Видео

I do have purple now, I originally ordered ultra soft but was sent the wrong tyre. Surprisingly the orange compound is still very soft, when measuremt it was a 56, ultra soft a 53. Both seem great, ive got a mullet setup 2.6 on back order to get the full experience 🤙🤞

The radial casing offers more traction from using a larger foot print. This is great although it results in a 30% greater amount of resistance to the gravity casing. So it will be harder to go up on a long day, especially on the back. I haven't got my back tyre yet so I don't have first world experience with it

@@LifeofScottDenney Harder to go up? No, what I'm talking about is more bite so you reduce the chance of spinning the tire. I'm not talking about rolling resistance, but bite. Most people only consider how tires function going down, and well, what about climbs... It's a bit weird to see you give me that kind of answer when you were the one who made this video to begin with. If it works down it works straight forward and it works up as well. It shows how the tire are more prone to shape it self to and around the things it is rolling over rather than just rolling over it. That = BITE. That will definitely help trying to clear techy uphill sections with rocks and roots and what not, because it will rather try to claw itself upthere and dig in, than just trying to roll over and eventually slip and it's game over.

​​@@a8f235what you are saying is exactly correct. I've seen many ebikers talk about it, although schwalbe themselves have noted how poor the rolling resistance is so it's worth noting that aspect if we are talking about climbing ability. Think of trails bike traction, or a cars tyre in the sand, traction from the casing or rubber comes at a cost. As above I'm still yet to ride the radial both front and rear but I'm excited to try it to see if the claimed resistance is bad. Schwalbe noted it would be the same resistance as running a magic mary from and rear.

@@LifeofScottDenney I'm a trail rider and my goal is never amount of miles or logging data or anything of that nature. I own a bike with slack seat tube angle so the front get light pretty easily. I'd just like any form of help I can to tackle techy uphill as well even though the bike isn't really designed for it. Lots of people claim Maxxis DHF/DHRII maxxgrip has too much rolling resistance as well, and personally I find them to roll very good for what they are. So, I'm more than open to test a radial tire on the back because no matter where I ride where I live, there's just techy uphill sections all over the place. Got to get up there somehow and pushing the bike is just sad.

​@@a8f235I hope the tyres do what you want mate, just so you know I would consider a dhr a decently rolling rear. There's better and there's worse but it's a good medium imo.

What country are you in? Should be released in most now but also they're sold out here

USA. I'm waiting for the Magic Mary. I don't see it for sale yet. The Albert is sold out or not in the compound or size I want yet.

I find the new wireless t type drivetrains make the bike way quieter. Must have much better clutch designs. Cheers mate!

@tristwallace i can't see a reason why you can't, seen plenty do it on trail bike setups, the sides are still very aggressive. If you are interested the enduro supersoft release should be in the new year. an enduro super soft xynotal front would be beneficial as the soft one are still a pretty firm rubber.

@@KiwiInGermanyMTB yes, lugs are very close together. Far closer than I was expecting, expecting to be great for hardpack and loose over hard

Does Assegai measure wider in 2.5? Wondering if the Albert 2.6 would be the same width as an Assegai 2.5

@@thewholetrail they are on backorder sadly. So I haven't got to look at one yet

@@rokbukejlovic currently I'm only running a front, rear will be on when I can get one. It's hard to tell, the 2.5 is more like a 2.35, i want to get a 2.6 to see how that handles the pressure. I'm running maxxis front tyre pressure (23psi) and I havent had a major one, In the video it was down to 21psi once i was home and it was all wrong... I'll be going up to 24psi and playing around with it

the shape and profile remind me lot of the kryptotal fr, it is very square edged and higher surface area though. still experimenting with pressures to get them right

you have to wait for the casing to break in aswell, you can hear it wearing in when its new, once thats all settled it will be interesting what air pressure i end up on.

