Видео

I believe a study confirmed sub saharan africans dont have any neaderthall dna.

You should check out paglicci 23 a 28,000 year old cro magnon. I think you'll find the results concerning Neanderthals & homo sapiens interesting

Awesome video i was able to understand everything

My sisters and I are Finnish/Sami, and our DNA tests revealed some Central Asia (Kazakhstan), Nenets, and a little East Asia (China and Japan). Others have shown Inuit, particularly from Greenland. We’re mostly Europeanized now, but our ancestors were quite a lot different.

I’m white and I have oceanic dna and I have no idea where it came from

This is such a good channel. These things are really hard to figure out chronology of. Thank you!

This video is still a Theory that all these wabos want to believe.

I an African do not have any trace of their dna as Neanderthals did not enter Africa.

Informative video, thank you 👍🏿

Why did Indo Europeans cross the road?

The Goths in today's official histories are the ancient Getae, with the name modified by historians, starting with the 4th century. There were no Germanic nations. At the beginning of Europe, the primordial Getae nations with the above genealogy existed. There are many documents. The anciant Getae=Goth. Today it is believed in the existence of some Goths, independent of the Getae; it is not known where the Goths come from, there is no known historical data for their beginnings, there is no evidence for the legend of these beginnings and, as such, nothing can be confronted with any historical date and verified as to the content of truth and error. - Jordanes writes the History of the Getae and their genealogy - in Jordanes there is a clear identity of Goths = Getae, ( De origine actibusque Getarum (The Origin and Deeds of the Getae) . -Carlo Troya (37, p 5-7) writes: '''Di mostrare, che i Geti di Zamolxi e di Decebalo furono i progenitori de Goti di Teodorico e degli Amali / To show that the Getae of Zamolxe and of Decebal were the ancestors of the Goths of Theodoric and the Amali. -Nicolo Zeno (1515-1565) was a historian, cosmographer and Venetian patrician writes - Books of the Getae - with the genealogy described above. Not Germanic nations. - Carol Lundius, in Zamolsiz, primus Getarum legislator, Uppsala, 1687 writes: p. 3 Nempč unam eandemque Gentem Getas et Gothas fuisse / Without a doubt the Getae and the Goths were one and the same nation...is their genealogy from the Getae=Goths, Lundius, President of the Academy of Uppsala-Sweden. www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/9899871/first-legislator-of-the-getae-upsala-daciaorg ( The book can be read. )... Nicolo Zeno - 1515-1565 : The identity of the Getae, , Massagetae Visigoths and Ostrogoths. The Visigoths and Ostrogoths were formed from the Amal and Balt families. From the Amal family, generations follow each other for 450 years. These Amals continued Decebal's Getae family and had kings Amal, the Ostrogotha and Theodoric the Great the Ostrogoth. After the Ostrogotha is Ermanaric the Great, who founded an empire from the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Baltic Sea, to the North Sea, Zamolxian empire, not Christian. Thus it was insinuated in the genealogy of the power of the North - In the histories of Norway, Sweden, Holland, Denmark. King Decebalus mentioned above was the king of Dacia, today's Romania. the kingdom made up of Getae and Dacians tribes. The ancestors of the Romanians. The race of the ancient Getae, a primordial race in Europe whose name was changed in the writings of historians in the III-IV centuries AD, changes that still create confusion today, numerous, our Dacians being tribes from the Getae race, created the nations of Europe under the new name of Goth. There are many documents and books written in antiquity and the Middle Ages about the identity between Getae and Goths. By migrating from the Carpathian region ( ancient Dacia , actual Romania) and the North of the Black Sea to Europe, they contributed to the birth of other nations. Sweden - (Vikings) Spain, Denmark.. Many ignored documents. we follow a history from the 19th century to the present.

Native Americans refuse to admit they are Siberian

Yes. Anahuac is older than Africa

Think homo sapiens went from Central Europe into Africa and Asia

Israelites were Caananites!

It’s such a joke. 🤣

I'm west African igbo. I have done my ancestral dna and I have 0% Neanderthal dna specifically so SOMEONE IS LYING HERE!

