- Видео 19
- Просмотров 4 316
Legions Of Knowledge
Великобритания
Добавлен 12 апр 2024
The Gospels say Jesus was saved from crucifixion | Tay | Speakers corner
The Gospels say Jesus was saved from crucifixion | Tay | Speakers corner
Просмотров: 254
Видео
Would the Gospels pass as Hadiths? | Raihan
Просмотров 9609 часов назад
A pleasant discussion with a Christian on the veracity and grading of Hadith. #islam #christianity #dawah #speakerscorner Video source: @sFDawah
Prophecies of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and other proofs of Islam | Raihan | Speakers Corner @dawah2soul
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.14 часов назад
Prophecies of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and other proofs of Islam | Raihan | Speakers Corner @dawah2soul
Conveying the message of Islam in 10 minutes | Raihan | Speakers Corner @dawah2soul
Просмотров 34616 часов назад
Conveying the message of Islam in 10 minutes | Raihan | Speakers Corner @dawah2soul
Islam Q&A | Idriss & Agnostic | Speakers Corner
Просмотров 104День назад
Video Credits @SamDawah Discussion talking points: 1. Hadith 2. Quran Preservation 3. Comparison of Quranic preservation to other scriptures 4. The Kaaba
Muslim and Christian both reject Fake Christian unity at Speakers Corner | Tay @LETSUNITEUPONHAQQ
Просмотров 88814 дней назад
Video credits: Letsuniteuponhaqq Speaker: Tay
The sincerity of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ - solar eclipse event | Speakers Corner
Просмотров 443 месяца назад
The sincerity of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ - solar eclipse event | Speakers Corner
The Authorship of The Gospels: Church Tradition
Просмотров 463 месяца назад
1.catholic-resources.org/Bible/Eusebius_Gospels.htm 2.www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103303.htm 3. "An Introduction to the Bible: Sacred Texts and Imperial Contexts" “All four of the canonical gospels were originally anonymous. It was only in the second century CE, when the four gospels were published a a collection that the superscriptions were added to the gospels, attributing authorship to Matth...
Historicity of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ - Chronicle of 640 - Thomas the Presbyter
Просмотров 574 месяца назад
#islam #history #muslim #ancienthistory
Historicity of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ - An Introduction
Просмотров 524 месяца назад
#islam #christianity #muslim #atheist #debate #history #middleast
The Doctrine of The Trinity: A New Approach
Просмотров 725 месяцев назад
The Doctrine of The Trinity: A New Approach
Book Read - Paul and Jesus Part 1 - James D Tabor
Просмотров 1178 месяцев назад
Book Read - Paul and Jesus Part 1 - James D Tabor
The phrase "in this book there is no doubt" only exist in the quran. How come no such phrase in your gospels if you claim bible is true & quran is wrong?? The quran even starts with "in the name of Allah", but your gospels doesn't even mention Jesus name right from the beginning
Ιησούς Χρήστος νικά ☦️
I remember this dude. Speaks a lot of English but with zero understanding of what he's talking about
I thought the hadiths were explanations of what is in the Quran. The Sunnah might be closer. We keep away from commentaries, They could be misleading.A current example is the Prosperity Christians in the US, they got the total wrong end of the stick on; For those that have will be given more
That’d be cool if it was clear. It’s all so muddy either way.
Hi Quinn, thank you for sharing your honest thoughts. We can understand that for sincere seekers it is a minefield online. Our team on Legions of Knowledge’s goal is partially to reach out to sincere truth seekers such as yourself. Feel free to reach out with any questions you may have. We will continue to share genuine information about why Islam is the truth, and avoid as much as possible contributing to the online entertainment that has sadly arisen around interfaith discussions InshaAllah.
Not all hadiths are true, some are fabricated. Even in Bukhari
Your evidence?
@ruddin93 Sahih Bukhari 1339 There are many fabricated hadiths in Bukhari, i will show you some. What is your opinion about the above hadith. Don't smile while reading that hadith, Bukhari 1339
@@Diegoalllll Prove to me this hadith is not historically attributed back to the Prophet.
@@ruddin93 It is one of the controversial hadiths narrated by Abu Huraira. This hadith goes against Quran. It is crystal clear. It jokes about ALLAH. If you accept it, then you denied Quran and you became a kafir. It jokes about ALLAH'S command. Read that hadith. Somebody made that hadith and linked it Abu Hurayra, ignorants priesthood slaves like you believe those. Any Hadiths goes against Quran must be neglected, otherwise it us Kufr.
@@ruddin93 The First condition to accept an Hadith is that it should not go against Quran and it's teachings. This hadith bukhari 1339 goes against ALLAH and insults ALLAH. If you accaept this you become a kaafir. No difference btw u and a christian, both took their scholars as Lords besides ALLAH as Quran says
Why your book asked if you have doubts go to the people of the book
What is the surrounding context?
