Видео

And what we have to believe your philosophy No

So even if god was proven to be true you wouldn’t respect him. That’s nuts.

The worst thing that I can see from all sides is that there is always someone out there trying to convince you that their way is THE WAY. No ones 'WAY' is the way. You have to figure this out for yourself. Don't listen to this guy, and by the same token don't listen to a religious person. LISTEN TO YOUR OWN SENSES. Trust yourself. You will know the path you need to move forward with your life. No one else will.

See? even that is a proof that the guy needed to job the job for Jesus than Jesus himself. LOL

I'm an atheist. I believe the reason I do not believe in a God is because I was not brainwashed when I was a child. Anybody who says they believe in God has three choices for the reason they believe in God. 1. they are brainwashed. 2. they are lying. 3. They have absolute proof because God visited them and performed a miracle for them. Choice 3 is clearly nonsense so people who believe in God must accept they are brainwashed or they are lying.

As the King said to the Bishop " You keep stupid I'll keep them poor"

“Just forgive our sins then” Lol thats not how that works. If he could do that then there wouldn’t need to be a Jesus to die on the cross.

My only argumemt with this video is the Nazis were theists. Hitler wasnt. Their high command took Roosevelts death as a sign god was on theis side. The RCC suported them. Helped Nazis escape the Allies at the end of the war. The Nazis were not and are not irreligious. Though some are. 😊

Surely, these guys are the Donald Trump of religion: just thorough-bred idiots.

Is the preaching of Jesus Christ ineffective to you?

Christians don't all believe the OT, Christian means you follow the teachings and words of Jesus and believe HIS story not the OT. I get why it feels like a gotcha to atheists but it isn't. People don't believe in God because of the books, you still don't get it padawans.

God has given free will and He is righteous: 'And the king will say to them in reply, "Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me." Then he will say to those on his left, "Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.'" (Matthew 25:40-41, Catholic Bible) He says: 'Refrain from anger; abandon wrath; do not be provoked; it brings only harm. Those who do evil will be cut off, but those who wait for the LORD will inherit the earth.' (Psalms 37:8-9, Catholic Bible) 'He said to me, "They are accomplished. I [am] the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give a gift from the spring of life-giving water. The victor will inherit these gifts, and I shall be his God, and he will be my son. But as for the cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murderers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every sort, their lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second death.'“ (Revelation 21:6-8, Catholic Bible) Jesus Christ`s opinion of Satan: 'You belong to your father the devil and you willingly carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he speaks in character, because he is a liar and the father of lies.' (John 8:44, Catholic Bible)

They mock religion without any knowledge of what the Latin term means. But we must excuse the ignorant because all the modern dictionaries have abandoned the root meaning.

So many pseudo-intellectuals criticize religion when they are utterly ignorant of the meaning of the term: re- L. 'again' + legion, fr. ligare, 'to bind' = that which binds man back to God. So anything that does not re-bind man to his Creator is not religion. Roman Catholicism, Islam, Mormonism, Hinduism, even modern Judaism do NOT qualify as religions as they are humanistic. No atheist has any proof that God is not working in the life of man...not a shred of evidence, save a myopic view of the subject. But those of us that have invited Him into our hearts have proof in peace that passes all understanding. We cannot prove God to you, just as you cannot disprove Him to us. Only you can prove Him to yourself in humility. So to the skeptic, we say, be honest: you do not know everything there is to know in the universe. Until you experience the good fortune of suffering so greatly that your pride ceases to blind you, the existence of God will remain an insult to you, nay, the smell of death. But it is never too late to avoid the terrible shock that awaits you on the other side of the grave.

God exists, just like Mickey Mouse exists.

It's sad how people so easily fall for this type of deceit and twisting of scripture. What's poisoning minds is Godlessness and the lies fed to us by modern society.

