Видео

@@gustavogcs1787 How's that gonna help?

Because it might be closer? That's a good thought! Thanks!

@KedrigernGaming but it measures steps in terms of actions performed, not in the distance traveled, so why would that matter? You're not measuring seconds, are you? This one is different from 7 Billion Humans!

That is what I thought too! But was a bit confused :D

That is genius! I feel this 'write it backwards' approach is gonna be the norm now. And I can't say I like it.

@@realdragon so we have the same idea then, it's the same thing I suggested in my comment

@ Yea maybe, I don't have brain capacity to understand code in non code format

That could work!

Could be! When I made this, in my mind it was just normal carrot planting with an added bonus. So original "plant carrots always" transformed into "sometimes plant a companion instead". A little change and a lot of improvement. But really I think the carrots do take a long time to actually grow even if watered. So perhaps waiting would not be the best thing to do (they might have changed it or I might be remembering wrong)

I'm sure there is! Would be fun still but feel like I should just have an empty expression on my face and watch the numbers go up in this mode. "No thinking allowed" challenge

That's smart! I had to go check because I was sure I was not able to do that before. But yeah, seems to come with the latest update that you can specify how large the maze should be.

Oh wow! This honestly just made my day! Thank you

Hey, developer here )/ I didn't develop ROLL but I do love that game, and Card Draw is indeed obviously inspired by it :)

@@oddeyesgames It looks like a fun twist on the mechanics

Glad you think so!

Thank you very much!

Tyger tyger!

That is super weird. I literally just went off the Steam page. No idea why it wouldn't let you download. Try again later I'd guess or worst case try the game on itch.

There was no problem for me, you need to download the steam demo not the itch demo that is only for browser

You should have been using the second slot for all of your new cards unless they're your new best card; multiplier or add; you chose to swap the +78 for a x2 instead of putting the x2 where the x3 was, getting you 0; you did that thing like every time tho

Felt it might have been better not to lose the x3 for a while and sacrificing one hand (getting 0 points once). But yeah, not yet good at it for sure!

I went a little overboard there

Thank you so much!!! Yes, Human Resource Machine - working on another episode for the next week :)

It changes the strategy so much. I can't wait for the other modes.

I just love the game!

Any shot this can be on mobile?

​@@adeptmage2293 A mobile version would be very nice, I'll definitely consider porting to Android and maybe even iOS if the game will do well on launch on PC :)

@@oddeyesgamesI can see myself playing this for hours on an iPad

I might have gotten addicted a bit :D

I feel like it really depends on how your brain decides to work at that moment. So sometimes I can't figure out a puzzle because my initial thought that I am stuck with was wrong. And all it takes is to just sleep it off and forget it. And the next time I might nail it first go, fully optimized.

Thanks for this comment! Glad you went in depth like this! I fully agree with everything. I tried solving the puzzle in any way and it worked and was fine. Later I realized this issue of waiting and harvesting only a single plant. Eventually wanted to just reset the field after a few passes. You were right that the puzzle used to work differently. Only harvest the plant with the most petals. That would give you the power of all the plants on the field. Harvest any other plant and you get nothing and all the plants die. Have not yet gotten to the new version of the puzzle though but will be nice to figure it out again from scratch and maybe avoid some of the mistakes I made and re-design the whole solution.

@@KedrigernGaming thanks. watching a new playthrough (using old knowledge of the language, but having to do most things at least a little different) will be very interesting. since I'm a bit busy, i am currently still working on the last two parts (improving dinosaurs, and the maze, as well as finally the leaderboard), and once again it was fun. eagerly waiting now for your new attempt including the leaderboard :-)

Means a lot 😊 will do my best not to disappoint. Feels a bit daunting though. So much has changed under my hands so the code I have is basically unusable and I need to redo most of it. Not to mention some of the puzzles got changed completely 😂

You really think so? Might give it a go then!

I have not played in a long time. There have been a few major updates.

After you open the chest, the robe will be available as an appearance. So you can use it on any robe you're currently wearing.

@ where is that?

Hover over the equipped robe and there you should see a prompt to change appearance (X on Xbox)

I just tried it again and it works for me :)

Agreed! But I still wonder what else we could do. The possibilities are literally limitless so maybe with some clever wording even an "insta-win" could be possible?

@@KedrigernGaming i was wondering what would happen if you simply wrote "god"

I love it!! Have to try :D

Please do. It’s really fun 😊

That looks fun. Thanks for the tip! Will add it on my TODO list :)

Sorry to hear that! Really think it's worth it.

Human Resource Machine

Well at first I didn't know the data would stay there :D

You are absolutely right!

Okay now that's some next level coding! A bit afraid it might fail if the number of cubes is not even but let's see. Thank you!

@ If it fails then it truly is impossible :p

​@@KedrigernGaming why would it fail? Your initial code is an infinite loop to get an infinite sequence of inputs and outputs, so the game stops the solution when you completed the task. So why would you care if the amount is even or odd? The game will stop it anyway, it doesn't have to be before the jump...

I might be remembering wrong but I think that I tried hard coding many in/out commands and it failed as there were too many commands and the code execution wasn't completed. That was the feeling I got. But I realize that technically with a jump the code is never 'finished'

Now that is hybrid bruteforce

It is a great game, yeah! My guess was that the cards in shop depend on the overall value of my deck. So after buying a few good cards and burning the bad ones, the value increases and the shop matches it.

I will! Already looking forward to it!

Thank you!! I really enjoy playing the game so Im looking forward to trying out the demo as well. By the time the video left the editing room, the demo has already come out but that is on me!

Feedback for the demo: Great game, but *I already have it wishlisted*. Please stop asking me after *every single interaction in the menu*. (especially with such a guilty looking reject option "No Thanks :-("

​@@megaing1322 you are right about the repetitive wishlist popup. For now, there is an option in the settings to show the wishlist popup less often throughout the game (it won't show it when you restart or exit a run, only when you quit the game). Unfortunately, I have only one way to ensure players remember to wishlist my game, which is to show the popup as frequently as possible, but on the other end I have no way of knowing if a player already wishlisted my game so I can avoid showing them the wishlist popup (Steam rightfully won't grant me access to players' wishlist).

This reminds me of Roll, which was really fun. I'll be watching your career with interest.

Glad I did not disappoint 😂

Hate the language even more now

Because he quit? Not surprised! Thanks for your faith in me!

They should have made it to be the last puzzle - "Your code is now broken. Lolz, good luck"

Oh damn! This game is getting more and more realistic! I have the added bonus of code reviews - getting yelled at in the comments. Surely next step is getting paid.

@@KedrigernGaming Getting paid is a RUclips feature

Python and other stuff follow a version format like A.B.C, A is incremented when a change that breaks old code is made, B is incremented when a feature is added that doesn't affect old code, and C is incremented for bug fixes. Makes sense why Python 2 code is broken in Python 3, etc..

Good! For me it was more about the transition to this game being simpler which is what I needed now. But glad it worked out this way then.