Видео

Thanks for your feedback. We totally agree the GTR-X is a huge amount of fun (and really hope the next-generation ST3 hull addresses the ‘bow hunt’ of the current model). That said, we are a little bit jealous of your two ski garage. Nice one!

Thank for the note. As you can appreciate it takes a lot of effort to collect that data so we are grateful for your feedback. As we say in the video, we know some people get higher speeds (and sometimes lower) but we are aiming to deliver a guide on how various skis compare. Same rider. Same stretch of water. And sometimes we do multiple craft in one day for even closer consistency. All that said, we reckon even the slowest skis are still a huge amount of fun. And we’re quite happy with the fastest FACTORY delivered ski topping out about 120kmh. We don’t really want to go too much faster than that :)) Kudos to anyone who wants to travel in excess of that speed. Thanks again for stopping by and leaving a note!

Thanks for the feedback. Yeah they’re both pretty thirsty these days. Especially as newer craft have gotten heavier and more powerful over the years. As it stands, though, you’re better off on the SVHO because the new 1.9 naturally aspirated uses just as much fuel but without the SVHO power or acceleration. Crazy times. Happy riding and thanks for leaving a note.

Thanks for the note. We use launch control on each ski we test (when available) purely for consistency and to explore what the manufacturer has deemed best. Otherwise if we adjust trim on the fly, it comes down to technique, which could vary from craft to craft and from test to test.

Both are fine in salt water it really depends on your riding style. If you prefer to sit (even through chop) then the Sea-Doo RXP-X 325 would be the go, but if you want the option of standing or crouching (to protect your back) then the Yamaha FX SVHO has a better riding position for that. Hope this helps!

@@WatercraftZone what i really wanted to say is this. I am originally a yamaha fan but but performance plays a huge role in my riding experience so i am thinking of getting a see doo i am looking for smth that goes 72 mph or more but i am afraid see doo will give problems in salt water as yamaha is known for more reliable jet-skis my yamaha fx svho limited can berry squeeze 67 mph

​@Baltintroshku the best ski if you're looking for performance is 100% the rxpx325. If you get a SCOM unit for 200 bucks some people have seen over 80mph. I do beat the stock 325 on my modified 300 but the launches are pretty similar and I pull away hard at 30 ish mph. It's the only ski I've ever raced that's been able to hang with me off the launch. Never lost to a yamaha. If you like launching then seadoo all day because the yamahas have a tendency to cavitate.

@@WatercraftZone standing on a FX? Man, you have to have long legs because of this sofa they call seat

Thanks for the note. We hear you. All the entry and middle of the range skis need to step up their game when it comes to the digital instrument cluster. Full colour technology is relatively accessible, affordable and proven now. Time for old school LCD screens to make way for the good stuff.

Hey thanks so much for leaving a note. This one was a blast to put together. We certainly had our hands full on this one. Soooooo quick.

We hear you. That’s a huge amount of power for that hull. We wouldn’t talk anyone out of buying a Sea-Doo GTR-X 300. But we also reckon the Sea-Doo GTR 230 is great value. Thanks for the note!

Hey congratulations! Be sure to hold on tight. It’s an epic machine. Thanks for the note.

@@WatercraftZone looking forward to that first hit on the throttle! 🍻🍻

Thanks for the note. Good reminder. We are doing a video on that and other stuff we use. It’s a small Australian company so we are just checking if they ship overseas.

@@WatercraftZone Thanks! looking forward to the video and link ;)

Lindsay Warner is a legend guy and his feat is a massive achievement beyond a scale many people can fathom. To cover that distance is one thing, but to do it solo is an entirely different challenge altogether. He’s an inspiration. Thanks for leaving a note.

We completely agree. The RXP is a great hull but not everyone wants or needs supercharged power. Here’s hoping Sea-Doo is tempted to build it one day.

It’s a great concept. We’re not surprised so many customers have embraced it and that Sea-Doo has expanded the range to offer a 230hp version as well as the 170hp unit. Thanks for the note.

We will let you do the maths and the conversion but in our testing it used 55L/100km and it has an 80-litre tank. By our calculations it could cover 120km on a single tank (with some to spare) but best to try it yourself first on a shorter journey. Consumption can increase depending on riding style and rider weight. Hope this helps.

We are too! The 2025 Kawasaki Ultra 160 Angler should be in showrooms by the end of this year or early next year.

Thanks for the note. We agree. It’s on our ‘to do’ list but still some time away unfortunately.

Thanks for the note. You a couple of nice skis there. We are due to test the Yamaha GP 19 HO soon. We are a fan of the new 1.9L engine in the Yamaha FX (though it is thirstier than the previous 1.8L in that ski). The performance gain from 1.8L to 1.9L is marginal but fuel use is higher. Here's hoping Yamaha is working on fine-tuning the fuel use of this engine. All that said, we reckon the 1.9L should be well suited to the GP HO. We'll be sure to post the video here once we test a Yamaha GP HO 19. Thanks again for the note.