By denying existence of GOD without separating the crucial difference between 1) The Creator of the universe and 2) the one demanding prayers and subordination to the rules, supposed to have been delivered by that Creator (but, in practice, always invented by some humans), Richard is doing a disservice to the task of GETTING RID OF THE RELIGIONS, because it is only the second function of GOD needs to be denied, while the former, as a NON-PERSONAL entity is implied in any rational explanation of the existence of the universe. It need not be denied. Even science has only changed the name of THE CREATOR from GOD to NATURE, while retaining its role as The Power that determines the flow of all events in the universe. Otherwise science cannot DISCOVER LAWS OF NATURE. On the contrary, by claiming the existence of immutable, inevitable amd irrefutable LAWS OF NATURE with all the EVIL intact, Science only provides very rational EXPLANSTIONS justifying all the evil as they exist ~ thus contributing, inadvertantly though, to perpetuate them. Thus Science, as it exists at present, is a far more destructive religion than all the conventional religions taken together. As QM clearly shows: THERE ARE NO LAWS OF NATURE TO BE DISCOVERED. Nature permits us to design the laws we consider most appropriate to SUSTAIN EVIL FREE LIFE on this earth and, only thereafter, analyze phenomena selectively to find THE MEANS to implement the laws we want nature to follow. EVIL, thereby, is defined exhaustively as DISASTERS (earthquakes, volcanos, floods, droughts, storms, accidents), PREDATION (human and animal), DISEASES (including all birth defects, all weapons manufacture, all violence) and DEATH. Lack of this realization is the reason why the humsn race in its entire history, from antiquity to present day, from Thales of Miletus to Stephen Hawking (and still continuing), is yet to derive the mathematical model for the mechanism of even a single natural phenomenon that could PREDICT accurately when that phenomenon may harm life function, let alone PREVENT such ~ which, in fact, SHOULD be the sole purpose cum criterion of proof of all knowledge.

This is your god and looking at a fried egg. This is how your brain looks like when you belive on god or do drugs any cuestions ?

He’s never answered mine, the Vikings still have not won a Super Bowl.

As an illustration of Voltaire's beliefs, Evelyn Beatrice Hall once wrote: "I might disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death; your right to say it"! If believers and non believers (I am agnostic) gave this simple right to the other side, there might be far more peace and much less hatred in our old tired world.

What about human beings? God is a fluffy sugar bunny compared to the most evil, vicious, cruel, self-serving, greedy, bigoted, sadistic, perverted and disgusting species on this planet. Babylon is burning.

Religious fanatics want everybody to believe like they do so they don't feel so damn stupid...

5:08 While it's not wrong what he's saying here, he's not addressing Kant's position at all. In all fairness, the question also didn't really encompass it, so either he's completely unaware of Kant's position, or he's misrepresenting it.

0:58 "Many people do simply awful things out of sincere religious belief" As well as out of sincere belief of any other kind that's not religious. That's just called human nature. 8:00 onwards, there he goes again: Admitting what is simply a feature of human nature and still blaming it on religion, claiming that it's all just "religious mentality", although it is clearly and admittedly NOT religious, and although, contrary to his claim, these iterations of the problem are not "transcendent" by any means, they are very down-to-earth, very exclusively concerned with this earthly, material existence. He has it all backwards. The problems is not that religion contamins the human mind, even in those cases where it's not religion in the proper sense, the problem is already existing within the human mind, and it gives birth to religion and other dangerous non-religious ideologies. You can't get out of the dilemma by saying we would all be good people if religion didn't corrupt us, no, it's because we're already (potentially) corrupt that religions and other dangerous ideologies can prove to be so successful. He says it himself: "People want that big truth. They want sacred scriptures." And so, he concludes the problem is somehow NOT people's inherent desire for those things, but those things themselves, although they have been created by people to fulfill their desires? People are creating gods in their own image, but those gods are somehow responsible?

Like the video but could you do it without that wobble thing happening all the time? And if you're going to hard code subtitles maybe you could error check them first?

replace the word God with the word reality and grow the fuck up

It would have been better without the highly inaccurate subtitles. But I did like the unfinished "fallacy" being rendered as "phallus"! Clearly, absolutely no intelligence was employed, whether artificial or otherwise.

Yep. Religion is basically intellectual impatience and laziness. Why think about things when you can skip directly to "God did it"? It's a perfect storm of many people not wanting to think for themselves and a few greedy unethical people (i.e. the clergy) willing to take advantage of the lazy people and tell them what to think and how to act.

All religions are based on lies.

God does not exist. Absolutely no evidence of it. No mental gymnastics can prove otherwise. When we die, we're gone. As simple and peaceful as that.

