- Видео 173
- Просмотров 47 330
BenSucksAtPingPong
США
Добавлен 7 июл 2024
Welcome to BenSucksAtPingPong! 🏓
Join me on my journey from being mediocre to mastering ping pong. Watch as I chronicle my progress, sharing game highlights, points, struggles, and triumphs. I'm sick of sucking at table tennis and would love your interaction, feedback, and tips to help me get better!
I update my unique ranking system based on a modified Colley matrix before and after each game, so you can see my progress in real-time. My rankings will show my improvements and setbacks, making the journey more exciting and engaging.
If the ranking has changed without a video being recorded, it most likely means I played a match with a kid without the permission to post the video.
Subscribe to follow my ping pong adventures, learn with me, and let's build a supportive community of ping pong/Table Tennis enthusiasts!
If you want a copy of the spreadsheet I use, or if you want me to manage your sheet for you ($5 a month) just send me a message!
Let's Play!
Join me on my journey from being mediocre to mastering ping pong. Watch as I chronicle my progress, sharing game highlights, points, struggles, and triumphs. I'm sick of sucking at table tennis and would love your interaction, feedback, and tips to help me get better!
I update my unique ranking system based on a modified Colley matrix before and after each game, so you can see my progress in real-time. My rankings will show my improvements and setbacks, making the journey more exciting and engaging.
If the ranking has changed without a video being recorded, it most likely means I played a match with a kid without the permission to post the video.
Subscribe to follow my ping pong adventures, learn with me, and let's build a supportive community of ping pong/Table Tennis enthusiasts!
If you want a copy of the spreadsheet I use, or if you want me to manage your sheet for you ($5 a month) just send me a message!
Let's Play!
Testing My New Serve Strategy & Facing Unexpected Counters 🏓7th Match vs Joseph
This video features my 7th match against Joseph. After our last match, where it was noted that we both won the first attack at similar rates, I wanted to focus on winning that first attack in this match.
According to the footage, I started playing more defensively in the second and third games, which threw me off my strategy. My new serve style-half-long serves to set up an attack-was met with a counter I hadn’t prepared for. I stuck with it to learn and adapt, but it didn’t pay off as much as I hoped.
Joseph’s unexpected returns, aiming for my centerline or even down the line to my backhand, caught me off guard. I suspect this was due to either a lack of sufficient spin or Joseph having an...
According to the footage, I started playing more defensively in the second and third games, which threw me off my strategy. My new serve style-half-long serves to set up an attack-was met with a counter I hadn’t prepared for. I stuck with it to learn and adapt, but it didn’t pay off as much as I hoped.
Joseph’s unexpected returns, aiming for my centerline or even down the line to my backhand, caught me off guard. I suspect this was due to either a lack of sufficient spin or Joseph having an...
Просмотров: 258
Видео
Losing Focus & Learning Valuable Lessons 🏓First Recorded Match vs Devin
Просмотров 30512 часов назад
This was the first recorded match between Devin and me, and it was a great learning experience. Devin is a fun player to face, with unique serves and strategies that make for an interesting game. Unfortunately, I waivered from my strategy, and it showed. I didn’t think I was doing anything different at the time, but watching the footage revealed that my placements and aim were off. By the end o...
First Battle Against Tibhar Grass Pips & Serve Strategy Lessons 🏓Match 17 vs Logan
Просмотров 47414 часов назад
This was my 17th match against Logan, who is back to playing with pips and using the notorious Tibhar Grass rubber. This was my first time playing against it, and let me tell you-the stories are true! I managed to win the first game, but Logan came back strong, dominating games 2 and 3. I was sticking with my half-long serve strategy that worked well against Kelvin, but I got stubborn with it. ...
Half-Long Serve Practice & Deuce Battles! 🏓🔥8th Match vs Kelvin
Просмотров 51516 часов назад
This was my 8th match against Kelvin, and I’m really pleased with how I played! I dedicated time to practicing half-long serves, focusing mainly on distance rather than variety. This unexpectedly pushed me to improve my backspin technique over shorter distances, as I couldn’t rely on large paddle movements to generate spin. Turns out, the advice in the comments was spot on! I also worked on top...
Long Pips Challenges & Playing Through Discomfort 🏓😅 Match 16 vs Logan
Просмотров 426День назад
This video features my 16th match against Logan, who’s moved back to using long pips. I was testing a few strategies in this match, especially focusing on countering his long pips’ reverse spin. When the pips didn’t add spin, I tried overpowering the deadspin with high racket speed, but it didn’t work as well as I’d hoped. Still, I stuck to my plan to see how it would play out. Here’s something...
High-Risk Shots, Push Footwork & Forehand Block Struggles 🏓Latest Match vs Kelvin
Просмотров 132День назад
This video shows my latest match against Kelvin, and I’m happy it was as close as it was. However, I’ve pinpointed a few key issues: 1. High-Risk Shots: I took some unnecessary, high-risk backhand loops late in the games, shots that I rarely hit successfully. Why did I do them? I honestly don’t know! 2. Hyperfocused Push Footwork: I realized during this game that I wasn’t paying enough attentio...
Facing Nate’s Immaculate Spin Deception! Outmatched So I Let Loose and Did Better 🏓🔥
Просмотров 606День назад
A new player, Nate, showed up at the club, and this match was an exciting challenge for me! Not only did I go in without knowing what to expect, but once I realized I was outmatched, I decided to let go and play without overthinking-a great lesson for sure. Nate’s serves were tough to handle, packed with a LOT of spin and incredible spin deception. I learned quickly that I need to stop being so...
Rare Win Against Hardbat Master Jim! 🏓🔥Epic Battle vs Jim: Deuce Thriller in Game 5
Просмотров 9614 дней назад
Just played an intense match against Jim, an incredible hardbat player known for his attacking skills and precise placement, especially on wide angles. I knew I had to be extremely vigilant for this one-Jim dominates many players at the club, and I’ve never beaten him in my life… until now! This was my second match of the day and possibly his as well, as he only plays a few matches each session...
New Rubber Debut Match vs Joseph! Adjusting & Learning with a Surprise Outcome 🏓🔥
Просмотров 7914 дней назад
My new rubber debut kicks off with a match against Joseph! I was focused on three key areas: 1 - Getting used to the new rubber on both sides (I switched back to my red side with thicker sponge), 2 - Attacking first, and 3 - Taking away Joseph’s attack. Surprisingly, my pushes were decent, even though I wasn’t consciously focusing on them. Later in the club session, after a misstep, I realized ...
Step-by-Step Guide: How I Replaced My Paddle Rubber with Xiom Omega VII Europe! 🏓
Просмотров 6214 дней назад
In this video, I’m switching things up! Instead of a match, I’m demonstrating how I put a new Xiom Omega VII Europe rubber on my paddle’s red side. Many people recommended this upgrade, and I decided to wait until after the tournament to make the switch. I needed to replace it anyway due to a tear, but didn’t want to adjust to a whole new rubber right before competing! Here’s the step-by-step o...
Hardbat Battle with Wide Attacks & Blown Leads! 🏓🔥14th Match vs Leanne
Просмотров 18314 дней назад
Just played my 14th match against Leanne, a really skilled hardbat player, and focused on three main goals: 1 - Attacking first, 2 - Hitting at the right height, and 3 - Blocking her attacks better. I managed to get two strong leads in a couple of games, but Leanne expertly fought back, attacking my angles and taking away my chances for a win. My blocks weren’t as successful as I’d hoped, but I...
Seeking Redemption & A Thrilling Deuce Battle! 🏓🔥5th Match vs Joseph
Просмотров 10821 день назад
In my 5th match against Joseph, I came in seeking redemption after he swept me in our last encounter. This time, I focused on three main areas: 1 - Limiting his attacks (as he’s a fast, aggressive player), 2 - Better blocking, and 3 - Improving my pushes. Overall, I felt pretty good about my performance. However, reviewing the footage, I noticed my footwork slipped in a few key moments, especia...
Working on Serve Placement, Push Footwork & New Strategies! 🏓6th Match Against Kelvin
Просмотров 19621 день назад
In my 6th match with Kelvin, I focused on three key areas to improve my game: 1 - Serve placement (again!), 2 - Push footwork (to keep my right foot forward instead of behind or lateral), and 3 - Push placements to limit Kelvin's strong attacks. Before the match, Kelvin and I discussed some new strategies he’s been working on. He’s preparing for an event about a year away and focusing on loosen...
Working on New Serve Placement & Struggling with Rhythm 🏓Post-Tournament Match vs Dallas
Просмотров 10521 день назад
Working on New Serve Placement & Struggling with Rhythm 🏓Post-Tournament Match vs Dallas
Huge Upset & Close Finish 🏓🔥Epic 5-Game Table Tennis Tournament Battle vs U1500 Champion Josh
Просмотров 17621 день назад
Huge Upset & Close Finish 🏓🔥Epic 5-Game Table Tennis Tournament Battle vs U1500 Champion Josh
Focused Play & Tough Battle in U1800 Tournament! 🏓🔥Group Play vs Leanne | Provo Canyon Table Tennis
Просмотров 15221 день назад
Focused Play & Tough Battle in U1800 Tournament! 🏓🔥Group Play vs Leanne | Provo Canyon Table Tennis
U1500 Tournament Match vs Shiva! Great Rallies & A Tough Loss 🏓🔥
Просмотров 21428 дней назад
U1500 Tournament Match vs Shiva! Great Rallies & A Tough Loss 🏓🔥
From Winning Streak to Sweep! Joseph’s Attack Style Took Me Down! 🏓😅
Просмотров 13528 дней назад
From Winning Streak to Sweep! Joseph’s Attack Style Took Me Down! 🏓😅
Shaking Off the Cobwebs vs Michael O’s Antispin! Can I Bounce Back? 🏓💥
Просмотров 79Месяц назад
Shaking Off the Cobwebs vs Michael O’s Antispin! Can I Bounce Back? 🏓💥
Feeling Rusty in My 6th Match Against Eric! Last Club Day Before the Tournament 🏓😬
Просмотров 302Месяц назад
Feeling Rusty in My 6th Match Against Eric! Last Club Day Before the Tournament 🏓😬
Caught on Camera: My Craziest Table Tennis Shots, Points and Rallies! #5 🏓😎
Просмотров 241Месяц назад
Caught on Camera: My Craziest Table Tennis Shots, Points and Rallies! #5 🏓😎
Top Shots Compilation # 4! Lucky Shots, Crazy Nets, & Epic Game Enders! 🏓🔥
Просмотров 95Месяц назад
Top Shots Compilation # 4! Lucky Shots, Crazy Nets, & Epic Game Enders! 🏓🔥
My Top Table Tennis Shots #3: Slams, Edges, & Lucky, Undeserved Blocks
Просмотров 948Месяц назад
My Top Table Tennis Shots #3: Slams, Edges, & Lucky, Undeserved Blocks
Blown Lead against Terry! Finally a Close Match | Intense Rally, Deuce Battle & Spinny Serves! 🏓🔥
Просмотров 152Месяц назад
Blown Lead against Terry! Finally a Close Match | Intense Rally, Deuce Battle & Spinny Serves! 🏓🔥
My Top Table Tennis Shots #2. Even I Get Lucky Sometimes with Nets, Slams, & Rallies! 🏓🔥
Просмотров 529Месяц назад
My Top Table Tennis Shots #2. Even I Get Lucky Sometimes with Nets, Slams, & Rallies! 🏓🔥
Closest Match Yet! How I Took On Jun’s ‘Unreturnable Serve’ in Table Tennis! 🏓😲
Просмотров 230Месяц назад
Closest Match Yet! How I Took On Jun’s ‘Unreturnable Serve’ in Table Tennis! 🏓😲
Top Shots Compilation! My Best Table Tennis Moments from Day 1! 🏓🔥
Просмотров 229Месяц назад
Top Shots Compilation! My Best Table Tennis Moments from Day 1! 🏓🔥
Penhold Player Challenge! How I Worked on My Attacks Against Kathleen! 🏓🔥
Просмотров 172Месяц назад
Penhold Player Challenge! How I Worked on My Attacks Against Kathleen! 🏓🔥
Leanne Taught Me an Incredible Table Tennis Lesson in Our 12th Match! 🏓💥
Просмотров 581Месяц назад
Leanne Taught Me an Incredible Table Tennis Lesson in Our 12th Match! 🏓💥
You Won’t Believe What Happened to the Butterfly Tenergy 5 in This Table Tennis Match!