Right, except Bukhari lived 300 years after Muhammad - how could he possibly verify who is trustworthy? If you don’t have the original documents from close to the time (like the gospels) the hadiths - while I won’t say they are made up - are totally unprovable. Think about it sensibly: Could I write a chain of narration for something not written down in 1724. It makes zero difference what the gospel writers’ names were. You cannot PROVE you claims about the scribes.
Just to answer your question, Prophet Mohammad had 10000 companions who had written and memorized Quran. They are called the generation of Sahaba, their successors called the generation of tabiyi, their successor called tabiyee-tabiyeen. This first 3 generations are called salafi. Among this generation, there are 4 school of thoughts corresponding to all hadiths. So the chain of commands are still like a crystal and how imam bukhari verified 600000+ hadiths and denied 570000+ false hadiths. If you study imam bukhari's life and techniques of his scientific work, you need a half life time to study that. Because he has 30 volumes each having a 1000 pages of root analysis how he verified authenticity and nullified the rest.
@@robiulkabir8812 Listen to this garage. No evidence.
@ Thank you for your answer. But all this is Irrelevant. Bukhari could easily have invented all the Hadith and all the chains of transmission because he lived 300 years after Muhammad. I’m not saying he did - I’m just saying there is no external proof of any of the Hadith and the vast majority of the Sira, which was written down even later, is even less fact-based. It’s not just the delay in recording the material but there are specific problems with the Islamic methodology: Eg, are you aware that you can never get back to the Prophet under your system? This is because the Companions do not even have to have been eye witnesses to the events they describe. Or in the same area. Or even older than 1. They just have to have been born and be listed as a companion to get the old blue tick! Under the followers and followers of followers there was just no way to check facts and many of them did invent Hadith for their own reasons, be they sectarian, economic or just a poor grasp of history. By the time the big collectors eg bukhari tried to properly systematise and classify the Hadith too much time had passed - you could never get back those lost 300 years, especially as they were a time of constant warfare, rebellion and theological/ sectarian reinvention. he also admits himself that he discounts anything that would not please Muhammad or his family. Plus he is a Sunni, working for Abbasid bosses so is clearly biased against the Umayyads and the Shia. It’s no more possible to verify any of it than the story of King Arthur. The only good contemporary source on Muhammad is the Qu’ran of which we seem to have the Uthmanic version from only a few decades after his death. Good js perhaps pushing it as the Quran is a very esoteric book that takes no interest in earthly details like places, or named people - hence the attempt to fill in using the Hadiths/ SirA. The Quran genuinely is very good in terms of its proximity to Muhammad’s lifetime and reliable transmission - it is just hard to understand without using externally verified historical context.
I should add, that I’m not an ardent follower of any religion, including atheism, and have no axe to grind theologically. I’m simply giving you the accepted academic standards that drive intellectual development in everything from archeology to ancient Arabic linguistics to astronomy.
1. Scholars had their own ahadith before Al-Bukhari (Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal d. 241 A.H, Imam Malik's Al-Muwatta d.179 A.H). 10 vol set of Musannaf ibn Abu Shaybah (d. 235 A.H). 12 vol set of Musannaf Abdur Razzaq (d. 212 A.H). We have reports the Companions wrote down ahadith of the Prophet. For example, Musnad of Ali ibn Abu Talib. 2. Hadith Criticism is stricter than Western Historical Critical Method. Islamic scholarship took into account forging lies against the Prophet for political purposes. 3. Companion narrated directly from The Prophet must be an eyewitness. 4. Prove Al-Bukhari made things up. He rejected taking a hadith from someone because the person treated his animal unjust. 5. The written Qur'an today is identical to Uthmanic Script which was transmitted 15 years after The Prophet's death by the Companions of The Prophet. We can only know this through hadith narrated by Al-Bukhari. This testifies the truthfulness and veracity of Al-Bukhari. Uthmanic Script identical to The Qur'an we have today is testified by Western scholarship, including Nicolai Sinai, Dr Sean Anthony, Dr Marijn Van Putten, Dr Hythem Sydky. This confirms the narrative of the written Qur'an fixed and closed under the reign of Uthman through the hadith of Al-Bukhari.
Gospels on Bible are eyewitness accounts from disciples who walked with Jesus Christ for three years unlike hadiths wich is lies and deceit that came 200yrs after prophet muhammed!!
Islamic scholarship had blockchain technology centuries ago.
How can allah hates dogs mans best friend 😢
But Uthman burned the words of allah
Quran and Allah are all false god
Which of the Qurans? Is it the one Othman burnt or the ones in different parts of the world?
