Видео

Hey, unfortunately I didnt buy this game to test as it is way too expensive here. I have seen some comments about it and looking at some performance videos I dont think it has been fixed, but I could be wrong.

What GPU is paired with that CPU in your laptop?

Yeah, game currently runs pretty poorly on pretty much all systems unfortunately. The framerate I can deal with as you can make a plan to improve that, but the stuttering is the real issue.

Yeah, the ghosting happens in Native TAA as well. I only sae that after making the video. But yeah, it's a good game just terribly made. I'll wait for a few patches before actually playing.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews i don't wait. i will go as far as I can to progress :)

You can run the game from steam, and then once in the game you can press Alt+R and enable AFMF2. You can even enable it globally so that it is on all the time but it would be best to apply it on a game-by-game basis.

Yeah, task manager is good enough if you just want to see usages. It updates slower than some of these overlays but will give you a good idea.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews thanks

Wow, that's a big deviation. What are your specs?

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews ryzen 9 3900x 48gb 3600mhz ddr4 RAM and RTX 4070 i tried to restart my pc and the GPUBusy Deviation drop to 9%.Thanks for the reply <3

@@lightjordan Yeah, 9% sounds more realistic with that CPU. Glad it's sorted now!

100% agree with you! I'm sure performance will improve. Until then you can experience your awesome new GPU in games that arent running as poorly as this one ;)

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews That's very true, thank you. I really hope they fix this game up. As much as I love PC gaming, I do find it pretty frustrating how most modern games have optimization issues. At this point you may as well play some of these games on a console.

@@bahlahkayy I have been having the exact same feelings lately towards PC gaming. I love it, and I love hardware, but boy can it ever be frustrating 🤣

@@bahlahkayy Congratulations, you bought a very good graphic, just make sure to set the shader quality option to low, the problem is more than the low shading cores of AMD graphics.

Your CPU is really not bad. that said, Starfield specifically can be very CPU bound at times meaning that if you upgrade your GPU the CPU will hold back the GPU a bit at times in this game. But for the majority of games that CPU paired with something like a 6800XT will be perfectly fine.

I forgot to mention, the art in this game is hand drawn. A true passion project if I have ever seen one.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews hard drawn wow that's a throwback hell yea

I usually don't play platformers but I'm going to pick it up to help support the artists​@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews

I have and I am in the process of making a video about the differences. Will be a while still, but it's in progress.

Lol! You can still get very high frame rates, even when CPU bottlenecked, and if you are happy with the performance then there is no need to change anything at all. These are not all realistic use cases, it was more self-inflicted to show you what the GPUBusy metric does.

Wow, okay, that is interesting. Talented people you are for sure. Thanks for this lovely game!

great tunes!

It does have TSR yeah, but you can only select High or Low when this is enabled with no explanation of what the differences are. You cant set the render resolution scale unfortunately.

Not sure, but there have been other benchmarks showing AMD underperforming heavily in this game for some reason. Not sure if it's driver related or game related.

@ariaSincere ithink its this game only bc most PS games like God of war and ghost of tsusima runs way better on rx6700xt than on a 3060 ti . But few games where there's some kind of RT is always enabled (like Alan wake and Avatar now this one) they runs better on Rtx3060 ti

Game feels very rushed indeed. Like, the game is good, but it's made very poorly. Way too many issues for me to enjoy it personally.

What resolution do you use again? 1080p? It should be perfectly fine at that resolution with DLSS Quality pethaps.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews for this one I was thinking 1080p yeah, wouldn't dlss quality like kinda ruin the image quality? Not sure how bad or good dlss looks at 1080p

@@UT_Alx It actually doesnt look too bad in this game. So try it without DLSS first, but the town areas are quite a bit more demanding and I suspect you'd need DLSS there.

Yeah, it works perfectly fine on Ryzen processors too.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Thank you! I will identify the severity of my bottleneck with R5 1600 + GTX 1080, I use it mostly for VR where the bottleneck is not as bad, but in Cyberpunk it's very severe

I believe frame gen was planned but they ran into issues and had to disable it. Hopefully it doesnt take too long for them to add it again.

