DBMM Hong Kong
DBMM Hong Kong
  • Видео 13
  • Просмотров 7 550
DBMM Battle of Hattin
The Battler of Hattin took place in 1187AD between Saladin's Arab army and the King of Jerusalem's Crusaders.
It was a decisive battle in the Crusades, changing the direction of the war.
This battle was refought at Hong Kong Society of Wargamers using the DBMM rules
Просмотров: 245

Видео

DBMM100 Competition Hong Kong May 2023
Просмотров 378Год назад
This video describes the competition held in Hong Kong using the Ancient wargaming rules DBMM. Armies were limited to 100 points, with an hour per game. Hong Kong Society of Wargamers hksw.org/ Music credit: Sons of War by Thomas Bergersen
DBMM Battle Report WOTR vs Burgundians
Просмотров 1 тыс.2 года назад
Book IV Battle Report between IV-83 War of The Roses Henry VII and IV-76 Early Burgundian Inert Charles the Bold
DBMM Ming vs Navarrese
Просмотров 3622 года назад
Battle Report of Regular Tiger rooms DBMM battle between Inert Ming Chinese (Book IV-73) and Navarrese (Book IV-39)
Battle of Nicopolis AD 1396 DBMM Big Game
Просмотров 8302 года назад
Battle of Nicopolis AD1396 Crusade of Nicopolis Book IV DBMM Ottomans vs Crudader/Hungarian/Wallachian Allied force ~900 point armies www.hksw.org
Battle of Watling Street AD60 DBMM Big Game
Просмотров 7522 года назад
Battle of Watling Street AD60 Boudicca's rebellion Ancient British vs Early Imperial Roman Over 1000 point armies Fought at Hong Kong Society of Wargamers www.hksw.org
DBMM Battle Report: Book IV Serbs vs Catalans
Просмотров 3873 года назад
DBMM Battle Report Book IV-22 Serbian Empire vs IV-60 Croatian Company Music credit: Invincible from Two Steps from Hell
DBMM Ghurid vs Qara Khitan
Просмотров 2583 года назад
DBMM Battle between two Book IV armies
DBMM Kurdish vs Armenian
Просмотров 1953 года назад
400 point DBMM battle between Book III armies Kurdish army uses figures from Legio Heroica (Bedouin and IKnI)and Lurkio (IKnI)
DBMM Ghurid vs Later Muslim Indian
Просмотров 3943 года назад
DBMM Ancient battle between Book IV armies, 1206AD
DBMM Army Review Norman III 52
Просмотров 6864 года назад
This video reviews the Norman army organised for DBMM Army List III-52 Figures are mostly from the new Forged in Battle range Please comment on what would you list look like, and any armies you would like me to review next. Subscribe to get notified when the next review is done
DBMM Army Review Minoans I-18
Просмотров 7094 года назад
This video reviews the Minoan army organised for DBMM Army List I-18 Figures are mostly Museum Miniatures Please comment on what would you list look like, and any armies you would like me to review next. Subscribe to get notified when the next review is done
DBMM Army Review - Seleucid II-19
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.4 года назад
In this video we review the DBMM Seleucid Army from Book II, List 19 Figures are a mix of Forged in Battle, Xyston, Lurkio and Museum

Комментарии

  • @SylviaFerguson-u8g
    @SylviaFerguson-u8g 7 дней назад

    Kilback Tunnel

  • @philRminiatures
    @philRminiatures 11 дней назад

    Great looking game, a beautiful battle with colorful armies!

  • @EnglishBob256
    @EnglishBob256 29 дней назад

    Nice to see a scenario being played. Looks tough for the Crusaders though.

  • @arnimlueck7884
    @arnimlueck7884 Месяц назад

    Super Video, well done! Thank you

  • @Edward-Plantagenet
    @Edward-Plantagenet 5 месяцев назад

    Interesting video and some great thoughts on command planning (esp with a full command of 2ME not suffer Disheartened). Only thing I would say is that I found the music became EXTREMELY annoying after about 5 minutes, it’s too loud IMO, I’d suggest binning the music altogether or at least dial it down by 50%.

  • @Edward-Plantagenet
    @Edward-Plantagenet 8 месяцев назад

    Interesting video, not much on DBMM around. I've often seen people trying to balance the ME between the Commands so 28 / 28 / 28 for the army here. The 20 ME command will be considerably more fragile. I'm assuming you've gone for 32 x 2 and 20 merely to get the deployment you want? I'm assuming Scythed Chariots are total garbage given you didn't even mention them LOL? If your'e still interested in doing more videos, Later Carthaginian and Polybian Romand would round it out nicely. Not much to be said about Romans by and large though I guess (e.g. # number of legion divided by 3!).

