Видео

cgi will be the way to go going forward ..live action cant last more than 100 movies maximum , people will get too old , or you'd have to recast or do future storylines..

Call it 616 was the worst idea.

Yk between this and the Deadpool and Wolverine “Sacred timeline” stuff my interpretation is just that the MCU has the timeline equivalent of completely unchecked main character syndrome. Like “Yeah, obviously we have the big important 616 number, we’re the all important main sacred timeline, that comic continuity already carrying that designation is completely irrelevant.” Meanwhile the entire rest of the multiverse outside that bubble just looks at it like any other alternate universe with its own distinct classification.

If you asked Mark Gruenwald he would say The comics 616 and the MCU 616 are in different multiverse but the same megaverse. This would account for how the TVA operate differently in the different multiverses. Problem solved.

I'll believe the MCU is Earth-616 when a source outside of the MCU calls it 616, like a Sony movie or something, but until then I'm calling it Earth-199999

support you

Don't let this guy know that DC named different universes by the names Earth-2 , Earth 2 and Earth two

The movies are not the comics. What the comics do are of no consequence to tje movies. If the comics want to include an MCU universe and give it its own designation tjen fine. But as far as the movies are concerned, their main timeline is 616.

Well duh 616 is comic universe

Well, for Iron Man there is still one 'Iconic' story, but I don't think Disney will EVER do it justice: "Demon is a bottle', the story of how Tony fell into alcoholism, and eventually overcame it. I think disney thinks the character means too much to both fans, and them (money wise) to ever 'taint' him with something like this, even though it was the story that put Iron Man on the map (more or less). He did get drunk in one scene in Iron Man 2, and had people thinking he was 'drinking' too much, when he was actually taking the antidote for his 'platinum poisoning', but that's as far as they will go, unless RDJ stepped up and say he would don the iconic beard one more time to tell that story right (don't think he will; kind of put the character behind him, even with the Doom thing, and he's swimming in Disney cash already 😅) I have always said, though, that you can do a 'variant' of MCU Tony Stark that is similar, but at the same time very familiar, in more ways than one: Introduce Arnold ('Arno') Stark, Tony's adoptive brother from the comics (actually Tony is adopted, but I never liked that), who may or may not be Evil. Also, have him be played by Charlie Sheen: A person who is a good actor, but 'fell off the wagon' in his own way, just as RDJ did in his youth, but is poised to make a come back now that he is Clean and Sober, and is used to playing 'Lovable Asshats' 😂

I used to be mad about it but honestly I seen another video or something somewhere calling the MCUs choice for calling itself as 616 adaptation. You wouldn't bust DCs balls by using the Earth 1 in any of the media that clearly isn't DCs Earth 1. 616 is just a in universe way of saying it's the main earth = earth prime = earth 1.

8:08 A coincidence? Its just that Easy

I love your Fanboy Geek Card-carrying passion, I really do, but you are making a mountain of a mole hill - most modern comic book fans don't read comics - Marvel Comics are altered to fit the aesthetics of the MCU when an MCU character becomes popular (Agatha Harkness is aesthetically a 90-year old woman, but now she looks like a 40-something middle-aged woman with a streak of white hair in current comics continuity - and many think Krakoa ended because the X-Men will premiere in the MCU in a few years) loved the video, but the need for this distinction will never resonate with modern comic book fans who don't read comics and don't know the history anyway.....

I think the fact they called it 616 is because of the fact the MCU is an adaptation of the comics. They're trying to say that everything is just an adaptation and doesn't run alongside the comics, which makes complete sense as so many of the multiverse stories happening between the comics and the MCU wouldn't work alongside each other. I personally would've preferred if they stuck with 199999 but I can see perfectly why they chose 616.

This was done utterly on purpose... The MCU is being established as separate multiverse ever since Endgame, with the Infinity Gauntlet working completely different from the rules established in the comics. Why was it done? Because Feige wants creative freedom. He wants his movies to be able to do whatever they want, without being restrained by the comic continuity. Nothing that happened in Loki TV Series would have been possible within comic book multiverse, where entities upon entities watch over and would immediately interfere if any timeline got spaghettied. The MCMultiverse might exist somewhere within Multiversal Eternity on the other side of the Superstream, be the Ninth Cosmos, experiment by The Beyonders or just be its own thing entirely; who cares, certainly not the filmmakers. Is this disrespectful to the comic books? A bit, yeah; because it does mean that comic books don't matter from the films' perspective. But 1) they don't care anyway 2) I kinda see their perspective, they wanna tell their own stories however they please. Many comic book writers wanted that freedom back in the day and we rooted for them, why should films be any different? And at the end of the day - it's all fiction, so. 🤷

