Видео

My 7800x3d and 4080 super gets 80-90fps on medium with quality and FG

I don't understand, what's the difference between the PC Game Pass and the Steam version ? Both are running on a PC with raytracing and all ? No?

i have use GTX1080Ti AORUS GIGABYTE and i consider buy one more VGA. and i select RX6800XT! and wanna get same brand stuff the AORUS haha btw this Benchmark look so really powerful. even setup to 1080p Ultra and the FPS is 75-90. this point make me impressive!

I see many people claiming they're not CPU bound because CPU usage isn't showing 100%. Most of these softwares show the overall CPU usage, not per-core, and most of the time games aren't capable of taking advantage of all the available cores. I tell them to change their resolution and only the resolution to the lowest; if they're still getting the same FPS, then they are CPU bound. Imagine someone gaming on a Threadripper, that shit will barely use 5% of CPU lol :D By the way, there's one game that is actually quite stunning as far as utilizing available cores go. Check Doom Eternal benchmarks. Unlike most, if not (nearly) all of the games where per-core speeds matter quite a bit as they cannot utilize more than a few cores, Doom Eternal can utilize nearly all available ones. 3800X/5800X/7800X usually yield superior FPS in those games, but in Doom Eternal 3950X/5950X/7950X which feature more cores but a lower per core speed yield more FPS. It's a technical marvel!

I don't understand why they just don't put a powerful cpu into a GPU, add 128 gigabyte of ddr 7 shared ram and 4 ssd slots directly on the graphics card! It would get rid of the ridiculous bottlenecking! It could future proof for many years also. We are almost in 2025, we should have 8k gaming graphics! Nothing should be 1080p or 1440p! Its like these people still are using Betamax and VCR's in their home entertainment systems!

I just got my new system with 4070 ti super and I love it.However, I still have my "old" monitor with 2k@75hz. I tried to play Helldivers 2 today with DSR@4k and my card goes up to 105 degrees but it is around 75-80 at 2k@75hz. So I am struggling if I should get a 2k@180hz monitor or get a 4k one (not sure how many hz for 4k yet) or may I should just wait for monitor price to goes down or a new one comes? I mostly play single player games except I play Overwatch religiously. Any opinions would be appreciated :)

When i was testing the black ops 6 beta on gamepass and steam i found the gamepass version better performance wise and less issues the only annoying one being downloading the game through the broken xbox app for pc other than that it ran smoothly on gamepass compared to steam

Buddy, thank you a ton; this video taught me that RivaTuner has a Reflex setting for the frame cap. Thanks to you, it's solved and all of them (frame generation, frame cap and VSYNC) are usable at the same time! For years, I've been using what I call the "HoboSync"; VSYNC ON from NVidia Control Panel combined with a Frame Cap from RivaTuner to eliminate screen tearing and input lag at the same time. It's also good for your GPU on the long run. The frame generation technology I never got to use because as you're trying to showcase in this video, it introduced the massive input lag back. No more! edit: Tested with STALKER 2. Smooth as butter!

Stuttering and low FPS is anomaly 😅

For this to work do I need to keep rtss open when running the game?

Is that Afrikaans accent I hear

if someone has got an i3 cpu than obv that person is playing at 1080p . playing at 1440p with an i3 is obv bottleneckking. i have an i3 and playing cyberpunk at 1080p with no bottlenecks whatsoever.

you test in unstable cpu-intesvie location. do a normal benchark outside a town, and do 3 runs to average results.

I’ve got an I5-10400F and 3060 and my cpu usage is 100% while my gpu doesn’t go past like 46-47 usage. I honestly don’t know if this is ok and what to do about it. Maybe my cpu is just too weak for the game?

