5LOAVES2FISH
5LOAVES2FISH
  • Видео 73
  • Просмотров 18 160

Видео

Another Reason Why the Scapegoat CANNOT Represent Christ!
Просмотров 9314 часов назад
Another Reason Why the Scapegoat CANNOT Represent Christ!
What KIND of Sins Did the Scapegoat bear? Identifying the Scapegoat Part 3
Просмотров 4916 часов назад
What KIND of Sins Did the Scapegoat bear? Identifying the Scapegoat Part 3
Does the Scapegoat Make Atonement for Sins?
Просмотров 7914 дней назад
Does the Scapegoat Make Atonement for Sins?
Did Uriah Smith CONFIRM Ellen White’s RACISM?
Просмотров 1872 месяца назад
Watch ADL on this subject: ruclips.net/video/nKUAvmz50qk/видео.htmlsi=-yMpBWX57NIQHuzX ruclips.net/video/LDWAWys5aWI/видео.htmlsi=zdWc_cZ9AVI5ZHTQ
Did You Know that the 2 Great Commandments are a Summary?
Просмотров 552 месяца назад
Did You Know that the 2 Great Commandments are a Summary?
Small Study on the 5TH COMMANDMENT
Просмотров 152 месяца назад
Small Study on the 5TH COMMANDMENT
Is the Sabbath Ceremonial?
Просмотров 432 месяца назад
Is the Sabbath Ceremonial?
Perfect Like Our Heavenly Father
Просмотров 422 месяца назад
Perfect Like Our Heavenly Father
Answering their QUESTION & COMMENTS about the Law and the Sabbath
Просмотров 1062 месяца назад
Answering their QUESTION & COMMENTS about the Law and the Sabbath
Is Jesus Michael? What does the Bible Say? Response to iThink Biblically
Просмотров 2072 месяца назад
Is Jesus Michael? What does the Bible Say? Response to iThink Biblically
10 Commandments ONLY for Israel? #10commandments #sda
Просмотров 1232 месяца назад
10 Commandments ONLY for Israel? #10commandments #sda
10 Commandments as 10 PROMISES? #10commandments #sda #jesuschrist
Просмотров 1233 месяца назад
10 Commandments as 10 PROMISES? #10commandments #sda #jesuschrist
What’s Jesus’ NEW Commandment?
Просмотров 813 месяца назад
What’s Jesus’ NEW Commandment?
How to Keep the Seventh-day Sabbath Holy?
Просмотров 1183 месяца назад
#sda #truth #sabbath
How did this Seventh-day Adventist OVERCOME Strong Criticism Against His Church?
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.3 месяца назад
How did this Seventh-day Adventist OVERCOME Strong Criticism Against His Church?
Don’t Be Discouraged :)
Просмотров 653 месяца назад
Don’t Be Discouraged :)
Does the Scapegoat Represent Satan? Identifying Satan Part 1
Просмотров 2793 месяца назад
Does the Scapegoat Represent Satan? Identifying Satan Part 1
Book of Enoch Validates SDA View of Azazel!
Просмотров 5083 месяца назад
Book of Enoch Validates SDA View of Azazel!
Pastor Ivor Myers’ Appeal to Independent Ministries @powerofthelamb
Просмотров 5143 месяца назад
Pastor Ivor Myers’ Appeal to Independent Ministries @powerofthelamb
4 Falls of Satan in the book of Revelation! Part 8 of the “Is Jesus Michael” series.
Просмотров 753 месяца назад
4 Falls of Satan in the book of Revelation! Part 8 of the “Is Jesus Michael” series.
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Part 7 @samshamoun4720 @answeringadventism
Просмотров 4683 месяца назад
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Part 7 @samshamoun4720 @answeringadventism
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? (part 6): REFORMERS’ & POST-REFORMERS’ VIEW
Просмотров 2213 месяца назад
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? (part 6): REFORMERS’ & POST-REFORMERS’ VIEW
Is Michael the Archangel Jesus Christ? Part 5
Просмотров 634 месяца назад
Is Michael the Archangel Jesus Christ? Part 5
Does Jude 9 Prove Michael is NOT Jesus? @shamounian @Answeriing Adventism
Просмотров 2514 месяца назад
Does Jude 9 Prove Michael is NOT Jesus? @shamounian @Answeriing Adventism
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Prt 3
Просмотров 614 месяца назад
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Prt 3
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Part 2 @shamounian
Просмотров 354 месяца назад
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Part 2 @shamounian
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Prt 1
Просмотров 2364 месяца назад
Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Prt 1
Is Ellen White RACIST? Reaction video part 2
Просмотров 854 месяца назад
Is Ellen White RACIST? Reaction video part 2
Is Ellen White Racist?
Просмотров 1154 месяца назад
Is Ellen White Racist?

Комментарии

  • @RiseoftheFourthAngel-kj4bz
    @RiseoftheFourthAngel-kj4bz 2 дня назад

    Good point bro. Solid. The truth is clear and so harmonious. Why anyone would insist the scapegoat represents Jesus after seeing this is insane.

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 3 дня назад

    So the sin are on the cross and it's (only the first goat). how did they get on the first goat the first goat does not bear any sin( they burned that goat!)!!!!! You said they're on the devil ! devil.! This all happens on the same day! and you said they're placed on the devil? So where are your sins at?? on the devil ??or Jesus Christ on the same day?. What happened to the second goat previously you said he dies. ..Well now that Lucifer is dead . you're free to do pretty much what you want!. Do you realize how convoluted you are?. does the first goat come back.? They burned the goat! Where are your sins at? It requires faith that they're gone you have just established there's no way you're going to have that! That's what's required for salvation that's why Christians are set free. you're not that's why you're making videos! This is what you did with Daniel 814 it completely entrapped you into never being able to trust at the cross!