Lol 🤣

You should!

Thank you man, this is appreciated!

Yeah 100%. Dropping shadows to low really increases the performance a lot, and you can still get a decent gaming experience at 1440p here. Bar the stuttering issues of course :(

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews is the stuttering an AMD issue or a game issue?

@@VoidyWay It stutters on all systems, so not AMD specific. Though the performance on AMD GPUs are lower than what it should be for some reason. Not sure if it is driver or game related.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews it will probably increase a little bit. but the problem is AMD only release 1 driver a month!

What is your framerate before you enable frame gen? And what is the framerate after?

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews I capped it at 60fps using Rivatuner so I don't really know the max fps

@@LK-md1id Ah okay, makes sense then. Yeah, if your final framerate is 60 fps it will feel terrible. Best use case for frame gen is to get a base framerate of at least 60 fps, and then take that to 100+ fps with frame gen. If you cap it to 60 the input latency and visual artifacts will be terrible unfortunately. The tech was mostly developed with high refresh rates in mind, not to go from 30 fps to 60 fps.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews I see.. ok Imma lower some graphics settings and run some tests. TQ

The Intel degradation issue affects stability though, not performance. The latest microcode is also set to resolve all issues related to that, except if your CPU has degraded already unfortunately.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Well yeah, but the MC updates do reduce performance somewhat. I just felt like taking a stab at Intel after you said "14th gen CPU" as if Intel was the only choice, just like so many are doing with Nvidia.

@@Bassalicious I only use this 14600KF as it has been my bench system for quite some time. I bought a 12700K a while ago as a bench system, and before that I had a 5900X. So I kept the same platform and just slotted in the 14600KF. If I had my pick I'd use a 7800X3D, but an in-socket upgrade was the better choice financially at the time.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Totally makes sense. In-socket upgrades are hard to come by in Intel land.

@@Bassalicious And if rumours are true, Arrow Lake motherboards will only be a single generation. If true it'll be really bad.

Yeah, the town area is indeed even more demanding, I mention that. Just overall a complete technical mess.

Nice trick 🧠

I agree

🤣🤣🤣

You mean semen? 😏👉👉

@@Jakiyyyyy what kind of diet are you on ? 😲

I use GeForce Experience for those. It only works on Nvidia GPUs though, just FYI.

Yeah indeed, I do mention that it is even heavier in town, but I have refunded for now. The only reason why I tested here again is because I already have video in this area. Didnt want to risk going to town and then go over my 2 hours before I could refund. I refunded it on 110 minutes 🤣

Yeah, I have no idea what's causing that. Other people also said CPU bottleneck but it happens at 1440p and 4K too, so it's definitely not CPU bound. Very strange. Yeah, this is a brand new clean installation on this system. Havent touched anything and I am using a capture card on a 2nd PC for all my recordings, so it's also not due to screen recording software. I dont know, tried a few things offline but it's the same. Only thing I didnt check was to disable Anti-Lag. WIll do so in the morning.

I saw Krizp's video and in his video with lower end GPUs FSR also sometimes performs worse. I am inclined to think it's a game bug / issue. In the one scene I put both configs next to each other and he went from 62 fps to 57 fps by enabling FSR 3 Quality on a 2060. ruclips.net/video/l-acWfl71uc/видео.html

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews I mean I use antilag myself so it shouldn't be the culprit. Not sure honestly. Edit: just checked the vid you linked, I had no clue. Must be an issue with the fsr implementation then I guess...another issue 🫣 Anyway a couple of things I noticed trying settings myself: 1) shadows on low actually removes some shadows , hence why I try to keep it on medium (for example, in the opening scene check shadows from poles) 2) I think xess works better than fsr, even though it has a weird ghosting around the main character in some instances

Yeah, there are definitely some shadows that disappear. It might impact the experience, depending on how sensitive you are to these things. I tried XeSS and the visuals look better, but the ghosting is worse for some reason. When the framerate is low enough, at around 30 fps or so I see myself like 6 times when turning haha! This game shouldve stayed a bit longer in the oven is my thinking.