The new Schwalbes look promising. I can confirm the Conti Kryptotal tires are fucking sorcery where grip is concerned. Edit: I’m on Enduro Soft Kryptos

@@jeremyprovonsil7886 do you think the Albert's would be alright in wet or even muddy condition ? I wanted to go magic mary radial front and albert rear. But only the Albert's are available for now where i'm from, don't really know if i should pull the trigger or wait.

That doesn't mean that you have to use a higher pressure, but that you *_can._* If you aren't riding Red bull Rampage, 30PSI is too much for most people.

@@irfaniaffan got plenty of videos of the track, they never look steep on a normal view 😁 something a little different.

@@LouisCollison-rj5ks cheers, trying to do some new angles. This is one of my favourite tracks, Lepers Leap in Rockhampton, Australia. Steep and technical track

@@anselpage schwalbe radial Albert's ✌️

Hey, I'm using a insta 360 camera with a 4k camera on each side. I can they turn the camera point of view and zoom in and out when edited.

What is the price of your camera ? (Sry for my english)

​@@xertyx_louis4276I'm using the insta 360 x4, it's $818 Australian dollars.

​@@LifeofScottDenney so wait you're using the 360 camera with a 4k camera on each side ? SO YOU ARE USING 3 CAMERAS ?!?! ISNT it heavy my boy??

​@@timothy2935it's the new 8k 360 camera. It's just a 4k camera on each side. But yes 3 cameras on my helmet haha, it can be funny if not weighted correctly but gotta get them shots 🌶

Thanks!

You guys make it easy ✌️✌️

@@ozay54 don't have them, sold all the pieces mate, but too small litres and too small port in original setup

@@LifeofScottDenney What kind of box do you recommend for the transporter vehicle, for the sq style?

​@@ozay54it will go great in anything near the alpine recomendations. Id go 2cuft, and around 35hz, depends where you want it to peak though

Cheers mate, ive had alot of good feedback on this style. I'll definately be looking at how to make it better

@@LifeofScottDenney thats awewome, look forward to seeing what comes next

Bike was awesome, I'll try a bigger motor next, and a full power bike and see what route I take

I don't think I would go 100% ebike, but if I was going to something like this fuel would be a great pick to still get involved in the climbs. Or better yet a new slash+ so you have everything in one package. I think I'd rather have both atm though so I'll see how a full power one goes

@LifeofScottDenney yeah that's fair, I think I would rather a really efficient hardtail for quick rides and a nice FS ebike as a combo for rocky's trails haha

Thanks a ton!

Cheers mate, fast and slippery

Depends on what you compare it to I guess, compare to a double down or an exo+ it is harder as the casing is much harder and doesn't stretch. It is hard to get on most rims but far from impossible, I guess that's why people say it's rare to burp a continental though.

Cheers for the reply, definately what we need. I've seen information circling of a enduro super soft but no diameter info. They make 2.6 casings in the rear and in the argotal so no reason they can't give us it either. Let's hope it's soon!

Why i am holding off on Conti for right now, no 2.5 or 2.6 for Front specific tires. Feeling like they missed the mark there. Being 73" tall and 220 lb rider weight, the 2.5-2.6" front tires definitely help improve cornering for me. 2.4 F/R is just a deal breaker for me, no matter how grippy they are. Balancing on smaller width tire makes a huge difference in feel and turn in.

@@miningshorts it's been left behind twice now, first time by a Chinese company Nd now because it's no longer profitable. Still has some caretakers and it's Australian law to be rehabbed but I think they'll try sell it again

@@LifeofScottDenney If there's any coal left guaranteed they will come get it eventually

Definately need more power, getting a 5k with some lithium soon ✌️

@@1ohmwrecker love it, problem is now I want 2

@@rcrhino2148 all running good, some finer tuning to go with the box. Will be changing it alot actually. Cheers mate, new amp and some more mods to come

@@LifeofScottDenney I can't wait to show everyone when my build is completed. And I hope it is worth all the time and money I spent on it too. You can only go up from here man. Keep CRANKING IT UP!!!

