Видео

Combat Wheelchair?????? Which drug addict came up with such a stupid idea? 😂

I remember seeing a miniature of a berserker in a wheelchair who was dual-wielding. How can you move your chair if you’re dual-wielding axes?!

I'm thinking of doing a Last Of Us campaign so this series will help me so much! thank you!

Super underrated

Bible Study! (Quick timestamps for each god) Athreos 1:22 Ephara 4:12 Erebos 6:11 Heliod 8:16 Iroas 10:02 Keranos 13:40 Klothys 15:30 Kruphix 17:05 Mogis 18:47 Nylea 20:13 Pharika 22:24 Phenax 24:39 Purphoros 26:00 Thassa 27:27

I love making up house rules. I enjoy videos like this, because I get to see what other DND fans are coming up with. My main goal for making house rules is to make the game more streamlined. A streamlined game is far more enjoyable, and it lacks any significant downsides. I even like the action economy in Pathfinder, because it is streamlined. I see that this video is keeping streamlining in mind. There is a couple of comments about speeding up context. There is one where a wall of text is too much. That is good thinking. There are rules in this video I heard of before. There are two that are similar to house rules I did. One is about health. I prefer to remove randomness in games. Or at least tone it down. So I made a table to determine health. I used level and body type to determine health. Each class has a kind of hit die used. So I refer to the kind as a body type. Classes with a die of fewer sides can be described as frail or scrawny. Classes with more sides can be described as muscular and brawny. I do add extra health to characters of low level to help them survive. Determining health based on level and body type is tricky. So I made a table for that. A player uses the table to find their number. Then they add constitution. That forms their final number of health or hit points. The other rule is about intelligence. Intelligence is so underpowered. The video claims that it is used as a dump stat. I can see why. My house rule is to make sorcerers powered by intelligence. This provides balance. It makes intelligence more useful. Charisma is OP, so it gets a well deserved nerfing. This change makes good sense conceptually. Sorcerers are very similar to wizards, so it makes sense to share the same mental ability score. I put both in a category of magic that I call arcane. It makes sense for bards to use charisma, because they charm an audience. It also makes sense for warlocks, because they get a long with their patron. Sorcerers are unique for being the only class with an innate magical ability. They don't get it by studying hard or showing devotion to some entity. This has nothing to do with the socializing stuff that charisma has. I think it is better for both wizards and sorcerers to use intelligence. I characterize both as being intelligent and even nerdy. The wizard is more into studying and reading books. The sorcerer is more hands on with knowledge. It would be more into magical lab work and field work.

for the maximized crits, I only give bosses the maxed dice, not the peons.

Nah. Limiting alignment to G and N only is dumb. Firstly, murder hobos are without alignment. Secondly, the most problematic players, them who cause the most problematic party conflicts... It's always LG. And yet somehow we accept that LG is fine but ban anything E? Foolishness. To limit the scope of human experience is to limit the interesting nature of the story one can tell. Plus, again, as I can't stress this enough, LG is the *worst* alignment and the worst characters. Always.

So would you accept a Kia Soul in a medieval fantasy setting just because there id magic?

Absolutely love this, I was in the mist of making my own homebrew version of this since in my campaign we have cross over events. Then while i'm making the creature I find this video. Combined both your recommendations and my own works into a creature that is pretty scary since the party hasn't faced a fast combatant yet that can also heal itself. Though I plan to have mine be a bit underpowered since there are supposed to be multiple of them in one combat and they are rank and file bio-weapons compared to there master. Kind of like comparing zombies to Wesker from RE when it comes to describing the one who made these bio-weapons

I feel advantage is too powerful from flanking.

If you drink a potion in haste, you may spill some and leave some in the bottle.

Toll the Dead is a cleric cantrip

Dawnbringer also has this feature

Did you ever do that follow up video on house rules to avoid?

Official content balanced? Laughable

I allow evil characters because they have evil goals but still work for the party.Just no murderhobos.

