Видео

That’s awesome. I’d love to have a 1014 loader. They definitely punch above their weight!

Hey Richard! Thanks for the comment. While the MF 180 is my favorite tractor, the 35 has a special place as I grew up running one of them for many hours. The 35 is a definite upgrade from the TO20-30 with much improved hydraulics, two-stage clutch, and two-range transmission. You could go a lot slower with a 35, which may seem like not much of a plus, but when you are running a transplanter putting in 50,000 strawberries or cultivating the same, slow is good!

@@TheManKnownAsJR - hehe just cute as a button that alternator! Tower of power.

My only Ford experience is with the 9/2N tractors, I don't have a point of reference, however, I have never thought of these as very fragile. In all the hours our family has put on Massey's, I cannot recall a clutch or engine failure.

@@jakek9765 not many of them around- mine does fine with tall grass and sunflower I don’t have too much ragweed around but a heavy patch would test it for sure

I bought them from Taylor Foundry in TX. I don't recall the model #, but you can find them on their site. They ar e 150# each, two each side for me and that seems to be working great.

I would say that it depends on the size of logs you want to drag! If you are skidding them, it won;'t take a very large log, if you are pulling firewood in a trailer, it would haul a decent amount, but be mindful these don't weigh much and the barkes need to be in good working order. If you are buying one for that purpose, I'd take a hard look at a 9 or 2N Ford, cheaper, heavier and twice the HP.

@@froghairfarm great info thanks

When I get the pony back together I'll give it a run regardless, but would have liked to have a bit more adjustment!

Yep, tach drive needed for sure. I do ahve a guy, but it takes a while. Definitely a=harder to come by.

I agree it isn’t fully correct and works against itself. However, when I set the valve to work perfectly in one direction it will not run at all in the other direction. It almost appears that the valve itself is too short

Thanks! I appreciate the compliment. It is a great tractor and I use off-road Diesel (red), fortunately I have a station that sells small quanities. I have used both though and the only difference is taxes.

I may have been in the 2nd range and agree a gear trans is MUCH better for this work!

I haven't had to find them, but you may look into having your re-lined if the backing is in good shape.

Hmm, maybe we have different definitions (or tractors). In this case, when you push the clutch part way down, the tractor stops and PTO runs, push it all the way down, both stop.

@froghairfarm the 2605H should have a standard split torque clutch. The PTO is not influenced by operating the clutch pedal. It is it's own separate power system utilizing a hydraulic clutch pack to engage and disengage the PTO independently of the transmission by way of a lever under the left side of the seat. You can engage and disengage it any time you want regardless of clutch position. The 2604H has an option for the old school 8x2 trans that utilizes the 2 stage clutch like you're describing but if you have the 8x8 synchro shuttle it's got a normal single stage clutch and the PTO is operated independently of the transmission or clutch. I prefer the two stage clutch myself. I'm known to find trees stumps when bush hogging and it is nice to be able to shove the clutch pedal all the way down and kill power to the PTO.

@@justkeepingitreal7768 🤷🏻‍♂️ you are probably right, all I know is that when I push the clutch part way the tractor stops, pto runs, all the way down all stops just like my 35 deluxe.

@@froghairfarm that is odd because the 2605H 2606H and 2607H with the 8x8 trans doesn't have a two stage in it. I love mowing with the little 135 because of the clutch. I honestly sold my 2606H because the 135 two stage just works better for me and my mowing.

I am in Eastern Kansas, Around Lawarence/Topeka

I have the same tractor as yours

I had mine put on before delivery by the dealer and I know they can be added at any time. It seems I looked around for a kit other than the dealer but did not find one.

For sure - I didn’t want to bring the tractor and plow in for that but now I remember I have a one bottom that would be just right for the little tractors I have here - or…. Find a Ferguson 2 bottom 🤭 hmmmmm

I’ve been thinking of sweet clover and have the seed but that stuff is good at self seeding too! Hehe

I had planned on getting to it at about 2ft high, but.... I'd agree that weeds are suppressed. Buckwheat had a similar effect, but you get a lot of volunteer buckwheat!