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 3 дня назад

    Where is the verse that the animal becomes the sin bearer. You just added to scripture. I'm you know what Revelation 22 says about that?. It's only the blood that pays the price. The blood has no sins in it. You're going to pay with sins right? What blasphemy

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 3 дня назад

    2nd Peter 2:1-4. Galatians 1:18 and 9. 2 Thessalonians chapter 10,11... 2nd Timothy 3: 7.

  • @johncoleman8555
    @johncoleman8555 5 дней назад

    Pastor Myers is on point! The shaking happening Gods allowing this to happen. You see where peoples hearts are really at

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 6 дней назад

    No the sinner didn't kill the Goat.. It was Aaron that kills the goat! And there's no sins placed on that Goat!. You've got no scripture verse that says that.. it's the blood. perfect blood of Jesus Christ that (pays the price. )Your sins are not forgiven!! and you're going to stay there by your own continuation of making lies !about what Jesus Christ actually does at the cross !you're speaking the devil's language every time you make one of these videos. And he loves it!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      I was referring to the daily services. The sinner lay his hand on the sacrificial animal’s head, representing transference of sins, and kills it according to Leviticus 1:4-5; 3:1-2; 4:3-4; 4:22-24; 4:27-29.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 4 дня назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHthere is no verse in the Bible that says the sin are transferred to that goat!.. the goat's blood was meant for payment

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 6 дней назад

    There's no place in the Bible that says the second goat dies..your breaking the 9th commandment ..!!!it doesn't die. So you're saying that's the( devil). so you've got the devil dead already! so he technically can't exist!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      He is let go into the wilderness, never to return. So eventually, it will die after a time. The scapegoat is completely separated, never to return to be among the camp of Israel.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 4 дня назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHso why did the goat you're saying is the devil come back the next year. How many Lucifer's are there? You just got done saying the devil is dead in the wilderness. Then you got the devil coming back the next year.. you're not in your right mind.. did he bring the sins with him when he came back. ?How many years of sins was he carrying when he comes back? To add another load on top of the load that he's been carrying ever since the time of Moses first started this? Do you understand what you're saying?. When in the levitical system did the first Goat ever come back.? What did they do with the first Goat. The Bible says they burned the first goat!

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 6 дней назад

    What you're saying is Jesus Christ is not God !! Did God die on the day of atonement.? Jesus is 100% God and 100% man.. it was the man of Jesus Christ that died for your sins..that's why he came in the flesh!.. so you have no salvation ..that's all you're saying . and you're going to stay there until you meet the real Jesus of Hebrews 7:13! That does nothing at the altar!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      The death of sacrificial animals happened at the altar on the daily services. These animals acts as substitutes, dying in the place of the sinners. These sacrifices represents Jesus dying in our place. The scapegoat did not die in our place.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 4 дня назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHthat's right the scapegoat did not die. God did not die that day!. The first goat died. The son of God...And it was the blood that was used to pay ! ( pay the price ). It was perfect no sins in the blood! And they (burned ).the Goat! there was no sin in the Goats blood. If you put sins in the Goat's blood you're paying for sins with sins !God is going to destroy you entirely! Because then you have (no remission!..) (reparations is atonement) you didn't pay it! That's the difference between a Christian and a non-Christian. And that's what creates a cult. You changed who Jesus is and what he does. in 1844 with Daniel 8:14 because you have to add a cleansing. Which is not what Daniel 814 is about. You created this! What you just said ..what he did is worthless.! Where are your sins?

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 6 дней назад

    Do you realize what blaspheming the holy spirit means in Matthew 12:31 32? Attributing with the holy Spirit Jesus Christ does at the cross to the Devil Himself!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      I know what Matthew 12:31-32 says. The devil did not die on the cross like. But he will die in the wilderness outside the camp.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 4 дня назад

      ​@@5LVS2FSHso if you know what it says. And I just showed you it can't possibly be the devil.. because you got him coming back the next year! And the first goat is burned he never returns. so it's Jesus Christ. The holy Spirit at the cross ..now read Matthew 12:31 and 32 again!

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 6 дней назад

    Wait till you meet the real Jesus!

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 6 дней назад

    Could you tell me why you're only showing 11 comments when there's 13 on the last one!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      I don’t know why. I may have accidentally removed the when replying to them.

  • @davidwilliams6580
    @davidwilliams6580 6 дней назад

    Wow. Satan is your scapegoat? Here are some biblical reasons why the scapegoat ABSOLUTELY represents CHRIST "1. Bearing Sins: The scapegoat, chosen by lot and sent into the wilderness, symbolically carried the sins of Israel after they were placed upon it by the high priest (Leviticus 16:21-22). This imagery parallels Christ’s role in taking upon Himself the sins of humanity. Consider Isaiah 53:6, where it says, "The Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all," which shows that Christ bore the sins of the people, much like the scapegoat bore the sins of Israel. 2. Removing Sins: The scapegoat removed the sins of the people, carrying them into an uninhabited place (Leviticus 16:22). This resonates with the way Scripture describes Christ’s work of removing our sins. Psalm 103:12 says, "As far as the east is from the west, so far has He removed our transgressions from us." This is the function of the scapegoat-taking sins far away, much like Christ removes the believer's sins. 3. Symbol of Substitution: Christ is the ultimate substitutionary sacrifice. The idea of substitution is present throughout Scripture in passages like 2 Corinthians 5:21: "God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God." The scapegoat was also a substitute, bearing the people’s sins so they wouldn’t have to bear them themselves. 4. Contrast with Satan: Nowhere in Scripture is Satan depicted as one who bears sins or takes them away. Instead, Satan is described as the "accuser" (Revelation 12:10) and the one who leads people into sin (John 8:44). His role is to tempt and condemn, not to bear or remove sins. 5. Christ as Both Offerings: Hebrews 9:11-12 speaks of Christ entering the heavenly sanctuary with His own blood, securing eternal redemption. He is also likened to the sin offering made on the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:15-16). In some interpretations, Jesus fulfills both the role of the sin offering (slain goat) and the scapegoat (one who bears sins and removes them from the people), completing both aspects of atonement. By comparing the scapegoat’s role with the work of Christ, Scripture supports the idea that the scapegoat is a type of Christ. He bears and removes sin, much like the ultimate atoning work of Jesus on the cross". I thank Jesus Christ every day for being my scapegoat. The One who Knew no sin, bearing and removing my sins. Forever, I will praise His name.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 6 дней назад