I'm about 78kg mate, can go as low as 18psi on the front without major issues but usually run around 22 as my trails do benefit from rolling speed. Rears I have played with around 22psi. This is on the downhill casing , abit higher using the enduro casing

@@naomiv7133 I just put larger batteries into them, some required different adapter wires but it's just a bigger voltage battery

It's definately a weapon, still only pushing it on 1200watts though

Hey mate, cheers for the reply. I haventtried any michelins yet, they're very high on my list but a few things have set me back. The tyres you've mentioned do have high amount of drag and weight so for my locals I haven't tried them. I was really looking forward to the MH, MS tyres and to run the new rear specific except they don't make or haven't imported 27.5 rears so I can't run them with my mulletwheelset. Extremely disappointed. As for the wet weather question it is a hard one, I don't think anything with grip we'll it rocky/roots wet stuff that isn't mechanically minded,such as the argotal. That is a tyre that's given me far more confidence than the assegai in the wet. You'd definately want something with mechanical grip over rubber traction, I havemt personnaly used the kryptotals in such conditions but I'd imagine they perform similarly to an assegai. I've used my argotal at cairns in wet weather through roots etc and thought it was brilliant so I'd imagine your michellin pairing would be similarly as good. It's all give and take, best bet is a wer specific front imo.

@@S1ckb0t yeah tubeless, downhill casing is pretty thick and stiff so you can go pretty low. Full traction you can go down to 18-20psi, but I run 22psi front and 24psi rear now for abit more speed on my local trails.

What about for just on a 120mm travel trail bike? (I have bigger bikes). You wouldn't even run the trail casing on that?

@@powskier the trail casing in the endurance compound was increadibly fast, like I felt it instantly. I didn't have luck with it but our trails are very rocky, a friend of my put one one his bike a few months ago and he hasn't had any dramas. If you run say an exo or a trail casing in other brands you'll probably be OK

@@LifeofScottDenney So you are saying grip wasn’t a problem. It was that the casing didn't hold up in rocks?

​@@powskier I didn't get a chance to test of the endurance rubber, if it's in the rear it wouldn't be a drama. Don't know about fronts, all depends of how hard your comparing it to. My friends still running his on the rear and loving it. Yes, I had an issue with a stick straight in the middle and a rock cut. Something I've never gotten on a exo+ maxxis. If the trails you hit are rocky I'd go enduro

I've actually got an Attack FSX, attack HPL combo to try next. Looking forward to it

Cheers mate, but hey I've tried alot of tires and nothing is really worth a change without being completely wrong. The DHR is a great tyre and I'm currently on one. The conti's just have a much longer life and are a little faster. In hero dirt I feel the maxxis comes out in all out grip but on loose over hard it's a pretty even battle. Every brands main difference seems to be how the casing reacts and feels, I think you should just wait for it to wear out but sometimes a new set of socks feels as good as a holiday is you know what I mean.

@LifeofScottDenney ah nice! Well, I will think more about it haha 😄

Cheers for the comment and video you've shares, I'd definately love the chance to give an X a go. Going to try another amp to compare them with this cheaper pioneer amp soon, aswell as another sub I'd like to try.

I was looking at those db subs a while back, they're so sick!

Hey mate, I do believe the SQL is still on point. It is not exactly loud compared to what you might think, mainly like this to play low well. I'm currently redesigning the setup to run 1 of them so I can have some boot back. I originally wanted to run some 8's aswell. I had one and the bass was really nice. If you look into my other video on these it might be slightly informative but the space required to make these work the way they show if large, you'd be looking a 1.8cu/ft +port per sub minimum. Any smaller and the output isn't work the power to them. I bought these is the factory alpine box's and the output was horrible, worse than my 2 rockfords p1's on 800w and these had 1600w, they are such a big woofer they displace alot so the box konda had to go up with them, 2 8's would be neat as if you need to work with less space. Hope that makes sense.