Просмотров 312Месяц назад
You Won’t Believe What Happened to the Butterfly Tenergy 5 in This Table Tennis Match!
Well I couldn't resist to make another tactical review, based on errors and winners. The two of you have a similar style, backhand oriented, relatively aggressive with that backhand, spinny serves. While you are making a similar number of errors (21-23), Joseph has more winners (6-15), his reward is higher for same risk taking. The majority of your errors is on return or on 3rd ball. As said previously, return errors are to be expected, if the opponent has good serves. But your 3rd ball error rate should go down because that's where you are in command. (The same is even more true for Joseph, who had 11/23 errors coming from 3rd ball). You didn't get any reward from risky 3rd ball, 1 winner. While you did get reward from consistency: Joseph made 4 errors on 4th ball. Watching your game from that perspective again, I noticed a pattern. During your recovery, there's a lot going on, especially after a backhand serve (which is your standard). You have a long follow through, then you are twiddling your bat a little, and then the fingers are busy as if readjusting the grip. As the other commenter has pointed out, the hand often goes below the table too. So I'd a gree this is the focal point in your next training: recovery, especially after serve, into neutral position, that very same position which you consciously take upon return. 1. serve with backhand, reducing the follow through so your bat ends up in front of your body 2. get the whole body into "receving mode" 3. bring the bat in front 4. try reducing any superfluous motion; in particular there is no need for the hand to go down before coming back to neutral 5. as a 2nd point, be more active with the feet than with the arms; put your weight on the front of the feet, so that you can quickly move about
Great analysis. I actually practiced my third ball attack quite a bit yesterday because of this. And you're right, I need to simplify it quite a bit. One thing I emphasized yesterday is initiating the swing in front (or at least 'shortning') the stroke to simplify it. That minimized the superflous motions, I think, as I didn't feel like I needed to 'kill' the shot, just get it on the table whilst drilling it. Thanks so much! It'll come around!
This match really exposed how your bad FH form was losing you a lot of points. You were able to put away like one or two out of the many chance balls that went to your FH. A lot can be written about what can be fixed but the main points are : 1. Too big backswing 2. Elbow too far from body and rising during the shot 3. Using your shoulders instead of your body to hit The one decent one you did was around 5:15. The reason it was successful is because it was close to your body and you had a little less time to perform your stroke. Making your stroke more compact increased its effectiveness because you had less time to implement your bad form like you used in other FH smash attempts. To fix this you want to keep your elbow close to your side (maybe two fists away). Depending on how high the ball you lift your shoulder and your elbow. Backswing doesn't go to more than few degrees past 90 in relation to your sides. When you hit, use your legs and twist your hips and generate power into the ball. You want to feel a connection from your legs, hips, to your arm. Right now you're just trying to swing the racket arm using your upper body and shoulders, and it's incredibly hard to find a correct hitting point when your shoulders and elbows are so unstable with such a big swing. Also keep your eyes on the ball the entire time until contact. Actually train high ball and lob smashes. You don't get good at strokes without practice. For some reason people think because these are supposed to be easy balls, these smashes don't need to be trained. They absolutely need to be trained.
Excellent analysis and yes, my forehands are really suffering lately. This comment, though, prompted me to practice my forehands (by way of 3rd ball attack, as I know I can at least set them up) with my son on our table for a few round. Great instructions. Will definitely implement! Thank you so much!
Hi Ben, I'm glad to see you marking your best points this time! The unfortunate reality is that to improve, we have to criticize. But this always needs to be put into perspective. And we're going to use at least one of those happy points in the end, if only just to drive today's point home. To be honest, I would REALLY like to use the opportunity to blabber about table tennis chess now. Getting unexpected returns would be a prime opportunity to do just that. Unfortunately, upon closer inspection of this match, we don't get to the point of discussing chess yet, because as we may have already hinted at in past videos, there are major major technique issues that prevent you from playing the 2nd or 3rd balls anyways, and there's actually no need to strategize if the ability to turn any strategy into reality is missing. So let's get to work on the first and this match's most egregious issue, one that prevents you from playing forehands, backhand AND return Joseph's serve receive properly all at once. Let's get the productive to-do out of the way first: My recommandation for next match is simple: Ignore serve length, ignore push length, ignore tactics, none of that matters at all, play however you want, have fun. But your mission next match day should be to focus, at all times, in every point, after every serve, on every receive, between every ball, without exception: To NEVER NEVER EVER let your racket drop below the table. --------- Let's watch the "ideal" first: ruclips.net/video/YiEDQR0--BM/видео.html The match is between Bernadette Szocs, offensive/allround strategy, and Han Ying, a modern defender. It's a great match in general, but I want you to watch this and focus on one thing, and one thing only: Watch the position and elbow angle of their right (racket) arm after serve and in general between every strike, and when they are standing ready to receive serve. Because Han is a defender, there's ample time to watch them remain in their "ready" position between strikes. ----------- Now let's watch you (tension building...) after serve, shall we: let's set our youtube to 0.25 speed and go to... 1:43 Pause the player exactly when the ball hits Joseph's racket. Look at your right arm position. Look how outstretched the arm is and how low the racket is. Resume play, and watch how low the start of your strike begins, and how you are forced to move the racket upwards during contact to barely hit the ball in time, and how your whole racket motion goes high forward up due to the low start, predictably making the ball fly out. 1:49 Pause the player exactly when the ball hits Joseph's racket. Look at your right arm position. Look at how the super low racket position influences your push. Instead of being able to tightly chop beneath the ball from above for maxiumum backspin, your arm has to move up all the time, leading to just lifting it high. 2:11 Pause the player exactly when the ball hits Joseph's racket. Look at your right arm position. Look at how it influences your following return. Your racket has barely time to rise to softly touch the ball, instead of being able to drive through the ball from back to front and adding speed and spin. 2:23 Pause the player exactly when the ball hits Joseph's racket. Look at your right arm position. Look at how it influences your following push. Your racket has to move up all the time, barely able to stop before the ball is already near, and unable to do a proper backspin-inducing chopping motion from above, again sending the push long. 3:21 You know the drill. Pause EVERY TIME Joseph hits the ball. Notice a pattern? Heck, let's look at 4:23 (I'm just clicking randomly on the time bar by now tbh) Joseph serves. Pause on his ball toss. See how nice and high you are holding the racket to receive Joseph's serve? You know that the serve is the slowest ball you'll receive the whole point because it has to touch the table twice, every ball that follows is likely much quicker? Pause when Joseph contacts the ball the second time. See your stance? Your racket arm? Why aren't you AT LEAST as physically ready as on the serve to receive this likely much faster ball? See how your racket has to go up again, making the ball fly predictably high/long? Okay, let;s finish this, just one last time. Let's go to 1:15 Notice how when you can strike directly from a high racket position, you can play pretty awesome attacks? :) ------------------------------ The whole point of the game is to keep the ball ON the table, not UNDER it - and the most foundational, basic, and important job of your racket is the be ready where the ball likely is, and not be where the ball definitely isn't. If your king isn't covered by your pawns anymore because you always shove them all under the table immediately after your opening move, Joseph can just take it anytime he wants, and your opening gambit doesn't matter. So keep your racket (and head) high, and maybe we can maybe actually talk about table tennis chess next time. Just maybe though. :) PS: Kudos to Joseph too, he played really well this time.
Maybe thats why I felt like he played on "relax mode" when watching the game
Correct analysis. I made my own and we seem to concur.
Okay. This was a really REALLY good exercise. I went through every time stamp and can see EXACTLY what you meant. I have 3 more videos to edit before I will probably go to the club and implement this, but luckily I can play at work against people and try this out TODAY. This was excellet and something I've been working on a while, but this is granular. Thank you so much - if I can just get it up when it strikes my opponents racket, that gives me a good timing goal. Excellent.
@@BenSucksAtPingPong I think what is meant is that you should KEEP it up as much as you can, not GET it up.
Yes, thank you. That is clear to me. Sorry I didn't make that clear in my comment.
Hi Ben! The next time you are editing a video, I'd like to see you put your favorite positive emoji on at least 5 of your strokes or decisions you liked! Putting emphasis on what you did wrong (that applies to the self-scolding during match as well, it also applies to calling yourself a 'dummy" in the intro) reinforces doing the wrong things. Putting emphasis on what you did correctly tells your brain that it might want to repeat the thing you did right more often. This might be counter-intuitive since people tend to think that self-flagellation of some kind would be some kind of punishment that leads to not repeating the action criticized. But it isn't. If self-loathing would be something to be avoided, we would just not self-loathe so much, right? You don't see anyone running around slapping themselves, right? Actual pain would work, but noone does it, because it actually hurts... Your brain knows that you screaming "attack that!" or letting your body slump in disappointment at yourself doesn't cause any physical pain or damage. Instead, it has learned that doing this is a positive social interaction. Expressing this may lead to positive interactions with other human beings who observe it, and then help, give tips, encourage you with many nice words. With every such scolding, your brain reinforces that doing wrong things is good, because it gets it more "positive" social interactions in the end. It's how toxic relationships work - getting mistreated by someone is still way better for our social brains than having no socal interaction at all. Don't drift into a toxic relationship with yourself (or your youtube commenters, for that matter). Even if your brain perceived it as a capital self-punishment, that wouldn't work either: Making a good movement or decision in table tennis is not a conscious decision. It is a result of having figured out a "good" movement once, remembering the feeling, and then chasing that rewarding feeling for a thousand times until it becomes second nature, by doing drills. Table Tennis is simple in theory, but very hard in execution. For every "correct" movement or decision, there are a thousand terrible movements or decisions, PLUS also a pesky opponent who tries to make every decision as hard for us as possible. Even if you punished yourself so terribly for one bad decision that your brain will refrain from ever doing the same thing again, there's still 999 other bad decisions it has not taken yet. And if you do not know the "correct" thing yet, your brain may get to feel like it's getting punished for everything it does without reason. Do you know why so many pro athletes shout "Chooooo!" so often, yet you rarely see them slump? It's not because they never make mistakes anbd only produce brilliance. They make plenty of mistakes. They just know that emphasizing their mistakes doesn't help them to avoid them. If you're not the type of guy to scream Cho!, do a silent fistpump instead! Keep your spirits up during a match, don't just focus on your mistakes. Everybody makes mistakes! At 7:52, you make a serve error. Watch your reaction. In this match ruclips.net/video/QKXSayRNGJ4/видео.html at 4m41s, Felix Lebrun makes a serve errors vs Timo Boll. Watch his reaction. (at 10m58s, Boll makes a serve error too) It happens because you're tense. If you laught about it, the tension goes away, you shake a little to regain focus on the next point, and go win that match. If you get angry at yourself, you respond to an error due to tension and impatience by adding even more tension and impatience. -------------------------------------- These are things you did this video that I liked very much: 0:00 When faced with a short or half-long serve by your opponent, your decision to push and the way you approached it was great! What was missing and the reason you were too late for the push was that you don't do a "start", a small jump or step forward, on the opponent's ball toss. See this video explaining it: ruclips.net/video/o0cK3GUmQbM/видео.html Also an example: 0:35, or 6:11. It's not your fault! You weren't taught that! But rejoice! This is VERY easy to fix, you're just missing one small step or jump and you'll be in position much quicker mand all of those pushes will land! In contrast, at 6:04 when Devins serve was long and you didn't have to move into position, and I like how quickly after the bounce you received that. A push received early in the rising phase of the ball will fly short and have a crapton of spin. So if you practice/drill just making a little step forward on the opponent's ball toss (before hit), you can play all pushes on all locations of the table that quickly off the bounce, and you'll be a master pusher! Big improvements incoming! 0:40 The deception on that serve was great! 0:53 I'm both impressed how confidently you were able to punish Devins risky reverse hook serve, as well as that you went for it again just after missing it the previous point! That's metal fortitude! 1:18, 1:43, 2:18, 2:24, 4:56, 5:20 You set up an attack either by serve or great pushing, and went for it! That was perfect! You don't have the forehand technique to reliably make a point yet, but the serve was great, and the decisionmaking was immaculate! With a few forehand drills (I'll write you all about forehand sometimes soon, but want to get all the mental stuff out of the way first), we will see the rate of winners you hit improve vastly in the near future, I'm sure of it! You are at the point where this is the main problem stopping you from winning matches, and it's practiceable! 1:28 I loved the pushing! Devin is pretty good compared to your previous opponents, he serves and pushes short or half-long quite often, and you can go toe-to-toe with him, not giving him any attacks he could reliably go for. There are many other points in this match where the length of your pushing was absolutely great. 1:35 We get a glimpse of a glorious future as attacking player by you attempting a pivot attack on a long serve! A great decision, the movement was a bit too tentative, but that can be fixed! The mindset is great! 3:55, 4:12 Another taste of glorious things to come. In a few months, with fixed hard-hitting less-brushing relaxed-but-stable forehand and backhand techniques, you will be playing every rally at at least this speed or higher. Very good hitting sound out of your rubbers. This sound is what all the other forehands are missing. You can do it! 4:33 I like a lot that you did not retreat from the table too far and stayed attentive and in a low position throughout all of Devins attacks! Very often, I've seen you retreat too far or give away a point before its over - not this time! 4:45 Loved the slow loop played directly on the long serve and that you took a step back immediatelyt after playing it.