      When someone blasphemes the holy Spirit and and (attributes to the Devil Himself ...with what the holy Spirit does it to cross!.. these guys can't repent.! Matthew 12:31 and 32! I've spoken to lots of these people showing them what it really means. Like you did .they refused to repent! they don't care! Absolutely no conscience at that point! they've got no conscience! I spoke to this guy on his previous video..! showed him everything that the scapegoat does ..and what He doesn't do .and he refuses to listen to God!! (The word itself! )!! So it's not like he's doing it in ignorance!.. ignorance allows for repentance he's passed that! he is defiant against God!. With no conscience!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      Will make a response video to your comments.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 5 дней назад

      @@5LVS2FSH you're interested in trying to create a means of getting money from RUclips your same as Judas

    • @davidwilliams6580
      @davidwilliams6580 5 дней назад

      @5LVS2FSH looking forward to your response video. But in the meantime (in a nutshell), here is roughly what YOUR VIEW is on the scapegoat, YOUR view is that the scapegoat (Azazel) in Leviticus 16 represents Satan. You argue that this goat, which is led into the wilderness after the Day of Atonement, symbolizes the final judgment and removal of sin from God's people. Satan, you believe, will ultimately bear the responsibility for sin and be cast into the wilderness of desolation (Revelation 20:1-3. however Jesus is the sin offering whose blood provides atonement. Will respond deeper after your response video. All the best.

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      @@JamieElison I’m not looking for money. If I get monetized then praise the Lord. I’ll be fine if I don’t. If I think you have a good argument I’ll respond with a video. Your critiques only motivate me to study more.

  • @juligraham7319
    @juligraham7319 6 дней назад

    Amen🎉🎉

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 6 дней назад

      Are you thanking him for blaspheming the holy Spirit!

    • @juligraham7319
      @juligraham7319 4 дня назад

      @@JamieElison friend, everything stated is Bible truth. Jesus is the Lord’s goat of Lev 16. The other goat represents Satan as paralleled in Rev 20 who is sent to the wilderness, aka the desolate earth, to wait for his destruction outside of the New Jerusalem, aka outside of the camp.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 4 дня назад

      @@juligraham7319 where does it say the goat is the devil.?And where does it say that devil is tied to that goat ..(is tied to Revelation chapter chapter 20).?. Just print the verse that the devil is connected to any of anything. pertaining to Leviticus 1610!. You got realizing you never use the Bible once there! Where did The Sins go that were in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2:24.. this all happens on the same day! . And you said the sins are placed on the devil that means they have to be on the devil on the same day! Where did those sins go on that day? How come your story is different than the uploader and you're both from SDA? He said the goat dies!

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 4 дня назад

      @@juligraham7319 when was Jesus ever in the sanctuary in Leviticus.?He was already outside the camp! he never went into the sanctuary !Jesus Christ is the sanctuary! he said so. He said destroy this Temple and I will raise it up in 3 days!. What did he do with the sins?

    • @juligraham7319
      @juligraham7319 4 дня назад

      @@JamieElison psalms 77 states “thy way is in the sanctuary.” So the entire way of God, is found in the sanctuary. It is a type of the antitype. It reveals how sin was forgiven by the blood of the lamb, how the high priest atoned for the people, and how sin will be cleansed from the sanctuary. Anyitypically pointing to Christ our lamb, Christ our high priest, and the final cleansing of sin for all time. Historically, going back thousands of years, it was common knowledge that the scapegoat is Satan.

  • @okwijames947
    @okwijames947 7 дней назад

    Keep doing the good work bro, critics will never cease to exist They were in the time of Moses, Jesus Christ and They will continue until Christ second coming

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      Did you notice give you a heart and he knows he's lying he still can't interpret the cornerstone where he's coming from but he's standing on a false teaching so how does he know what he's doing.. That's what the Pharisees did they slapped each other on the back for telling Jesus that he wasn't God .and then they murdered him. All they could do was break the 9th commandment.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      Where did the sins go in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2:24 on the same day what did he do with them?

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 6 дней назад

      @@JamieElisonI dont understand your question. I may be able to answer correctly if I understand you correctly.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 6 дней назад

      @@5LVS2FSH are there sins in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2 24. Does the Bible say the sins are in Jesus himself. 1 Peter 2:24 yes or no.? If they are.. how did they get there? And what did He do with the sins? (you said they're on the devil!) On the same day!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 5 дней назад

      @@JamieElisonChrist bore our sins on the cross before He went up into the heavenly Tabernacle to be High Priest. The scapegoat did not die at the altar, he was sent away from the camp carrying all the sins never to return.