Human do not originate from one place, they don have to travel long distance crossing continents...all human across the globe get the same mutation during the same period... We need to look for bigger data set that not only support certain hypotesis by also to dismiss other posibilities, for example the above mentioned.

Neanderthals trapped on the west side of the CI fallout had the second wave west african overpopulation pressure to contend with, and the egyption empire ended similar to the united states. I think the people who put the pyramid on the dollar bill knew the african heroin control was spreading early on, and Africa was hauling out shiploads of food. and sure as shit, we are almost out of topsoil.

The interesting thing is this: the Haplogroups of the North Atlantic Native American specific strand are , in fact, split between ANE and East Asia related haplogroups. Certain DNA test registers Native North Atlantic American as a specific DNA strand, because enough Native North Atlantic American DNA can be tested against each other. However, certain DNA tests register it as the combination of ANE and East Asia. Especially if it's admixed with many other things. So the ANE + East Asia strand is the North Atlantic strand but if it's admixed with a lot of Whites with ANE it means the DNA test has a hard time reading the difference between the ANE from the European side and ANE from the North Atlantic side, and only registers the Asian related aspect of the North Atlantic strand. One DNA shows Native North Atlantic American and another splits it into ANE + East Asia, meaning ANE hides with White ancestry if you're mixed and only East Asia shows. But if you take the DNA of Native North Americans and cross compare then that's why its a specific strand. At the end of the day, nobody Native American has lived in Asia since before the end of the Ice Age. This is nonsense, if Native Americans are "Asian" than so is the whole human race.

The 1st Scandinavians were Ask and Embla.

Ancient DNA is telling us a very different story than what we've been told. Upper Paleolithic genome reveals deep roots of modern Eurasians Published November 16. 2015

No somali?

They want me to believe that black Africans with kinky hair, broad noses and big lips , (which there’s nothing wrong with that btw), turned into white blue eyed blonde haired people, sure, why not, I also believe in the “ toof “ fairy

I dont trust these studies, really suspicious...

Strange, Sardinian being close to Africa, Africans being the first people on the planet and no African DNA on Sardinia? What kind of white agenda is this?

Not kosher

Thank you. I have some Sardinian , Portugal, Spain, plus Siberia besides France, Germany, England, Ireland and Scotland. Neanderthal too.

We keep tryna tell y’all that y’all are Siberians why do y’all fight with us 😂😂 we are the original American Indians the ones who are so called black today

They say Africans come to Australia 60,000 years ago and the indigenous people of Australia are Africans...Well to stop this BS im a descendent from the Mungo man the oldest human found in Australia..When they did a DNA test their was no connection to Africa...Like all indigenous people of Australia our DNA dont fit into any race on earth its been proven through science DNA and archeological findings...We have dates in Australia of human occupation way ova 150,000 years old and way older...We the indigenous people of Australia know who created us its time u learnt the truth....

Thank god.

Jews do not have a single origin, different groups of Jews have different origins, the only thing they have in common is Judaism

