- Видео 6
- Просмотров 91 047
Koham BMU
Добавлен 31 мар 2017
Is the RTE Act Causing a Systematic Destruction of Private Schools ?- A Talk by Shri Amit Chandra
Amit Chandra currently heads Advocacy vertical of Centre for Civil Society (CCS). His prior work has been focused on advocacy and research. He has successfully led advocacy campaign called Jeevika: Law, Liberty & Livelihood for recognition of street vending as legitimate occupation in urban space which led to legislation formation in Rajasthan and Bihar. His research initiative in governance led to publication of Delhi Citizen Handbook 2009.
Просмотров: 1 831
Видео
How should India engage with the Islamic world? : A Talk by Shri Sanjay Dixit
Просмотров 32 тыс.7 лет назад
Shri Sanjay Dixit is a part of the Indian Administrative Services.He is currently a Secretary in the Govt. of Rajasthan, Command Area Development. He was previously in the Merchant Navy. He also writes frequently in Swarajya Magazine.
Demonetization: Was it the right way to make India go cashless?
Просмотров 4537 лет назад
Mandar Kagade and Rajesh Dhuddu debate this very relevant issue. After graduating from the Government Law College, Mumbai in 2008, Mandar Kagade obtained his LL.M. from Columbia University School of Law, New York in 2011 graduating with Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar Honors. He practised law with several law firms in Mumbai focusing on private equity transactions, infrastructure and general corpora...
The Why and How of Retaking India's Educational Institutions from the Left- Shri Anirban Ganguly
Просмотров 7137 лет назад
Dr. Ganguly is the Director at the Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Research Foundation - one of the most influential institutions in the current government. He has authored multiple books, the latest of which is 'The Modi Doctrine'.
Rethinking Nation, Nationalism & State in India - A talk by Shri Abhinav Prakash
Просмотров 8 тыс.7 лет назад
Rethinking Nation, Nationalism & State in India: Need for a New Conservative Paradigm - A Talk by Shri Abhinav Prakash Abhinav Prakash is a research scholar in economics from JNU. His interests span the social issues, politics, history, economics and religion.And one day he hopes to grasp the reasons behind rise and fall of civilisations
Indian Courts and Judicial Restraint : A talk by Shri J Sai Deepak
Просмотров 48 тыс.7 лет назад
An engineer turned litigator turned arguing counsel who appears before the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. Sai has carved a niche for himself in IP litigation, Competition law, Drug regulatory laws, indirect taxation and technology laws. Sai has handled multiple patent matters across technology segments.An avid writer and a prolific legal blogger ,his blog “The Demanding Mis...
How fortunate and unfortunate the audience is for getting to meet him but with such less intrest
Sai sir is a legend and inspiration for the gen z
Tere se jyada wafadaar hain muslim desh ke liye ☺
Toh terrorist kaun ban Raha hai 😊
Yah kabhi musli. Ke khilaf bolta hai kabhi sikhon ke yah kaun hai 2 kauri ka dalla 😁
Tu kya hai oye dhakkan jo yahaan hindu muslim kar raha hai tere parivaar ne kya kiya hai desh ke liye hai koi jawaab 🙄
Bhosdike tu bhi hindu hi hai nalle Sikh koi dharm nahi hai wo angrejo ne hindu ko divide karne ke liye banaya tha Pehle ke jamane main sabse bada beta sikh banta tha jo dharm ki raksha liye ladta aur unko rajput train karte the lekin angrejo ne use mazhab bana diya Abe tera guru nanak hindu khatri hai gadhe aur tum sabki guru granth main prabhu sri ram ka naam sabse jyada hai
Blessing to youngsters,,wata factual eye opener to the yester year / older generation too
After Nupur Sharma this hits differently doesn't it. Jsd predicted exactly this. We need to wake the fuk up
Huge respects
Based
muslims to engage with their Creator than anything else..God decides
They are not special.
Judiciary must be ashamed of overactivism in the recent agitation of ryots on the borders of Delhi and of course in Panama papers controvercy.simply burnt their hands and still putting brave face.and continuing activism not bothering about their primary function of adjudication long pending cases.
What I mean is the voting right of judiciary. must be withdrawn
Judges shd not participate in election process.
Judgesappoint themselves.
Wonderful oration !speaking the voice of common man.
What happens if AGI standsup and refuse to participate in proceedings that cross the Lakshman rekha of.Judiciary.
Perhaps one more dose of i ternal EMERGENCY is needed to stop judicial activism and show their place in Indian democracy and constitution.
Judicial activism particularly taking pleasure in enyertaining PIL s is plaguing this country and putting a brake to development of this country and is continuing with vigour by tje presrnt regime of SC.
Please continue your efforts to educate the society
So clear an interpretation.wow. super
I feel so bad that so less people attended such wonderful lecture.
