Видео

Please make more videos like this with other cameras

Looks like a female angel holding a baby angel 😳

Ahahaa Okey dokey

The first few images the scope was most likely not collimated but the last few were breathtaking great job!

Human already destroyed the earth my friend. Don't look too far.

beautiful ! may i ask what camera set up you used ? i’m a beginner and it’s my dream to capture like this

the moon plasma

Layman terms. Pattern is real. Color is fake

The music is unnecessary. Hard to listen to your voice. It would also be good if you talk less and just be straight to the point. Forth and back and sharing all your thoughts doesn't help me as a beginner. Seems like you do trial and error and let us take part in it.

Это не телескоп. А зрительная труба, девок на пляже разглядывать.

Fake from internet

Not so sure the telescope is actually able to see Saturn.

Maybe go up higher ?

What are lenses you used for the photos?

Thats awsome bro 👍

I often hear people say "aperture is king" for planetary....I say that isn't true. Focal length is king for planetary. Most planetary captures are done at f/20 to f/30 intentionally, which is the opposite of fast. For deep space, yes, a fast aperature is incredible.

BS

That's another proof of Earth is spherical, if Jupiter is

Kit dla Ociemniałych....

Subbed😊❤love your works....❤

Bitsy, is this you? Douglas

Carl Sagan i wish he was around to See modern advances in science ❤

Music Credit: Jean Michel Jarre "Equinoxe" PT. 1

Mars has red fringe from one side and blue from the other. Get simple adaptive optic attachment. Can you get Jupiter satellite pictures showing actual discs? 14+” scopes get them.

Dude, do you not realize that you’re using an 8 inch which is considered a large aperture compared to a 3, 4 or 5 inch APO?

This is OSC processing, not MONO, thanks, but no good to me

Wonderful images !!! 😁👍🏻🔝

wow! That's really cool!

100% alllll of this!

It's not just the size of the telescope, but also the quality of the optics. This may not make sense for many telescopes, but is mainly for the Refractors, some of which are likely better than equally sized Cassegrain types, and Reflectors. However, refractors are some of the most expensive telescopes but at least they don't need collimating, at least not as much as the other types. In order to get magnification from a refractor equal to that of other telescope types, requires a lot more money. Interestingly, if you were to attach differently sized camera sensors to a telescope, if they have equivalent resolution, you can get more detail from the smaller sensor, because the native magnification of that sensor is greater. That's one reason why I prefer Micro 4/3 format of sensor to APS-C type of sensor, and larger formats for planetary imaging but also general terrestrial objects; the relatively small sensor is typically better for photos. If the sensor is small enough, you might not even need a Barlow lens!

It's not the size of the aperture that matters, it's how you use it! Had to do it

8 inches is still big and expensive this is invalid

4:09 - This is King. Seeing > Aperture / Processing > Camera. Someone in Texas with an 8" SCT is probably always going to get better images than me in rainy UK with my 14" dob - simply because of the very local conditions we all battle. That said, I have an 8" SCT and a 14" dob, and the 14" dob *is* better under the same skies. However, you need *good* skies to get the best results from it if you want to push the magnification as high as you *can* go. Just a note, the extra light from a big aperture helps keep frame rates high and you don't *have* to crank your gain all the way up like you often do with SCTs, which means less noise reduction or aggressive processing required to get the same result.

your not right and your not wrong!

Aperture is not so necessary if what you are going to photograph is something relatively bright like a planet, I am talking about nearby or very large planets, it would not apply to Uranus or Neptune. I had not thought about the post-processing of images, this is a very good tip. The problem is that if you want to take a lot of photos, and for that you need the photos to not have too much exposure, then you will need a good aperture. I mean, with a planet you cannot take photos for several days, because the planet rotates and the images would be different, Jupiter rotates very quickly (it has a day of 9 hours) and that forces you to take photos with little exposure.

I'm thinking about getting into this hobby and you made me even more interested. Thanks for the video!

Recently found your channel, I think your content is great. I haven't started with astrophotography yet, but I'm saving up for it!

Are you running an 8" SCT on your eqm-35 pro? How do you feel it handles the weight? I have that same mount and am curious how it performs with that kind of payload.

great video. love it. your personality pops, the audio is good quality and a pleasure to listen to and the length and pacing is also good. (just giving some feedback.)

Once I set up the mount and pointed at a DSO, does the mount track automatically or do I need to keep the hand controller connected to it at all times?

Also, is it possible to get a consultation on how to get better images?

Great photo! I have a 10 inch Dub. and I have never captured anything even close to that. Do you have a Instagram?

That's mean nebula is so near to earth .

What kind of camera?

Music Credit: Jean Michel Jarre "Equinoxe" PT. 1

Great comments, advice and love your enthusiasm! I will be watching your career with great interest! (quote from SW)

Love your videos, I'm into to deep sky Astro but that photo of yours of Saturn is making me want to have a crack at planetory Astro - You are an inspriration to all of us well done.

Great video mate! Nice Saturn…🪐

I think you got good image because of great seeing. The rest is delusion. Speed of camera definitely matters, but light gathering capabilities of your scope will define exposure time. Now, about collimation, it is impossible to perfectly get it for your scope, since mirror is shifting. Bottom line, seeing made that picture, but it could be well better if you get larger scope.

you dont need to collimate a reflector everytime you use it. ive done each of mine once and theyve held every since. a SCT ahould rarely need collimation unless youre rough with it. keep up the good work though good image of saturn