Видео

In person I can hear motor sounds. Maybe they have in camera canceling of lens sounds.

Do you plan to bring powerbank with you to also power the camera from usb-c? If you will record 4k24 or 30 with low bitrate and display open.. it will not overheat. For anything else I would use any active cooling. If you dont want to look like crazy person (me) with the big ventilator, buy it. Also for more client stuff I would buy maybe more pieces from Ulanzi. While using one unit charging the second etc. And it is a smaller package than big rig with big ventilator 😆 the np-f battery is good but heavy addition.

Though big vent cools the camera much better and faster

I know 🤣 maybe I should have refrase that. though its not the top end

With what you are comparing?

@@VitValentaEnglish Compared with DSLR or SONY - Nikon MILC

I agree compared to DSLR. Other fullframe mirrorless are close to same weight 660 to 700g. Maybe it's just a feeling though 😅 what camera do you use? I guess you might have favorite model.

You never had overheating?

Attached fan to a magic arm should be more flexible for placing. Only slightly harder part is to make the attachment solid.

ahh maybe an L Bracket plate can be used @@VitValentaEnglish

Like for 4K? You can use HDMI or now there is CR-N700 which has 12G SDI.. though our company does promote NDI a lot, and all of these have 4K support in NDI/IP video. And the Image is alright. Noone will notice that you use NDI instead of SDI. Haha😁

@@VitValentaEnglish Yea, I meant 4k output which i believe, and correct me if i'm wrong, can only be achieved with an HDMI cable, not the SDI on the N500. N700 is out of my range.

I don’t have any spontanious shakes..In occasions when I pan diagonally I looks that it might be something un-correct. But with paid jobs I usually do are on a tripod and zooming frequently like concerts or interviews or handheld talker to a camera and there I don't have issues at all. Camera has IBIS settings as well - you can set auto focal length or specify. Maybe they have manual settings and therefore it has issues.

lately I notice that the VC is not perfect indeed. Sometimes it seems that knows I want static shot, then it is very good. When I am paning it seems to get it good as well. but in spontanious movement it does jumps oddly. It is tough to say, but It is not gimbal it is just Vibration Compensation But what other choise we have with stabilisation - the old Sony 18-105mm F4 and that had big issues with focusing in my experiece. I rather rig out my camera to have more stable handling.

that is the porshe there - I should have put a title there

For vlogs is maybe more suitable the kit lens 16-50mm its much smaller and little wider - for more professional things I would go with this Tamron. Only down side is that it is non-parfocal - if you manualy focus and then zoom after focusing it will be blurry. I saw people using this lens with FX30 and none of them complained :D so go for it

Only downside is the size. If you are ok with that then go for it. The lens is wide enough for talking to camera and the reach for telephoto is better than kitlens. Aperture is the bright and it is sharp wide open. In low light you will get goosebumps. .. I should have open the video with that 😅

@@VitValentaEnglish thanks!

Asi to je v manuálu, bylo by fajn, kdyby tam byly nějaké bubliny vysvětlující ta omezení.. zpětnou vazbu jsme posílali Canonu... snad časem srovnají tyto detaily... kde jste kupovali kameru?

@@VitValentaEnglish Tak přesný původ nevím. Bylo to s ještě dalším vybavením přes další firmu. Ale mám z nich ohromnou radost. Máme Jak CR-N300 tak i CR-N500.

May it serve You well. Sony is twice the price, I am not sure if it is two times better - hahaha

That may depend on the camera also. I never noticed with my a6500.

Did you find any alternative that you have now?

@@VitValentaEnglish Unfortunately not yet.

@@SavasKara i mean, there isn't really any. The sony 70-200F4 is a FF telephoto lens thats quite big and way more expensive. And another option would be the tamron 70-180F2.8 that comes with a larger aperture but without stabilizer and is also quite expensive.

I don't really know what people want. They'd have to stick a 200-600 full frame with teleconverter to beat this 525 mm ff equivalent extremely compact telephoto lens that's also extremely compact. It's probably the best compact zoom on the market.