From this, to demolishing giants in 2020-2021.. JSD has entered every educated household ! Hats off !
Such a refined speaker he is
So much misinformation......most of RW in India is blatantly saying India is nation of Hindus.....That's what LW is fighting....
Last message lit 🔥🔱💯
See the energy level and the urge to tell truth...those who were present in that particular auditorium are really blessed and lucky to hear Sai...next Vivekananda....👍👍
Thankyou for sharing this video with us. Bohot dhanyavad ji
It is paid stooges of government like you who are pushing a beautiful nation of 70 yrs to divisive socio political stage where civil strife will germinate to deep and bloody skirmishes.
This program name is in hindi and they are speaking in English...😂😂
It's okay. It will reach to masses even in south india
BJP organised Vijay Rally for the accused.
As expected reaction 😂
I admire sai sir's efforts, hear every single bit of knowledge that he is sharing has to cherish with lakhs of people present. But I saw a very low number of people attending it. Compare to the crowd gathered in other RUclipsr fans meet. Why? Who's a fault it is?
nice
ईस्लाम per their Books and history is enemy of democratic form of govt, and Islam is violent against any other religion. So then, there is no sense in giving Islam a legal status in a democracy. Angola has declared Islam illegal. Why Bhaarat and Bhaaratiyas show lack of wisdom even after the 1947 partition, where we gave them a lot of land, a lot of soldiers, and a lot of cash for treasury. Did we do all that so that they can safely cook destructive designs against us and Hindustan? Additionally, Almost every of the 53 or so Muslim countries, all religions are illegal except Islam. So, no democracy has a rational argument to give Islam a legal status. So, how to deal with the Muslim (internal or external to Hindustan)? Answer is deal rationally with them, not like a fool or coward. United economic boycott is one of a few mighty means. jaya sri krishna!
Based on below rationale I believe that it would be great if Bhaarat replaces its current constitution with US constitution with some added Hindu culture flavor. Rationale: 1. The US constitution is drafted by best minds of the time. It is written in such a way that one cannot do any injustice that the British did to American colonies. In contrast, Bhaarat's constitution is created by the British (the foreign rulers with anti-Hindu culture). Consequently the constitution is anti-Hindu, and so anti-majority. 2. The US constitution is small and simple, and you could keep in your shirt pocket. In contrast, the Bhaarat's constitution is big, and complicated. 3. This time is info age, and the need is that the situations change rapidly, and the govt must take right decisions quickly. This is possible by US constitution where the President is the highest authority. In contrast, the Bhaarat's constitution has Parliament as the highest authority, and Parliamentary process for decision-making is really slow, and decisions cannot be made quickly. 4. US democracy is mature. Govt employees and politicians think that they are the servants of the people. In contrast, Bhaarat's democracy is immature, and the govt employees and politicians think they are the authority over the people. 5. US constitution provides freedom to carry arms. In contrast, while the criminals do carry arms illegally, the general public is not allowed to keep arms. This puts the innocent public as the easy target for jihadis, the anti-nationals. jaya sri krishna!
I find this talk very informative. I request new and existing Hindu lawyers to amend the constitution of Hindustan to be pro-Hindu, and not anti-Hindu (anti-majority). Below article identifies five defects in the constitutions of most democracies. Please fix those issues from the constitution of Hindustan. -- Five Defects of Democratic Constitutions By Suresh Vyas Democracy means a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. It is a government for the people and by the people of a country. The people draft a constriction, and then agree to live by it. The defects in most constitutions of the current democratic countries are: Protection of minorities Freedom of religion Separate laws for different groups of people Majority (even if unrighteous) rules Human Rights Each of the above is discussed below. The constriction says to protect the minority, but a minority can be righteous or unrighteous, tolerant or intolerant, divine, or demoniac, etc. There is no need to protect unrighteous, intolerant, or demoniac group whether a minority or majority. In a healthy body, a cancer cell is a minority. To protect it (let it live in the body) is suicidal. Same for a nation. The constitution assumes that all religions are equally good. This is not correct. Some religions are not tolerant of any other faiths, and constantly act to wipe out other religions and cultures from the world. Islam and Christianity are such religions. In contrast, the Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind. Any two religions can be objectively compared to see which religion has higher potential to cause peace at personal to national and global level. Universal criteria for comparing religions is stated at below site: skanda987.