Thanks for the note. You can see our review of the 2024 Sea-Doo RXP-X 325 here. ruclips.net/video/iJgnD7NF1YI/видео.htmlsi=z_HT7M19VIjumup9

Seadoo build quality can’t be compared to Kawasakis. Cant be. I’ve owned both and there’s no comparison.

@@pajamatime5750 I have both currently and I would take the Sea doo all day long. GTX 300 limited and a 2023 310 lxs. They are both nice but try working on the Kawi, it's comical.

@@americanworker2604 That’s because you don’t have to work on a Kawi like you do a Seadoo! 😂

@@pajamatime5750 lol. I've had 2 recalls on the Kawi and I have not had one issue with the sea doo with over 100 hours of use. Have you tried to change the oil on the Kawi? Talk about comical you can't even see the oil filter lol

The main problem is the bushing has almost no grease on it from factory...grease it and you will be fine in fresh water. I have the original 2011 300X

@@fzr1000981agreed. Less than a Pennies worth of grease would go a very long way. However, a better design overall I think is warranted.

Very humbled. Thank you for the kind words. And the inspiration. The Watercraft Journal inspired us to start a channel on the other side of the world. We just wish we could only do as many cool videos as you guys …

They finally have a better look! Better on the color too. They’ve always been so old man looking. Pay no mind to my screen name. I like everything

It’s a tough call. All three brands have their strong points and room for improvement. Sea-Doo has great ergonomics and fuel economy but the ST3 models have bow hunt. Yamaha FX has a great hull but is a wet ride and the fuel filler is on the nose. And the Kawasaki Ultra 310 is a beast but very thirsty and some riders may not like the riding position.

❤ this Kawi ski! Thanks for the great review.

@@WatercraftZone24’ FX has fixed all mentioned above. No longer a wet ride, and gas fill has been repositioned on the side. Unless you’re getting a different ski than the North American market. Great videos though, I’m digging it.

@@WatercraftZoneI rode a week worth of riding along side a buddy on a 2022 Seado GTX 230. I towed a tube lots and had similar hours to his. My 310 LX took $8 more fuel to fill when we gassed up after a day on the water. It’s thirsty but not crazy compared to others.

Hey thanks so much for the kind words. This colour scheme started off as a 2022 theme for the Kawasaki Ultra 310 X for Australia, but has carried through into 2024. Fortunately we were able to include a preview of the 2025 Kawasaki Ultra 310 range colours before this video went live. Thanks again for the note. It’s always appreciated!

@@WatercraftZone Gotcha, anytime. We appreciate you & crew. Keep up the great work.

Fair point. There are plenty in stock in Australia but we suspect inventory might be running low in the US, which is perhaps why Kawasaki unveiled the 2025 colour schemes a few months ago.

Thanks for the note. It's heavy, thirsty, the bow storage is small and narrow, and the handlebars need to come up a bit further. Plus flushing it twice (engine and intercooler) and fogging the supercharger afterwards are more complex than flushing a Sea-Doo or Yamaha after a ride. But the Kawasaki Ultra 310 crushes chop with ease and the supercharger sounds awesome.

Lol. Only if you fall off. Most riders enjoy the sport for leisure and to have a nice day on the water. Some ride long distances in the ocean, others do stunts on stand-up skis. And on some of the smaller skis such as the Sea-Doo Spark Trixx and Yamaha JetBlaster, it could go either way. You can ride them for fun, or challenge yourself and the craft and fall off with a smile on your face countless times. Some of the best days we’ve had on the water have been with the two of the cheapest craft (Spark and JetBlaster) because they are small and nimble they feel like an extension of your body. Remember, any day on the water is a good day.

Hey thanks for the note. Glad you’re loving the new Sea-Doo Explorer. It’s a great ski, especially the functionality and the long list of standard equipment. Some old school Jet Ski riders might not understand the windshield, but it’s definitely an asset on cold winter rides that’s for sure. And a lot of Fish Pro riders are adding them to their ski. We owned a Trophy with the pop up swivel seat, but honestly we didn’t use it much other than filming it. But for anyone fishing on a calm lake or river, the seat is a no brainer for long days on the water. Thanks for the note and congratulations again on your new ski.

Thanks for the note. We see where you’re coming from but it’s also a very practical design. Great hull, great sponsons, better storage, and a faster engine. Also worth noting this was a retro colour scheme. Later year models used more modern colours for the Yamaha Jet Blaster.

@WatercraftZone Couldn't agree more. It's not the color scheme of the Blaster, it's the physical shape of it. Reminds me of those now considered, "vintage" late 80s early 90s ski's. I just can't get over it.