This was a . . . transformative comment. I went and looked at every single timestamp that you posted, and most of them were losing points. However, the positive 'spin' on them was really helpful. For the past few weeks I have always felt that I am really REALLY close to taking a monumental leap in my progress - whether it was service, technique, finally getting a 'backspin loop' down, I didn't know. Maybe it's a combination of all of those things, or decision making or whatever, but I have to give myself credit for making some pretty darn good progress. And I think perhaps that 'thing' that'll really help in my progress is focusing on what is WORKING and doing THAT over and over again. I really don't need to fix what is 'wrong' but really focus on what is RIGHT, and the techniques will all fix themselves. More and more will get 'right-er' as time goes on. Simplifying my game has helped, and perhipherally many more things have come together. I play table tennis for the mental aspect of it more than anything because I LOVE the chess of it. But there is another layer, and it is the inner game, not just the strategy. Thanks again for an excellent post.
Fun match Ben! Thanks. Was just able to eek out the win. If anyone has suggestions, coaching, or criticisms about my play I am open to hearing it!
Ah yes, Devin, this was a fun match. Thanks for frustrating the crap out of me, haha. You won this one, but I promise I'll get better! Also, be careful what you wish for! You might just get super-professional advice.
@droppedwaffle242 In general, I would advise shortening your serve motions so it's easier to accelerate. It's like a whipping a towel. The more you're able to accelerate, the better the spin will be. Also, consider your starting position relative to the table when you serve so you don't leave any openings. Your grip is a bit unorthodox but if it works, I wouldn't bother changing it unless you want to. Based on my observations, a two-fingered grip will let you have a looser wrist but it's less stable when you try to apply power. In addition, the way you're holding the paddle is also very backhand dominant. On your forehands mid/away from the table, it looks like you lead with your right foot forward? Typically, this adversely affects a person's timing and strike zone and makes it difficult to hit down the line. You can be almost square but it might help if your right foot was slightly behind your left. Right foot forward is okay for shots over the table and I like how you step in for these shots. With regards to your backhand, a lot of times, you reach which means you're only using a wrist to generate spin and power or slapping the ball. Generally, my advice for bh is to strike the ball while it is close to your body. Try to keep your elbow a little higher so that your paddle doesn't stand vertical when you're preparing to use your BH. If the paddle is too vertical, you can't brush over the top/add spin with much quality. Imagine throwing a frisbee (but don't let go of your paddle...) I don't think I can give more detailed player-specific advice without watching more of your games though
@@droppedwaffle242 one more thing: when you're pushing, keep your elbow close to the torso and apply the force forward, not from the side. Push intentionally, try to resist "swiping" at it
Remember to close the blade a little and swing forward on those high balls. I understand the desire for safety vs backspin but when they are very high, all you need to do is make sure the ball crosses the net fast enough 😁
In the words I'm my super smart 11 year old son: "I KNOW YOU DON'T HAFTA KEEP TELLING ME......" *proceeds to do the exact opposite.
@@BenSucksAtPingPong ( ಠ_ಠ)
2:39 😂 I liked how you figured out his serve during game 1 and was able to take the advantage in games 2 & 3. It can be hard to switch between opponents, especially if they have widely varying styles... Remember! As you adapt, he's trying to do the same to you! When you're ahead, keep experimenting every few shots and look for more weaknesses to exploit and save those for when the opponent adapts to you.
I'm glad you enjoyed that - haha - he'll pop up more and more, I'm sure. It's good to be aware of such nuance now, even between different styles. I really like our club because of that. I'm not sure how unique we are - but we have different skills and different bats like crazy. Pips, hardbat, anti spin, inverted, etc. I've only ever been to 3 clubs (Salt Lake Table Tennis, Orem, and Danny Seemiller's in Indiana) but I'm not sure if they are as diverse as ours. And you're right, it's tough to shake off what I just spent a whole match doing! Great advice.
------------------------------- IT'S STATS TIME: Control of point (Initiative): ------------------------------- - If a player is in obvious control of their destiny, errors are theirs to make and points are theirs to lose. - That means if a player scores very high in controlling points and loses the match anyways, the reason they lost the match are overwhelmingly likely their own mistakes, and less the quality of opponent. - There were a LOT of switched serves / miscounts in this match... --- Game 1 (Won) --- Ben remained in control of point on own serve: 6 of 9 Ben gained control/initiative of point on opponent's serve: 8 of 10 Control rating: 14-5 Predicted result based on Control: 11-4 Actual score: 11-9 --- Game 2 (Loss) --- Ben remained in control of point on own serve: 3 of 6 Ben gained control/initiative of point on opponent's serve: 4 of 6 Control: 7-5 Predicted result based on Control: 11-8 Actual score: 1-11 --- Game 3 (Loss) --- Ben remained in control of point on own serve: 2 of 5 Ben gained control/initiative of point on opponent's serve: 5 of 6 Control: 7-4 Predicted result based on Control: 11-6 Actual score: 1-11 >>> switch of tactics here <<< --- Game 4 (Win) --- Ben remained in control of point on own serve: 7 of 10 Ben gained control/initiative of point on opponent's serve: 7 of 10 Control: 14-6 Predicted result based on Control: 11-5 Actual score: 11-9 --- Game 5 (Loss) --- Ben remained in control of point on own serve: 8 of 9 Ben gained control/initiative of point on opponent's serve: 4 of 10 Control: 12-7 Predicted result based on Control: 11-6 Actual score: 8-11 What this statistic would tell me: - Ben should have won every single game because he always had control over the majority of points, but he can not convert "control of" a point into "winning" a point, sometimes disastrously so (set 2&3). That means practicing a switch of serve tactics isn't necessary to win, it just dilutes training time and repetition/mastery. Practicing converting controlled points into won points is universally useful and will win with any tactic that provokes the most opportunities. Remaining unable to convert control into scoring will lose no matter the tactic (as can be seen, the change didn't lead to winning). - The switch dramatically increased Ben's control over his own serves, which was slipping, but did not influence the winning predictions (or ultimately the outcome of the match) at all, because he at the same time lost the ability to gain control over his opponent's serves. This, to me, would be a hint that not only the serve length has changed, but the entire mindset on how to play reverted to something more passive, reactive. What this looks like to me: You spent a lot of mental energy on your game quality in the first set, getting a win, but then your mental reserves started to drain/slip, and your game quality dropped like a rock. To fix the lack of mental energy, switching to an erratic but very well trained (for months) style that could be played from muscle memory eased the mental burden and felt better, but the lack of paying attention to the points in the last two sets transformed the game from a competition of two players for control of points to an inability to wrest control from Logan, and it became a game in which whoever got the initiative by the rules mostly remained in initiative. Initiative/control wasn't earned by player skill anymore, it was given and taken by the rules. So the rules started to determine the outcome, not skill, and since the rules were not followed due to not paying attention due to lack of mental energy, Logan got a lot of free extra serves, and hence he won the game and match.