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 7 дней назад

    Your issue is Daniel 8:14!!!!! You destroyed every Prophecy in the Bible by that misinterpretation !and destroy Jesus Christ at the same time! You can't interpret Daniel 8 if your life depended upon it!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      My issue is not Daniel 8:14. The Day of atonement is a the day when the Sanctuary is cleansed from all the uncleanliness of Israel’s sins. No hands were placed upon the head of the first goat. That means no sin was transferred the blood of the first goat was not ladened with sin, it did not contain sin, it was not contaminated with sin. This uncontaminated blood was used to cleanse the sanctuary according to Leviticus 16:19. This only happens in the Day of Atonement.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHthat happens every time they use the sanctuary otherwise somebody's going to die! Leviticus 16: 2... Exodus 28. 2 Samuel 6: 6,7. You as much as touch the place and you're dead!. That's how important it is to keep sins out of the sanctuary. Even on the outside ,! you still haven't said... shown...how the sins got in there !! and you're lying about what it says. I don't think you know that you're lying . but that's what you're doing... how long is it going to take. Take you to understand the 2,300 days of Daniel 8:14 has got nothing to do with the levitical sanctuary.. ?.. and that's where you're cleansing of the sanctuary got started! why don't you understand what Daniel 8 is saying? That's the cornerstone of where you come from.... You're calling Jesus Christ a liar in Matthew 24:15.. the transgression of desolation Daniel 8:13 what's he telling you?. (at the same time) and you don't realize what you're doing.. how can the sins be in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2:24 ?and on the devil at the same time! You better understand what Daniel 8 says ( before).. (before)!!!!. you speak you can't get to the fall of October the 22nd. In 1844 with the (false starting date). you already have established. ..The math will not let you do it . (if you don't want to believe the prophecy ).!!the math proves it doesn't work!!. That also destroys your Daniel 9:27 concept at the exact same time.! Absolutely nothing you believe is the truth ..but you're convinced it is! You don't bother looking!.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      @@5LVS2FSH whose blood does the goat represent in all those other places you're trying to twist this thing with? Is that your own blood going in there? The guy that carries that in there would die

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​​Why are you not letting them all post. I sent you two of them oh I see you're hiding them.explaining what you're doing. Where's the other one. Where did The Sins go that are in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2:24 on the same day?​@@5LVS2FSH

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      Without Daniel 8:14 you've got no cleansing of a sanctuary .that's what created you in the start ..it does to matter. !!!!A totally blind person would( create) completely supported by the Devil Himself! that issue .and totally blind people would follow it!! You can't even reach the fall of 1844 October the 22nd from your starting point with 2300 the math will not let you do it!

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 7 дней назад

    Where does it say that the sins (are transferred to the animal )?print the verse..! Only the blood goes into the sanctuary representing Jesus Christ perfect blood. Perfect blood to pay for your sins you're not going to pay for your sins with sins! Remission means to pay for (remission ).means to pay for. . (Reparations)! paid!..Where does it say sins go into the sanctuary? Print the verse!. Where does it say The Sanctuary is cleansed. For sins the record being recorded on the horns. Is your conscience. The knowledge of sin written on your heart at the same time as the horns.... Print the verse. .You're cleansing of the sanctuary is coming from a false interpretation of Daniel 8:14 ..(which has absolutely nothing to do with the levitical sanctuary!)! And is creating you to destroy the levitical sanctuary system to to match that false understanding to make it try to represent what Daniel 8:14( does not say) Daniel 8 does not say! so now you have to (understand) what Daniel 814 says!.. what does Daniel 8:13 say? Jesus told you how to understand that in Matthew 2415! . the whole thing is coming from a (indoctrination). that is false!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      Sins transferred: Lev 16:21 Sins were in the tabernacle, therefore it needed cleansing by the blood of the sin offered: Lev 16:15-16 Blood sprinkled on the altar of sacrifice to cleanse it: Kev 16:18-19 Remission of sins were paid in the daily sacrifices. Sprinkling of blood seven times represents cleansing (Lev 16:19). Blood was sprinkled inside the tent (Lev 16:15-17) and on the altar outside (Lev 16:18-19)

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​@@5LVS2FSHthat is atonement being paid for the record ( no sins are in there) show me how the sins went in there.. print the verse that the sins go into the sanctuary! you still haven't done that.. atonement does not mean cleansing! It is payment for what you can't pay for. So if the sins are cleansed( what sins are you going to be placing on the devil)?? if they don't exist. If they're blotted out and remembered no more inside the sanctuary.( which it doesn't say they're in there in the first place )..what sins are you going to place on the second goat?.???. what happened to the ones that are on the cross??. Jesus never went into the sanctuary on the day of atonement!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      @@JamieElison According to Hebrews 9, Jesus is in the heavenly Tabernacle.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      @@5LVS2FSH that's true .but he's not doing anything up there besides (being my mediator.)! Sitting at the right hand of the father.. where does it say he's doing an (atonement there )and why would there be a sanctuary need to be cleanse? do you still haven't shown (where sins go into the sanctuary( in the blood of Jesus Christ!.)....((( And where are those sins that that were in Jesus Christ on crucifixion day! )))??You still haven't done what you were told to do in Matthew 2415! What is the transgression of desolation in Daniel 8:13 that you're supposed to understand?

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 7 дней назад

    In both cases Leviticus 4 and Leviticus 16 Aaron places his hands on the first goat in Leviticus 16 .otherwise he can't kill the goat... the hands are laid on the head of the first Goat. But it does not say sins are placed on that goat!. you're not telling the truth. Leviticus 4 is for sins that are unknown or or (unintentional ).it's a different type of sacrifice.! You're creating a scenario that's not there..

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      Leviticus 4 is also for sins KNOWN (Lev 4:14, 23, 28). Base on Leviticus 16:21, laying on of hands represents transfer of sins.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​​Where does it say it's transferring sins?. To verify there's no sins going there you say that's (only the first Goat. ).So how did the Sins get on the cross. ?The first Goat does not bear any sins! the blood goes in but there's no sins in the blood!! otherwise you can't pay the bill! The blood is perfect for what you can't pay for.. you're saying you're paying sins for sins!!!!.. the perfect blood of Jesus Christ you have just contaminated the blood!...( He is paying ) He did what you can't do! because you're a sinner....​@@5LVS2FSH

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHhow come you're not letting me respond to this and letting them be visible in the normal stream without hiding them

    • @okwijames947
      @okwijames947 7 дней назад

      There's nothing like the sins that are unknown 😅

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      @@okwijames947 I know one that you just committed and you don't know about it!