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 8 месяцев назад

      The Command sizes are based on the way PIP dice are allocated for Regular armies in DBMM, highest, middle and lowest. The highest dice here is for the mounted command, so it can manoevre to get the match-ups it needs to use its great variety of unit types best. The lowest dice command only gets 1-2 PIPs on avergae, so it is a "PIP dump", smaller size, used as a reserve command while the other 2 front up. Scythed chariots, as in most historical battles are a gimmick, will force your opponent to look up the rules, but 9 times out of 10 fizzle out. At least the Seleucid ones are Regular, makes them a little easier to control. Carthaginians are interesting, lots of options but hard to make a good list. As you say, early Romans are very limited in choices!

    • @Edward-Plantagenet
      @Edward-Plantagenet 8 месяцев назад

      @@ChrisMusic2468 Yes I’m aware how the pip dice allocation works. Often though I’ve seen folks try to balance the ME sizes of the commands so they are all roughly equal, even to the point of saying that’s the best way. I can see that working quite well with Romans and other armies with almost identical troop types across the board, and all Regular, I don’t see the equal size ME approach working here though (e.g. trying to get each command to 28).

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 8 месяцев назад

      @@Edward-Plantagenet I usually do balanced commands for irregulars, but weight them for regulars. Of course some troop types don’t need many pips, like a pike phalanx, but in general give the highest pips to your big commands that have to do the heavy lifting.

  • @elgentleman6259
    @elgentleman6259 9 месяцев назад

    Need to work up to that many! I see the Brits have chariots - could anyone help a newcomer with them please? I have the 2.1 rules ('16) which gives them and war dogs -1AP on pg.16. Beyond the chariot treats RG as DG on pg.23, I can not find a single mention of either element type. Where am I missing their extra rules? Thanks

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 9 месяцев назад

      You’ve got it, treating RG as DG is the main difference between chariots and cavalry. Also they are 40mm deep, not 30, so they can’t turn into flank if they punch a 1 element wide hole in the line, because their rear edge can’t touch an enemy unit. Worth it for the 1 pt discount, I take as many as I can get. War dogs are treated a IWbF, the only difference is they don’t get rear rank support. In general, you point them at the enemy and let them go impetuous,hoping they cause some trouble. I am currently building the Ancient British Panzer division, lots of chariots that can dismount as WbS. Scary and flexible.

    • @elgentleman6259
      @elgentleman6259 9 месяцев назад

      @@ChrisMusic2468 Brilliant, simple and thorough thank you. Still in the blood, Brits loved their cruiser tanks. Hope you have a lot of fun with yours.

  • @arnimlueck7884
    @arnimlueck7884 Год назад

    Great video thanks. We have not done a 100AP tournament here, only 240AP. But looks liek you guys had an exciting day. Inspiring!

  • @craigcollings5568
    @craigcollings5568 Год назад

    Wonderful to see. Sorry I missed it.

  • @Curaissier
    @Curaissier Год назад

    Great to see a DBMM based RUclips video.

  • @craigcollings5568
    @craigcollings5568 Год назад

    Great game!

  • @craigcollings5568
    @craigcollings5568 Год назад

    Some practiced play there. Have you heard of any DBMM in Singapore?

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 Год назад

      Sorry, don't know anyone. Know several in Thailand, Many in Australia/NZ. You can come to Hong Kong, we are enough to have many games in a DBMM vacation!

    • @craigcollings5568
      @craigcollings5568 Год назад

      @@ChrisMusic2468 As it happens I'm going to be in HK quite a bit from now on. Will be there 5th, 6th, 7th but I'll be busy. I will be returning though.

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 Год назад

      @@craigcollings5568 If you can give us a few days notice, there are DBMM games here most Friday/Saturdays. If you have any time free to drop by on the 6th, we have 8 players playing a mini DBMM-100 competition.

    • @craigcollings5568
      @craigcollings5568 Год назад

      @@ChrisMusic2468 Thanks for the kind invitation! Let's see if I can.

  • @ViscountSandwich
    @ViscountSandwich Год назад

    Is this 15mm?

  • @neilcrossley1961
    @neilcrossley1961 Год назад

    Great to see a massive DBMM battle

  • @michaelcarlin9153
    @michaelcarlin9153 2 года назад

    Really enjoyed that. Great video and fun looking game

  • @michaelcarlin9153
    @michaelcarlin9153 2 года назад

    Excellent video and beautiful looking armies

  • @christophervanbrunt904
    @christophervanbrunt904 2 года назад

    Thank you. I'm new to DBMM and thanks to the video realise the importance of baggage

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 2 года назад

      Welcome, it is great to have new players! I always take Baggage to boost break points, I where possible, S even better. F is better than O since it can set up in the flank sector and flees on a lost combat. Regular Baggage is worth protecting, I leave Irregular Baggage open, if the opponent uses PIPs to take it out, hopefully I can win elsewhere

  • @TrueColorado
    @TrueColorado 2 года назад

    Hi! Is your army builder available somewhere or it's just a plain excel file (and you do the maths by hand)?

  • @craigcollings5568
    @craigcollings5568 2 года назад

    That was AMAZING! I had to flick through frame by frame. So much drama in each shot. (PS. My money was on the British the whole time. Well done to the Romans for keeping it to 15-10).

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 2 года назад

      Many thanks, the credit should go to Tony for his magnificent armies……sheer dedication to paint 1,000 points when most of us stop at 400…..