--------------------------------- To drive the point home: Detailed analysis of the disastrous Game 2: ------------------------------- 1: Ben sets up a textbook 3rd ball attack and wins. 2: Ben gives Logan a free point by serve error 3: Ben puts pressure on Logan and gets a high ball close to the net to his forehand side as reward. Ben waits too long to hit it, striking it in the dropping phase, and with a very closed racket angle as if it was a low topspin instead of flat like a smash, forcing it into the net. Backhand technique issue. 4: Ben puts pressure on Logan with a soft slow opening loop, getting rewarded with a weak and slow high block and Logan retreating from table in anticipation of getting utterly killed. Ben completely misses the ball by trying to brush it thinly instead of safely driving through the ball. Forehand technique issue. 5. Ben puts pressure on Logan and is rewarded by a slow, high ball to the centerline. Instead of taking one step to the left and calmly forehand-smashing it home on the peak of the bounce, he takes a step to the right to receive a must-be-forehand ball super early off the bounce as if it was a low backhand topspin, predictably making the ball fly over the table. Footwork / position issue. 6. Bad easy push on serve receive, taken too late, leaning back/taking a step back while striking while also hitting with with unstable wrist and angle. Footwork / stability issue. 7. Ben puts immense pressure on Logan after a nice backhand receive, getting a perfect long high block right into his forehand as reward, with Logan rushing away out of cam in anticipation of surely getting killed. For no reason, Ben retreats from the table himself while he's clearly attacking and while having a massive advantage, just to hit the final ball too late because he's too far away, and smacks it into the net trying to brush way too flat for that distance instead of just driving straight through the ball. Aggravated footwork/position and forehand technique issues. 8. Ben takes the initiative by playing a well-placed serve to the centerline, forcing an awkward lift-receive from Logan, because he's a big boy and receiving anything that goes to the middle is super awkward for him. Instead of following up by smacking the 3rd ball even harder to the vulnerable middle, Ben smacks hard into Logans backhand corner, which is the easiest thing in the world for Logan, because he's a very big boy and his arms have enough length that he doesn't need to reach or move at all to receive that safely, and it hits his long pips, so absolutely zero mental difficulty at all, while creating additional spin-related difficulties for Ben. This attack to the backhand corner instead of down the middle hence makes Ben lose control of his own serve point, turning it into an open rally in which both players are evenly matched. Ben continues to cooperatively aim diagonally to Logans backhand as if it was a practice drill, until Logan places one return to the middle of Bens side. Ben does not move at all to sidestep it, hence his attempt to return it is suddenly awkward, and it goes into the net. First ball aimed at the middle wins, even if slow and not spinny. Completely forgot "always aim for the middle" after serve, and immediate footwork/position issue in receiving a ball to the middle himself. 9. Nice half-long serve to the middle, immediately rewarded with a weak high lift receive to the centerline by Logan, who jumps back in anticipation of getting utterly smashed to oblivion. Ben correctly spots the 3rd ball opportunity, actually sidesteps a little to use his forhand and... thinly brushes the ball instead of properly driving through the ball, making it drop slowly towards the net. MASSIVE forehand technique issue. The decisionmaking was great this time, but apparently the default forehand striking motion that is in Ben's muscle memory is very weak. 10. Logan is serving way out of position from his forehand side. Nice receive by Ben, immediate point for Ben - which is counted for Logan because no player pays attention to points anyways. 11. Ben misses the table long, serve receive issue. Once per game is perfectly fine and normal tho, so doesn't matter. 12. Ben serves long to Logans middle forehand side. Immediate easy topspin by Logan, who plays the point and game home safe. ------------------------------ Game 2 had 12 points in total: ------------------------------ 3 of the points were "rightfully earned": 1 point was a textbook winner for Ben. (1) 1 point was kind of a case of forgetting a dangerous tactic after serve and Logan using the same tactic against Ben first successfully. (8) 1 point was misread serve spin, can happen. (11) 9 points were just free points for Logan due to fixable issues: 1 point was a winner for Ben but counted for Logan. (10) 2 Points were unforced errors like a serve to the net (2, 6). 5 points were theoretically clear winners for Ben, each just lost to simple-but-tedious-to-fix attack technique issues. (3,4,5,7,9) 1 point was a case of serving long to the opponents forehand and getting inevitably dunked on. Free point for opponent by serve placement. (12) With 9 out of 12 points being free points for Logan, it seems silly to me to say that Logan "adjusted" to anything, or that he hasn't given you opportunities. His playstyle is passive. He wasn't in control for the vast majority of the game. 75% of the points in this set were freely given to Logan, not cunningly earned by him. And with the ONLY points in which Logan actively dunked on you being the long serve to his middle forehand, it seems weird to think that "Oh im gonna play more long balls like this to his middle forehand as I used to" is a viable adjustment to turn around the match. I'm also relatively sure that noone adjusted to anyone especially in game 2 and 3, because of the frequent serve order and counting mistakes. A player cannot adjust to points he doesn't remember, and they don't know the current results of their tactic if they do not keep track of their score, so if neither player notices that Ben regularly only serves once instead of two consecutive points, and both players regulary switch serves on an uneven count, and that Ben has hit a winner but Logan gets the point, that means neither player does reliably remember even the most recent two points in the past or keeps track of the score, if even only the point just played
This was such an amazing analysis. It wasn't so much counting mistakes as editing mistakes with the editing software I use. That is the result of most of the 1-serve instances. But wow, this analysis is beyond thorough-thank you for taking so much time to break down each point in such detail! Your insights into my control ratings and specific technical issues in Game 2 are eye-opening, especially how you connected them to the match’s outcome. It's clear that while I had the control and initiative, converting that control into winning points was where I fell short. The fact that I SHOULD have won game 2 and 3 even with such a huge score delta is telling. Very, very telling. Your point about the technical issues, like my forehand brushing instead of driving through the ball and footwork/positioning mistakes, really hit home. I know that focusing on refining these aspects could drastically change my ability to capitalize on opportunities. I just wish you would GET OUT OF MY HEAD with your commentary on my mental state. You're some kind of wizard there. Defintiely a lot of unforced errors. I need a lot more attacking consistency and better serve-follow-ups to avoid giving away easy points. That transition is KEY. Your breakdown is exactly the push I need to improve. Thanks again for your support and for being so invested in my game!
Fantastic games Ben! I think that's the best match I've seen you play yet. Few unforced errors, and you kept the ball low and controlled. And yes, I think it all stems from your half-long service.
Thank you! Yeah, I agree. It really did help against this opponent in particular. In our match, which I'll be posting in the coming days, it seemed to have, like, zero effect, haha.. I haven't looked at the footage yet, but I'm curious to see what the issue was. The discussion afterwards certainly did help.
Good job trying to adapt mid-match. Remember to consider the opponent's position (and which side the pips are on in this case) before serving. When you're deciding which serve to use, consider what the most likely return will be and prepare for it. What kind of spin do you want to receive and how do you force him to give it to you? Other than stuff from LP weirdness, looks like the feeling carried over well from your game with Kelvin 👍 Btw, what kind of ping pong balls do you use? Strangely enough, you can actually feel a difference between brands!
I actually think I'm really, really good at knowing which side the ball is hit on. As a former twiddler myself, I can spot it quite well. Reacting appropriately is another story. I was trying to overpower the dead more than react to a reversal more than I should have, but the grass reversed it more than I thought. As far as the balls we use, I always carry Nittaku 3* 40+ and most people in the club use those. Dallas (and I think Michael O) like the DHS 3* Premium 40+ and I don't mind those. However, I really, really, REALLY loathe, with the fire of 1000 suns, the Butterfly 3* balls. It's like playing with a thin, hollow golfball to me.
@BenSucksAtPingPong I remember you were of the dark side LP crew. I'm not disputing the fact that you can spot it, just advising that you consider the potential effects of each side and how to respond prior to serving 👍 I really like the DHS DJ 40+ (One step up from DHS 40+). Not only are they cheaper, they feel a lot more stable and spinny than the nittaku premium balls imo.
I'm not sophisticated enough to tell the difference yet between the DHS and Nittaku, but I DEFINITELY can tell with butterfly and training balls.
Special RUclips thanks indeed... 😂
(ง ͠ ͠° ل͜ °)ง
@@BenSucksAtPingPong ┻━┻ ︵╰(°□°╰)
First off Ben, REALLY well done. You can use this match already as an example how this length and the strategy in general works and if you like it or not. I think it's worth looking at your last match vs Kelvin again and compare it against this one. The thing is: If you liked the high-octane aggression and defense of last match better / was more fun for you, long serves it is. If you like this match's more deliberate, controlled aggression style and pushing-with-purpose more, half-long or short it is. So for the thumbnail question: Do half-long serves work? You decide! But here's what the numbers say about your service performance: ----------------------------- Serve Stats: ------------------------------ - This statistic is meant to focus purely on the immediate effects of your new serve length, not on the "attack first" idea, and not on receives at all. That means I'm using 3rd ball literally here. - I'm only counting "opportunities" as attacks that I consider to be executable at your current level with your current techniques. - "Pressure" gets ticked when Kelvin either attacks directly or makes a return with enough quality that it puts you visibly on the backfoot for the remainder of a point (you retreat from the table or play passive/defensive shots like blocks or lobs). - Sometimes a point is counted as both pressure and 3rd ball attack opportunity. That's the case when you made a strong emergency/reflexive counter because he attacked the exact location of your racket hand. That is still a quality of a serve when the opponent's attacks land exactly where they are best for you to counter. ======================================================================= Serves in the LAST match vs Kelvin (ruclips.net/video/_ExnWLlNN4I/видео.html): ======================================================================= Serve errors: xxx (3) ---------------------------------- Short (3 or more bounces): xxx (3) Pressure by Kelvin directly after short serve: xx (2) 3rd ball attack opportunities after short serve: xx (2) Short aces: - (0) ---------------------------------- Half-Long (1-2 bounces, 2nd bounce or ball drop close to the end of table): x (1) Pressure by Kelvin directly after half-long serve: x (1) 3rd ball attack opportunities after half-long serve: x (1) Half-long aces: - (0) ---------------------------------- Long (1 bounce, ball drop away from the end of table): xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx (19) Pressure by Kelvin directly after long serve: xxxxx xxxxx xxx (13) 3rd ball attack opportunities after long serve: xx (2) Long aces: xxxxx (5) ---------------------------------- 3rd Ball attack opportunities total: xxxxx (5) 3rd ball attack opportunities used: xx (2) Direct winners by used third ball attack: xx (2) ======================================================================+ The Half-Long Experiment ======================================================================= Serve errors: xxxx (4) ---------------------------------- Short (3 or more bounces): xxxxx xxxxx xx (12) Pressure by Kelvin directly after short serve: xxxx (4) 3rd ball attack opportunities after short serve: xxxxx xxx (8) Short aces: - (0) ---------------------------------- Half-Long (1-2 bounces, 2nd bounce or ball drop close to the end of table): xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx (15) Pressure by Kelvin directly after half-long serve: - (0) 3rd ball attack opportunities after half-long serve: xxxxx xxx (8) Half-long aces: xxx (3) ---------------------------------- Long (1 bounce, ball drop away from the end of table): xxxxx (5) Pressure by Kelvin directly after long serve: xxx (3) 3rd ball attack opportunities after long serve: xx (2) Long aces: x (1) ---------------------------------- 3rd Ball attack opportunities total: xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxx (18) 3rd ball attack opportunities used: xxxxx xxx (8) Direct winners by used third ball attack: xxxx (4) You played a very representative match for this style with GREAT serves this time, and Kelvin is a fairly experienced opponent. As result I think these numbers are relatively representative of the "general vibe" of the 3 serve lengths in general in table tennis, independent of the opponent. - The numbers of 3rd ball attack opportunities each serve generates can be improved by working on the spin and placement and deception of the serve. - Your effectiveness in attacking the 3rd ball can be improved dramatically by practicing it. - The pressure you usually get back even on great serves for each of these lengths cannot really be reduced and is directly related to serve length and its interactions with the geometry of the table, and independent of spin and placement.
This is really, REALLY telling. Seeing that I had 15 half-long serves this time with ZERO pressure from Kelvin afterward and 8 third-ball attack opportunities really shows how effective they can be. Even telling-er: 3rd Ball attack opportunities total: xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxx (18) 3rd ball attack opportunities used: xxxxx xxx (8) Direct winners by used third ball attack: xxxx (4) If I'm going to play attack-style, I should probably attack - if I can hone that in and not error-out, I can be super-dangerous. This is SUCH a great way to set up! This is incredible, thank you!
Great job! I feel like 0:47 and 3:23 were really good examples of setting up the serves and playing positive shots afterward. If you compare this with a few weeks ago were you had a "wild' backhand swing trying to put so much spin on the ball, this is significantly better because you are ready for the follow-up and the ball you are getting back is more attackable. You were also measured and seemed quite calm...which is especially good when playing a 'better' opponent. I would say keep up with this strategy, expect the balls to be returned (so I don't stop playing after the 3rd ball), and be mentally ready for each point take it point by point. Once you start taking a few of the close games from Kelvin, things will definitely start to get interesting!
Agreed. Compared to a few matches prior with him, he's taking you a lot more seriously, which is a compliment!
It's amazing how I felt during this match - I really felt in the zone and afterwards I definitely felt different. I agree, this is a strategy I need to adopt (Except against pips, hardbat and antispin probably, see the video I posted today). And yeah, the day I get a match against Kelvin will be a wonderful day!
Love it!
What do you mean "turns out, advice in the comment section was spot on" like it's some sort of surprise... How rude! (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
RIOT! ┬─┬ ︵ /(.□. \)
┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ).. I need this table. ........