Do you have the NDI tools instaled? If yes, Try connect with cable not WiFi

I have done every thing you explain on this video. Right i am using the Wifi connection.

I am using my iphone skype account as invitee,the same name and account,would it be the problem?

@@nawxassnazari6877 I dont think it should a problem, the NDI sources are created localy on the PC where you set the NDI usage. Try to do it from the other side to check if it's the problem.

No 😁 I am from Czechia, but accents are probably similar

Fistly make one or two private test streams to see what you need to tune up, scenes, audio levels and etc.. for streaming to two or more channels is plugin Multiple RTMP outputs.. one stream is in normal OBS settings and others is in the plugins window.. let me know if you would rather see it in a video 😁

I am not sure, If it something that clicks its probably not usual. Fucusing element can move but it would be almost silent. If you are nervous make a video and send it to sony support.

little but its corrected in the image processing if you have it anabled

I have not, but I would look for reviews with a7r2 or later model to see how sharp it is.

Tamron 17-28mm is shorter zoom I bet on Tamron for sharper image at least in the center.. But this Sony is very good in terms of sharpness.. if only it was half of the current price :D You got good idea for comparison video :)

There are really only a few Sony lenses that I am enthusiastic about; among these are the Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 and the Sony SEL 50mm f/1.8 (for APSC format). Some other glass; such as the Sony-Zeiss 24-70mm f/4 are mediocre performers while, the really solid performers are the GM Series which are quite heavy and very-very expensive. My favorite mid-range zoom for the e-mount camera is the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 which I use on both my APSC cameras such as the A6600 and on my full-frame A7iii. IMO - I have no problems shooting people with the 28-75mm on a crop camera. The 42mm equivalent on the short side prevents major distortion. Here are some people images from the Tamron 28mm f/2.8 lens on the Sony A6400... rpcrowe.smugmug.com/Dia-de-los-Muertos-Hollywood-Forever-3019/i-tFw2487 If I needed a wide angle zoom for my Sony cameras I would opt for the 17-28mm... In fact the Tamron trio of the 17-28mm, 28-75mm and the forthcoming 70-180mm f/2.8 would be an excellent combination. I am assuming that the 17-28mm and upcoming 70-180mm will be of equal quality to my 28-75mm f/2.8...

Right now, when I need to go wider that 28mm on my APSC cameras, I slap on the small, relatively inexpensive and excellent quality 12mm Rokinon f/2.0 lens. I usually don't need to go wider that 28mm on a full frame but, if I do - I would carry the 12mm on my A6600. (BTW: I have both an A6400 and an 6600)...

What I think - at pictures 4-6 of yours (rectangular net) we see camera compensating barel distortion, I believe if you turn it off it should be ok, but the wide angle side will draw more fisheye look. I forgot to try that when I was making my video - how much was actual optics involved and how much was software... I dont see black lines in out of focus area at pictures with people, just some sort of character of blur that lens make of image out of focus. Some lenses just dont have that amazing soft bluriness as others do. For example: I hated Canon 50mm F1.4 boheh - lens wasnt really sharp as I wanted to be and bokeh did some sort of odd waves - so I have sold it.. using sigma 30 mm instead :D

@@VitValentaEnglish I checked everything with and without camera corrections, with exactly the same result. The problem with the bokeh is only when the camera is over 16mm, the alignment of the lenses is not perfect and then you have double imagen in the bokeh, this happens always (with people or not people). But of course, when you have lines (or branches, trees) and contrast is very noticeable. Usually, with fix lenses, you don't have this problem. So yes, the lens is very good but not perfect. Please take you camera, look for branches or thin lines, set the SONY 16-55mm F2.8 G at 55mm F2.8 and make a series of pictures from focus to slightly out of focus... you will see the problem very clear.

I could see images only in camera and on TV they brought, because they didnt allow us to put inside our own SD cards. It looks nice, very saturated - if it has same properties and compression as previous panasonics it will be great.. also with lower noise at higher lSO. I hope l will have better look for review in a month or so if l manage to borrow this badboy :)