Here we go again, another ignorant fool who is unaware of the Ahruf, Qira'at and Riwayah.
yes which quran is the correct one? What about the one the goat ate
@@BloodofChrist-jx8tethere were "n" numbers of Quran after the death of prophet (pbuh). Your question is like, we are talking about the amount of water in the sea and you are asking what about that bucket of water that you pulled out from the sea. Your question does not make sense.
Why don't you list them first and highlight their differences? 😂😂 You can't, right, just copy pasted 😂😂
Like we can tell you only KJV has John 5:7, other bibles have a footnote that it is a fabricated, manipulated verse 😂😂. Can you do the same? No? 😂😂😂
What a miracle = الله = 4 and محمد =
1. The person was satisfied with the explanation provided. 2. Analogies are for the purpose of clarification and partial similarity (not in the absolute sense). 3. Justin Barrett says children naturally believe in supernatural beings. It is to illustrate atheism is unnatural. There are other extensive studies conducted by Deborah Kelleman, Paul Bloom etc. 4. The person was satisfied the need to have guidance from The Creator. 5. The Prophecy of Arab Bedouins competing tall buildings (NOT Rome or Persians). The Prophet said this in the 7th century. He is describing the generation from those bedouins who are barefooted shepherds of his time that would compete with other Arabs in the future. The rest of the points is projecting your frustration so no need to entertain. Until next time...
This is some weak-ass Dawah. Only a little above Zakir Naik level. Here's a breakdown and criticism of his arguments. 1. Even if you were to establish that there is a Creator, the need for worship doesn't logically follow. You would need to justify that conclusion. 2. Phones are manmade. We know how phones are made and design is a process. It's actually such a hilariously terrible example. Is the universe v15? v100? v10230303.3r.242.4? Phones don't have a designer anyway; Apple employs teams of designers. Are there therefore multiple gods? It's disanalagous and also suffers from the Composition Fallacy. 3. You're mispresenting the Barrett, just like other Dawahgandists - he argues that kids have a natural inclination to identify agency in things. This isn't surprising. Apophenia is a common phenomenon. He does not argue that kids naturally believe in a Creator. 4. The need for guidance also requires a thorough argument. You're making that assumption. Why couldn't a god be disinterested? Why couldn't he prefer a different species and we're just an accident, a distraction? Also, the phone's manual - is the manual meant to be read by the user or the phone? Because in your analogy, we're the phone. It's hilarious how Dawahgandists keep using this terrible analogy. 5. Not everything you create needs to have a purpose in the sense you mean. People create stuff all the time for the sole pleasure of the act of creation. The thing they create doesn't exist have to last a decent amount of time. 6. "Tall buildings!" How predictable. One of the worst prophecies ever! 👏🏻 Firstly, tall buildings existed back then. Ancient Rome used to have insulas which were thought to have been tall buildings, often used to house lower class people and servants. They were thought to have perhaps been up to five storeys high. Do they count as 'tall buildings'? So, tall buildings were not a new phenomenon. Also, the Burj Khalifa was not built be barefooted bedouins. It was built by South Asians, was designed by Americans and paid for by Samsung, a South Korean company. Also, as he mentions, this was meant to have been an eschatological prophecy (an "end times" prophecy). The Burj Khalifa was finished in 2009. Is it still Judgment Day 15 years later? You also need to read the context of this so-called "prophecy" as there are also some additional prophecies which were meant to come to pass at the same time as people competing in constructing these 'tall buildings' - prophecies which are literally impossible - e.g. everyone becoming so rich that no-one will accept charity, which is economically impossible as that's not how money supply or economics works! 7. The "working from home" prophecy is a new one, so at least there's something novel in this video, but is he seriously trying to argue that Mo predicted the advent of the internet and working from home? Really? C'mon, seriously! 🤣 8. You don't need religion to value the role families play in societies, but this is just some loose apologetics about the "ills of society" and how Islam is the magical solution. Also, I don't think you really want to bring up 65:4 when talking about divorce as it's been continually illustrated that that verse is talking about divorcing pre-pubescent children (even Mohammed Hijab confirms this). 9. Islam doesn't support enlightenment. It's unquestioning religious dogma and the Quran actually discourages people from asking difficult questions and this is reflected in the responses you get from some Dawahgandists like Abbas from EFDawah who has, on more than one occasion, told callers to their show to stop asking difficult questions when he's unable to come up with a satisfactory reply. 10. Gambling - this is probably the only point he raises where we'd have some agreeement. Degenerate gambling can certainly destroy lives, but having the "odd flutter" with money you can afford to lose isn't that harmful and shouldn't be prohibited. 11. "What's the guarantee you're going to be leaving this park alive?" Well, lower, if you turn up demonstrating that there are mulitple Qurans and you're wearing a Charlie Hebdo t-shirt. 12. "Now I've given you convincing proofs, you either believe or there's Hellfire". What convincing proofs were these? I must have missed them! 🤣 Also, Dawahgandists will often tell people that Allah will only confine people to Hell if they've heard the message and they reject it. Well, if this is as convincing as the message is going to get, then I guess a lot of us are going to Hell. Furthermore, this guy has just endangered these two fellas by trying to deliver the message. If he hadn't bothered, they'd have been forgiven, according to his own paradigm. So, in order to get the most people to Jannah, Dawahgandists should just stop doing Dawah, especially if it's this bad! 🤣 Game Theory 101. 13. "Islam is the fastest growing religion". Er, well, firstly, the last bit of Pew Research suggested it was flat-lining due to the "avalanche of apostasy" cancelling out any growth from using women as baby machines (typically in third world Islamic countries) and the odd Western convert you might get from using these terrible arguments. Secondly, even if it were true, it would just be an Argumentum ad Populum fallacy (just because a lot of people believe something doesn't make it true). 14. Finally, a small point - if you're going to have a conversation with someone, have the courtesy to give them a mic too. There's a bit at the end where you can hardly hear what the guy with long hair is saying.