Really good play! Don't forget this feeling and try to play like this all the time! Good pushes, controlled attacks, and natural movement. If you could clean up the unforced errors (especially on service), you might have been able to claw a victory! One thing I noticed is that you didn't serve long to BH very much. Long backspin to the BH is a pretty good skill check to do on your opponent. Might have been a tactical decision on your part, I dunno... If I recall, the 2nd bounce usually landed between the middle line of the opponent's table to his FH side so you're giving him the advantage of not having to move too much during his receives. Remember to bend your waist *a little* to keep your center of gravity forward and on your toes naturally. You don't want to feel like you're falling forward though, just enough. So you feel like your heels are a paper-width off the ground 1:14 - when you don't attack when you're supposed to, just imagine I'm standing behind you in the coaching corner, staring at you with crazy, bulging Samuel L. Jackson eyes...😂
Thank you so much! I REALLY felt like I was in the zone here. It was amazing. First match of the day, and it was my best match, I think. And hey, the first step is at least admititng I have a problem. I KNOW I need to attack those and EVERY SINGLE TIME I will intentionally avoid looking at you. You'll know why. It's the Falkenberg drills.
( ಠ_ಠ)
Win or lose, relax and play some shots. You're playing an open game with attacking shots and there's nothing better than hitting a few winners! Get a bit of coaching and balance practice with match play. The journey is what it's all about, so I'll keep an eye on how you're doing.
I really appreciate that! Thank you so much for the advice!
I love the name of your channel Ben! As previous commentator said, his entire game seems to be based of his serves - if you'd manage to take them he gets pushed back cause he's standing straight up and tabletennis is a lot of keeping yourself low to the ground to be prepared!. Keep at it! We will follow your journey! =)
Thank you so much! I appreciate you being here!
Looking forward to your continued progress! RUclips ate my reply to your previous question but luckily someone else covered it 😁
It's the electricity goblins, probably. Today was an interesting day, for sure. Kept my serves simple with mixed results. I can really see potential in them. I'll practice them a lot more.
@BenSucksAtPingPong At a certain point, serves are less about getting aces and more about setting up for the next ball. It takes some experimenting and experience to see what works for you and "refine the process" so to speak. Even then different serves work better (or worse) against different opponents so it's good to have a variety, but not too many that you can't practice them and quality suffers. Tailor your serves to your style. If you like pushes and over the table play, the majority of your serves will probably be short. If you like mid/long range rallies, you'll probably want to serve long, etc etc
The side he contacts the ball the the side you put your racket. If its on the left, you counter by putting your racket to the left. Downspin and topspin are decided by the direction of the motion. If he contacts moving his paddle downwards then its downspin, and vice versa for topspin. Try not to be aggressive, and play it safe. Ben over like you are typing on a computer when playing. It is very important to lower your center of gravity. This will always help you see your opponents serves. On topspin, drive to ball more directly, and focus on hitting the your opponent's middle or corners. You can also play soft and change the pace to mess him up.
Definitely some great points to work on! I think when I get beind my stance is definitely the first thing to go!
Nate's game is based on superior serve. When he meets players who can return it he'll face the issue of standing upright, observing the game, rather than be in a ready position. Ben was visibly frustrated but the basic flick return is actually the right strategy against serves with side-topspin. I had a little fun with stats :) Ben - errors 31 Serve 1 Return 11 3rd ball 9 4th ball 6 5th ball 3 rally 1 Ben - winners 9 Return 3 3rd ball 2 (1 lucky) 4th ball 1 5th ball 2 rally 1 Nate errors 8 Serve 1 return 3 3rd ball 1 4th ball 1 5th ball 2 Nate winners 2 4th ball 1 rally 1 From the stats we can see how you got more winners in than Nate (9-2) but made way more errors (31-8). The majority of those were returns indeed but you shouldn't ignore the ones coming from not being ready for 3rd or 4th ball. His returns or 3rd balls weren't as tricky as his serves. Let's also acknowledge his 3 return errors. Your serves are not as spinny but they are good enough for the level of play. So I wouldn't say your serve is the main point to develop 1) continue developing the flick return 2) readiness for 3rd and 4th ball 3) overall footwork 4) it seems like you are backhand oriented, sometimes going for a bh on the fh side; so working on a reliable forehand? I won't always post this long pieces of obnoxious advice :) Enjoy the game!
The in-depth analysis was greatly appreciated! 1000 thank yous! It also gave me a who 'nother perspective on analysing a match. I spent a lot of time between this day and the next club match practicing serves yes, but because of this comment I paid a LOT more attention to the flick returns and even tried attacking them a lot more than usual. Yes, I did make some errors, but I was a lot more happy with my progress. I hope you take a look at the matches I'll be posting in the next little bit to take a look. (No you don't need sucha long analysis) but I think the short attacks will be at least .49380249384023% better.
haha. Your channel name is the best. keep chipping away, bud. You'll eventually upgrade to "Ben'sMediocreAtPinpong"
@@scooterinmie1 thank you so much! It's definitely a journey. Maybe some day, I can be 'BenIsNowOkayishAtPingPong' Someday!
Any stronger spin will override the spin that's on the ball. Otherwise you have to account for the spin. But really... you need to develop your own serves, yours are super weak. Serves don't need to be deceptive, just strong in their pace, spin (or no spin), and placement, so you can play the point your way on the return. The better you will be at serves - the better overall play will be as well. Also I see very poor anticipation and footwork, you are not getting to the ball/into a position.
One thing I definitely have had hammered into me is that my serve isn't to win an ace - it's to predict an outcome in my favor. It needs to be hit by my opponent to favorably play into my strength. Is it a topspin loop attack? Maybe. So a sidespin top to their forehand to go to my forehand. Since my backspin loop is my weakest shot, I shouldn't use it that much until it's developed.
@@BenSucksAtPingPong Your current strength is backhand topspin/block - that's my observation from this game. I find it technically way better than your forehand. So you want to either serve with right/clockwise spin so that the ball comes to your backhand. Or left/counterclockwise spin and you move up to the center to activate your backhand from the center. That's tactics. For technical advice, see my direct comment.
This is generally true unless it's backspin. My weakest shot a long backspin to my backhand. If you want to beat me 11-0, just make those 100% of your shots. :)
That was good, especially considering the opponent is playing pretty wild and unpredictable AND has long pips to boot. Just go to the loo next time. You can't keep track of the spin of the ball when your mind is spinning around your balls.
Isn't that the truth! Gotta just go!
What I see in this match, is: 1. High risk shots aren't a problem at all, you already lose basically every point on serve or on serve receive. Nothing afterwards matters in any way. 2. As lt.kettch mentioned, you're not supposed to / can't focus on stuff like footwork during a match anyways. 3. Forehand blocks aren't a problem at all, the actual blocks you can hit during this match are phenomenal. When you don't manage to block, it isn't the block's fault - you already lost the point beforehand, the predetermined result just happened to fully manifest when coincidentially you also happened to try and play a block. 4. Kelvin doesn't have a 3rd ball attack pattern. In this match, you have a pattern of not just enabling, but basically encouraging him to attack you every time you touch the ball, by both placement and length of your shots. When he serves he can attack on 3rd ball since you touched the 2nd ball. When you serve he attacks the 2nd ball because you touched the 1st. He does nothing to encourage you to do this. He does not have a special tactic or spin that would set up a 3rd ball attack from him. 5. Kelvin wasn't in control of this match, you were. He was just reacting to you. To win this (unless Kelvin is holding back), you don't have to pay any attention to Kelvin at all - he took no decisions or actions that were any relevant to the outcome of this match, except making a ton of unforced errors to give you some points for free. If you see any patterns in him, that means that you have a pattern in you that he always reacts the same to. So you first need to pay attention to your own patterns. I think that'll level up your game way more and easier. How to begin fixing it: -------------------------- Terminology: "long" = a shot that bounces once on the opponents side of the table before crossing the endline. "short" = a shot that bounces three times or more on the opponents table before crossing the endline. "half-long" = a shot that bounces exactly twice on the opponents side of the table, the second bouce ideally being close to the endline. -------------------------- I do recommend that in the next match, and training leading up to the next match (no matter the opponent), you focus on these things: A) If you serve, always fully focus on your serve being half-long. Never long or short. A2) Whenever you push, always fully focus on your push being half-long. Never long or short. B) Whenever you counter or attack, always fully focus on placing it on the centerline of the table, preferably long, close to the end of the table. During match, only focus on the above. Practice footwork only if it's necessary to help you play half-long, or aim attacks down to middle. Only focus on length when serving or pushing for now, you can place it left/right/middle however you feel best in the moment. (When you watch this match, you can see that your placements in this match are the anti-patterns to these "recommended" patterns: - You always serve long to his forehand side, enabling him to easily attack all the serves, since he LOVES attacking long balls with his forehand. - Kelvin always serves diagonally to your backhand, you again almost always receive long to his forehand side, despite this not being necessary or easier than just pushing back diagonally. Again, long forehand = he LOVES it and easily attacks every one of your receives. - When you manage to attack on your own, you almost always place it diagonally to this forehand side, which you can see him anticipate easily every time, because its highly repetitive. Whenever you accidentially play to the centerline, you make the point. (This is not unique to Kelvin, every player except maybe penholder players (or Leanne...) will have the most trouble with placement at the center of their side. The corners are really easy to react to and only effective if you play extreme angles / risk a lot or have moved them out of position before.)
A+ phenomenal comment and you're right. Thank you so much for the great analysis. I definitely was in control of this, and I have a few 'backyard' matches I can play at work and really practice these serves and returns. I'll almost exclusively try to aim with these distances and shot selections. It should really help to take away the attack. There are a few people I know who really struggle with a fast, long serve - especially if it's dead, but they aren't Kelvin. I still might keep those serves in my back pocket. I'm glad you called me out for mis-seeing a pattern in Kelvin. It's something I'm still struggling with is my game planning and adjusting. Sometimes I feel like I'm just serving/shooting just to see what works, and sometimes I feel my opponents are adjusting way faster than me - and sometimes I feel like I may see something they're doing and then they stop. Was that just a phantasm or a strategy? Yeah, probably. And if it was, ultimately, them winning is my fault.