I'll let people make an evil character. They will soon learn that civilization exists solely because it has ways of dealing with such people. Players do what they want, but the consequences are there. If you want to be evil, you had better be good at it. Crying about characters outside of game is petty as hell. A capable DM has perfectly reasonable and realistic ways of handling bad decisions in game.

I like how you specified that the killing happened in game.

Since The Legion has been updated for a bit now, I think it would be interesting if its power here were touched up, too. Now, instead of having unlimited numbers of attacks on creatures, The Legion is limited to 5. After 4 successful hits on any creatures that are not yet inflicted with Deep Wound, all enemy creatures are made Vulnerable. Any creature The Legion successfully attacks, regardless if they were inflicted with Deep Wound or not, will immediately be put to 0 hit points. Feral Frenzy ends after a 5th successful hit on a creature, if The Legion attacks a creature already inflicted with Deep Wound, or if they miss an attack. What do you think? An alternative I was thinking about is, instead of making the next victim vulnerable, maybe the 5th attack deals additional damage of some kind.

Since Cruel Limits has been updated at some point, would you say that the radius of this ability should be increased? Maybe to 120 ft.? Or 60 ft.?

Since this Killer has been updated to have an alternative to his bottles, I may have a suggestion for you! Afterpiece Antidote: Works just like the Tonic. However, this one cures Players of all of the Tonic's effects, and immediately gain +15 movement speed during their turn. The movement speed benefit is also applied to The Clown after he passes through the Antidote Zone. This allows The Clown to move faster in the event he is too far from his targets, and giving him that little boost to catch up to them while also slowing the enemies down. However, it also gives benefits to the players, where they can also be given a chance to remove their poison and slowdowns in exchange of endangering themselves by approaching The Clown. Players or creatures that have gone through one gas and into another lose the first gas's effect and are affected by the second one.

One additionnal proficiency times intelligence modifier = i'll use this!

On healing potions, you could rule that taking a potion requires both drinking some of it and applying some of it to any open wounds or whatever you have. So an action would be required (or longer if you're more strict about it), but the full potency would be gained. But chugging it down, as a bonus action, would most likely (since you could roll max anyway) prevent its full power from taking direct effect, so a roll would be justified. Also, really like that stealth rule.

Ya your just a pussy bro let me DM

Just... uses point buy ?

I love the last suggestion, though if you use a reaction to successfully resist a Counterspell, then you would automatically fail another opponent’s Counterspell as you’ve already used up your reaction. You would need an extra noodly rule, allowing you to resist further Counterspells using the same reaction (though still burning more spell slots).

Imagine getting raped by a nigga named gandalf 😂😂 couldn’t be me

Very confused on the skill check actions. Most physical checks are already tied behind actions or movement. Stealth is the hide action. Athletics is involved in grappling which is technically the attack action replacing an attack. Athletics can also be used in climbing difficult terrain or jumping farther than your normal jump distance but that's all tied to movement, are you now making that cost a full action? The mental checks costing bonus action I think is maybe fine although really I'd probably just combine it with item interaction which you get one free one per turn

Isn't that just the normal flanking rules?

My Lawful Evil characters dont murder hobo

I think evil characters are perfectly fine! Being murder-hobos is not fine, but Jeff Bezos could be considered an evil PC, but he' didn't get rich by stabbing randos for their wallets. A lawful evil hobgoblin with an undeveloped sense of justice and honor learning wisdom from the party's lawful good paladin? That sounds awesome as fuck. Dragonborn named Zheff Bhezous who's a shrewd and unscrupulous merchant, who exploits both his employees and customers to make a bigger buck? Well, why not see where these shenanigans go? Let's see what happens when he tries to rip off the wrong customer. A noble? A duke? A fellow businessman, greedier and more sly than even Zheff? In the end, I try to make a distinction between chaotic evil and chaotic stupid.