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/religions-and-religious-freedom_paper.pdf The constitution needs to say that all tolerant religions will be legal, and intolerant (I mean respectful to religion of the nation) will be illegal. In one country there cannot be separate laws for separate groups. The Muslims always have asked for separate law-Sharia-for them, separate prayer rooms, etc. This cannot be allowed in non-Muslim countries. On a related point, the government should not favor-give benefits-to any group over other group. This is discrimination. E.g. in Hindustan the gov’t has special quotas and benefits for so called “dalits” or oppressed group of people. Such favors backfire, because the dalits (the shudras) want to remain dalits for ever to rip the free benefits even when no one is oppressing them. Instead of favoring dalits, the gov’t should punish those who oppress others. The Hindus need to understand this: The Vedic society is made of four varNas: Brahmins (the spiritually intellectual class), Kshatriyas (the protectors of the society), the vaishyas (the traders), and the shudras (so called dalits now for mean political purpose) who provide labor and service to society. Now according to Bhagavad Gita and the Vedas, this varNa I defined by one’s guNa (qualities) and karma (one’s actions and aptitudes). It is not defined by one’s birth. Additionally, dharma does not tell that a varNa should oppress or hate any other varNa. So, the gov’t needs to force the Hindus to live per the Vedic dharma, and stop providing quotas and benefits to dalits. Majority Rules. If the majority people are less intelligent, or barbaric, or greedy, or criminals, or violent, they will rule. Such governments, e.g. that of Pakistan, cause suffering for themselves and for other countries. The majority need to have wisdom to elect those who are really intelligent, capable, and righteous leaders. Human Rights: The democracies (their constitutions) assume that anyone with a human body is human. Accordingly, the demoniac people, e.g. Hitler, Idi Amin, Mafias, terrorists, Human Traffickers, etc. are all humans. The Veda, however, does not agree to such a definition of a human. The Vedic scripture says: aahaara in.ndraa bhaya maithunam cha saamaanyam etad pashubirnaraaNaam It says eating, sleeping, self-protecting, and mating are common between men and animals. Animals do not do anything more than that. So, if a person being does that only, then he/she is an animal. Below is an evidence from Rig Veda that at birth one is not a human. तन्तुं तन्वन् रजसो भानुमन् विहि ज्योतिष्मतः पथो रक्ष धिया कृतान् । अनुल्अणं वयत जोगु वामपो मनुर्भव जनया दैव्यम् जनम् ॥ Rig. 10.53.6॥ “May you spinning the thread of divine knowledge, follow the splendid light of illumination, and protect the pathways well, which have been constructed by sacred acts and divine wisdom; may you render the pious works of the worshiper free from defect; may you first strive to become MAN, and then rise to the status of an enlightened one - the DIVINE.” - Rig Veda 10.53.6 So, to make a new born a human, the child has to undergo yagnopavit (holy thread) samskaar at the age around eight. After this samskaar one is called a dwiija (born again as a human.) Then he goes to live at a Vedic guru’s ashram to study the Veda and other subjects till the age of 25 while remaining a brahmachaari. While the non-Hindu world talks about Human Rights, the Veda talks about Human Responsibilities. The constitution of Bhaarat needs to be made pro-Vedic and define a human per the Veda. That way the criminals and demoniacs will not have human rights and can be treated according to what they did. jaya sri krishna!
Jai Sai Ram! J Sai Deepak! India a glittering marvel of democracy and freedom.
Societies have always looked for sensible and helpful guidelines.
Islamic community is hardworking, aggressive and emotion oriented community and part of world family. So we all need to enhance and utilize good qualities and help to overcome harmfull natures.
If there is an 'Islamic World' then why is not there a 'Hindu World' or a 'Christian World'?
It is always a pleasure to listen to you
Jai Shree Krishna
. .
Buy why can’t a common man sue the government in our judicial system?
India is a civilization state , so many languages, cultures are thriving due to the sanatan dharmic principle of let live and let others live by respecting other civilizations..we speak different languages, follow different traditions and rituals. Respecting other fellow human being irrespective of his/her language ,traditions is the hall mark of sanatan dama. But Abrahmic Faith's won't subscribe this, they respect other human being only if they subscribe to their belief system. For them the other human beings if they subscribe different belief systems, traditions no respect for them. Leave alone tolerance, respect and they subscribe to the doctrine that other humans are worthy of contempt , destruction and killing. But Santana peoples with out understanding Abramic Faith's blissfully believes that Abrahmic Faith's also reciprocate. But not so in practice and history is full of these atrocities, large scale killings of non believers of Islam and christianity. The Santana Dharma never encourages homoginigation. Most of the Sanatan people think blindly that Abrahmic Faith's will also reciprocate the same respect and love for each other.But this belief system is is being cleverly exploited by Abrahmic Faith's to annihilate satan dharmic civilization. That is the status of Sanatan dharma in India now. Let us hope sanatan will realize this for our very existantinace and survival of our civillagation.
Tarekh fateh ko islam ka 1percent bhi knowledge nahi hai.
Mhin jatiwadi hai ye bnda .......
Kahna kya chaahte ho? Kis adhar par?
SC is the most corrupt place on universe.
First of all STOP CONVERTING or Religious convertion! No religion is superior or inferior to one another! Don't make Religion s commercial commodity!
Wickkipidia is reported to be anti Hindu and anti India. Is it true.