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 7 дней назад

    Where does it say The Sanctuary was( cleansed.) There was an( atonement) (made( for )the sanctuary )that means (payment to the sanctuary)!!!!..( who's the sanctuary. )...(The sanctuary is God himself)!! ( remission means to pay for )..it does not remove the sin. ! For if the sin were removed they (wouldn't exist). so what sins are you going to place on the second goat for the atonement to be finished? There's still the second part of the atonement Leviticus 1610!..

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      Sins placed on the Scapegoat are sins already atoned for and forgiven during the daily sacrifices (Lev 4; 16:22) Sins or uncleanness of the people were in the tent and on the outside altar. Therefore blood was sprinkled seven times in the tent and on the altar to cleanse them (Lev 16:15-19).

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHwhere does it say that there are sins on the altar ?where does it say the sins are placed on the the goat?( the first goat bears no sins). And the goat don't go into the sanctuary..( the perfect blood that pays your price goes in.).. So how did the sins get in there? What did Jesus do with the sins in him on the cross 1 Peter 2:24 (it all happens on the same day where they go!..)???

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​@@5LVS2FSHyou've got a completely remove Leviticus 1610 out of your Bible. because the atonement still (wasn't completed ).until the sins go away! What God himself does Isaiah 43 verse 25... So what sins are you going to place on the second goat if they're already gone in the sanctuary? they're forgiving blotted out remembered no more when does Isaiah 43:25! When does that ever happen for you? Was the devil tied up underneath the the cross on the day of atonement. Or when Jesus removed the sins. Wednesday April the 25th in the year 31. John 19:31 was the devil tied up underneath the cross did Jesus come down off the cross and placed the sins on the devil ?(cuz it all happens on the same day.)! To fit your narrative. That is exactly what would have to happen. So where did those sins go?..

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison 7 дней назад

    You're misquoting verse 20! he's speaking of the atonement on the inside of the sanctuary..( payment)!!! the( second part ).is the atonement on the (outside of the sanctuary!!! ).there's two parts to the atonement!! otherwise you can't be saved. !!You're making that verse say something that it doesn't say ! pertaining to (the entire atonement.). Because the word (atonement) is still in Leviticus 1610!.. and that hasn't been finished yet !..otherwise your sins never go away.. Your sins are never removed! Isaiah 43:25 they're still remembered.. so there's no cleansing of a conscience or sin!.. thay can't possibly happen. that means you're not saved!!!... So your problem is how did the sins get in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2:24.? Notice Aaron places to sins on the second Goat!!! (Jesus Christ takes Aaron's place).. So now (Jesus Christ places the sins on himself. )..What every verse in the Bible says (((on the same day)))) it all happens on the same day! Otherwise you have destroyed the type and Shadow. So the first line of 1 Peter 2:24 (where did Jesus place the sin!. )?

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      Lev 16:15-19: Atonement made inside the tent and on the altar outside. Lev 16:20: atonement FINISHED, “And when he hath MADE AN END of reconciling (ATONING FOR) the HOLY PLACE (INSIDE OF THE SANCTUARY) and the TABERNACLE of the congregation, and the ALTAR (OUTSIDE OF THE SANCTUARY), he shall bring the live goat. Note that scapegoat cones after atonement for inside and outside the sanctuary is FINISHED.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      Just answer the question how did the sins get in Jesus Christ 1 Peter 2:24.? in Jesus Christ...What did he do with sin?. How did they get in Jesus Christ ..(Jesus Christ never went into the sanctuary. )!The sins are (never placed on the first goat.so what you're saying is that you got the devil hanging on the cross ! Because that's your sin bearer! The devil is all that bears your sins !what's the devil doing with your sins right now?

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison 7 дней назад

      ​​@@5LVS2FSHnotice you didn't address the atonement on the outside that still needed to be done it's two parts Just because it was finished inside it wasn't finished outside yet. You got to destroy the Bible to fit your narrative you know that's what what you are doing! This all got destroyed with Daniel 8 14. And you destroyed Jesus Christ at the same time and what he does at the cross!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      @@JamieElison in the daily services, sins were symbolically transferred to the victims (bull, lamb, goat,..etc) by the laying on of hands (Lev 1, 3, 4,…etc). Animals were killed at the altar of sacrifice. The altar of sacrifice is the place of death (foreshadowing Calvary). The scapegoat did not die at the altar. It died outside the camp of Israel.

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 7 дней назад

      @@JamieElison You can share with me how sins get in Christ in 1 Peter 2:24. This verse also say that Jesus bore our sins on the cross. The altar of sacrifice represents the cross. The scapegoat did not die at the altar of sacrifice.

  • @keittkatranch5167
    @keittkatranch5167 13 дней назад

    Just thinking about this last Sabbath as it was the Day of Atonement.

  • @DezriaKay
    @DezriaKay 14 дней назад

    Amen🙏 🙏 🙏

  • @mwansarichard9619
    @mwansarichard9619 15 дней назад

    Wonderful content

  • @mwansarichard9619
    @mwansarichard9619 15 дней назад

    Bro I would like to have that information on new moon being the new month please, where and how do I get that information from

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 14 дней назад

      Here is a link to an article that can help you: www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1945/11/new-moon-and-sabbath-of-isaiah-66

  • @mwansarichard9619
    @mwansarichard9619 15 дней назад

    Nice video

  • @JamieElison
    @JamieElison Месяц назад

    I'm looking for the video you were speaking about ,who the scapegoat is. I can't find it. how do I do that?

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH Месяц назад

      It will be a video answering why many Christians identify the scapegoat with Christ. I have not made that video yet because I wanted to focus on my family. That video will come out and I’m sure will help many in identifying the scapegoat.

    • @JamieElison
      @JamieElison Месяц назад

      @@5LVS2FSH I saw the video where you were using the word understanding of Azazel... Which is identifying who the scapegoat is! where is it at ! (I can't find it.) You already produced it!

  • @Sirder
    @Sirder Месяц назад

    This guy is on the milk he dosent understand the meaning of angel as ministering spirits.and angel meaning messenger.