I’m fine with it being 616. The MCU multiverse is clearly a different multiverse from the one in the comics since Multiverse of madness established that there was only one America Chavez, so I don’t see what the big deal is

1:34 with Spiderman at this point the only thing I wanna see is a doctor strong return. No dimensions just Spiderman swinging through portals to the Grand Canyon or some RANDOM place then New York again. Maybe some villain in a montage is in a location he can’t get to and he doesn’t have Tony’s money to get him to that spot. He ask Dr. Strange and he says sure, then he had a 10 minute window to portal there and fight crime until another portal opens to go back to New York. It ties that it’s all connected together, but it’s not TOO much and they can still have fun with new spaces- PLUS it makes the stress of a time limit.

Great video!

LOL Spiderman4 is not the last film, he has 6 more movies on his contract, King in Black is an awesome storyline

.

Its so bizarre that Marvel went through all of that to make Parker a street level hero, just to go cosmic again.

are you showing spoilers for the spiderman game? I've not had the chance to play that one yet as I don't think it's released outside of playstation.

sony is dumb as hell for not allowing spiderman and daredevil to ever interact

A remake of taxi? No. This was never made to be the D.C. comic Joker. Don't review! I thought the film was brilliant. I loved all the music (it took me back to the time of beautiful melodies). The acting was perfect. Don't listen to these reviews. Either these people are complete idiots or it's a Hollywood pollitical thing that they are paying people to do... give bad reviews. The film was brilliant!

I just want the Sony Spider-Man Spin-Off Universe to be over. It's incredibly atrocious in its worst moments and average in its best. Tom Holland's Spider-Man means so much to me. His entire trilogy only consists of 10/10s for me. I could never forgive Sony if they ruin Spider-Man 4 by putting Venom in it. No Way Home was already a multiverse movie. Don't just reuse the sam formula that worked last time, give us something new!

8:36 only if Santa is also played by Robert Downey Jr

Very well done on new video. 🥳

Love what Joaquin Phoenix did as Joker in the first movie. He felt different from the usual Joker and that's what I liked about him. It worked, because at the core you could still see that he's Joker. Sadly, that wasn't the case in Folie à Deux.

IMHO, Ledger's Joker is amazing because he's a force of nature, something beyond humanity and, in the other hand, Phoenix's Joker is amazing BECAUSE of his humanity.

My fav Gotham was from the Gothamseries and my second from the batman. And if allowed i add the arkham knight gotham

The opening sequence of Matt Reeves' THE BATMAN had the right idea. It's set on Halloween, so everyone has an excuse to wear an outlandish costume. Nobody probably even suspected those guys in "skeleton face" were criminals until they started actually committing crimes. And then, there was that guy with what looked like an onion for a head who was absurd even for a comic book story...but it works because he's depicted not as theatrical or goofy, but terrified of Batman. It's Batman who's the real freak there. Costumes in movies like THE PURGE also work because the perpetrators are fed up with society and want to spread terror throughout a city they hate, even though they don't need the disguises because their crimes have been legalized. And in both JOKER and its current sequel, the purpose of the clown garb on the protesters is both to get media attention and to strike back in defiance at a despised figure who really did call them clowns. But there are times when being surreal just doesn't work. As much as I love Walter Hill's 1979 film THE WARRIORS as a guilty pleasure, it is just that - a guilty pleasure - and, like A CLOCKWORK ORANGE, comes off not as a crime drama but as an extremely dark comedy. The characters in THE WARRIORS are supposed to be serious revolutionaries, at least during the early parts of the film. You'd think that they, like all committed anarchists, would not have time for silly dress-up games.

5:11 "The idea of being locked into a specific thing is almost impossible to do when you're doing a movie. Things like The Dark Knight Returns and The Killing Joke are very good for the movie in the sense that they go back to the psychology, and yet they blow apart the conventions and do their own thing, and are smarter about it." - Tim Burton, 1988

Thheee stoooorry is abooouttt the Jooookkeeeer, damn! 🥴 The F is with people.

Just watched it. Loved it. Don't believe the haters, it's a great film.

The first Joker is absolute trash. I think people got drunk on the cinematography, the soundtrack, and of course, the lead performance. But it isn't good, let alone a masterpiece.

I think stories like Condiment King or Kite Man would be great to translate to the big screen because it would show how Gotham wears down on good people. The thing I love about Batman’s villains is that they are all, for the most part, well meaning characters with tragic stories who feel justified in their bad deeds.