So I have a question. If I have a ryzen 7600x bottleneck (bought 7600x like 3 months ago to wait for 9800x3d with normal price and ofc availability so I would sell my cpu so also didn't want to spend much money) with 4070 ti super is it possible that it cause stutters even if I lock my fps with cpu usage less than 50% even sometimes less than 30%? I have stutters in most games. For example I have like 400fps in cs2 so I lock it on 280fps but still have stuttering, even against bots so it's not internet problem (cs2 sometimes has some problems with network - loss). Also I checked my old gtx 1070 with new pc and it seems like there are no stutters in cs2 and much less in different games like PUBG. I tested some games with same settings and lock fps at ~85-99% usage of gtx1070 (just min fps which I got) and then tested same games with same settings and same fps lock with 4070 ti s (so if I had min 70 fps with gtx1070 I lock it at 70fps, test and then I lock fps at 70 with 4070 ti s too) and I had much more stutters with 4070ti s even if gpu usage was 60% with cpu usage ~40%. So I had a similar cpu usage (never more than 60%) and ofc much less gpu usage with 4070 but much more stuttering. I'm not sure if it's a gpu (or its driver) problem or just a bottleneck. I don't know if it is possible to have cpu bottleneck stuttering with cpu usage ~30-40% by frame cap. Without locking fps it's like ~50% cpu usage (gpu 75-85) so still not 100% like in the first part of the video. I saw some stutters in the first part so i decided to ask if it is possible to have them with 80% gpu and 50% cpu usage because I see that there are no stutters in the 2nd case on video. Also I notice that if I lock fps in cs2 on 220, it's never 220, it's like 195-209 in match (I can get 220 without players or bots on map). The problem is that with gtx1070 if I lock 220 it's 220 with some drops and also even 1%low and 0,1low are lower with 4070 ti s. Without fps lock it's terribly low with avg 400fps+ and 1%low - 95 fps, 0.1%low - 60. Also in different games 1% and 0.1% low are awful too.

And this is best case scenario, imagine those with <13th gen CPUs like myself. Horrible experience.

Bro, this game gets the exact same frame-rate as black myth wukong at 4k DLAA cinematic LOL.

So u guys buying high end card to play at Medium settings?

congrats on getting the RTX 4090

Was the new Steam recording function enabled during the Steam version's benchmark run?

GOG maybe faster )))

Getting under 40 fps with a 4090 at 1080p......lmao this game needs optimization badly

Impressive benchmarks comparing the Steam and Xbox Game Pass versions of STALKER 2 on an RTX 4090! It's encouraging to hear that even with an RTX 4060, you're achieving excellent graphics at 2K resolution. With upcoming patches, the game's performance is bound to improve further. I also create videos about STALKER 2 and was amazed by the unexpected reactions when throwing a grenade into an anomaly-truly mind-blowing!"

Here is why ReSTIR DI/GI is so expensive TODAY. The base cost of these techniques are hight because you start tracing rays per pixel. If you play in 4K DLLS Performance mode that mean you trace for each pixel in 1920x1080 grid. Now for example CP2077 shoots 6 ray per pixel up to 2 bounces for each fram of that grid. Now you do the math on it how many calculations that is... The great advantage of this is that although today it is heavy even on the best GPUs this cost is much more scalable then any other technique meaning, that ReSTIR DI/GI traces against everything withing BVH and camera view. If RTX 50series will again double the speed in which rays can be calculated that means you will in theory get double the performance. So RT is actually smart way of how to light the scenes and I wouldn't blame developers wanting to leverage that. With that being said it is important to understand that not everygame necessarily needs RT lighting or reflections. From what I have seen so far the biggest impacts are when the game uses a lot of dynamic lights, changing time of day or dense forests. Other than that you can get away with pre-baked lighting and game will look great in the still shots but as soon as you introduce any dynamic objects in the scene (torches, lights, particles, muzzle flashes...) it will start to show it's videogamy look. My point is that the RT feature have this sort of flat cost which means that future GPUs will not neccesarily need to be more powerful to get the same results and focus might shift from lighting to simulating physics or A.I. for example.