@@froghairfarm Good to know! I've never tried buckwheat. Also I really enjoy your tractor videos. I collect vintage garden tractors mostly since I only have a small plot of land but recently picked up a Massey Harris and a Ferguson Pony for restoration projects. Growing up we did market gardening and between using a 101jr, Super M and 9n I caught the old tractor bug LOL.

If buckwheat smells dirt, it grows! The Pony's are fun little tractors and I may have the same illness, possibly.

@jeremydavis2595 - at one point years ago we had about 25 acres of strawberries, plus sweet corn, etc. We ran a Ferguson 35, Case VAC, and a MH22. On the "regular" farm ground mostly larger MF tractors, but we had a Farmall MD that was a favorite, super efficient and the fastest on the road.

Well, I started young with "corrective reinforcement" supplied by my father :). Burned in pretty well.... But, the best advice came from my grandfather, he said: "when you open the field, pick a spot at the other end, close one eye and take a picture of the relationship between it and the tractor, then steer accordingly. Also, just like when riding a motorcycle, you will steer where you look, so if you have to look away, stop first until you get the hang of it. Great tractors btw.

Already sold, can't recall the price.

I get parts from the dealer, ebay, salvage, and aftermarket suppliers depending on shat I need. They are easy to source parts for.

Definitely not the biggest!! I'll make a video and give a report if it turns out I have a little wheat to combine.

hehe - I love my little 1020, she's tough

@jeffkeith4668 - I got the kit from the dealer, I haven't looked for an aftermarket kit.

For sure the grass benefits more overall. Early burns help the forbs more as the ground warms up a bit faster and gives them a small jump on the warm season grasses.

I am not super familiar with the 90's but I am sure it would handle 12-15' without much problem depending on what you're cutting. The 180 has 63hp at the pto and runs the 12' in heavy grass full width without breaking a sweat.

Right on - They are great little tractors. I have a soft spot for 35's especially.

Thanks, will do! I'll have some time to make a few more soon.

I mostly just google for them, although you can get some from the dealer still but it is spotty.

We have 1 we’re looking to sell. Ours isn’t as nice as your though

@andreahoevet497 It did sell, a couple hundred less than my asking if you recall what that was.

That's why I used the magenetic base so I can reposition them to give best light according to what I am doing. They can be stuck to the ROPS for instance. The 1840's are nice the M version is a heavier machine, your friend's tractor is a nice machine!

They are check plates. What they do is knock the ridge off of raised bed rows when going across them to level the ride.

@@froghairfarm thanks .

A couple of things to determine what you have: A) 1 gear lever and 4 speeds = 20 or 30, 2 gear levers = 35 B) 2 levers on hydraulic controls = 35

30 had one shift lever 4 speeds forward, one reverse. Dead PTO. 35 has 2 shift levers gives 6 forward 2 reverse. Live PTO 2 stage clutch.

It’s fantastic, love mine

@garytitus8298 - I also have a 1840E, there is no comparison when it comes to robustness. The 2605 is larger for sure, but it is built far heavier. There's a big difference in lifting capability and feeling safe. It really depends on how you'll use it. If I had to select one to keep and one to go, I'd hang onto the 2605 in my case. I haven't looked at the 2850, so I can't comment there. The 2605 is more suited for agricultural work (if you do any) and really doesn't give anything up otherwise unless you want a hydro trans, which you cannot get on the 2605.

@arvbergstedt3303 You are 100% correct. I was kicking myself after I made the video!

I may have a friendly difference of opinion, but I have a fondness for both the early Fords and these Fergies

I will do that as mine is in need, it may be a month or two, but I'll post it. Thanks for watching!

Nice! They are fun little tractors.

The 35 we had (not this one) also saw a lot of work and it just always did the job. I agree that Ferguson was well ahead of the competiton with the 3pt hitch. Thanks for stopping by.

I have your tractors sister, 1955 green belly serial number S150204. My favorite tractor ever and it can still get alot of work done!

I'd like a blade for mine for the same usage!

I have a 2N that I was going to part with, but based on the low-ball offers, and the fact it is a solid machine, I think I may hang on to it a bit. I -may- tackle a restoration on it, but who knows! Once we get some warmer weather I'll do a comparison of the 2N and the Ferguson TO20.

255's are great tractors. The 150 may sound like a 2N, but definitely brings more power to the party!

The 255 is a great tractor! Thanks for stopping by.