@@BenSucksAtPingPong Yes, the hardbat & long pimple players will be especially vulnerable to long serves - but the basic idea is this: 1. Table Tennis is a mentally really difficult sport. The basic principle of the recommendations I may give you is to reduce mental complexity for ourselves so we can focus on increasing shot quality so much that we hit winners, while increasing the mental complexity for our opponents so they return weak balls. Every opponent has different weaknesses. Even if you find out an opponent's weakness, it does not mean playing into that weakness is one of YOUR strengths. If you try to adjust to every opponent, you have to basically practice everything, which means especially at Amateur level with little practice time, you will be strong yourself in nothing. Two players have only 4 hours of practice a week - who do you think will become a stronger player: - Player A decides that the strategy he loves playing the most is - for example - attacking the 3rd ball with his forehand. He practices keeping the ball half--long to make it difficult for the opponent to attack first, he practices adding counter-clockwise sidespin to his serves and shots to encourage the opponent to play long into his forehand, he practices attacking the elbow of the opponent (usually in the middle of the table) with quality, making the opponents choice what to play next hard while making it easy for him to land the shot since it doesn't go out due to slight left/right imprecisions. He practices these shots over and over and over relentlessly, increasing his own shot quality while slowly getting to know the responses opponents might have to him and how to shut those responses down. He does not pay attention to the opponents weaknesses during match, he focuses 100% of his mental power into increasing his own shot quality. - Player B decides that his strategy is to discover his opponents weaknesses and play into them. Since he does not know what the opponent's weakness will be, he needs to find out during match what the weak spots are, and hence has to focus on what the opponent does and memorize what worked and what not during a set, and hence doesn't have mental capacity left to focus on his own shot quality. To explore weaknesses and exploit them, since every opponent has different weaknesses, he has to learn every shot in existence, in case some opponent might be weak to them. Since there are so many different shots in table tennis, he might be 2 sets down already when he has finally figured out a shot that works. He then has to be able to play into that weakness with enough quality that his shot is stronger than his opponents weakness, so he tries to practice every shot in existence during his 4 hours of training each week, practicing a different shot, footwork, placement, length for 5 minutes each before switching to the next. My claim is that even trying in first place to adjust to the opponent is maybe a bad idea, and maybe you'll have a much easier time by developing a strength in your game that your opponent can't adjust to anymore, because your opponents visibly try to do the same - they adjust to you, which means they are also player B, which means in theory you could "force your game upon them" and play the shots you practice with more qualty than they could ever hope adjusting to, by becoming a little more of player A. ;) I'm for example an aggressive looper. I have never played a chop block in hundreds of league matches and tournaments. I never spend a minute practicing chopping. Maybe some players would be weak to it. I don't care. If I ever practice it, I'm not practicing my loop, which would cost me points because my strategy, my serves, everything, is purpose-made to set up for my loop. Why wouldn't the same apply to serves? Yes, maybe an opponent is weak to a certain serve, but I make my points with my loop anyhow, so why would I practice a hundred different serves once rather than the one serve that sets up my loop a hundred times? I have completely given up on long serves. They went out too often because for them to become better (faster, more surprising), I'd have to practice an additional permutation of how a point may go, and that would cut into the time I practice looping, and when I serve half long then loop I get the point anyways, why would I even try to get it on serve? I always play the same heavy side-underspin tomahawk that always sets up my loops. I even play heavy spin serve against long pips - simply because the point goes the same as soon as I've learned the spin that comes back, and long pips players at low level are surprisingly weak at receiving super heavy spin serves since it turns out everyone is adjusting to them by serving long no-spin, so when they get heavily practiced sidespin, they can barely receive it. My strength just outperforms the theoretical strength of their rubbers, because I focus on practicing it over and over, and then I don't have to care about their weaknesses, their strongest receive can't overcome my strongest strength.
I must say, this is such an amazing comment. Eric and I had a long discussion about this comment tonight at the club and how I oriented almost my entire play utilizing it to some pretty decent success. I played Eric twice today, and afterwards we discussed my tactics against quite a few people and how it worked against some and how others they saw it and adapted. This has been VERY useful, thank you. I have practiced my serves a LOT since this comment came out, and I apologize for the delay in responding. I've read it several times.
@@BenSucksAtPingPong I'm very happy if my lengthy ramblings help! And no need to apologize, you don't owe me a response - I have to thank you for uploading your videos for the world to learn together with you! By the way, here's a few videos I could recommend if you're working on this idea right now (NOT technique videos - we can improve technique when you like the strategy and try it some. Just reinforcing the strategy / basic ideas, that it isn't original, and that this works up to a very high level): First two are from Heming Hu. I don't like the guy particularly much, but in these two videos, he occassionally drops all the important wisdoms and demonstrates this "strategy" of keeping things simple, pushing short (When he says "short", he means two bounces on table, but not very short as in drops directly behind the net.), not needing fancy stuff like long serves, just a solid short game and looping once to win: 1. ruclips.net/video/OFYUpm5z0Ck/видео.html and 2. ruclips.net/video/Sp6CiaKAyac/видео.html Also an important bit he mentions in the both videos: Simple does NOT mean that these simple things "easy to execute" at all, it just means you make your games "simple" in order to focus on fewer things so you learn these few, still hard-to-execute, things faster. There's sooo much to learn and so much fun to be had just with various pushing techniques! 2nd video he also mentions that he likes to aim for the middle of the table because that's where opponents react slower. 3rd video is Zhang Jike training a few students, re-iterating that looping to the middle is a good idea. He can't explain why it works, he just scores a lot of points that way: 3. ruclips.net/video/UrpHpJfh6qs/видео.html
This advice REALLY has helped me, by the way, as you may have seen. I think keeping the game simple has been a really transformative in my approach, especially in my last club day. Particularly in my first match against Kelvin. My play degraded a little bit as I played, but I had some good moments. Even 'simplicity' takes practice!!
Wow... What kind of crazy ping pong deathmatch club are you a part of where a timeout is required to use the bathroom when there's a need??? 😮 He didn't let you go even after the match was over 😂 Even though your BH felt off, you FH seemed to be doing well. Given the situation, you didn't do too poorly. With regards to losing the lead in game 4, I think a timeout would have helped; try to arrest his momentum. Relying more on your FH over your BH because it was showing to be more consistent. Taking advantage of the innate properties of long pips: the inability to significantly impart spin, predictable spin reversals, difficulty attacking short/low balls. Also taking advantage of the fact that most pips players try to receive serves with their pips side, sometimes even at the cost of positional advantage. Lastly... call time and go to the restroom...
See the problem with this advice is that it makes total sense. When you gotta go rational thinking leaves. That's when the whipping guards force us back to play until they say we can stop. There is a reason the Orem club is free.
@BenSucksAtPingPong My conspiracy theory is that there are piezoelectric generators under the floor and they sell that electricity for income, ergo the forced play, enforced by whips
Well that explains the power plant thingy across the street. Orem Club: 40.311143683950654, -111.65889641911721 Spooky Electricity Factory: 40.31216874474083, -111.65645385583257
I think your observation for point 2 is correct... Ideally, a player would focus on one aspect of their game during training and it will manifest naturally during gameplay. Diverting too much attention to any one thing (except maybe watching the contact point during an opponent's serve?) will probably slow a player down to their detriment. For now, just play relaxed and try to implement broader strategies (be more aggressive vs adjust your paddle angle to 35.75353° when looping).
Yeah, I can very much see that was the case. I'll keep my laser levels and protractors at home from now on. I'm starting to get some 'looks'.
@BenSucksAtPingPong let me know if you're ever in the OC. We'll find somewhere to practice and you can bust out your tools and high speed cameras 😁
There is a 50/50 chance I'll be in Long Beach in January, actually! I might have to take you up on that.
Not much you could do but good job hanging in there! Something to study: Watch the way he accelerates his paddle on contact during serves. Even though the motion is small, there's good acceleration which translates to good spin. A lot of people get distracted by the ball toss during the serve. Keep your attention on the opponent's paddle and watch for subtle motions during contact. Is contact early and cutting down? Is it late and pulling up? Is the contact at 6 o clock (directly under the ball, pure backspin) or at 3 o clock (almost completely sidespin) or somewhere in between? There are 2 general ways to deal with sidespin: go against the spin or go with the spin With regards to serves, it's easier to return short if you go with the spin. For long returns, it's fine to use either. For example, if the serve is a regular pendulum serve, contact is on the right from your pov and looks like it's spinning clockwise from top down view. Going with the spin means brushing to the left (clockwise), similar to the concept of loop in a backspin, but sideways. To be honest, this is my preferred way of dealing with sidespin and it feels easier for me to control the position of the ball. Going against the spin in this situation is hitting on the *right* (edit: correction) side of the ball, using blade angle to mitigate the effect of the spin. This is like playing topspin vs topspin. If you block a topspin ball, it'll want to jump off your paddle, just like a pendulum serve makes the ball want to jump off your paddle to the right from your pov. Nate seems like a good player, one of the best I've seen on your channel at least in terms of service quality. To be honest, he wasn't playing to his full ability so I'm just estimating based on the quality of his serves, his footwork, the mechanics of his swing, and the way he reacts to your good attacks. That being said, I don't think his level is too much out of reach for you.
I was once told that if it's pure sidespin, topspin has the ability to cancel out the sidespin no matter what (if you loop it.) Is that correct? And yeah, I could tell he was messing with me - and he wasn't playing 100%. That's why I was like: "Okay, let's just give him something he's not expecting" - and I just went all out. I threw out all consequences.
@@BenSucksAtPingPong man... RUclips keeps deleting my comment. I guess they don't want people to know if topspin can cancel out backspin... I'll try to repost...
@@BenSucksAtPingPong I would claim that that is incorrect, at least very very very misleading in the way it's being often claimed to be a something like a magic silver bullet, "Just do this one magic topspin receive and you'll never have problems with sidespin anymore!". Basically, it sounds like pure theorycrafting, because the problem is never how to respond to any one specific spin (there's always many easy ways to counter something, if only you knew it was coming...), it's to recognize the subtle difference between pure sidespin, side-under, and side-top, and slightly adjusting racket angle accordingly, and spending the least time in limbo while deciding whether to receive forehand or backhand when someone spins the ball into your elbow. The uncomfortable truth is: To receive sidespin serves, you have to practice a helluvalot of serve receive with someone who serves sidespin, period. If something sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't true. However, the remaining question that is actually somewhat interesting basically amounts to: "What difference does it make If I strike the ball at its equator (topspin on topspin) versus at one of its poles (better: try pure sidespin on pure topspin)?" If you touch the spinning ball at the equator and your rubber has good friction (grips the ball well), the same thing will happen when a rotating car tire comes into contact with a road - it will convert angular movement of the round, rotating tire into linear momentum along the road: the ball will jump sideways = suddenly convert a lot of angular momentum into a lot of linear momentum. Which beginenrs usually fear, but becomes a non-issue over time when you learn how to recognize the spin, because then you can counter it by going against the spin to surprise your opponent with speed, with the spin to surprise your opponent by keeing it short, and all sorts of things. Just recognizing it in time and making the decision how to respond is the problem, not that it can or cannot be dealt with in theory. If you touch the ball at one of its poles, this is the same as a spinning top touching the table surface it spins on - it will KEEP it's angular momentum, and convert none of it into linear momentum = it will not suddenly jump sideways on your racket, but it will keep its spin direction and velocity. The difficulty with this for beginners is to reliably identify where the rotation axis of the incoming ball is in first place, because if you don't know the rotation axis you also don't know where the poles are, so same issue as before: In the real world recognition must come before action, and is difficult. Theorycrafting on a specific known spin is child's play. However, you will add new spin to the already existing spin (=try to move the table quickly under the already rotating spinning top), and a ball can only ever have one axis of rotation, so your rotation will get added to the existing rotation. That means if there was a lot of sidespin on the ball, and you add an equal about of topspin, the ball will leave your racket with a tilted side-topspin rotation axis, which means it will still make a curve in the air and jump sideways when contacting the opponent's side of the table. This is exactly for example is the principle of the two flicks, banana flick (touch ball left side on backspin serve, turning it into a side-topspin return) and strawberry flick (touch ball right side on backspin serve, same results but different corner/spin direction). It's way easier to return a short backspin serve with a sidespin receive than pushing it or topspinning it back, because you touch it near the poles instead of near its equator. You do not aim for the poles to "cancel" the spin, you simply return the ball to your opponent with their own spin mostly preserved instead of reflected, and prevent the ball from converting spin into linear motion when touching your racket. You still need to be able to read the spin and angle your racket precisely according to the incoming spin to hit the rotation axis somewhat precisely in first place, so there's no practical "cancelling out" any of the actual difficulty of the stroke. So this is not very helpful in any degree for beginners in my experience. It's just not worth it burdening your brain with all this info and then being too slow in a match because you can't think about all that at once. Hence, what always works well is, when in doubt, attack confidently and always aim for the center. If you always aim at the center, the ball will always be hard to receive because it hits the opponents elbow (see Nate getting struck by your wonderful ball through the center at 4:12 - every shakehands player is vulnerable to that, no matter the skill level), and it can veer a little left, a little right, no matter if caused by bad timing or bad footwork or by the opponent's sidespin, but it will never miss the table. :)
@@BenSucksAtPingPong It's not so much that topspin cancels out sidespin, rather hitting the upper part of the ball will reduce the impact of the sidespin on the ball. In the extreme, there's no sidespin at the north pole. If you'd topspin the ball by hitting the back, then the impact of the sidespin will be maximal. This is why hitting under the ball, imparting backspin, is another option. At the south pole there is minimal sidespin too. But flicking at the top has the advantage of taking the initiative. The same principle applies to the banana flick against a backspin serve. When striking the ball on its left side, the impact of the backspin is minimal (because the axis of the spin runs from left to right). Same for the "strawberry" flick, which strikes its right side. Again, it's not so much that the sidespin you impart by doing so, neutralizes the backspin. It's about the contact point.
