Видео

Thank you, and thank you for watching.

Thank you for watching, you are the best, sincerely Diamond Jim.

You are very welcome, and thank you for watching.

What camera make and model are you using, and what version of CP1?

Will do! And thank you for watching.

Agreed, and thank you for watching.

Sorry to hear about the experience. I will say that I am not wild about the interactions I have had with Capture One before. There are some serious issues I have had with the program, design not issues like you are having, and they have not given me the idea of being all that receptive. Thank you for watching, sorry to hear about the experience you have had with the program.

Thank you very much, and thank you for watching.

Thank you so much, and thank you for watching!

Thank you for watching!

I totally agree, the price is a hard point to argue against. But I will say that for commercial work, the import/tethering/export features of CP1 save me considerable time per job, and makes for a much better client experience. And when I take that time into account, against my hourly rate, the price difference in CP1 has paid for itself before he first quarter. But again . . . many photographers don't use or even know about many of those features.

In my use of the programs, I didn't see a radical difference between the two programs, but I am sure there are images where LRC does a better job than CP1, but I haven't seen it yet. But it is very early in the cycle of updates for 2025.

I think Capture One will always have a hard time competing with Adobe on price, it is why QuarkXPress died a quick death. What I think CP1 can do it make the user experience better for users, and that might bring more photographers over . . . maybe.

No it's not. Most professionals use Adobe. Basically Adobe Color was terrible, then it became bad and today is "me". Thetering was also soft. Today the color is competitive (I sill prefer Capture One's) and tethering is competitive. In terms of price, you need to have problems paying $21/month for Capture one when you can get Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Photoshop and 20GB of cloud storage for $9.99/month. It's such nonsense.

Thanks for watching @@jaimeduncan6167

No its not, CO is geared more towards fashion photographers and there it has a strong following, but in every other aspect (Landscape, Arcitecture, etc.) Lightroom is the clear winner.

Thank you for watching @@ArminSteiner

Thank you for watching. I know there is threading on the inside of the lens, but I haven't check for anything that would fit. I am afraid it would probably be a matte box solution.

@@PhotoKitchen425 Yep I've tried, doesn't seem to work with anything. Kind of a in between size frustratingly. Thanks anyway. Best wishes

I need to look deeper @@LukeBurwood-b9z , but the solution might be a step-down or step-up ring. I have the Lee system for my still camera, something like that might work.

Thank you for watching!

Thank you for watching.

Thank you for watching!

Look at how C1 Pro looks 'straight out of Camera' compared to LR (CC, Classic, etc) and see that Adobe is not without its issues too.

Also, I find myself still using Photoshop, Lightroom is constantly updating almost every month with new software features and fixing bugs

​@@v3rlonC1 just applies different contrast/color settings on import. Nothing to do with quality.

@@haakon_b No, there is definitely more to it than that. Look at some of the deep dives into importing into various RAW processors. Contrast will co er some of it, but not all. In my case, I ran into an edge case that really highlighted differences.

Thank you for watching!

It is hard to justify the price when Adobe is offering such a good deal in the creative cloud. Thank you for watching!

Yeah plus it seems that Capture is more gear towards portrait style photography like fashion and modeling. I used it in the past too but ended up going back to Adobe because of Photoshop and its other features like Adobe portfolio.

Thank you for watching@@Emanuel-oo6mc

I certainly see the value over other brands to be sure.

It is odd to see that much of difference between two lenses, especially quality glass from Nikon. Is this in auto focus only, or do you see the sam issue if you manual focus?

You are very welcome.

Thank you for watching.

So happy to help and thank you for watching.

Thank you for watching.

Thank you for watching.

Thanks for watching!

Thank you so much for watching!

Thank you for watching. I think CP1 is the more frustrating for me, because they just won't make simple UI changes to improve the experience. The lack of true, or inconsistent "Auto Sync" for Metadata and Development settings costs me so much time, but not as much as the lack of quality export on LRC's side of things.