GP over 6-7 fps difference in certain spots. Not much, but they can do a lot of difference in heavy scenarios. Steam bloatware lord confirmed.

If in playing an old games from The 2000’s with rtx4060 i5 gen13 , does asus 4k can be an option for Me?

Would've loved to have seen a loading time comparison

Game runs fantastic for me. Runs smooth, no stuttering or at least none that I've noticed. I've had a few bugs with the UI and got stuck in the scenery once. By far the only significant issue I've had is crashing which has happened more times than I can remember. The game is so good though I don't really care and I know it'll get fixed. Game pass 3090 12700k 4k Dlss balanced Fsr frame gen Epic settings. 100fps+ in the wilds 70-90 in towns

Playing Stalker 2.. it is epic 😎 ❤ kept all the aspects of the original three games ❤ plus some new stuff. ❤ even at rookie level I am struggling 😵‍💫 which makes it a great game ❤

Nearly 200W on cpu.... jesus

I feel like I've been very luck regarding STALKER 2. I run a 9700x and 4070ti super and I've had almost no issues. The game runs great. I usually get between 90 - 120 fps, 2k, max settings. Worst FPS drops happens in towns where it can hover around the mid 80's. No stuttering however. Usually I'm super unlucky with unoptimized games, lol.

Interesting vid, I usually try to avoid Microsoft/Xbox app when I can but bought BO6 on there as was cheaper Stalker 2 actually running a lot better on my 7900XTX, loading is faster also after getting killed, where as on the 4080 it felt like sometimes all assets being loaded, something slows it down and then again those horrible slowdowns in certain areas on the 4080 Could be an Nvidia driver issue, XTX I haven't run into any issues so far like I was before

I wonder how good this game will be in 6 months

Interesting. Very slight advantage for GP. On another note, I find it interesting how much more demanding TSR is compared to DLAA. My initial benchmarks through the same area you tested here was done using TSR Ultra Quality with 100% resolution scaling. With DLAA, I actually get about 4% higher performance at 1080p, and up to 10% at 4K. DLAA looks better, too.

Finally, feature parity between Xbox and Steam versions haha.

Cod warzone is broken on steam battlenet version is the best

Testing whether there are performance differences in Stalker 2 between the Xbox Game Pass version of the game and the Steam version with the RTX 4090 at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. We just do a short run here in the first town you come across as it can be both CPU and GPU limited. I have a slight overclock on the GPU VRAM here, bumping it up to 24gbps, up from the usual 21gbps.

oof, the game doesn't look that impressive and to have it run this poorly on a really good PC like this, is sad.

What drivers for the graphics card? Please mention

М Положительные отзывы

Thanks for showing this. I'm going to wait to buy it until after a few patches.

I'm not sure if this was worth a seperate title from the 2020 one

Im planing to buy a ryzen 7600X and a 4080 Super. It's a good combo? How it will run this game compared to you? It also have 32 GB DDR5 6000MHz of ram and 2TB SSD.

you need to lock framerates and turn framegen off. If the framerate is allowed to run wild it dips massively.

My pc specs are rtx 4080 super and amd ryzen 9 7950x3d and its not running well like it has stuttering issues and like its laging very badly game is great but i wished it was a little well optimised and i was playing in 4k

You've got a cpu bottleneck lol

Just wait for the hot fixes coming in the next day or two. Can only get better from then on.

Who would have thought that this card would have outlast and be future proof having been launched in June 16th of 2016 and still showing off by playing games developed 5 years after Ha!!! this card is still a beast at 8gb of RAM.

I have 120 fps~ with 4k ultra rt ultra fg on dlss quality with 4080 and 7500f 7500f makes bottaneck in this game for a first time even cp2077 with full graphics didnt cause bottlaneck and i bought 7800x3d from friend and im sure even 7800x3d will have bottlaneck

I honestly can't trust any performance benchmark without the GPU busy stat