As with anything on the water, regular maintenance is key. Some rental, rescue and tour guide skis clock up more than 700 hours, but they are well maintained throughout their life. Conversely, a low hour used ski could be problematic if it wasn’t flushed after going in salt water, and it’s just been sitting in a garage for ages afterwards. Most regular jet ski users clock between 50 and 100 hours over a few years. But I know some people who have clocked up 200 hours within a couple of years. But they either service the ski themselves or get it done regularly. Hope this helps.

Get a boat for fishing, jetski for waves busting. Don’t buy into the hype. You’ll thank me later.

Great suggestion. We love this hull but a bit more power, a more comfortable riding position when standing, and a bit better fuel economy would be welcome.

Thanks for your feedback and appreciate your point of view. For now we have steered clear of the stand-up skis from Yamaha and Kawasaki as they really are a niche for experienced riders these days, rather than a ski for first timers. We will take it on board, though, and consider them again next time around. Thanks for the note.

We see your point. Let’s find out the price first. Either way, we’re happy there is more competition in the fishing segment now.

Good idea. The back portion of the seat is already removable (and there is a storage bucket underneath) but utilising this space for extra fishing gear could work.

It is definitely easier to board the Sea-Doo Fish Pro from the water from the rear, and the rear deck has more space. Here’s hoping Yamaha is already working on further refinements for its fishing ski.

They are game changers. I’d love to meet the people who came up with these ideas. The second battery, the touchscreen navigation unit, the scuff guards on the outside of the footwells, and the pumping audio system are also pluses.

Thanks for the note. Since 2022 the FX HO has had a deeper cut in the ride plate to try to bring up the nose, even in a neutral trim position. But the FX is still a very wet ride versus the Sea-Doo ST3 hull. The trade-off though is that the Yamaha carves better through chop and the Sea-Doo nose gets pushed around more. If you want a dry (ish) ride try the Sea-Doo but it’s better suited to flat-water riding. Thanks for the feedback. Your experience will hopefully help others.

Great question. We received the following response from our Kawasaki expert: The patent for the new Kawasaki Ultra reverse trigger design says when the reverse trigger is activated it immediately checks the vessel’s GPS speed. Reverse will only be applied gradually if the vessel is at speed, washing off minimal speed so as to not send the rider over the handlebars. Once the vessel speed decreases to a modest level, activation of the reverse trigger will lower the bucket further, to create more of a slowing effect. The slower the vessel speed, the lower the rear bucket drops. It is marketed as a KSRD ‘smart reverse with deceleration’. It’s initially very gradual. Meantime back to our experience. Sea-Doo craft have a more aggressive reverse trigger (even at speed) whereas Yamaha’s reverse trigger is not as aggressive as Sea-Doo. Hope this helps! Thanks for the question.

Hey! Thanks great news. Thanks for the feedback and congratulations on your purchase. That’s a great combination. Let’s know which you prefer between the VX 1.9 and the FX 1.9 once you’ve had time to get acquainted with both skis. Happy riding!

Thanks for your query. That is footage of the ski being flushed with fresh water after riding in salt water. Hope this helps!

Thanks for the note. The 2024s have a new screen and we are not aware of (nor have we personally experienced) the issues you describe. However, if anything does emerge, we will be sure to include it in a future review of Yamaha models. Thanks again for sharing your feedback.

Thanks for your feedback. The more in this category the better it is for buyers. Kawasaki’s Angler is just around the corner too. Sea-Doo won’t be sitting still and is likely working on the next generation of Fish Pro models already. Here’s hoping Yamaha can make further improvements to this setup too. Either way there’s more choice than ever before. Thanks again for the note.

Nice. What a great craft. Awesome blend of performance and economy. Thanks for sharing.

Hey! Thanks for the note. Really appreciate it. We would say no shallower than 3.5ft or 1 metre of water. Even idling it is easy to suck up debris. So waist deep really. And try to avoid beaching them. It really hurts the hull, and there’s also more risk of getting sand and grit in the impeller. Hope that helps!

Okaaaaaaaaayyyyyyy. A bit random. Not sure how broad the market is for a secondhand original Blaster, and how many are left in working condition after all these years. But thanks for your feedback any way. We love these craft just the way they are. Hope you don’t mind. Either way, any day on the water is a good day.

It’s awesome but we have had a few instances where the pop-up mechanism can break in rough conditions. Here’s hoping Sea-Doo is working on a tougher version for certain applications.

Thanks for your feedback. That 1.9 should really suit the GP. We are getting on one soon. Congratulations on your new ski.

I have a 2021 GP 1800 HO and I love it. I'm wondering how much better can a 2025 GP 1900 HO be?

@@BroBob1254 My biggest complaint is at idle I get a ton of water over the “bow” even when I’m trimmed up. I’m a big guy at 350# though. I run mine on rocky rivers, and have already kinda beat the crap out of the hull. 6 hours on it and a whole lot of WOT. Lots of fun.

Sea-Doo does great industrial design. The cooler box is easier to step over on the Sea-Doo than it is on the Yamaha. The practicality - and the thought - that went into the Sea-Doo is incredible.