Certainly, as God is depicted in ancient texts, the image one can come away with, is that of a rather petulant god. As such, it makes sense that one would not want to worship someone like that. (Although the Congregationalist church I grew up in paid those awful concepts of God no mind. Jesus, and his concept of God was what mattered.) As a child, I knew nothing about how religions had evolved over the ages. I didn't even know the term "god-of-the-gaps," (which refers to the human tendency to personify and deify unexplainable phenomenon). It all just seemed to be a static thing, as though this was the way everyone had always understood it. But learning about how the Greeks and Romans envisioned their gods, on Mt. Olympus or wherever, and their relationship to things like lightening, I began to get the feel for the way people conceived of gods. Thanks to Homer we have the Iliad and the Odyssey, detailing the exploits of sailors on a quest for a golden fleece, (although how a sheep could have hair made of gold made no sense to me...). But the subliminal message was that people deify lots of things. It took awhile before I learned that the concept of 'Yahweh' started out initially as a volcano. Thor and his lightening, made for superheroish fun. Now we have Marvel's Avenger series, where mortals and semi mortals alike battle the forces of evil. The point is, we're still doing it. That religion evolved out of attempts to appease forces of nature, or unexplainable events that caused death and destruction, is nowhere to be found in the critiques of atheists. They look at the current state of the product, (which others have foolishly labeled inerrant), and take it at face value. As though the authors knew full well what they were talking about, (somehow had powers of perception lost to modern man), and recorded it all down from perfect recall. My question to those atheists is: "have you met people?" Why pursue belief? Science is providing us with explanation for more and more of the hazards in our lives, and that's great! The need to appease a supposed angry ghost or god, is rapidly fading from view. Eliminating all the things God isn't, makes sense. Many believe it's possible we will eventually have answers to all the mysteries in the universe. (Although how they think they'll find out scientifically where personality comes from, I don't know.) One persistent mystery is 'life.' Saying 'god did it' to each mystery has gotten so old, that even if God did do that one but not all the others, why should we believe it? We know "mind" exists, but some imagine it might just be a product of neurology. (Except there's evidence of mind/cognition in organisms devoid of neurons, like slime mold, or mycelial networks.) So, there may well be some things for which we'll never know the answer, like why time exists? Enter, near-death experiences, psychic phenomenon and revelation, which point us toward a first source and center. It does seem as though there is something transcendent out there, (up there, or wherever). A wiser approach, it seems to me, would be to grade each depiction of God in the Bible, for example, just based on their own perception of what perfection should look like. I say "perfection" because the Bible has God saying: "be you perfect, even as I am perfect." He's asserting that he's perfect, so let's evaluate just how well the authors have done with even just one of his supposed attributes and ask: "does this sound 'perfect' to me?" As loving someone (which no one has a problem with), and sending them to hell for not worshiping in the way the priest deems necessary, sounds like a contradiction, that one concept, as compared against perfection, would get a failing grade. (Never mind the problem with, why is it the priest who gets to decide what the right way is?) But to do this, would require one to throw out the inerrancy claim. As critical thinking goes, many an atheist doesn't seem to be sympathetic to how it got written in the first place, just critical of the end result. If our concepts of God were understood to be a work in progress, (something very few religions acknowledge or tolerate), we might be able to create a list of attributes that seem perfect to us and those that don't, and confine ourselves to the ones that pass the perfection test. Although it would be much easier just to read the Urantia Book.

We all of us know that science is yet to explain the exact origins, first cause of the universe, not possible, & most certainly not what science wants, be the last thing they want, then nothing left to talk about, isn’t it…. Perhaps most things, the most important will always be beyond reach, the resolution of the microscope not enough… Science will never know what other species comprehend at “ their own particular level”. that which we cannot comprehend… Like what is a whale dreaming about when it’s hanging upside down sleeping ? Or does it dream at all ?

This not God, Man wrote, so is a him, mankind, ever hear word woman kind, tells you man wrote… Others see nature as divine… a lovely truth ..remembering we all indigenous once upon a time… So why haven’t we outgrown “ god condoned war” slavery, convenience perhaps you think. ?

I've lived in London England for 40 years I have never once heard of anybody getting their heads kicked down the road as if it's a football - Peter is grasping at straws yet again to substantiate something that can't be

Peter never gives a tenable answer to any of the questions, and criticisms raised by his much more switched on Brother🤔

ATHEIST’S BIGGEST FALLACY >>> ……………… EVERYTHING (in the Universe) JUST SO HAPPENS !!! ……………… NO. NO. NOHHHHHHHHHH !!! ………………….. Proof #1: An Atheist puts ten coins labeled 1 to 10 in an opaque container in PERFECTLY ASCENDING order. Were shaken and mixed very well ……………… Now, he/she wants to FISH THEM OUT in PERFECTLY DESCENDING order. Does he/she know the CHANCE those ten coins would come out as he/she wishes ??? …………….. According to Ai Bing: 1 in 3,628,800 (one in three million, six hundred twenty eight thousand eight hundred) !!! …………………….. Proof #2: Our planet Earth ROTATES AROUND TWO AXES at the SAME TIME … Around its OWN @ over 1,000 miles per hour and around the SUN at an average of about 67,000 miles per hour -- WITHOUTTTTTTTTTTTTT going CLOSER to the Sun (humans would BURN to their deaths) and WITHOUT going AWAY from it (humans would FREEZE to their deaths) !!! …………………….. Atheist, UNDERSTAND THIS NOWWWWWWWWWWW: The Earth does NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT do those things ON ITS OWN !!! … THE LORD GOD JESUS DOESSSSSSSSSS IT !!! ………………….. The Bible says in Colossians 1:17 >>> “He is before all things, and in Him all things HOLD TOGETHER (caps mine) … Amen.