It’s a joke

Boy us africans have noooo neanderthal dna stop lying

I’m Sardinian

I’ve been saying out of Australia for all my adult life

Out of africa has always been a crock of shite

GÖTE ON TOP

VERY wrong: Pliocene Homo lived in S-Asia: I'd think we should forget the outdated "out of Africa" slogan: apparently "out of the Indian Ocean shores" is more correct. In any case, contrary to the Afrocentric prejudices of many paleo-anthropologists, our Pliocene ancestors were NOT in Africa: 1) "Evolution of type C viral genes: evidence for an Asian origin of man" RE Benveniste & GJ Todaro 1976 Nature 261:101-8: OWMs & apes incl. man possess, as a normal component of their cellular DNA, virogenes related to the RNA of a vims isolated from baboons (this) distinguishes those OWMs & apes that have evolved in Africa from those that have evolved in Asia. Among the apes, only gorilla & chimp seem by these criteria to be African - gibbon, orang & man are identified as Asian: most of man's evolution has occurred outside Africa. 2) "Lineage-specific expansions of retroviral insertions within the genomes of African great apes but not humans and orangutans" CT Yohn cs 2005 doi 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030110 ... Pan troglodytes endogenous retrovirus-1 (PTERV1) has become integrated in the germ-line of Afr.gr.ape & OWM spp, but is absent from human & Asian ape genomes ... a RV infection bombarded chimp & gorilla genomes independently & concurrently, 3-4 Ma ... 3) "Have we been barking up the wrong ancestral tree? Australopithecines are probably not our ancestors" Mario Vaneechoutte cs 2024 Nature Anthropol.2(1), 10007 open access doi org/10.35534/natanthropol.2023.10007: ... upright posture/gait is already present to different degrees even in Miocene apes : hominoid orthogrady is a primitive characteristic : knuckle-walking has evolved in parallel, independently in both Pan & Gorilla ... numerous similarities between australopithecines & extant African apes ... not our direct ancestors ... Apparently, Pleistocene Homo typically dispersed intercontinentally along coasts->rivers, starting from Indian Ocean coasts. Recent insights in ape+human evolution: Miocene Hominoidea were already aquarboreal in swamp/coastal forests (aqua=water, arbor=tree), google e.g. - "aquarboreal" - www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

The "out of Africa" theory has already been proven false. Just like the Nebraska man and Piltdown man.

Do native Americans take offense to this? I never hear of this and genocide has been committed against them here. Why not want the relation.

🔹 The "all Out of Africa Theory" has been proven inaccurate by (David Reich, PhD, Geneticist, Harvard, while working on his project: "Mapping Ancient Migrations Worldwide using DNA", circa 2019). Data confirmed 3 times, Peer Reviewed.

The amount of sea level that has risen due to the melting of all the ice after ice-age has to have submerged massive areas of land under the oceans. There is no way that we have a full understanding of the origins of Humanity & Civilization. We need to dig all the lands submerged under the ocean if we want to even debunk or believe any theory.

Its intresting they can make up this theory when The proof also can say denisovians came to africa partner with apes, The wery few dna samples can actualy mean abundance of theory but The rasist Darwinism is number 1 as Africans are not developed and White are The peak of human develooe

we wuz kangz

of course. Sapiens didn’t develop in one place and spread. They evolved independently and maybe even after some crazy events like flooding or an ice age the most sophisticated race began traveling the world trying to rebuild. Maybe thats why pyramids are found all over the world, from south America, egypt, turkey and even western china (which china plants trees on to this day to hide them)

Prehistoric civilizations on the territory of Romania - Ancient Dacia. On the map of civilizations Romania - the ancient Dacia is white. In fact, civilization in Europe was born here, the oldest civilizations in Europe. Schela Cladovei - Romania , 9000 years . 7000 BC. Neolithic: Early Neolithic (6600-5500). Cultures: Carcea-Gura Baciului, Starčevo-Criș, Ciumești-Pișcolt; The developed Neolithic (5500-5000). Cultures: linear pottery culture, Vinča, New World, Dudești, Hamangia; Early Eneolithic (5500-4500). Crops: Boian, Vadastra, Hamangia, Vinča, Precucuteni; Late Eneolithic (4500-3800/3700). Cultures: Cucuteni 7500 years, Gumelnița 7500 years, Salcută, Hamangia 6000 years.... The Bronze Age - in Romania is a period of Romanian prehistory divided into the Early Bronze Age (circa 3,500-2,200 BC), the Middle Bronze Age (circa 2,200 - 1,600/1,500 BC) and the Late Bronze Age (circa 1,600/ 1,500 - 1,100 BC Phase A (I) - Early Bronze Age (circa 3,500-2,200 BC) Cucuteni culture - Eneolithic archaeological culture (polished stone and copper age) 7500 years, Baden-Coțofeni, Monteoru etc.... Iron Age..........etc

All Africans with Eurasian ancestry have these variants, everysingle one.

The proto semetic according to many experts would be haplogroup E. Which is almost non existent In Middle East today.

Of course it is. They lie jews that is Fake jews satans kids are evil evil evil.