Heath ledger: Do I look like a guy with a plan? Joaquin Phoenix Do I look like a guy with a girlfriend?

You're right. Batman movies need to include Batman's full rogues gallery, including the paranormal villains Mr. Freeze, Killer Croc, Solomon Grundy, and Man-Bat. Grim, gritty, and Gothic Gotham should be the mood and style of them, but not constrain the characters' superpowers or costumes, because they are still superhero movies, and must appeal to a geek audience.

Reboots tend to usually happen, but yeah I don't think a movie franchise that's been spanning over a decade now even going through a kind of rough time due to weird stuff going on behind the scenes is going to be able to be rebooted in any successful capacity. EDIT: The best solution I think instead of a reboot would be to have some self contained universes and stories alongside the main one instead of an actual reboot of the MCU. It'd be a better usage of a "multiverse" than what they ended up doing, too. A good several decades back, quite a while before disney owned them, Marvel did something kind of similar-ish with their "Ultimate universe" comics. MCU nick fury technically draws from those as they based Ultimate nick fury off samuel L jackson BEFORE he even had the role in a movie. Always was cool to me. Also, someone might have already brought this up but the hate for the she-hulk show is mainly the cgi and one scene that treats bruce really bad. The pre-emptive aggression towards fans and people even mildly critical that people involved with disney/marvel do sometimes in response to anything other than full praise the last few years probably didn't help the situation either.

Comic joker's origin WAS the red hood. It's "nebulous" as a modern invention but it was outright stated in the first appearance of red hood that it was him the whole time. In that first appearance comic however, he was always a criminal and just rethemed after his skin got bleached, not a guy that had one bad day. Also it was a vat of chemicals, not acid. Harvey was the one that got acid on his face. Going off on a tangent here but Two face's iconic appearance in most iterations is literally just what acid attack victims look like minus the green/blue/purple face coloration. Kinda interestingly one of the more realistic designs for a mainstay villain when you remove the two toned suit. The stuff brought up at 9:01 reminded me the "self aware but still kind of serious at times" batman has been done before, ironically in an animated show titled "batman: the brave and the bold" There's an episode that showcases joker's origin but in a slightly different way as it's an alternate timeline where him going through a traumatic event didn't break his psyche but instead strengthened his moral compass.

The makeup killed the movie for me before I even watched it. Why make a movie about a character if it isn't even going to look like the character it's supposed to be about? The movie itself was just cliched and hackneyed as far as I'm concerned. Giving The Joker a name and a backstory is bad enough, but making a typical disturbed mama's boy with some goofy laughing disorder is almost a mockery of The Joker as a character. As far as I'm concerned Todd Phillips' whole take on The Joker sucks toilet water.

The original ending had Harley kill Art and become the new Joker.

I need my joker to be in a Batman movie... A lot of people are saying that they should have just thrown Batman in here... Itd have to have been based in the future and Batman would have been beating up poor Arthur jokester at the Arkham nursing home. I don't want to see that. This Arthur probably would have just fell down and broke a hip anyway so definitely wouldn't have been able to go up against Batman. It would have been terrible (even if Batman was the correct age in this movie, he's just a kid in this era though). He would not have been any criminal Mastermind to go up against Batman, it would have been too easy and who wants that? * Edited because Google does not like my voice, sorry if they're still mistakes because typing is not easy for me

Marvel's still going to reboot some characters, X Men.

the joker as a character is the juxtaposition of a psychopath with a comedian. he's supposed to crack a stupid joke and laugh hysterically as he detonated bombs he had strapped to an innocent person's chest. every modern iteration of the joker has completely lost the comedic side of the fucking JOKEr which in my opinion is his entire appeal

I really wish that they would’ve made Arthur the cause of the events in the Joker sequel. Inverting the Harley and Joker dynamic and making the courthouse bombing be an escape plan would’ve been nice. Then get rid of the mean spiritedness of the film against its own characters and audience would’ve fixed it quite a bit.

1. Greed 2. Hubris

I've been saying since the first movie this guy wasn't the joker and people kept saying it's a different interpretation and that I just want the same thing over and over. I can easily debunk that argument by saying he's a bad interpretation. An interpretation should add something new and different that benefits it. Not strip the character of every quality that made them interesting and who they were to begin with. And I don't understand how wanting a movie to stay true to it's character wanting the same thing. If you call a movie joker damn right i want the joker.

Plot was a bit messy. but still a fun movie, still better than i thought it would be. I give it an 8.5/10

Absolutely disagree. A reboot is more than necessary.