ATHEIST’S BIGGEST FALLACY >>> ……………… EVERYTHING (in the Universe) JUST SO HAPPENS !!! ……………… NO. NO. NOHHHHHHHHHH !!! ………………….. Proof #1: An Atheist puts ten coins labeled 1 to 10 in an opaque container in PERFECTLY ASCENDING order. Were shaken and mixed very well ……………… Now, he/she wants to FISH THEM OUT in PERFECTLY DESCENDING order. Does he/she know the CHANCE those ten coins would come out as he/she wishes ??? …………….. According to Ai Bing: 1 in 3,628,800 (one in three million, six hundred twenty eight thousand eight hundred) !!! …………………….. Proof #2: Our planet Earth ROTATES AROUND TWO AXES at the SAME TIME … Around its OWN @ over 1,000 miles per hour and around the SUN at an average of about 67,000 miles per hour -- WITHOUTTTTTTTTTTTTT going CLOSER to the Sun (humans would BURN to their deaths) and WITHOUT going AWAY from it (humans would FREEZE to their deaths) !!! …………………….. Atheist, UNDERSTAND THIS NOWWWWWWWWWWW: The Earth does NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT do those things ON ITS OWN !!! … THE LORD GOD JESUS DOESSSSSSSSSS IT !!! ………………….. The Bible says in Colossians 1:17 >>> “He is before all things, and in Him all things HOLD TOGETHER (caps mine) … Amen.

The Church Of England currently has over 10 billion pounds in investments. Yet they still ask for donations for the upkeep of their buildings. Such hypocrisy.

Dan Dennett was one of our most perceptive voices. Thank you.

God is a terrible character because he mirrors exactly the mean nasty repressive retributive tribalist rulers and priest-kings of ancient times. This is a fire engine-red, honking, careening clue that Man created God in his own image. Religion such as Abrahamic religion (Judaism, Christianity, Catholicism, Islam, Mormonism) was Man's desperate attempt to fashion a moral code, control each other politically, encourage solidarity for war, and make claims on real estate.

garbage editing

Dan Barker will find out on the day he dies whether he was right or wrong about God.

Stupid and wrong video title. Atheism isn't a "belief". It's the complete opposite; the lack in the belief of a deity as explained by a few religions. I expected better from Jupitar Star.

It was an accurate and factual video, but it could be shortened because it was somewhat repetitive. I am figuring out if I heard it right. Did our friend Berty Russell suggest that the arguments for a god could be better? grammar-grammar-grandma. Like a stuck 78 RPM gramophone record.

There’s no evidence or proof for a God. Sports stars point to the skies as if to heaven when they score a goal. There’s nothing up there except ice cold planets and moons existing in absolute zero. There’s plenty of documentation that Jesus was historically real. The question is where has he been the last 2000 years? Sitting on a golden throne with a white haired bearded white man smoking cigars and drinking wine? Remember he turned the water into wine.

Daniel Dennett is now the most religious atheist ever..

God loves us so much that we'll never ceas to exist, that would be more tragic than going to hell. No one will see anyone in hell, because all wjo are there will be alone for eternity. But take courage now in knowing that you will at least exist. Yes yes on fire and screaming for it to all end. And cursing God that i was right in my comment here, LoL don't worry we'll likely all be there together even even though we'll all be alone, but i am very much truly right that it is better to exist than not to exist even in hell. Now God would truly be evil and uncaring if at the end of our lives we just stopped existing.

Disappointing to hear that Paul Potts, winner of the first Britain's Got Talent show, turned to genocide in Cambodia. Who knew?!? 🤪

Man I remember when Peterson seemed to be a decent guy. His early stuff was interesting and thoughtful. Now, he’s just hateful and seems to have turned his pain outward, it’s sad.

“Since it is obviously inconceivable that all religions can be right, the most reasonable conclusion is that they are all wrong.” -Christopher Hitchens Ps; Love 💗 him, we are indeed poorer without Christopher around, and I sorely miss him.