Видео

Why do you guy look like your so full of sh--t

Thank you soooooooo much bro 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 I was so frustrated and I felt sooo relived ewatching your video...❤❤❤

Hey! you deserve more support. lets have me from Bangladesh...

lasko!!!

Hi everyone What’s the size dimension in Canon LZ1326 lens case that comes with ef 70-200mm f2.8 mark iii lens Not the box dimension I meant the Canon LZ1326 lens case

Saw a chap who used the swipe bar to flick between eye detect and spot focus (all others he disabled) and that seemed like a great use for the swiper.

Please fix your mic

works every time. Thank you!

insaaaaaane this worked perfectly for me! the magic of code 🪄 thank you for saving all of us!

By the way, RF lenses will never work with EF bodies because of the distance between the lens and the sensor. you can add distance (EF-R adapter) to compensate for the missing mirror system but you can't subtract that distance without destroying the camera

Got it today for $1300 CDN used. Not in perfect shape but it still sells for $2300 new. I think I got a good deal.

I only have an old e500 Olympus and I wanna get a new camera but I can’t decide between xt30ii or a6400, I mainly do portraits, automotive, landscape, and street photography

7:42 what lens did you use for filming?

Omg lifesaver bro! I had to do it 3 times for it to finally work but got there in the end. Saved me a tonne of time

You saved my day !!! MAGIC

now review the 100-300 2.8 rf XD

How do you get involved in that? Contact construction companies?

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 for Canon EF are a better options for a fractions of price.

A year later, still recommend the ef? :) Need to make a fast decision. Thinking about the rf 35 1.8 too

Wow ❤

Yo Joey! Good meeting you man, and great content dude, keep it up! This LUT video is a real take away for me

What about Color Matrix and Characteristucs? Why didn't you show it?

I just hate the external zoom and it takes more than 45 degree rotation while having more resistant than the EF III, definitely not worth the price. I was lucky to get EF III version near mint condition for $900

I still use 70-200 L 2.8 IS (first gen) with R6 ii. Works great and nothing to complain about on the image quality. Focusing could be a little faster, I think that's the main reason I would go with RF in the future. But EF mount works on older film cameras as well.

I got the MKIII EF for my R6 Mark II because it was about $1000 cheaper brand new vs the RF version. Also, the EF version doesn't extend which is important because I shoot hockey and need the front of the lens (lens hood) to touch the plexi glass at all times to keep reflections to a minimum. With the RF this isn't really possible because the lens extends and contracts making zooming VERY difficult. Also, the EF is sharp as a tack and NEVER misses focus.

Thank You! I learned a lot! I will revisit!

F1.4 primes still offer 2 extra stops of light over F2.8. So that's not really a replacement to primes in low light situations.

Film look just hit different, but mine is xt3 and dont have nostagic😅

Give me 1 plz 😅

AMAZING🎉🎉🎉

Can you list all the cameras in your collection..!!?

You reallly recommend the xt30?

If this is a sponsorship or paid promotion, you can get into some decent legal trouble if you don't label the short correctly. 👌

Or we can use a lamp.

I can't even open the project properly on Mac... The issue happened suddenly and won't go away even I tried to install Premiere for a thousand times. Everything was in slow motion, almost freezing after I open it. All other Adobe softwares work just fine on my mac. Anyone knows why this is happening? :( Tried to delete cache, all the plug-ins, and different versions of Premiere but still none of them worked.

Cool vid the stickers are nice

Thoughts on Mk ii vs iii?

100% agree. I've had the EOS R since it was first released. The EOS R is a unicorn camera. It's amazing.

i love you!

Price

Yes sir, your a smart man, all the 70-200 EF v1,2 and 3 are the same sharpness the only difference (v3) canon changed with the later lenses are the flare, saturation and abbreviation control other than that they are the same lens. I don't believe the hype anybody saying one is sharper than the next, paying more money so I expect the argument to always be the shaper fluff. That came from Canon straight out the box. The RF is weight its lighter and easier to carry around and of course it was made for the RF mount for convince of not having to hull a heavy lens around.

Like my EOS R

Hey great video! I have a question on high frame rate 120 p settings . When I enable it, it shows AF is disabled and the subject becomes blurry while filming. How to fix this?

It will take 15 more years for other cameras to be able to use the RF lenses once Canon’s RF lens mount patent expires (20 years patent). That’s how it happened in the EF lenses.

It just quit my project without saving... Darn

Thanks, great video! Please write what exactly do you use to stabilize this camera? thank you in advance✌️

Another advantage of the EF version. You can use the Canon extenders on them. You can't for for the RF 70-200 lenes. That includes the 4.0 version as well.

Since image quality is excellent and practically the same on both lens; It boils down to 5 factors: 1.)weight, 2.)size, 3.)versatility/compatibility, 4.)zoom throw, and 5.)price ! The RF wins the first two and the EF wins the last three 🤨

Students: P A I N