  • @JustAMessanger-o7g
    @JustAMessanger-o7g Месяц назад

    Anyone who reads Ellen white writings cannot possibly come to the conclusion she was a racist. Racist people do not say the things she said.

  • @trentevenson8988
    @trentevenson8988 2 месяца назад

    You changed Amalgamation of man and beast to that of seth and Cain. That isn't what was said. And you are blurring what is said. If they amalgamated man and beast, the creation were cursed like those of the flood. If God killed those men and animals before the flood for the Amalgamation, he would kill those afterwards. And this just declares those races as man and beast. You believe this? I think you just proved everyone's point.

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      She did mention that the amalgamation of man was between Seth and Cain. Read Spiritual Gifts vol. 3, chapter 6. Read the whole chapter.

    • @trentevenson8988
      @trentevenson8988 2 месяца назад

      @5LVS2FSH that isn't man and beast. Both Cain amd Seth have the seed of Adam. And after the flood, Cain's dna crossed, which means it wasn't cursed by God, amalgamation, so God let Cain's dna across. So it was God who allowed it. So this "amalgamation" doesn't make sense. It's man amd beast according to her, I just showed how it couldn't have been Cain as God would not have allowed that through the flood if that was why he created the flood

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      @@trentevenson8988amalgamation and of man and of beast. You should look at videos on Advent Defense League on this topic. It’ll help you understand what she meant. I provided the links to these videos for the viewers in the description. If you want truth and clarity? Watch these videos.

    • @trentevenson8988
      @trentevenson8988 2 месяца назад

      @5LVS2FSH where are the links? And I hope it's not a word salad like most on the subject who won't allow their brains to even look at the subject

    • @trentevenson8988
      @trentevenson8988 2 месяца назад

      @5LVS2FSH Yes. The sons of God went unto the daughters of men. Is salvation for all? Then the sons of cain can also be saved, so I'm not sure it has anything more than life choices inntje amalgamation and Cain's dna made it across the flood in the saved. So this amalgamation pre flood between has nothing to do with dna, or Cain's dna could not cross the flood barrier. Since it crossed, this amalgamation idea makes no sense. But I'll try read that writing

  • @trentevenson8988
    @trentevenson8988 2 месяца назад

    Didn't she further explain that that is why the antedeluvians were destroyed, the dna was corrupted with animals? This fits right in with her statement that some races of men are an amalgamation of man and beast. If this isn't what she meant, and left it at that, she brought this on herself.

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      Show me where she said human dna was mixed with animal dna.

    • @trentevenson8988
      @trentevenson8988 2 месяца назад

      @5LVS2FSH amalgamation of man with beast. Beast isn't a man. And since Cain's dna crossed the flood, beast cannot mean Cain's dna or God would not allow it to live past the flood. And why would Cain's dna, human dna, cause the deformation she claimed?

  • @NextLevel-k9o
    @NextLevel-k9o 2 месяца назад

    You want context ? George McCready Price wrote in the April 1931 issue of The Ministry, that he would like to make a slight alteration in Ellen G. White's statements. "Since the flood there has been an amalgamation of man and (of) beast, as may be seen in almost endless varieties of species of animal, and in certain races of men." -"The Problem of Hybridization" The Ministry April 1931, p. 13. D. E. Robinson for many years Ellen G. White's personal secretary took issue with Price: In a paper titled "Amalgamation Versus Evolution" said that Price's insertion of the word "of" into Ellen White's statements did violence to the "obvious meaning " that the author herself intended." -Spectrum, June 12, 1982, p.14. Dr. Harold Clark a biologist tells the truth "Clark called attention to his work with Ellen White's son, W. C. White and D. E. Robinson, her secretary. Neither of these men ever doubted that Ellen White meant the crossing of man and beast by the phrase "amalgamation of man and beast." -Spectrum, June 12, 1982, p.11. Letter from the Geoscience Research Institute I am inclosing a letter from Clyde Webster Jr. Ph. D., senior research scientist at Loma Linda, to Rex DeGoyler now deceased dated April 15, 1991. You will see from Mr. Webster's letter that he believes in amalgamation as taught by Mrs. White and ignores science and the Bible to prop up his prophet. Geoscience Research InstituteLoma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 9235OAffiliated with: Loma Linda University and Andrews University April 15, 1991Mr. Rex DeGolyer19 Sunshine LaneAvon Park, FL 33825 Dear Mr. DeGolyer: I am sorry that you were not at the afternoon meetings where this topic was discussed in some detail. Concerning the amalgamation of man with beast I believe this was how the Image of God was confused, and as Sr. White points out, was the ultimate cause of the flood. It would have been impossible to ascertain whether this living form was man or beast thereby confusing the Image of God in which man was originally created. I personally believe that the evidence seen today for such amalgamation is what science calls the "ape-man". such species as the austrailio Pithicus, a. Africanus, a. Robustus, and others would fit into this category. Neanderthal man on the other hand would not be classified as an ape-man, but rather a degenerate homo Sapiens sapiens. Not being sure of what you were seeking for as an answer, I trust that these few comments have met your needs. Sincerely, Clyde L. Webster Jr., Ph.D.Senior Research Scientistcc: Pastor Emil Moldrik URiah does deny that God didnt make it but he doesnt deny they are mixed with animals DNA. Uriah tells you that the amalgamated people are not guilty of the sin of amalgamation meaning its not a MORAL issue rather genetic. Its very clear what Uriah meant. He argues somebody might be mentally deficient due to this sin of amalgamation...its Genetic problem to him. He also doesnt explain how he harmonizes hisbdenial that God didnt make them with EGW statement that God didnt made the confused species. He argues if there is 1% blood from Adam then you are made by God but he never denied the black race to have animald DNA as well. He even cites the evolutionists of his days.

  • @thatnicekid04
    @thatnicekid04 2 месяца назад

    Another awesome video!!! I've been telling people about your channel. Keep up the great work!!!

