Видео

The only arguments that are worth taking seriously are the EO, if you can defend against EO, Protestants is child play

Can catholic bishop SIT at the center BACK to tabernacle like that?

Resistance should communicate or unite with sedevacantists maybe to contradict WEALTHY PAGAN VATICAN and preserve the true faith. At least don't fight each other.

SSPX did a mistake by compromising with Vatican ( Beshop Felay in 2012 ) against advice of Archbishop Lafabvre .

Je trouve tous les jours de nouveaux evêques? d'ou vient Mgr Roy.....

Only heresy is coming from you

He should have been made superior general of the SSPX. I don’t approuve of this decision to kick him out because he expressed his opinion on the narrative of the holocaust. SSPX sadly often reacts to those who expresses their view on the pope or the general agenda of the world, I think because they fear the title of excommuniated or in schism, to the point of throwing their own under the bus. They did this to Viganò, it is terrible how they distanced themselves away from him, like Peter who denied Christ because of fear. Something is going on with hierarchy in SSPX. No backbone.

I thought this was the chapel of St. Thomas More?

Its true, in SSPX they push this idea there on You that You can't critisize their superiors and priests no matter what.( false obedience). I'm leaving society to after witnessing horrible treatment- physical ABUSE of one of older parishioner right after the Mass. Two younger man ( serving as altar man and training children) pushed a table at the older man and took the chair from underneath him so the man had fall on the floor twice. The priest said only to us that this man offended a lady and was NOT obedient when asked to leave. After such SCANDAL and POOR treatment , ABUSE of its own parishioners- I'm looking farward to join SEDEVACANTISTS catholic movement. God Bless You and please PRAY for me.

Excellent discussion. As a fellow Canadian, I always appreciate Bishop Roy’s insights. It would be nice if he were able to visit western Canada.

❤

Is this bishop of the Thuc line?

Some where...not all...at that time...

There are two twin Fr Radeckis. Which one is this one?

So he thinks this but the Church continues the new order mass, it's not been good one can argue even if we kept the old mass, we would have seen decline due to sin. I don't know you don't know. This sort of speech is perhaps true, perhaps not. I have not the context to judge. I know God will determine this. I want to go to traditional masses.

Thank you for presenting these facts. It is so important to get this information out to the general public. Aside from Fr. Radecki being a clear and easily understood speaker, many don’t know what was done to our faith. We were manipulated and lied to by Vatican II. So many souls lost. May Our Lady guide us back to the truth.

Please please please include more of these highlights. Father Radecki is such a wonderful speaker and explains these concepts in a way that’s no-nonsense and easy to understand. He’s excellent!

the novus ordo is invalid as it is the counter church of satan of end times......run from the novus ordo...the chair of Peter is empty

But what of the sacraments dispensed by these so called laymen? Where is Father's care for the worry caused to the faithful as he blithely pronounces? Or indeed the channel creator?

That’s a matter opinion. He doesn’t even go into details of what document of Pius XII he was referring to.

SSPX is already DIVIDED: SSPX - sedevacantists, SSPX - resistance and SSPX which claims to be in communion with Pope and Vatican.

You obviously know nothing about the SSPX.

is there a difference in new confirmation and conditional confirmation during the ceremony with the bishop?

It hurts my heart the church would lead so many people astray 😢

VIVA VIGANO ! 💖

I have another favor to ask. Can Bp. Roy present a detailed demonstration for the conclusion that the traditional clergy have ordinary jurisdiction, though in extraordinary circumstances? The entire traditional movement has labored for 60 years under the notion that it does not have ordinary jurisdiction. We can't just have a bold statement from Msgr. Roy. We need the proofs upon which the conclusion is based. The public needs it. Not only the clergy. Because this is pivotal and affects all.

all BS have lost faith in Vigano he is a fool!

Sedevacantism proves the claims of the Orthodox Church. Roman Catholicism stands or falls on the Pope. Time to become Orthodox my wayward Catholic brethren.

The Novus Ordo snd TLM both belong to the Roman rite. There is no such thing as a TLM rite. And the Eastern Churches are more than just rites. They are distinct, self governing canonical churches.

Bishop Hey makes many good points. To this layman, he seems to have the correct answers.

The TLM was never banned. In fact Vatican 2 called for all Rites to be preserved which included The TLM along with the Eastern Rites. The NO was another Rite added to the already existing ones. Michael Davis explains all of this and Vatican 2 in detail. So Vatican 2 actually protects The TLM. That being the case to even restrict The TLM or any of the Rites goes directly against this ruling from Vatican 2. Why even restrict The TLM? This is one step towards a total ban which I believe they will try to enforce soon.

N.O. Canonizations has to be the best and easiest argument for Sede Vacantistism to be true. This is a very important topic and video.

Fr Daniel Ahern would make a great interview!

He's a well spoken knowledgeable intelligent Bishop and was an excellent choice for Episcopal Consecration. FSSP is still awaiting their traditional Rite Bishop 35 yrs later.

Perhaps, dear host, you may be instrumental in the great work of unifying the sedevacantist bishops by more and more featuring them here in substantive interviews, like this one.

The Protestant “church shopping” - anything but the true Church is insane.

Imagine thinking it's traditional Catholicism to reject the Pope and his Magisterium

Are you Catholic?