AFMF2 is part of the latest AMD driver package, so you can just download the latest driver from AMD's website.

I noticed it on the 6700XT as well. VRAM would start at around 7GB and end up at 11GB more or less. Not sure if it is a VRAM issue, or if the game just slowly loads more assets into VRAM. Either way, the game's performance is horrible currently 😔

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews at first I tought maybe the vram was the problem but now I think stutters anyway even at 6gb of usage. Horrible performance rn hope they fix :(

The game can look good, but it's not worth it for this kind of performance unfortunately. I would urge people that are interested to stay away a few weeks at least. That suggestion will fall on deaf ears though as it already has a ton of positive reviews on Steam, which I just dont understand 🤷‍♂️

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews U say that this game look good? I actually don’t get it. 99% of ppl say that UE5 games look stunning but it isn’t true. They all look the same and runs the same. These f***d up UE filters, assets, desaturation, artifacts and washed out filter are present in every UE game. High res textures don’t define games beauty, artstyle, colour grading and well balanced placed by hand shadows does. I swear, only by looking at any UE game I know what engine does game uses and it’s not compliment. Nowadays more games looks the same because of this f****g UE, games aren’t uniqe visually anymore. I don’t give a f***ck about 4K textures in every corner. Before UE developers used to lower textures that aren’t visible (corners, very shadowed places) and it was called ”optimization”. Now developers use these f****g assets and prerendered 10000K textures everywhere which is pointless. They should focus at employing true artists. Tell me why games like RDR2, Doom: Eternal, Cyberpunk, Resident Evil 2: Remake, Tlou, GoW, DMC5, etc. looks TEN times better than UE games. And you know what? All these games that I quoted have shitty textures but the engines and artists artworks are uniqe and uncopyable and it makes them so gorgeous. What’s more, authorial engine urges developers to check every part of their work because It’s THEIR engine which provides optimization!!!!!!!!!! I’ll say that again, F***CK UNREAL ENGINE 5. What an UNREAL mess…

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Even Heroes of might and magic III, Diablo 2 and Icewind Dale looks better than this shit. And look at this animations 🤣 Gothic has better animations than this shitf**ck.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Fun fact. As I love Cyberpunk, Witcher 1 and 3 (W2 is a piece of shit) Im 101% sure that W4 is going to be crap. As u can exprect… UE, DEI, SWEET BABY INC.. As an hard user I think it’s time to pass out new releases and play GOG games cause they are GOOD and used to be!!!

Wait! Did RUclips ereased my whole ass comment or just I don’t see it?

🤣🤣🤣 I should play well enough at 1080 Low? But the stuttering will be more concerning.

This 4070 Ti Super is my 2nd favourite card that I've personally owned. Now if only the 4070 had 16GB of VRAM. Happy to hear you're having a good time!

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews got the asus tuf, with 3070 tuf also... 1440p is enough even on 4k display a would say

Never escaping the allegations 🤣

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews 😂

100%. The CPU usage shown is an average usage across all cores / threads.

Appreciate it! Yeah, shader quality and shadows have a big impact on performance here, with not as big an impact on the visuals. Makes me think it might be bugged, well shaders at least.

First of all, laptop is always slower than desktop with same specs, second of all a 4060 is way worse than a 4070 Ti Super in the first place, of course you get worse performance

Unfortunately the 4060 laptop variant is slower than the 4060 desktop variant, and the 4070 Ti Super is more than twice as fast as the desktop variant. You will have to use DLSS balanced or performance, or disable RT. Not sure that DLSS performance will get you to 60 fps with RT on at 1440p.

"Gaming" laptop 🤦🤦🤦 With what it cost you, you prolly could have gotten a 4070 based computer. Also, an i7 paired with a 4060? You should have consulted your purchase before buying.