That makes sense! Thank you so much!
Agree with the observations in your description: quality of the pushes were generally good, overall play was a little too passive. If you watch some of your recent games vs Joseph, you did better when you were asserting controlled aggression. Ideally, you can finish the point before he gets the chance to attack. Something I noticed, your pushes were losing quality starting the middle/late of game 2 and was on and off during game 3. It looked like you were trying to be more aggressive game 3 but was vacillating between attacking and pushing into the late game, causing you to hesitate for a split second, showing you down. If your going to try to change the tempo, commit and go for it! Remember to favor hitting forward (sometime forward and a little down) instead of brushing the high balls. Your black side looks like it could use a cleaning ha ha. I can see the sweet spot in the middle of the rubber was a different sheen than the rest of the rubber. Remember to maintain your rubber between games and after sessions to keep as much consistency as possible! Try to hit through or brush over the top of those spinny high arc FHs early in the bounce. A patient block is (as you've experienced) going to fly off the table. When you see him wind up and pull back, it's going to be a lot spinner than usual! You got some good attacks in when you committed, be courageous and attack!
Completely correct, and actually, I'm not sure if my black side needs cleaning - it was cleaned right before this match! (As I clean it before every match.) I actually think it needs replacing. It's fairly old now, and it might be time to retire it. (I might even get some retribution on my near-botched rubber replacement I recently did.) This definitely was a timid game, for sure. I needed to come out swinging and I didn't go with my game plan at all. Thanks for the amazing tips, as always!
Remember to "pull" with the BH when you're closer to the table. A lot of misses were because of too much "hit". Remember to slow down before you serve. Lots more unforced errors and lets than usual. Decide when your first bounce will be based on where you want your second bounce to be. Better offense compared to the game with Joseph (comments are turned off for that video btw). When you block fast attacks, try not to add force and hit it, rather, try to gently "guide" the ball back. Lastly, be careful not to get pulled into your opponent's pace. Overall, nice game, hopefully more wins as you get more comfortable with the stuff you're working on!
Ahh!! Good catch! Comments back on! (I know what I did - I messed with the moderation settings). Lots of really, really great points here. I definitely feel like I rushed this match, and I know why. It's not an excuse, but it was totally me. Good point on the blocks. See, I might have the 'guide' confused. What I try to do with blocks (and I know I miss this a lot in the heat of the moment - I really do this only when I set up a hard hit from my opponent, which ALSO isn't wise) is do a regular hit, but not as 'much.' Like a 1/4 hit instead. The 'guiding' hit I can get around as a block to switch how I think about it. And yeah, I FREQUENTLY get pulled into an opponents pace. Was it that obvious?
@BenSucksAtPingPong I don't know if it's obvious per se... Maybe it's because I've been watching you play for a while now. Plus, it's something that most people have to work on.
======================================== 3rd ball attacks ======================================== Player: attempts (successful) --- set 1 --- Joseph: 4 (2) Ben: 1 (1) --- set 2 --- Joseph: 5 (4) Ben: 0 --- set 3 --- Joseph: 3 (2) Ben: 2 (1) 3rd ball attacks total: Joseph: 12 with a success rate of 66%, out of 26 serves, took initiative/control on 46.1% of their own serves Ben: 3 with a success rate of 66%, out of 24 serves, took initiative/control on 12.5% of their own serves 5th ball attacks in total (only occurred in 1st set): Joseph: 2 with a a success rate of 50% Ben: none How successful were the players in using their service advantage to set up an attack opportunity, and how often did they capitalize on it? - Both players have the same potentially match-winning success rate when being aggressive (making a point with 66% likelyhood on attempt is clearly a winning move), so the player who simply only attempts this move more often is likely to score more points and hence the match. - For both players, the success rate per set is never lower than 50%, so none of them could possibly lose a set by playing this move every time. - Joseph executes this move with 400% the attempt rate of Ben, with more attempts than Ben in every single set. - If a safety push was played on the 3rd ball (which is frequent and entirely normal / okay on this level) Joseph is infinitely more likely to retry gaining the initiative on 5th ball. If Ben doesn't attack on 3rd ball, he never attacks (or gets another opportunity to) again. - Ben plays an entire set without ever even attempting to attack on his own serve once (New rubbers are no excuse, you can't learn them if you don't even attempt to attack with them once.)
Exceptional analysis and I thank you so much for it! It actually does give my quite a bit of hope. In my next match against Joseph, I need to attack way more early - pretty much knowing I'll have more of a success against him. You're exactly right - I can't learn it if I don't use it. I was way too much focused on trying to take away an attack or at least BLOCK an attack, but what's the point in that? I shouldn't HAVE to block if I don't give him the opportunity to give me an attack shot in the first place. Thanks for this - this was an exceptional analysis.
This was painful to watch. My 2 cents: 1. Instead of 50 ml Free Chack (or any other "table tennis glue" by any other brand), you can get a 1000ml bottle of Liquid Latex for the same price, ya know the milky-white natural sap of the rubber tree. It's literally the exact same stuff. 2. Try to "clean" your glasses by rubbing your hands/fingers all over them instead of using a microfiber cloth. That's what you are doing to.your blade. You're just giving it a thick anti-stick coating of skin-protecting fat, symbiotic bacteria and dead skin particles, and the glue won't stick well to that peculiar human/wood composite material. Trust me, been there done that. Just use some dry kitchen paper instead. 3. Wet glueing is not the intended way to use that... you're meant to let all the water evaporate instead of eternally trapping it inside your sponge and wood. Think of applying two dry layers of velcro, and then sticking them together at the end. This is a video I usually recommend: ruclips.net/video/bYBOo8vOSVw/видео.html 4. If you look at exactly the 5 minute mark of your video, there are already two bumps starting to form on the top edge, really visible in the reflection - that 's the rubber seperating from the blade again, which would be logical, because you applied strong pressure at the edges away from the wood by pressing a definitely-not-sharp cutter into the sponge while the glue right next to your cutting location wasn't remotely fixed yet. 5. No matter if wet or dry, either way you used waaaay to much glue, like ten to twenty times the amount you'll ever need. Always have a little bowl and some kitchen paper on your table to press excess liquid out of your application sponge or remove some from your blade. Never push puddles of liquid latex around the edges onto your topsheet or between topsheet and sponge, as can be seen at 2:40. Also, you don't even need to put enough glue on to even reach the corners of the rubber sheet, because by the way: You're cutting those off anyways... 6. When using a cutter, always make sure it's actually sharp (test cut one of the rubber's corners and feel if there's much resistance to your blade), then always go fully around several times: First one pass very lightly to simply get a thin starting cut through the glue layer into the sponge, a second pass through the sponge, a third to carefully cut the topsheet. It will look more like lasercut by an inhuman machine and much less like torn to shreds by a raging Godzilla. I still also like curved scissors too because of speed and ease of use. tho 6.b) Don't use a stupid thin cutting mat, use your local table tennis shop's biannual print catalogue and really let the cutter dig in. That's what they get printed for. 7. May I ask why you got these rubbers and think they're an "upgrade", and what are they upgrading exactly? Like, how will you know if they "work" for you, what's the measureable metric of success? I'm not protesting, these are made in a factory not far from where I live, so thanks for supporting the local economy of my count(r)y by buying our notoriously over-engineered luxury products, we appreciate that a lot, just wondering why the devil people recommend these to you specifically over, say for example, a small stack of solid tried-and-a-billion-times-proven 5$ chinese ittf-approved training rubbers (Say Yinhe Mercury 2, Loki Rxton 1, Sanwei Ultraspin, DHS PF4, 729 Cross, Reaktor Tornado V5, and sooo-many-more) with which you can practice glueing with much less financial risk, are durable to last a long time, and at the same time help people exactly like you all over the world practice basic playing techniques very effectively?
Phenomenal comment, thank you! I'll try to get to each point: 1. I have only replaced 3 rubbers before, so I didn't commit to getting a large bottle my first time. The feedback so far has been pretty helpful, so if I get any better, or need more, I certainly would get a larger bottle! Great tip! 2. This was a very good point and well taken. Thank you so much! 3. This was also well taken, hopefully I didn't ruin my paddle, but I did put it between books overnight and it looks pretty good despite my mistake. 4. I think the book pressure might have alleviated that, but I will keep an eye on that. Good catch 5. If you look closely at the video a towel appears on my lap during my edit. I realized I did use too much glue so that is where the excess went. 6. One other thing that the edit didn't show (I didn't want to bore my watchers) is that this actually took 3-4 passes of cutting with that blade, but I should have taken maybe more. Even still, I should have used scissors. 7. I've actually used the Omega VII Europe on my backhand for about 2 years, and the Omega VII Pro on my forehand for about 2 years. That is too fast for me. I then switched to the Europe on my FH and I've liked that better, but the pro has been on my BH. The only change I'm doing is that I'm adding the MAX thickness sponge to upgrade control. I'm not unfamiliar with the topsheet, as I've played with them for a couple of years, it's just that I want to get a little bit more control. Hope this helps, and thank you for the comment! This whole channel is how I can improve at table tennis, and this'll certainly help!
@@BenSucksAtPingPong Just FYI, the first few times I did the glueing myself, I made an absolute mess (worse than this!) and ruined a few expensive rubbers (Omega IV Asia back then, I think) by having stuff running on the topsheet. I just don't want anyone else to make the same stupid mistakes I did. They're avoidable. :) Book pressure might have helped since the glue was still very wet. I'm very unfamiliar with how that plays out, since I never tried wet gluing, I only got wet glue everyewhere my first time on accident, not intentionally. Usually, dried liquid latex is rarely ever a destructive problem because you can remove it easily again from both blade and sponge (just never from rubber parts like the topsheet) and retry, which I had to do too often, hence finding out where to get a bigger and cheaper bottle of glue after a while. :D Also, from the videos you posted, it looks like the thing mostly seems to work normally, so don't worry too much. Have you ever tried getting a cheap youth setup from your club's coach, you know the stuff that gets recommended for the developing kids, practicing with that for a while, and then switching back to your "main" setup to see if you can directly transfer the strokes and techniques you were forced to learn? Alternate between both and transfer lessons between them?
Actually, yes! I have quite a few paddles at home and I use them quite often with my kids (I keep my main paddle in its case, and with my kids we play with cheaper paddles except my son. He's got a paddle setup from his coach after he played with a cheaper setup for a while and his coach wanted him to upgrade.)
