Видео

www.smwcentral.net/?p=viewthread&t=126183 You are gonna need to patch them yourself, if you dont know how then read this: www.smwcentral.net/?p=faq&page=1219815-bps-files

Who doesn't love when the final boss goes fuck you I'ma turn into a random abomination and we're going to space. Definitely one of the funniest classic RPG tropes

I do wish his PS1 counterpart was ported to MUGEN. I mean that giant eyed abomination. On an unrelated note, imagine Suwako with Colette.

Just because I rated your level low, by any chance? lol have fun improving your level design with that attitude.

I didn't change any pcsx2 settings, other than enable "FPU multiply hack" in the manual game-specif fixes/hacks. On gsdx settings I changed internal resolution to 4x native, texture filtering to "nearest". My PC specs are ryzen 5 3600, 32gb ram, gtx 1660ti

Beated him today and him having a 30 hit armor is a nightmare especially a 20% health left where he starts taking drugs and deals massive damage

@@sag2057 yup. If you thought this guy was a push over, final boss of the EX Dungeon is even more harder lmao

@@JudeHavoc i tried today and it’s so hard i have to be in normal difficulty to play in good conditions

github.com/furiousg4m3r/Tales-of-Destiny-DC Its brand-new translation and different team who did this translation

Apparently its automatic level, as in you hold right, and it plays itself, I learned that after I played and reviewed it, though there is no way to know that just from playing the level blindly, so I feel that's a very biased and unfair, as the level is as generic as it gets without that gimmick(so it shouldn't get full score IMO), and I really dont see how anyone can figure that out without anyone telling it.. And even then theres a bunch of mario maker levels with same idea/gimmick so its nothing new.

@@jokuemt Fully agreed, i can understand why he gave 20/20 for creativity but 40/40 for design is too much

No, its stuck there forever until you turn off or restart snes

@@jokuemt damn. That sucks. It would be nice if you could just continue on the other levels from there

if I were to get one dollar for checking every pipe during my playthrough of all these levels, I'd be a millionaire. and I still wouldn't be done playing through all levels submitted even after an year. Triple the amount for getting all yoshi coins and moons and secret exits.

One exit only, hunting for all optional stuff would have taken me way too long time(theres 124 entries/levels, so..)

@@jokuemt Okay, understandable.

i.imgur.com/4pvuRk6.png This is that levels title screen. WTC = when they cry(Higurashi is when they cry 1, Higurashi no Naku Koro ni is when they cry 2), which is visual novel(and also has manga and anime adaptions). The red text is an umineko reference(when they cry 3 and 4, which has also manga adaption). The TL;DR explanation for red text that its the red truth, whatever said in red is the truth. the red truth is used (and the main premise for umineko) in battle between Humans and Witches where human side argues the murders were done by human/human methods while witches argue they were done by magic. If you wanna know more then read the VN.

I did realize that later on.

Yes I dare, NSMBW is highly overrated. It has super wide and boring level design because the forced four players at same time gimmick which makes single player experience bad. It also started the soulless mario trend where everything these days looks the same, especially the 2D mario games.

Man, I didn't expect that kind of reply, I just told that as of a joke of sorts. But what you said is true. What makes me angry about the NSMB series is that NSMBU reused so many assets from Wii it's insane

@@jokuemt that IS true, i thought the levels were very fun but god it really kickstarted the trend of every mario game looking boring as shit

@@eltiolavara9 The culprit could be nsmb2 and/or nsmbu, when 3 games are the same you can't really blame the first one

@@davinchristino ig, nsmbw does start using the same models though so thats why

Yes

The overall thing is meaningless, you're overthinking it.

-Design: 40 Points -How well-designed is the level? Is it overall fun to play? How well does it execute its theme, gimmicks and level setups? Is the difficulty consistent or is it frustrating or boring? Does the level function properly or are there issues such as unintended slowdown? -Creativity: 20 Points -Does the level present any unique or interesting ideas using SMW’s resources? Does it have any original, nice setups? Is the theme/gimmick innovative? -Enjoyment -How much I personally enjoyed going through the level

​@@jokuemt I more mean that as in I want to know what you actually value in stage design. Give me some examples of what you consider creative or well designed levels, preferably not from this specific contest.

@@horushours9443 Sorry for late reply, youtube's notifications sucks ass. So to me the important parts of level design is how well does the level flow, does it have specif theme or gimmick, how well that is executed, how well are the setups done with the theme/gimmick/sprites. Secondary are length and difficulty, good level is 2-4 minutes long, starts easy and introduces the gimmick/theme and from there on ramps up with more challenging and unique setups from each other. The main problem is that a lot of these levels that they are just basic mario levels where you can just mindlessly hold right and occasionally jump over enemies and pits, theres nothing creative about that since its the bare minimum for an mario level we have seen million times already, so thats instant 0 in creativity from me, especially since levels are competing with each other. Second problem is how creators try to make their level long so they can have more fame or something, but this also fails quickly since I can immanently tell when part of the level is just filter, and these filters always gets repetitive, and because this is vanilla contest the level becomes too hard as if you die you have to replay a lot of the level, hence me using save-states in lot of these levels. And also there are many levels that feels like creator had no idea what to do with their level so they end up with level thats clearly 2-4 separate levels put together, and none of them being particularly interesting since there is no consisted theme or gimmick. Third problem is when there is hint of idea/theme/gimmick behind the level, but the creator hasn't gotten down what makes good level good, or how to make level based on ONE gimmick/sprite and make setups based on that, so the setups never get more challenging or unique or the gimmick is used twice at best and rest of the level becomes filter and basic mario level. So for an example lets use VALLEY OF BOWSER 3 from the original mario world: The level uses two sprites for its gimmick and setups, the timed carrot platforms and para-koopas. The level starts with safe, flat area to introduces jumping para-koopas to get you see how they work. Now then you are introduced to the timed platforms in safe area and the main idea of the level, where you dont fall down to pit and die if you ride on them for too long, and you are rewarded with coins if you jump off to next timed platform. Then the difficulty ramps up, now there is no floor, but to compensate that you have bunch of timed platforms to jump from to, and because there are multiple, and because you are not forced to wait full four seconds on each to reach next one, the level flows well and more skilled players can jump straight to next area, where the difficulty ramps up as there is less platforms and more obstacles and so on. See? There is clear theme, clear gimmick, clear use of set sprites, makes good use of said sprites and it flows well, there is no unnecessary waiting, the level gets progressively harder as it goes on, it has an midway point, it has multiple powerups and its only 12 screens long... If it was original level submitted to this contest it would have gotten just about perfect score from me. For example levels I liked from this contest that are good examples of good levels are "fuzzy drink"(in part 4) which executed its setups well and has clear theme but doesn't rely on glitch/bugs/unintended behavior. "Racid conduit"(also in part 4) has unique idea, its non-linear level which is rare in this contest. "musical sci-fi" (in part 9) is good example with level that uses glitch/unintended behavior for unique gimmick and for most part makes good use of it as the level goes on. "french twost" (in part 3) is good example of basic straightforward level that has some spice to it, but doesn't quite stand out. Despise me giving it low score doesn't mean I didn't like it or that its bad level, its good level but it really doesn't stand out from the other, more interesting levels.

@@jokuemt very informative of your point of view, I can respect it. Thanks for the reply

A E S T H E T I C S aren't judged either way. Glitched GFX aren't much of a problem. Whether you strive to build something as pleasant as possible or not is just preference.

@@Emerald_Shell It can still affect design though

@@davinchristino Aesthetics will only be judged if they affect design.