Видео

Umh, Sorry, I didn't understand 😅

Hi there, Sorry for the error 😅. The woman in the video is AI generated just as her voice. That's why sometimes there are some little problems in the spelling. Working on it 👍🏻

I asked a question in the title, I didn't state anything 😌

*CHAçALAMAI*

Infact they are AI xD

The hope is they'll attract more people that way. 🤣

@@lpquagmire3621 Nah, I just like using AI

Thank youu :'3

Better than the video I made or better than the trailer?

Hi there, may I know what are you exactly talking about?

@@Wrecking_World Sure. From an editor's point of view, first, I really meant to say your youtube clip "was poorly conceived and, thus, poorly executed." I don't know exactly what you were attempting here, but if you were in the same room, the edits are awkward and it doesn't seem "conversational," which seems to be the attempted effect you're going for. The production budget or equipment seem to be availabe. Onthe other hand, in the way that their are no wrong answers, only poorly supported claims. Sometimes well examined ideas go unnoticed because their structure and delivery are flawed. I tinhk it's worth asking yourself does it come accross cohesively to you? If the answer is No, then why would you release something that's less than the demands of your imagination? IF the answers yes, then what might the devil's advocate in the room say?

@@hulleeseeya Ah, I understand what you were saying now, thank you for the detailed answer. So, about the edit, I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it. I had other people in the comments who found it nice and personally I find it nice too. I mean, I tried to do something smooth, fluid, not directed toward "reiteration" (y'know, very well edited clips with lots of graphics and animations). It's not perfect obviously, but my line of thought was : "I am aiming for something simple enough to result in decent in one week/just a bit more". I'm happy you found the production acceptable (since I use AI resources, that's the best feedback I can hope for: being as good as the real thing or nearly). Umh, I'm really sorry, but I'm not able to spot those not cohesive moments you were talking about, could you make an example? I tend to be a perfectionist, I like to see little things well made, though my personal time is not that much. Furthermore, an average of 1 video a week is advised for channel about news. I mean, talking about this niche, a keyword can be not so competitive today and turn completely saturated in 7 days. Having said that, I just want to bring in the discussion my point of view and trying to logically respond to you. I am not annoyed, instead I'm happy you set up this discourse in a calm and respectful way.

Well, editing apart, It actually is. Look in the description : when I use AI, I am forced to select an option which states it.

Eh, I admit that the new trailer of Creature Commandos interested me more than invincible, but just because It is a new thing. It's not rare in my case to be more involved in a new series than a new season of a series I already enjoy. About Hazbin, I found it really nice but I was talking about series going to be released after the moment I was pubblishing (Arcane season 2 aside, which is just hours away)

@ i guess it’s just up to personal preference

@@Derp-rz1nn Indeed

@@ahobbyist9520 Written in description already xD

Yyyup :3

:'3 HOW DID YOU KNOW?! IT'S- IT'S IMPOSSIBLE!!!

Thank you so much! 🖤 I am not that good, I have just done basilar things For a few years now 😅 I know, Cartoon is not exactly the right term, but the title "The Most Anticipated Animated Series" was terrible, too cacophonic xD I hope people see that I'm just talking about an animated thing

@@johnguillen68 Yeah, Chalamet is a bit more "delicate" (not that I disdain that, the opposite UwU)

Umh, I say thanks to you for thinking this was a paid commercial, but It is not 😅 Anyway, thank you for sharing your point of view nonetheless. I'm happy to see people truly experienced in Dylan's history appreciating all this 👍🏻

I hope that's a good thing 😅 ...

you probably are, and to the other person who replied, no, that isn't a good thing. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be conditioned into simply taking in commercials and consuming. That's frightening.

​@@rational-public-discourse Umh, sir, again, this isn't a commercial 🥲 I am obliged to set on a banner at the beginning of the video in that case.

@@edh6008 *Baēz*

Maybe her name was mispronounced back then. All of the actors are a prettier than who they actually portray, which is pretty standard in bio-pics.

​@@rational-public-discourse What this has to do with names, though?

I don’t expect anything but garbage from Hollywood. It will probably be like Johnny Cash’s biopic Walk the Line. So much of it is crap and bashes his 1st wife, to make June look like an angel.

@@SJ-ni6iy Eh, there's this risk :/ I mean, I didn't enjoy Bohemian Rhapsody for the same reason, It was too fictionalized. I hope It will be different for this one, but I guess we can just wait to find this out.

@@jimsullivan6123 C'mon, she is not that bad, and she was the right example to make. Also, gonna be honest, I don't see so much difference between being mad at the music or being mad at the music because of the quality of the sound.

@@Wrecking_World OK, Swift aside there's a big difference to the perception that `pete segar was pissed that Dylan went electric (a betrayal, as the commentators say) and the stage sound on the day. Segar wrote to Dylan, saying he was not upset with the electric music but objected to the poor sound quality. Pete Seeger sent a postcard to Dylan in 1990s explaining that he liked “Maggie’s Farm” and why he was upset at Newport in 1965 - because the sound was muddy, he said. The new Bob Dylan Center in Tulsa has this postcard.

​​@@jimsullivan6123 Ah Jeez, I didn't know that :/ I always read that he was mad at electric music in general, I didn't find that news. Thank you so much for letting me know. Gonna add the info in the description. If you want, I can also say thanks to you there 🦾

In case you couldn't tell, this was basically a commerical for the movie designed for a young audience who are more familiar with Taylor Swift than Woody Guthrie. By the way, I am not sure this film gets the story wrong with Pete Seeger. Seeger had a lot to do with discovering him. I was watching an interview of Seeger talk about when he was visiting Woody Guthrie, and a young totally unknown Dylan walked in and played a song he wrote that was dedicated for Woody, and Seeger said that they were both genuinely impressed.

​@@rational-public-discourse Again, not a commercial ... 🥲🥲

Ah damn' man, sorry to hear it, they worked for me xD Which moments made you think that?

I'm 73. I was around then. These folks don't know anything about anything. Electric music had been being played at Newport before and during 1965. The two narrators are parrots.

@@davidabsalom3565 ... History and biological reactions have not clear bounds; we establish them because they help us to remember such facts better, sir.

I was suspicious when I saw the black guy, but the Asian girl was a dead giveaway. Just typical PC demographics like every commercial, but not the types who usually have any interest in Dylan. then you realize they sound very robotic.

​@@MrThermostatic PC?