@@PhotoKitchen425 I know what you mean, I left using C1 as it slow enough but it was frustrating using it and once LR improved a couple of years ago with the masking I switched. Found masking on each image more accurate with C1 and you refine better but overall very slow to use. Agree C1 seemed obstinately stubborn in their refusal to changes, probably don't have the R&D budget available to Adobe.

It would probably drop if there is not enough light, to be sure. This is just making sure it doesn't drop bellow if there is enough ISO range, and ISO is in AUTO. If you have maxed out ISO, it will then drop.

@@PhotoKitchen425 Oooohh ok that makes sense then ok thanks so much! Also would you recommend using aperture priority while using a 3.5-5.6 lens? I have the 18-135 and have been using aperture priority since it's a non-constant max aperture lens.

That is a good question @@antsalmon, but a tough one. I guess the good side of shooting in Aperture priority on that lens is at least you know you are getting either a fixed aperture, above 5.6, or the lowest possible number based on your zoom.

So it's not a minimum shutter speed really.

At some point, when the light is low, and the ISO is maxed out, the shutter speed will shift @@seaned8 .

You are very welcome!

So you are in two areas I don't do much work in, wireless tethering and Nikon cameras. My first idea/question is, can you preview if you are tethered with a cable, but not wireless? I know in the past Nikon has been tricky when it comes to tethered shooting, so I don't know if this is CP1 issue, or a Nikon feature. I also haven't upgraded to the newest version of CP1, but I know they have "better" tethering support, so you might want to check that out. Also, if you have Adobe Lightroom Classic, you might want to try a quick tethered test there and see if it works.

@@PhotoKitchen425 it actually works fine with NX Tether, I can see the preview on my cam. But on Capture One I cant. Everything else works fine, I can see a live view and play with all the settings from my cam and even ahoot. But no preview on cam

I would reach out to CP1@@bashirbouraffoul , I hate to be that person, but I am not sure about Nikon and wireless.

Not sure what you mean. When you shoot, or import, you can see the images, in the folder structured they were imported in LRC as in the Library Module, Left Column, Folders Panel. Your last import or tethered shooter should be listed under the Catalog Panel, same area, under Previous Import.

thanks for replying. Let’s say on day 1 I created a folder (team 1). I also created some more folders (more teams) On day 2 I want to add more pictures to my original team 1 folder. Is that possible?

Yes @@LuisMurciaLMXDIGITAL , when you do the tethered setup window, choose that Team one folder again. It might be already selected from the previous tethered shoot.

Thank you for watching.

So are you using a catalog or a session for CP1? And when you moved the images, did you also move that file, because that is where you mask information is stored.

Thank you so much for watching!

Thank you for watching. I have a few more videos on CP1 that might help you out as you move away from Adobe.

Thank you, and thank you for watching!

Thank you, and thank you for watching.

The sauce that brings all the viewers to the yard.

Thank you so much

I have been watching what CP1 has been putting out, but I generally stay away from Beta programs because I want to see what the public gets, and how it really works with out the old, "well it is still just a beta" reply.

Cool! This is a public beta, so features will be available at the end of the month. It looks like some of these gaps have been closed, so it will be interesting to get your take.

Have you updated CP1 or your OS? Check the cable, or try a new one. Do you have memory cards in the camera, and haven't before? If so, pull the cards. But an out of the blue issue like this is usually either a software update glitch, or a bad cable.

Thank you for watching. I hope you check out other videos on the channel!

I just didn't have one on hand. But the silver one would give you a bit more power to be sure, and increase contrast. In working with other photographers, I have seen them all lean to the white rather than silver because it doesn't create as much highlights/hot spots on the face. Thank you for watching!

@@PhotoKitchen425 I think for beauty shors better to have silver, cause model use a lots of cosmetic products to make skin precise, it give you more flexibility, if you need soft, you just adding the sox on beauty dish and get like small octobox with wider angles of spiting light.

Thank you for watching!

Thank you so much for watching.

Thank you so much for watching!

Thank you for watching. I try my best. It is funny how many people think I hate either program, and I really don't, I just want to point out the things I think need fixing.