@@BenSucksAtPingPong Okay, that's very good to know! I was worrying because I feel very fast and bouncy pro player rubbers like the Omegas make many techniques beginners absolutely need to master very very very hard to learn and execute: It's reassuring to know that if you ever get frustrated with any of that, you have a spare racket you can test that is slower, and that you play with these because they are simply the most fun to you!
you should be trying to target leannes forehand, as you can see she tends to try to drive the ball with her backhand istead of using forehand. reasom being is because shes hardbat reliant, so targeting the forehand makes it a whole lot harder for her
You're right! She's even emphasized that shot, too, and I've drilled that with her once for a few shots.
OH DEAR... Um... I don't know exactly what the instructions were for free check but... Usually with water based glue you need to wait till both sides dry (you can tell when it turns clear). If you put it together when it's wet, it won't stick well and you'll have patches of unevenness which will affect the consistency of your hits (usually manifesting in dead spots on your paddle). On the German forums, there are people who are proponents of wet gluing, but you need to press it with consistent pressure over a long period of time.
I pressed it between books on my bookshelf overnight, (like I always do) so hopefully I'll be okay. With editing, the process was much quicker but the blade was clearish but the rubber side wasn't. I hope this doesn't cause WWIII.
Hmm... Looks like RUclips ate my reply...
I'm really terrible at cutting with scissors so I use a single edge disposable razor blade. I think the edge might have been a little rough because it looked like you were trying to do it in one pass and pulled it apart when it didn't cut all the way through. It's okay to take your time and do multiple passes. Thankfully, edge tape covers a multitude of (cutting) sins 😂
When you pull a rubber off, it might be safer to pull it off at a diagonal but not along the grain which might cause splintering. Some blades come lacquered or sealed from the manufacturer and that protects the top ply but some do not and, if it is a soft wood like limba, it is more prone to pulling up pieces if you pull the rubber off along the grain
This is really good advice! I never knew this. (Obviously. I ripped it off irresponsibly.)
@@BenSucksAtPingPong It look like it was okay. If you don't see any pieces or slivers of wood then it should be okay. Also, it depends on the strength of the glue
There's some really good stuff going on! Did you notice the effectiveness of serving to zones 1 3 7 and 9? 1:14 2:31 3:16 4:40. Conversely, note what it's like when people do it to you, your reaction, and what you can do with that info. Occasionally they pop high though i.e. 3:00 3:43 4:13. At this point, if you have to choose between height and placement, choose height! Good pulling feeling starting mid way through game 1 though you seem to be on and off during the second half of game 3. Take a breath to reset and remember what you were doing before. Stay collected and don't rush! Some good blocking sprinkled throughout. 👍 Pushing looks smoother in general. I'll admit I was looking at mostly the ball quality/height (which seemed much better for the most part) more than your footwork or contact timing. 5:56 - so cruel dealing psychological damage here... For your friend, his timing on his off the bounce attacks is a little too early. In general, if he waits slightly longer (7:25 vs 7:34), his percentage of success should increase without much loss of offensive pressure. All in all, a nice win with good application of principles 👍
I notice that my NINE (when done to me) is my hardest, but I have been doing better. Also, I have been starting to be much more conscience of my strike height. It's still not fluid, but I recognize it's importance and will drill this like crazy so I can get better height off the net. Yeah, in game 3 I felt like I pulled away and probably should have called a timeout. Good call out. Thanks for the tips! This was a pretty rewarding game. Both he and I wanted a rematch this night, but unfortunately I had to leave before we could do that.
Inspiring to watch. Keep it up!
Thank you so much! I'm glad you're here to watch!
hello. been a while huh. youve gotten a lot better, but now you tend to sometimes move too far back. so try not to do that too much, instead at most maybe half a step back. like for example at 2:42 you mobed back for no apparent reason. another thing is that when you block with your forehand, you tend to flick it down a little bit, which is why its so inconsistent. imstead, you should try to keep it firm at one spot, as if you were lining up to hit a golf ball
Welcome back! So glad you can see a noticible improvement. Great suggestions and thank you! I think with the moving back, I've been working on my after serve footwork, but I haven't been doing it as a reaction to my opponent, but more of a reaction to my serve. This is a good suggestion, so thank you.
I just noticed Kelvin alternates placing the ball left, right, or to your elbow. So he makes you move around a lot, not giving you any comfortable shots. It looks like he is careful not to give an attackable ball to your forehand, so he will hit it short to your forehand, or move you closer to the backhand side before attacking the forehand. It's a really good strategy that maximizes consistency and game control.
Wow - that's a really, REALLY good point. He's either doing this as a tactic, or for a drill himself, or a combination of the two, but either way, it's somthing I can work on when he's playing against me. Brilliant.
As a side note, make sure your serves don't dip below the table level. It could just be the camera angle though.
@@Ericratz0014 great pointer. Thanks buddy!
Tournaments are such a different experience from regular play. There's the pressure of winning, and you will likely play someone for the first time, and often using a room and table you're unfamiliar with. It's the ultimate worst-case scenario, which makes it the greatest test of your skill. All things considered, you did very well!
Thank you, Eric, and you're very, VERY right.
Nice to see you continuing to add to your repertoire. Fast, no spin serves are great for clutch situations, especially when you've been serving half long or short most of the time. Good idea trying to use your pushes to limit his attacks. Against strong players, they'll usually attack long pushes (maybe with the exception of pushes to their transition point) so short, wide, short & wide pushes are more effective in limiting their attacks. Good job stepping forward more on your pushes. Remember to keep your elbow pretty close to your torso so you're pushing straight and not from the side. That should help consistency a bit. Also, remember what the proper push timing is! Movements and swings are looking more and more natural and comfortable so that's good. It's hard to judge improvement when you're playing against a very good player but the fact that you look relaxed is a good thing. I liked that you still attacked when you had the chance... Sometimes it's hard to do that vs a strong player so you did well
I'm going to write 'keep elbow close to elbow' a million times on a chalk board until it clicks. Thank you for the reminder - I remember when I flew to Indiana to do a camp with Danny Seemiller (my coach's coach) and my two weakest shots were my forehand push (for this reason you mentioned) and my backspin loop. (I still have the footage somewhere) Thanks again.
Do you remember our discussion regarding having a loose wrist and how squeezing the fingers naturally moves the wrist? It sounds like that's what your friend is trying to work on right now. Maybe you can pass him our notes. It might be the case that my eyes aren't fast enough but it looks like he's pulling his wrist up and down (it makes his paddle look like it's standing perpendicular to his forearm 0:07 0:24 0:47 1:08 3:58 4:27). From what I was taught, from a relaxed forehand where the paddle is at rest in line with your forearm, adding wrist is more like twisting open a bottle of soda where the wrist rotates the hand and the thumb applies "downward twist" and the index finger applies "upward twist". Not sure if that makes sense... Combined with breaking, it is a very small but quick motion and makes the paddle look like it is arcing/hugging/covering over the top of the ball. The quick motion over a small distance adds acceleration and that adds more spin... In addition, at 0:05 0:28 2:31, etc, if you play back at 50% speed, you can see his elbow is not stable and rises up quite a bit (sometimes higher than his wrist, a hooking down motion during follow through). This is indicative that he's using a lot of shoulder to generate power, which can lead to injury! It also introduces a lot variables and can lead to consistency issues He keeps his elbow more stable and in line with the plane of his swing at 0:22 1:51 2:47 although the wrist action still looks a little strange. In any case, he's a good player with lots of experience so I'm sure he'll be able to execute what he's trying to learn in no time.
Yes! I remember it well. (I have it logged in my scouting report!) I can see it very vividly from the time stamps. Wow. I will be sure to pass this on, it'll be very helpful! Thank you!
One more thing: as you work on placement, take note of where the opponents typically return for each zone and start trying to anticipate their returns. Use your serves to try to force returns to where you want the ball to go. One more place to serve to is their transition point but these should be fast or it'll be an easy return for them
Definitely I do have a deadspin and a topspin serve to a transition point, but I need to work on its accuracy. (And, actually, the height above the net now that I think about it.)
Keep at it and don't get discouraged! A lot of players think practicing service is boring but good quality serves are essential. As the level of your opponents improves, aces are going to be less common but a good serve will set you up for the third ball attack, prevent opponents from taking the offensive, and (incidentally) improve your serve receives through increased understanding of service mechanics. Take a second to run through your mental checklist before you serve. Spin, speed, height, placement, opponent. Don't rush your serve. It's the only time in a game where you have 100% control
That's great advice, I defintely know with anything I work on there is regression in skill, and so I took this quote to heart that night: "After a big match, it's probably best to relax and play for fun. . . " So I casually was working on this, but knew I was more relaxed and didn't put too much pressure on myself. I actually like practicing serves and I try to challenge myself and do a lot of fun games with it. I don't have a lot of feedback from an opponent (since I practice at home) but I like to practice one serve and see if I can do the following: Do a topspin version, backspin version, deadspin version, and maybe sidespin version(s) Then I like to do short and long placements. I used to do this a lot, but I know I have to get back into it - I've really simplified my serves and only recently began practice. Perhaps I'll record these at home and get feedback that way. I really like the checklist.
GGs, Ben! Looking forward to our rematch.
Same! I promise I'll come back stronger! It was a great match. How did you end up doing?
Lost to Gabriel in Quarters. Was 2-0 up but lost 3-2 🥺
Ah man! Tough loss, Gabriel is great!
Nice W!
Thank you! This one felt good!
Nice match, a well deserved win due to mental fortitude. Good job persisting and working out your FH. If you review the video, you'll see he starts avoiding you FH a lot more and start placing to you BH. Something to analyze: The general correlation between where you place your serve and where he places his return, especially prior to your FH fix. We know that he's going to try to push to your forehand as much as possible because he perceives that as your biggest weakness. So why, on some returns, is he unable to push to your FH? That's the power of serve placement! After a big match, it's probably best to relax and play for fun but if you HAVE to work on something, here's a few things but try not to do too much at once: 1 - continue working on controlled aggression. Attack when you see the chance but not at 100% power (80% max or you're control suffers!) 2 - don't reach for the ball. Remember the strike zone is in 3 dimensions. Move it to the ball or wait for the ball to come to it. 3 - service. Aim for zones 1, 3, 7, and 9. After you toss the ball, wait for it to drop to as close to net level as possible before hitting it. That will help keep them low. Be mindful of where the first bounce should be for the serve you want to do. 4 - a big part of serve receive is mobility. Make sure "staying low" doesn't detract from your ability to move to the ball. Stay loose. If you're too tense, you can't move quickly All in all, a good match! It's showing that the potential is there and you're gaining the tools to tap into that potential.
I definitely am going to be focusing on this a lot - especially the serve placements. In fact, to challenge myself I think I'll do that at the club - ONLY serve in the quadrants and hit at just above net height. I do believe this'll be a good 'play for fun' challenge. Great reminder on these 4 points, THANK you! It's fun to look back and see how Josh and I both adjusted to this match. He's a great tactician. I'm excited for the next tournament!
Nice one, Ben!
Thank you! Appreciate it!
In our group match, Leanne beat me, I beat Josh, and Josh beat Leanne. This led to a 3 way tie in our group. Because I won the fewest games, I was eliminated and didn't advance to the single elimination tournament, unfortunately. However, Josh advanced all the way to the finals and won 2nd place! He won the U1500 tournament and 2nd in the U1800. He text me and told me he only lost two matches this day. This match you see here, and the finals match of this tournament. That made me feel pretty good!
"Dont get cute with it, stay handsome". This is a new favorite quote haha. This was a fun match to watch. Good win ben.
Haha, thank you, Logan. Glad you enjoyed the match, and the quote that kept me grounded the rest of that game, at least.