Видео

T.D= Total Distance

No, there is no event horizon. That is a black hole.

Im not a Physicist, but I think that even for a Physicist it's hard to know, basically because the nature of the Wormhole its poorly understood. But, i will try my best with my knowledge and my not-Native english to with you good answer. To understand where we'll you end you need to understand vectors first. Vector are nothing but the direction of the energy that makes you to move respectly to another. In other words, if you moves to right, your Vector will be a "Right Vector" actually it only works in close systems like earth were you have a Base to compared movements, but for your understanding, I hope, it's enough. The vector don't change in the voidness of space, instead another vector Interfere, to stop a object you need a opposite vector, and make a Straight on going object it's right, you will need a Left Vector. Now, why do I explain this? Simple because crossing a portal or a Wormhole, that are basically the same, your vector do NOT change, that means that if you enter from the "North Pole" of one Mouth, you wilk end at the south Pole of the other mouth at your back, your vector didn't change, your position does. Like a Hall, with multiple doors with parallel doors at the other side. Any way if you put a Mouth at Alfa Centauri, you will end always in Alfa centauri Regardless of the side you take respectly, you will end having the Wormhole at you always. To Objects crossing from opposite sides, will see each other, and with enough space, they will not crash with each other. Two Objects entering both from the north pole of their respectly mouth is more interesting and a Question that myself, don't have enough knowledge to give you an answer. If you did not understand something cause my English or the explanation itself, you are free to ask and thanks for reading.

Wormholes are highly theoretical (and probably don't actually exist imo)

of course, in the description he set the license to "resuse allowed"

I don't believe you turn sideways as you fall in. But you have the ability to look sideways as you fall in, and this is what is done here. The reason is simply that the view ahead is all black so there is nothing to see.

I believe that is caused by the fact that the space-time is being curved due to enormous gravitational forces, and you are kinda falling into an unseen whirlpool. that's why you are going sideways. Mathematically this simulation seems to be more or less accurate.

Waah this is sad and terrifying to imagine 😖

at the moment you cross event horizon, an infinite amount of time have passed in the outside universe, so it doesn't even exist for you anymore

I think you really can't cross a event horizon, as time accelerates around you, it could reach the moment when the black hole evaporates due to hawking radiation, and suddenly, there would be no more event horizon for you to cross, only you, slingshoted to the end of time, but still, in this side of the spacetime.

@@santitabnavascues8673 Let me disagree with you. Time slows down for you indeed, but that does not mean it accelerates for other objects. This effect is one-directional. Objects below to you seem slowed down, objects above you seem just normal. When you approach the event horizon, the world above and the hole below look just the same as moments before. However, if you attempt to return and accelerate up, then the clock would start ticking like crazy and when you get home, a awful lot of time would have passed there. If you don't, no acceleration is observed anywhere and you happily cross the existing horizon (if it possible due to other reasons).

@ivanp7 it is a confusing matter to me, I mean, if the outside world would see you red shifting and slowing down, wouldn't you see the outside universe blue shifting and speeding up? If we get to the time stopping of the event horizon, wouldn't it essentially mean the outside universe reaching the end of time? Then, in the same fashion, if the outside universe has reached the end of time, that would mean the bh should disappear too, making it impossible to cross the event horizon. Maybe it is an erroneous unerstanding of all this, but in my opinion, it would fit very well the unique nature of black holes. Because there would be actually no physical way to enter! 😅

Physics cannot describe what happens when the observer reaches the center

@Daniel Langer I mean, within the mathematical models.

@Daniel Langer shit is so cringe when you say omg its jus a theory like no shit but its not baseless, its the best thing that we could come up with given the tools we have. But we literally have models of what they could be based on our understanding of modern physics and mathematics.

@Daniel Langer im prettu sure this one isnt accurate but if you literally took some time theres papers written by people who study this

@Daniel Langer lmao funny you said that because you are assuming that the measure were perfect. Theres literally a factor of how off they were its was ab .8 billions years and even then it was still older than the universe. If you literally just used your brain and the internet for a second you can literally see that the star was later proven to be old as fuck but not as old as the universe. And i love that you use a theory that was not only wrong but you then use it as a fact. When u ur fucking self said its only a theory. You literally defeated your own point my guy lmaoo

@Daniel Langer and no one said fucking theories are full proof. But the difference is that for example the simulation theory, we cant fucking prove it because theres no experiment that we've come up with or that we can do that would prove it so its literally fuckin mostly baseless and based in the idea that if computing does get better and better we could but not proven be able to simulate our entire universe and that we could be in a simulation ourself but we can only think ab it not prove it. Now a theory that was long been proven is the idea that light is a electromagnetic wave. But for example the photoelectric effect showed that you could light being either absorbed fully which would give electrons on the surface enough energy to be knocked off, Which a wave cant do because it would be over a area which isnt possible if only one electron is getting hit off. So does that mean that maxwells ideas of the photon being a wave is wrong? No its that his theory doesnt describe the entirety of the situation and people built upon it more. Which is where the idea of a object wave come from de broglie which fucking proved so many things like bohr model of the atoms (which at the time it was made, we had no idea why atoms had such specific wavelengths because Schodinger and like de brogile had not created quantum mechanic yet ) You can literally search all this shit up. Fuck it ill even give you a channel so you can watch it. Kathy love physic and history talks ab the histories and how theories were put together over time. Your logic is that its jus a theory so its cant be true. Well dumbass the idea of the electron and how we could control it for things like the computer your on now was a fucking theory and guess what your talking to me right because that theory was built up and research on because we can actually experiment on electrons so literally just think before you type