players have no idea at all of rules. Specially when something is unusual.

so if your first touch on a non-driven attack is a double, that's okay, and only counts as one 'hit' for your team?

That's gangsta blood

What about a hard driven ball, without block in place. The defense is clean, but drives the ball hard on player two nearby, hitting arm and head in one swift motion, without time to react. Is this allowed? Or is it only ok on the first touch, and after block... (Happened to me the other day...) ;-)