Видео

so is there any virgin/bethulah in Isaiah prophecy (dual) ??? not at all ! so please get your magical so called tammuz virgin birth of Jesus behind !an "Almah/Young noble maiden unmarried" (betrothed in the case of Maryam), never was and will never be a "Bethulah/virgin", as the prophetress in Isaih was pregnant !

It is just someone's name: Pele-joez-el-gibbor-Abi-ad-sar-shalom. Why all the fuss?

The verse, rightly translated should say, "For a child is born for us; a son is given to us, and government will be on his shoulder, and his name will be call wonderful counsellor, a mighty ruler, founder of the eon, prince of peace;" KtK

i notice that you left out the titles for Christ that are most important to this topic. Titles like God (John 1 v1), God of the Apostles (John 20v28), Creator of all things (John 1v1-3, Col 1v16 & 17, Heb 2v9-11, Jer 10v16). If you put in those titles this video would be gibberish.

The problem is what Dale just described is polytheism. There are two Gods in his religion. One that always was and another that triumphed and then ascended into Godhood to be worshiped. That is two totally distinct people that dont share an origin. Then you worship two, even if they work together they are still two.

Divine revelation doesn't even teach the trinity Heres the first verse thst puts trinity as a false teaching Revelation 1:1 God gave Jesus a relationship Jesus has limited knowledge in heaven He didn't know the revelation until God gave him it

It's actually not difficult. Absolutely no one should be praying to Jesus.

I hope that there could be discussions between Unitarian Christian alliance with Tovia Singer as he tends to interpret the Old testament to denounce Christianity.

Awesome presentation.

"his name Shall be" is an absolute tense. If you think present day jews care anything about Christians learning Hebrew, or care about Christians at all for that matter, you are gravely deceived.

Good!

Phillipians 2:5-11 NIV 5 In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in very nature[a] God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; 7 rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature[b] of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death- even death on a cross! 9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Also scripture says of God God is not a man that he should lie. No one can see God. God cannot die. Jesus is therefore the only way to a perfect sacrifice because God promised things to Abraham that he needed a mortal to obey and execute in order to accomplish. God’s Holy Spirit dwelling in Jesus until it had to leave jesus at the last moment before death. Jesus felt this and asked why he was leaving.

Jesus last words …..

James is following and being consistent with scripture and what it teaches about Jesus and Dale has a problem with that.

Bart Erhman take notes 📝 Jesus is YHWH

This is what I argue all the time. “God” is only ever conflated to and synonymous to “THE FATHER.” That’s why “Son of God” is the same as saying “Son of the Father”. It’s logical and proper. But nowhere in scripture is “God” conflated with the “Son”. Otherwise, scripture would have had no problem addressing the Father as “The Father of God”. If the phrase “The Father of God” was found in scripture, that would prove two things: 1) That the Son is God, and 2) That God has a Father, just as scripture already confirms that God has a son (Son of God)

I'm stealing and posting on tictok. 👍❤️

There is no deity in the New Testament either.

Listening to people who get it is such a relief then people who dont.

Prot nonsense

The True God ruclips.net/video/RZuZYchq4Sw/видео.html

Amen!! Only the truth here. Sad most Christians don’t care to learn the truth

Narrow is the gate to the Father and broad is the road to destruction. Choose carefully.

trnity a pagan concept , im not a a christian by the way

I'm still listening, but I've reached a point where I want to say that Mr. Tuggy has no clue concerning the doctrine of the Trinity. He has no idea what it means, nor does His god, by his own confession, have the ability to become God-man. And since I'm commenting now, Tuggy made three statements in the first 3 minutes that undermined his credibility completely. I did listen to everything he said. He assumes unitarianism in the first 8 points, and the 9th point is gibberish. Philosophical smoke and mirrors He actually made a couple of excellent defenses for atheism, too.

If the Holy Spirit is sent, doesn’t that mean he is not God but a separate distinct spirit sent by God?

Trinity is STOOPID.

Deuteronomy 6:4 NIV Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. Amen.

The ONLY answer is NO. Jesus is NOT YHWH

Here's more context on John 1:1 that may help clarify to you what it is saying. In the beginning was the Truth, and the Truth was with God, and the Truth was God.