JOHN 1;14 God became JESUS
@james-b7j7v bro can you tell me why he preyed like muslims ,why he used to fast.and why he was cryed to God and in bible he is saying that he dont know any thing but father bro a god comes to the Earth for die and he even could not gave a book which can t be change
just read Sharia law, the Quran follows that, muslims will say that it follows only the good parts, now that is funny
wat????????
its wrong bro we beleve all Shria not like you old Testiment
@@bilalyussuf8475 ask computer: Does the Quran follow Sharia Law?
Were does sharia come from James?@@JamesSchrader-i7o
Correction at 11:00 ; the Qiraat do differ in meaning and not just wording.
ALLAH IS NOT SAME GOD OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS.....
Thank god for islam❤
Black Muslims 😅😅😅
GoD 3in1 AnD GoD CaN DiE AnD Die FoR TheiR SiN DoeS NoT MakE SeNsE. Without Lies And Slander Christian Will Not Survive And Die. JUST ASKING Are Most Of The Christian Had Been Fooled By The Jews And Worship The Jew. After Prophet Adam There Were Other Prophet With Their Holy Books. Then The Only ONE Almighty GOD ALLAH TALLAH Send The Final Holy Book The Alquran Thru The Last Prophet Mohamad SAW. As The Other Holy Books Are Not Relevance To Use Till End Of the World. All Prophet And Muslim We All Worship The ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY ALLAH TALLAH. People Fight Islam Not Because Is False. They Know Islam Is The Only True Divine Religion. They Fight Islam Because Islam Is Against Their Evils And Falsehood. GOT IT.
Allah is not the father or a father in any sense how do we worship the same God and if Catholics think the pope is infallible that's pagonism
Muslims under pressure intellectually, they cannot defend their creed.
Please be fair what we are all dealing with is what is scripture and taken as God's words We have in Islam The Quran and contentious Hadith and seerat of Mohamed at times tafsir of scholars as helpful. In Christian world we use the Tanakh and New testament writings. We ignore things not found in the books but are scholars works. Example In Christianity We have trinity Papacy These don't exist in bible they are men's creation like the golden calf In Islam Mohamed is from Ishmael Mohamed went to heaven Bible is corrupt Those are golden calves Not in Quran. So discuss what is in Scriptures. But if Quran says Allah made it appear as if Jesus was crucified and killed yet it's not true and the followers of Christ called Muslims preached that and we have believed for 2000 years then Allah is a list. In bible Satan is the list so it means Allah is Satan. That is based on what is in the Quran and bible but not palatable
Say whatever you want but I have seen Christians defending Christianity at speakers corner and many other places. Cry all you want but Christianity is winning. Y'all just scared cuz I have literally seen siraj, lamin and all running away to debate with Christian evangelists now 😂😂
When a person fart, people run away.
2001 - 72% UK is Christian 2021 - 46% UK is Christian That is a complete collapse, clearly your apologists are failing in every metric and the collapse is partly due to their terrible behaviour and delivery in the UK
Another channel to block from my fed. Johnno and Amy don't even know what Christianity is.
These 2 man are Pagan.
Manuscript says "tayyaye d-mhmd", where is evidence that mhmd means name Muhammed? Mhmd from arameic means "desired" and tayyaye were christian arabs so thats why it's called "desired arabs"
That is a very poor argument. The term Saracens were coined by Christians addressing the Arabs but later on used for all Muslims. The Fragments clearly talk about a battle between the Byzantines and Arabs of Muhammad which correlates to the Battle of Yarmouk in 634 CE.
eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhistory/SEhistory.html
Great work It would be better with some editing to show the sources on the screen In my opinion
Quality content 👌 and I'm all here for it