Fr. Pierre Roy: Why, afterall, have we permitted ourselves these last 30 years to criticize the Fraternity of Saint Peter? Why have we more recently criticized Campos? Why did we repudiate the agreement reached in 2006 by the Institute of the Good Shepherd? Having recently asserted to a superior that it will be necessary for us to cease criticizing these communities, I received the following response: “Ah, but we will continue to criticize them!” I then asked why, by what principle. I received no further reply. HERE IS THE REPLY YOU ALREADY KNOW: Because they have compromised by embracing as "Catholic" the Bogus Ordo Mess and the errors of Vatican II and the SSPX has not.

What an interesting debate. First, there is no such thing as a 'novus ordo' church. There is only 'One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church' Second, as regards canonisation of Saints - all of them - St Thomas Aquinas writes this: "Since the honor we pay the saints is in a certain sense a profession of faith, i.e., a belief in the glory of the saints, we must piously believe that in this matter also the judgment of the Church is not liable to error (Quodlib. IX, a. 16)."

False dichotomy. To say someone is not a Big S Saint does not mean that they are in hell. It means merely they are not worthy of the veneration due to Big S Saints, whose lives displayed heroic virtue. Paul VI was a bad pope and had many flaws and vices. It doesn't mean he's in hell, but it does mean he's not a S Saint, not worth of the veneration and emulation

Is this correct, that there is a difference between "infallible" and "inerrant"? For instance, if I agree with Fr. Jean Colson, his thesis, the Beloved Disciple, the one who was at the Cross, the one who wrote 5 NT books, the one who was hosting the Blessed Virgin Mary, was NOT the Son of Zebedee, NOT one of the Twelve ... he was a disciple of a lesser order, a Cohen, not a guest but the host of the Last Supper ... 1) I am not in trouble with today's Martyrology reading, as both the Son of Zebedee and the Gospeller are in Heaven, I am relying on what's infallible when I honour both, simply not attributing inerrancy to the reading? 2) Or would stating they are not brothers according to the flesh being an attack on the infallibility of the reading? Sancti Jacobi Apostoli, qui exstitit beati Joannis _Evangelistae_ frater; et, prope festum Paschae ab Herode Agrippa decollatus, primus ex Apostolis coronam martyiii percepit. Ejus sacra ossa, ab Hierosolymis ad Hispanias hoc die translata, et in ultimis earum finibus apud Gallaeciam recondita, celeberrima illarum gentium veneratione, et frequenti Christianorum conctirsu, religionis et voti causa illuc adeuntium, pie coluntur. Father Colson considered he had detected variations in statements identifying the Gospeller with the other son of Zebedee, for instance no person remaining in Asia Minor in the first two centuries to mature age makes such an identification explicitly, the first one who makes them left Asia Minor at age 16, St. Irenaeus, and Fr. Colson considered it possible that he had made a confusion between two different John, and left too young to get the misunderstaning corrected. Then his prestige, very rightful, on other matters, led to a very large acceptation of his view.

all nonsenses although I am a traditionalist I believe Novus ordos ordinations and consecrations are valid.

So yo telling me that JP2 is a saint

The entire question of sedevacantism aside (a whole other silly issue in itself), Fr. Roy should seriously reflect on his position as a valid bishop. I like the man. He seems to be very educated, speaks well, and could do great thinks to maintain the True Church. But, unfortunately, he finds himself in a precarious situation - the Thuc line (1977 and onward) is very much doubtful. The two witnesses (Dr. Heller and Dr. Hiller) that were present at these consecrations in 1981confirm, on a recorded statement, that Archbishop Thuc was not in a clear state of mind, and that he had to be corrected in the form. He was a very good and intelligent bishop that had a rough life, God rest his soul. His conditional "consecration" of that non-catholic nutt job Laborie is just another example of how much the Archbishop had lost his mind. This is the same bishop that Archbishop Lefevre highly respected. But even Lefevre publicly warned the faithful to have nothing to do with this new Thuc line when he had heard what Archbishop Thuc had done (multiple times). Just as it could be possible (extremely doubtful) for a Norvus Ordo ordination or consecration to be valid (I am not stating that I believe that they are valid), we still do not recognize the validity because doubt exists. Anytime doubt is present, we must avoid it at all costs. Why would anybody play with Apostolic succession. It is always better to have 100% certainty than even the slightest doubt. I am not judging Fr. Roy, I just think it is a valid point to truly consider. It is better to be sure early on and be conditionally re-consecrated than to start creating another line of doubtful priests like the Dolanites and the Sandbornites. I have my many issues with the new direction of the SSPX; however, at least, for now, we have absolute certainty that our line of succession is valid. At least up to the four bishops that Archbishop Lefevre consecrated. Let's see what the future holds with Fellay's new direction. This situation in the Church is only going to get worse. And as we pray for the restoration of the Church, we should also pray that the traditionalist groups maintain some sort of cohesiveness. The more we start acting like the Norvus Ordo counter church by creating more muddy waters, the harder we make it to find the remnants of the True Church. We need to be battling to bring more and more people into what is left of the True Church, not creating more confusion amongst ourselves. Viva Cristo Rey!

How can Vigano declare Bergoglio not to be the pope without being a sedevacantist? If B is not the pope who is? Do we have a secret Pope in the woods somewhere? If B is not the pope then the chair must be empty.

There’s no jurisdiction out of pope Francis’power!

Here is the full interview ruclips.net/video/x7ynSkJgWAo/видео.htmlsi=DxgYbZQYNJk1tbYZ

Thankyou🙏

A friend of mine told me that a few weeks ago. He went to the sspx in garden grove and the priest celebrating mass was a Novus Ordo