Видео

Form vs. function is always a big debate in architecture. These buildings, like the Guggenheim, are super inspiring because of their bold design, but they do have challenges-like the lighting affecting the art. In these cases, the design (form) took priority over practicality (function), which can lead to issues. They’re amazing for creativity, but not always the best examples of balancing both!

@@Echavarriacoaching Awesome!!

It's worth a try!

lol, hope the video was to your satisfaction. Cheers.

@@HouseofSinope The duality of Brutalism

That's a different perspective! Thanks for sharing!

Yeah today its certainly used sparingly, compared to a few decades ago

Its a tough style to pull off!

Thanks 👍

It certainly gives the Nordic Design Aesthetic

Great question! Brutalist buildings are actually known for their durability because they’re often made with materials like reinforced concrete and steel, which are incredibly strong. However, their lifespan also depends on maintenance. Without proper care, even the toughest structures can face wear and tear. So, while Brutalist architecture can last for decades-or even centuries-regular upkeep is key to preserving its iconic look and functionality. Thanks for commenting!

The old concrete is, let's say 50-60 years, the durability of a building increases, it's weird

Haha I think it is, but it probably evolved into Neo Brutalism... Thanks for commenting!

Pretty cool Project!

Thanks, I saw your email. Will respond there

@@mdl.designs Thanks a lot

Great point! While the initial and maintenance costs of biophilic design can be higher, the mental health and productivity benefits often make a strong case for it. For schools especially, creating more engaging environments could transform how students feel about learning. Over time, those benefits might outweigh the costs... Thanks for leaving a comment! Appreciate it!

That's a fair point. I think one could argue that this idea of sharing the road also is the need for metropolitan areas to transition to transit oriented cities. Its hard when roads become exclusive to one mode of transport. Thanks for the comment!

Not sure it works that way but appreciate the comment!

Are you anti-motorcycle too?

Not a big fan of automobile dominated cities, but to each their own

I'm pretty certain he's removing bike lanes and restricting new ones being built

@ no he’s said he would prefer they be moved from the busy roads like Bloor and university to roads where there are less cars like side streets. I noticed that’s how Montreal does it. They will study the roads that have less traffic flow.

Nah

takes puff on cigar made of 100s.

Thats a good point. The design prioritizes aesthetics and a child-friendly vibe over space efficiency, which works better in areas where density isn’t a concern. Im sure these vertical spaces probably seem incredibly tall when we consider the scale of a child's world. It’s certainly an interesting balance

On bike lanes: In cities like Singapore, Tokyo, or Hong Kong, efficient public transport often makes biking less essential, while in car-centric places like North America, bike lanes fill the gap. They're not perfect but offer a sustainable alternative where transit falls short. That said, even in places with great public transport, biking can have its place. For instance, in Tokyo, short-distance biking is quite common in local neighborhoods despite the lack of extensive bike lanes. The argument for bike lanes isn’t just about commuting long distances but also about enabling micro-mobility and connecting people to public transport or local destinations. On biophilic design: I agree that curated green spaces can feel artificial, like in Singapore, where "green" often means manicured rather than natural. However, I’d argue that biophilic design is still a step in the right direction, especially in urban environments where untouched nature isn’t an option. While it might not replicate a true forest experience, it can still improve air quality, reduce urban heat, and offer psychological benefits to those who live and work in these spaces. Of course, ensuring these spaces are accessible and inclusive, not just aesthetic, is a challenge we should continue to push designers to address. You’ve also raised an important point about the labor behind maintaining these spaces-true sustainability needs to consider the social and ecological systems that support them. Thanks for sharing such great insights! -mdl

Appreciate the tip! Thanks for leaving a comment!

Traditional timber structures are more susceptible to environmental wear, but recent advancements in engineered wood, like cross-laminated timber (CLT) and glulam, have made tall wood construction much more durable and resilient than before. As for residential single family dwellings, there's benefits to either choice. Wood is more adaptible and mistakes during construction are less costly. Depending on where you live, if climate and weather is an issue, it may be best to use steel and concrete. Thanks for leaving a comment! Cheers!