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      Awesome thank you!

  • @charnelallan7159
    @charnelallan7159 2 месяца назад

    From Uriah's LETTER HE states OJECTS OF REGARD. SINCE WHEN HUMAN BEINGS R CLASSIFIED AS OBJECTS? THE SOUTHERN WORK PG 73 1895 There is the need of level headed men who love the lord Jesus AND WHO WILL LOVE THE COLOURED PEOPLE FOR CHRIST SAKE WHO HAVE THE DEEPEST PITY FOR THEM . BUT the méthode of Sister S ARE NOT THE METHOD WILL BE WISE TO PRACTICE. They cannot be PETTED AND TREATED AS THOUGH THEY R ON THE SAME LEVEL WITH THE WHITES WITHOUT RUINUNG THEM FROM MISSIONARY WORK IN THE SOUTHERN FIELD. The BREAKING DOWN IF DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE WHITES AND THE COLOURED RACE UNFITS THE BLACKS TO WORK FOR THEIR OWN CLASS AND EXERTS A WRONG INFLUENCE UPON THE WHITES. SOUTHERN WORK PG 96 1899. U tell me

    • @JustAMessanger-o7g
      @JustAMessanger-o7g Месяц назад

      What is wrong with that statement? When you read that statement, ask yourself this: what was the primary goal of going into the south? What did they want to accomplish?

    • @charnelallan7159
      @charnelallan7159 Месяц назад

      @@JustAMessanger-o7g U EVADE MY point since when human beings r l'abécédaire as OBJECTS?

    • @charnelallan7159
      @charnelallan7159 Месяц назад

      @@JustAMessanger-o7g THE LEVEL OF HYPOCRISY FROM U SDA'S IS ASTOUNDING

    • @charnelallan7159
      @charnelallan7159 Месяц назад

      @@JustAMessanger-o7g THEY CANNOT BE TREATED AS THOUGH THEY R ON THE SAME LEVEL WITH THE WHITES. MET THAT SINK IN

    • @charnelallan7159
      @charnelallan7159 Месяц назад

      @@JustAMessanger-o7g WHAT THEY wanted to ACCOMPLISHED was to KEEP BLACKS IN A SUBORDINATE POSITION

  • @charnelallan7159
    @charnelallan7159 2 месяца назад

    REALLY?

  • @malechid.7381
    @malechid.7381 2 месяца назад

    My concern is that you are softening Jesus commandment to make it easier than it actually is. Jesus teachings can sometimes be difficult, can’t they? God the Father is perfectly just, holy, loving, truthful, and faithful. Do you agree? So when Jesus says, “Be ye perfect even as your Father in heaven is perfect”, why wouldn’t his commandment include all of these aspects of God’s perfection? Did not Jesus exemplify perfect love AND perfect obedience to the Father? You seem to be trying to separate perfect love from perfect obedience. And in my opinion, they must go together. How could a person claim to love God perfectly if his behavior still falls short of God’s standard justice and holiness? Wouldn’t perfect love produce perfect obedience?

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH Месяц назад

      Don’t be concerned. I’m not softening the commandments. They are impossible to keep on our own power. That’s why John 1:12 says: “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God…” And Jesus said: John 15:5 (KJV) “I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.”

  • @odigrego
    @odigrego 2 месяца назад

    I noticed that the objector to whom you answered seemed to be pretty arrogand and biased in contrast to your gentle and humble explanation on a contextual basis, the truth on this issue has triumphed, praise GOD🙏🏼

  • @divergentone777
    @divergentone777 2 месяца назад

    The Seventh-day Adventist Pioneers and Their Protest Against Systemic Racism - Kevin M Burton June 18, 2020

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      Thank you for sharing this article 🙏

    • @divergentone777
      @divergentone777 2 месяца назад

      @@5LVS2FSH It certainly refutes the claims of our objectors. God bless you and your channel

  • @itsspiritual8645
    @itsspiritual8645 2 месяца назад

    The Ten Commandments are in the New Testament too and the Two commandments they refer to are a summing up the Ten Commandments. Loving God, the first four, loving your neighbor, last six. There're uniters and dividers, Satan is the Accuser of the Brethren and the Father of Lies. Myles Christian is a Presbyterian

  • @michaelreyes8182
    @michaelreyes8182 2 месяца назад

    My brother...are you by chance living anywhere near Southern Oregon, USA? Maybe no but I was wondering, I want to livestream as you are defending our faith here. Can you show me what kind of equipment you use? and how to use it? I can come to you for training if need be?

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      My brother, I live in the Pacific ocean in a tiny island called Yap. I use very simple equipment. I use DJI wireless mics for audio, an iPhone 14 for recording, and CapCut for video editing.

  • @michaelreyes8182
    @michaelreyes8182 2 месяца назад

    Myes talking abut love...ahhh ok.

  • @leroysmith6676
    @leroysmith6676 2 месяца назад

    Alan is deceive by his own reasoning, he is using snake oil reasonings , we have to keep the ten commandments it is the constitution of heaven and earth

  • @maxjnb4816
    @maxjnb4816 2 месяца назад

    So when the Bible published the events that happened at the cross, where the disciples all stood from a distance while Jesus was being nailed to the cross, and when Peter denied Christ, etc....is that gossip?

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      Obviously not

  • @RubyRuby-e1m
    @RubyRuby-e1m 2 месяца назад

    Happy sabbath brothers, new subscriber from the Philippines 😊

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      Thank you 🙏

  • @AhumuzaAlex-t1d
    @AhumuzaAlex-t1d 2 месяца назад

    If you people the problem is about the sabbath, should we think that the prophet of God Isaiah was disorganized , his words in chapter 66:22,23.