  • @craigcollings5568
    @craigcollings5568 2 года назад

    I would very much like to hear your thoughts on a Hellenistic Spartan army post-222 BC: Reg Pk(O), Reg Ax(S) & Reg Ps(S), almost no Cav.

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 2 года назад

      I'm a fan of the Athenian Hellenistic Greek list, with IAxS and RKnF. Aggression of 0 means you can pack terrain, swarm it and position the Knights for a decisive strike. I like Spartans too, but in the RSpS, RSpO combo, maxing out Ps

  • @craigcollings5568
    @craigcollings5568 2 года назад

    Thanks for that. Just what I needed as I consider the Hautville forays into Sicily.

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 2 года назад

      Now I've finished 1066 army, maybe I have to start on the Hautvilles.......you can never have too many Norman Knights!

  • @tommyworden72
    @tommyworden72 2 года назад

    At about the 33rd minute, when the LH entered the BUA, they were probably still in the open 0.5BW, so could have probably got to the other side of the BUA and importantly away from the enemy Knights.

    • @lorricount
      @lorricount 2 года назад

      No, they were inside 1BW difficult terrain of the BUA. The 3D nature of the BUA just slide them in a way that they looked like to be in the 0.5BW open edge of the BUA.

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 2 года назад

      It was very close. I also had to check the rules, move is reduced when you enter or end in the terrain, so I could not move through to the clear terrain behind. I expected worst case they would flee into BUA after a flank hit, had not realised that they could be hit front and back

  • @andyrmac7733
    @andyrmac7733 2 года назад

    Excellent battle report with very interesting narration. The graphics was a great touch also who had helped the motion of the battle be understood. Thank you for posting.

    • @lorricount
      @lorricount 2 года назад

      When we write battle reports in Hong Kong, we usually will add movement arrows and the Destroyed Boom symbols when we have the time to do so.

  • @peterfmodel
    @peterfmodel 2 года назад

    I love the music

  • @leonleese4919
    @leonleese4919 2 года назад

    I enjoyed that as the first army that I bought was Mikes Models Seleucid Army box for WRGAncients 6th Ed. I would like to see an English Feudal Army I have an Essex DBA Army but want to build it for DBMM if I can ever get away for a meeting :-)

  • @BizTraveller
    @BizTraveller 2 года назад

    It was epic!

  • @sirrathersplendid4825
    @sirrathersplendid4825 3 года назад

    Hard to follow what you’re saying when you talk about knights and pikemen. I don’t see any of either - just chariots and spearmen. Surely it’s better to use the terminology used in the army itself not some artificial designation in the rules?

  • @arnimlueck7884
    @arnimlueck7884 3 года назад

    Thanks for that presentation. I am actually inspired and I started to scan miniatures on the market. Just one question: Where does it say that the chariots are exclusively Kn(F) OR Cv(O)? I did not find any remark. If the army list want to indicate an exclusive OR they usually state either all kn(F) or all Cv(O). Here I would actually claim that you are allowed to mix... Or did I overlook something?

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 3 года назад

      You are right, I missed this. Makes the army even more flexible, I think RCvO@7 and RKnF@10 points are good value. With only a few chariots, I would make them all KnF, with the general in the middle, but if you are fighting an army tough for your knights and pikes (not many in book 1- eg Spartan?) bringing some CvO would make sense

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 3 года назад

      Also, museum have just revamped their minoan range to their new "Z" scupts

    • @arnimlueck7884
      @arnimlueck7884 3 года назад

      @@ChrisMusic2468 Yep I ordered a few to see them. Still need a good clue how to make generals for them though. Anyway it is a 2022 project.

  • @user-pk8xm8fe3s
    @user-pk8xm8fe3s 3 года назад

    I'm sorry, but your list is incorrect. You have calculated only 5 AP for the Sub-general Reg Pk (S) instead of 25 AP.

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 3 года назад

      You are right, I missed that! Will have to lose 4 of the RAxS to accommodate.....

  • @kwansam625
    @kwansam625 3 года назад

    big fans

  • @johnedmundson7547
    @johnedmundson7547 4 года назад

    Good to see some DBMM appearing on youtube! An interesting contest between quite contrasting armies. You mention it being part of a campaign. Can you provide any details of that, here or on FB?

  • @ChrisMusic2468
    @ChrisMusic2468 4 года назад

    Yes, all Museum. Chunky figures, very fast to paint. Recommend them!

    • @ChrisMusic2468
      @ChrisMusic2468 3 года назад

      Thats interesting! I never thought about the video being watched by someone who did not like the DBMM rules, next time I'll see if it can appeal to a wider audience

  • @egretII
    @egretII 4 года назад

    Nice presentation! Are those museum miniatures?

  • @genetatortoise
    @genetatortoise 4 года назад

    As someone looking to build a DBMM Seleucid army, this was really useful. Particularly the discussion on the use of each unit. I know this is a new channel so I hope you keep making DBMM content! This is easily the best DBMM content on RUclips.