All one needs to do is look at the context of Philippians 2. "being in the form of God" is a continuation of "let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus". So the "form" referred to is the conduct and authority Jesus Christ exercised from God. This same authority or "mind of Christ" is available for all christians to exercise.

This teaching is a good example of the problem with the movement presently. The problem being, you do not understand that God is Yea and Amen. That means that there is absolutely a right answer. So your "neutral" teaching does nothing for the body of Christ and is a big reason Unitarians are disregarded. Praying to Jesus is idolatry. Stephen asked Jesus to receive his literal soul in the grave because he was about to be there, and Jesus is the only one who conquered the grave... 2 Corinthians 1:17-20 17 When I therefore was thus minded, did I use lightness? or the things that I purpose, do I purpose according to the flesh, that with me there should be yea yea, and nay nay? 18 But as God is true, our word toward you was not yea and nay. 19 For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us, even by me and Silvanus and Timotheus, was not yea and nay, but in him was yea. 20 For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us. So here is the doctrine dear people, Pray to the Father God alone "in the name of", Jesus Christ, Christ Jesus, Dear Lord, name of Your Son, name of our Master.

Very well said presentation. I do find it extreme that you do not use the name "christian" simply because trinity doctrine is associated with it. Perhaps that is why this movement is so important. Further, @50:50 Jerry Wierwille's question about "denying your family" is way out of context. Jesus told this to the Jews because they were engulfed in worldly traditions, greedy gain, and self centered lives. I laughed out loud when Rohan asked Jerry how his family is doing. @57:32 The muslim man asks "do I have to believe Jesus died for my sins in order to have salvation". Anyone that asks that question does not believe Jesus Christ is the Messiah, the Son of God. This is the biggest problem with muslims. I have yet to meet a muslim that confess God had a Son, and therefore I have yet to meet a christian muslim.

How do we reconcile God being against human sacrifice and man not being able to atone for another mans sins and Jesus sacrifice?

Superb!

Are the agents you sometimes send men? Is your son a man? Or is your son much more than a man? Can your son be calked a man? Is it right to call your son a man? Is it wrong to call your son an agent if you send him out on a mission for you? Is not sending your son a sending of the best kind of agent?

Your logic is fallacious. You said that someone who has a god is, by definition, someone other than the one true God. A person might say, "I'm going to see my personal trainer to have a 3 hour workout". Does that preclude the person who said that from being a personal trainer themselves? Of course not. They could be a personal trainer, but hire a personal trainer who has more experience and expertise than himself.

Excellent session. Very good.

Unitarian Christian. What an oxymoron.

Whenypu have a 3some. Thats called 3 people in the bed at the same time. God can not be a man to be in a bed. Christianity is rejected by the bibles

Exactly - this honesty and logic about Trinitarian "proof texts" is something most Trinitarians are UNABLE to admit or even comprehend. Trinitarian indoctrination prevents it.

I like both of them so too bad they couldn't get along

LOL! Engineers, indeed! Computer science, software engineer, here, with a degree summa cum laude. BUT more important than that, to me, is the fact that Christ was one of the most *_Logical_* individuals of all time -- not merely logical in the physical realm, but *_Spiritually Logical._* I go on about this in my book, *_The Logical Christian._* "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent" (John 17:3, ESV). 😎♥✝🇺🇸💯

I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE.

The gospel includes the fact that Jesus is to be prayed to as being YHWH (Romans 10:13).

The best way to be a disciple and differentiate from other religions is to Matthew 10:7-8 [7] As you go, proclaim this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven has come near.’ [8] Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse those who have leprosy, drive out demons. Freely you have received; freely give. Miracles are what what made Jesus and then the disciples different Otherwise it's just another religion with a God who doesn't do anything (anymore)

He keeps falling back on interpreting Paul’s words as public perception of Jesus rather than Paul’s own teaching

Jesus never renounced, rebuked, criticized or re-educated those who ( in the Gospels) worshipped Him. Thomas distinctly said “My Lord and my God”. What could be clearer evidence than that.

He gives no proof or evidence that the passage refers to the Greeks estimation of Jesus rather Jesus’ journey from heaven to earth and back to heaven.