  • @AhumuzaAlex-t1d
    @AhumuzaAlex-t1d 2 месяца назад

    I wonder if a person who claims to understand the Bible and does not know that ten commandments describes love, the first four describes love between God and his children then the second table of six love between man and man(human beings) l conclude by saying that Jesus in John 14:15 is referring to the law of liberty which is the ten commandments

  • @Hursley-q5x
    @Hursley-q5x 2 месяца назад

    You guys really believe people are that stupid? What was Uriah Smith defending then in his pamphlet? Uriah Smith defended her statement by confirming that there was amalgamation between man and beast. Y'all need to be HONEST AND TRUTHFUL. SDAs are experts in calling out other denominations and their leaders for what they perceive to be false and anti-biblical, but when it comes to themselves, they go into a ridiculous defense mode, where they do all kinds of gymnastics to defend Ellen White and her madness. SHE WAS RACIST. BE HONEST. What I'm seeing a lot of is HYPOCRISY. Tell the truth, don't bend it, because denying facts don't ever, make them go away.

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      I’ll make a video as response to your comment

    • @Hursley-q5x
      @Hursley-q5x 2 месяца назад

      @@5LVS2FSH That's alright. You own the platform, and this can be considered your bully pulpit. I've studied Ellen White's writings for decades; I taught SOP to countless many. I've listened to numerous arguments for and against. I've concluded that SDAs, my brethren, are dishonest and untruthful when it comes to Ellen White. Ellen White had done a lot of good, but there's also the dark side, which many ignore. The difference between the Bible and Adventism, is that the Bible was open and honest about the Bible characters and their dark side, but Adventism covers up, suppresses the facts, denies the truth, does all kind of semantics and gymnastics around the truth and lies a lot to protect the legacy of Ellen White, and seeking to convince people that her ministry was without error. Y'all can defend all y'all want, THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH. The SDA church always had a white supremacist agenda, and don't tell me that Ellen White wrote this or that in defense of blacks and against slavery, I know all that. Read for me the embarrassing things she wrote that the E.G White Estate has suppressed for years. People can change, and I'm not in any position to judge, but based on all I've seen and read, Ellen White was racist. Then you'll say context, and I'll say spin. Spin and semantics. THE SDA CHURCH NEEDS TO BE HONEST AND TRUTHFUL; and like I said earlier: Facts are stubborn, ignoring and denying them won't make them go away. So, make your video my friend, but when you're making it, bring out all the quotes and be truthful; not just the ones that fits your narrative.

  • @DavidMutema-kc9ph
    @DavidMutema-kc9ph 2 месяца назад

    Powerful presentation.The law of God is immutable.What they are attacking is the Sabbath.Their projects of making money by preaching falsehoods are crumbling hence the bitterness against against those who preach and uphold the commandments of God.Myles and Alan Par are intoxicated with the wine of Babylon.They need mercy.

  • @Kenyanmama
    @Kenyanmama 2 месяца назад

    It very sad how SDAs are fighting Sunday keepers for breaking the 4th commandment while them in the church are fighting at the point of been admitted in the hospital 😢😢imagine a National media reporting "breaking news" (many SDAs injured and admitted in the hospital bcoz of a harsh fight in the church on Sabbath) my question is, how will you convince a Sunday person to come in your church while you yourself are hating each other? Just look the modern SDA churches, there is no difference with those who don't go to church but you are busy judging Sunday keepers

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      We are not judging Sunday keepers. We are giving a message to all. To preach truth we must expose lies. The message of the SDA Church is TRUE. The members are faulty but the message is still TRUE. We don’t need to convince. We are not called to convince but to preach TRUTH. We must preach TRUTH whether church members are behaving or not.

    • @DavidMutema-kc9ph
      @DavidMutema-kc9ph 2 месяца назад

      You right that some within SDA are not doing well but that does not mean that the law of God is no longer of effect.Jesus' teaching on the proper observance of the law including the Sabbath is very clear.Sda admit that there are sincere Sunday keepers who do that according to the light that they have,but they are also those who deliberately choose to violet the law of God.

  • @smangelenondonga1241
    @smangelenondonga1241 2 месяца назад

    Allen Parr went through all this just to kick out the Sabbath

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      I know, I keep wondering what’s their deal with the Sabbath.

  • @John424-c2k
    @John424-c2k 2 месяца назад

    My brother, thank you for the work you do. But a word of advice, use a more Christian oriented background music. Blessings !

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      Yes, I’ll use better background music

  • @malechid.7381
    @malechid.7381 2 месяца назад

    Thanks for explaining this! However, I am concerned that you’ve missed something important about the context of this passage. Romans 1 is written to the Gentiles to convict them of their sin. Notice how this passage focuses on the the universal authority of God as Creator (1:18-20) and the sin of idolatry (1:21-23). After appealing to the Gentiles in chapter 1, Paul turns to address the Jews in chapter 2. His purpose is to convict them of their sin through the law. The Jews thought that they were morally superior to the Gentiles because God had given them the law. So Paul is using the law to show the Jews that they are actually self-righteous hypocrites. (Romans 2:21-24) Although they pride themselves in their law, they nevertheless are failing to keep it as God commanded. This fact is clear when you look at 2:17-20: “Indeed you are called a Jew, and rest on the law, and make your boast in God, and know His will, and approve the things that are excellent, being instructed out of the law, and are confident that you yourself are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, an instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, having the form of knowledge and truth in the law.” So in context, Romans 2:28, 29 is not saying that Gentiles can become (“spiritual”) Jews. On the contrary, Paul is addressing ethnic Jews, and arguing that if they want to be Jews in the fullest and best sense, they must recognize their sins and trust in Jesus for salvation.

    • @5LVS2FSH
      @5LVS2FSH 2 месяца назад

      When Paul used the phrase “circumcision of the heart” he was quoting from OT Scripture. This concept is found Deuteronomy 10:16; 30:6. These words were announced not only to the Jews but to the mixed multitude that came out of Egypt as well (Exodus 12:8). Paul mentions the same idea of Gentiles and Jews being children of Abraham in Galatians 3:27-29 if they belong to Christ.