I would give an aditional 1d4 of damage of the same type of the attack aince its an attack to a weak point, perharps only on the first sucessful strike, since is only a cantrip. Or, maybe only take the concentration part off. It would be fitting for a divination spell to see beyond your initial observations

Dude, seriously, I don't get some of these DMs. They get mad at the mechanics and players making smart moves and builds and then do 0% research into how to counter and balance those player skills in a challenging and rewarding way. Please counterspell my sorcerer. Good play! I also will Counterspell on another turn! But now I don't have a reaction for a Shield spell as an Orge Chieftain whallops me for 22 damage. These DMs act like resources are not being consumed. I can't counterspell all day, and if I do, i dont have any fireballs and flight to cast. Its all give and take. I'm a fan of XP to LV 3 but I think he needs to step up his game. Even Silvery Barbs doesn't phase me. If you use that, that a reaction and spell slot cost. It isn't free...

The Tasha changes to Ranger are not that great

Not sure how I feel about the plate wearer rolling stealth for the party. Why would rogues bother with high stealth in that party?

What about stalkers and the rat king from the last of us 2

If you just circle around the first room right there it's pretty easy....the important thing is to have all 6 explosives, and a full flame thrower....which can be a challenge in itself when playing on grounded...

Honestly liked these alot. I've jotted down a few (with my own personal tweaks), that I would like to implement soon.

TBH I would make him charotic neutral , cos well he punishes only people who have guilt in there hearts

I can't believe this exact idea occurred to me and I look it up and someone has already done the job perfectly! I love clickers, they're so scary to fight and I feel like this stat block does a great job translating them into dnd

The stealth rule is a great one and underused. I've actually never heard anyone else say that but it's a rule I've been using on my own. But when I brought it up on a forum it really didn't get any positive response, I just didn't get it. To me, you don't know if you're likely to be discovered until/if it's too late. If a player rolls a really high stealth roll, they have a tendency to want to hang on to that as long as they can "I guess I'll just keep sneaking around and check out more..." on the contrary, they roll really low and they might be like "on 2nd thought...maybe I won't go in there." I love that you roll it at the moment it's important

Screw monsters, I'm gonna play the huntress as a player, have fun dming something that can snipe with throwing ax.

I personally would hate the idea of allowing players to pick from any or all official material + UA when most of it was never precisly playtested to begin with. I would relish to work with my players to homebrew a class together, so long as it adhered to thr following three: It fit the style of game / world we were building; It wasn't obviously overpowered or easily combo'd with something to create overpowered spells/abilities; It didn't already fulfill a role that the main 4 classes already fulfilled. Remember people! The more options you give your players, the more rigours their choices become. Meta builds become the norm, and players have to go out of their way to build suboptimal just to make controversal choices. The less options presented, the more creative and personal peoples characters will be. This is a near-untiversal game design rule.

Love this list. I took about 6 or 7 I plan to use in my games. I have another one for you. Identifying items. I HATE how you can just take a short rest and identify and item. My rule is that if you are proficient in arcana you can make a check to identify the item. If you are not proficient the check is with disadvantage. If you fail the check you can try again the next day. The DC is based on the item rarity. Common=DC5, Uncommon=DC10, Rare=DC15, Very Rare=DC20, Legendary=DC25. (obviously you can set the DCs however you see fit for your game). Identify spell still works as normal. Researching an item at a library or other source of knowledge can give you a bonus to your roll or add advantage. I fell like this makes items more mysterious and makes the identify spell more useful. I know I talked about this in a video at some point, don't remember which but now I want to do my own house rules video. Great job. Great video!

what is the torment affliction? is that specific to the rites of passage or is it some other thing?

Cha'alt!

I always let my players know how hurt a monster looks. I didn't know it was a house rule.

Would love this series to come back. Maybe only a few once in a while. Personally hollow knight would be fun

If you ever do any more I’d love to see something like the pursuer from DS2