Спасибо за ваш комментарий! Дизайн здания Birch действительно нацелен на современную эстетику, и вы правы, что нерегулярное расположение окон, вероятно, намеренно придает ему уникальный и современный вид. Всегда интересно, как архитектурные стили вызывают разные реакции; для одних сложность создает гармонию, а для других выглядит искусственно. Этот баланс - одна из интересных сторон архитектурного дизайна. Что касается безопасности при пожаре, я полностью понимаю ваше беспокойство. Современные высокие деревянные здания строятся с использованием таких технологий, как кросс-ламинированная древесина (CLT), которая гораздо более устойчива к огню, чем традиционная древесина. CLT обугливается снаружи при воздействии огня, создавая защитный слой, который предотвращает внутреннее возгорание, давая жителям больше времени на эвакуацию, а пожарным - на реакцию. Стандарты безопасности для деревянных конструкций значительно улучшились, но общественное доверие все еще догоняет. И да, действительно захватывающе думать о роли ИИ и автономной техники в будущем строительства! Скорость и эффективность, которые ИИ и передовые роботы могут принести в процесс строительства городов, действительно впечатляют - и, возможно, немного пугают. Мы, вероятно, находимся на пороге трансформационных изменений в городском планировании и строительстве, которые могут преобразовать города быстрее, чем мы когда-либо думали. Балансирование этих технологий с продуманным планированием будет ключом к тому, чтобы наши города оставались удобными для жизни и безопасными. Спасибо за комментарий! Мне пришлось использовать Google Переводчик, поэтому надеюсь, что всё перевелось правильно. Всего хорошего!

@@mdl.designs Да могли бы не заморачиваться так уж. Я понимаю вполне английский, но благодарю, конечно. Переводчик сделал своё дело вполне сносно. Ну, на счёт CLT не знал я совсем, например, от того и опасаюсь. Сейчас почитал, сомнения на счёт непригодности, в целом поселились у меня (я имею в виду, что могу допустить пожаробезопасность технологии), но всё равно, дерево есть дерево тоже. Как-то кирпич, железобетон будут попривычнее. По поводу роботов мне кажется, что уже сейчас стоит задаться целью хоть как-то попытаться подумать над регламентами их границ, а то уж слишком быстро как-то прогресс идёт. Может случится такое, что такие неповоротливые организации, как государства проморгают момент, а организации поменьше частные уже понастроят всякого этими роботами, нахапав земли. У Вас отличный канал. Я подписался и буду смотреть!

We love to design with whats familiar and I agree with your second point although architecture as a professional is notriously slow to adopt change. All the old architects running the firms hate to change things up. Especially programs. Thanks for subscribing! Cheers!

Interesting point! In a concrete structure, people often add wood or other materials for warmth, which can indeed eat into room/furnishing dimensions. I think with enough planning and finding that right balance between the two materials it can have that warm effect. It just takes enough forethought and a disciplined approach to your material palette. Thanks for the question!

Great question! When I say 'greener,' I’m referring to the environmental impact of the materials used and the overall carbon footprint of the building process. Wood is considered a renewable resource when sourced from sustainably managed forests, meaning it can regrow over time. Plus, wood stores carbon dioxide, which helps reduce greenhouse gases over the life of the building. This makes it a lower-carbon alternative to materials like concrete and steel, which have high carbon emissions during production. Hope this helps! and thanks for posting your question!

@@mdl.designsI think cutting down wood thats pulling the CO2 from the air does exactly the opposite of what you listed as a positive. Although I am not sure if concrete is better or worse.

Glad it was helpful! Thanks for leaving a comment!

Thanks! Will do! I think trying to keep a consistent schedule will be the next task for this hobby. Cheers!

Normal bike work just as well!

I'm not sure! Can't say I'm familiar with lil B's book either. Hopefully they do!

@Gegscape007 Super curious what the FR rating of those walls are

Actually, I thought it had a system that would release carbon dioxide to smother the fire but maybe that's Cornell's library.

Any time!

If I'm very quiet and bring my own teapot, may I join you? 😊

@@poesraven4540 The more the merrier

@@oaki_tea8031 mine too

It's most likely not story books😅

That's a fair point, living in Canada though I can say that there is a great mix of regular and E Bikes on the streets!

The issue in America is that cities, especially newer ones, have been so centered around the automobile that many commutes cover long distances. Mine is currently around 24 miles (38.6 km) roundtrip, and isn't unusual. Giving bike commuters some extra power through a motor helps extend their effective range without requiring them to become athletes. It reduces the barrier to entry to bike commuting for many people. My hope is that, as more people commute by bike (or e-bike), infrastructure in America will start to reflect that.

The general field would be healthcare; however, there are many firms that would take projects on in a variety of fields. Memorials, senior's homes, hospitals etc

Lol I couldn't tell you but if it looks amazing you should get one!

It's becoming quite popular in Brazil. I have one myself. They're mostly White label Chinese products. But indeed, the fat tires make them look cool. There are also some chopper styles that resembles custom motorcycles from the 70s.

Thanks man, Appreciate the comment. Will take that to heart when doing the next thumbnail. Cheers

I do all the video editing myself. Still trying to improve on a few things but your comment made my day. Thanks!

Glad it was helpful!

Thanks so much!

Thanks for watching!