Видео

Thanks 🙂 1. Super Symmetry is particle persistence in our Universe. V/c==ºC (Lorenz Gamma) The C scale is balanced in our Universe. 1c==1c^3==1c^2 is the same as +300,000,000m/s==+1ºC==+1photon So no "anti particle" is required to create matter. 2. The Big Bang Description you are using is a distance from the bang our Universe is possible, not an amount of time. Distance is the only moderator of energy. So what is particle "stability" actually doing in the Higgs field i.e What is happening in vacuum space to cause a particle to become stable and exhibit polarised "weight". Here's another contradiction for you ;-) We have proven that velocity time dilates with temperature. Yet we have particles of 300,000,000+ degrees Celsius traveling at the speed of light. The only answer is the raw "particle" is a whole in space and the hole is bouncing around at the speed of light. Welcome to "Skin Theory" **Bernhard** PS. The big bang is still with us and it is 12Planque wide, compressed with temperature into another "Dimension". Space is the Zero ºC , plasma output of the Big Bang, i.e. The Higgs Field. Great Lecture Thanks Again.

Excelente a apresentação do professor Artaxo e o debate em seguida. Parabéns aos organizadores desse Webnario.

I agree with Professor Kerr...(particularly minute 7:30 of this video)...Singularities was an interesting CONJECTURE ... but I think INVERSION physics (Shown at the Surrey 2014 math conference) places Singularity to an almost part of another 'Flat-earth-zone item' ...(the balance is , in my opinion, is seriously flawed, ....(before, minute 37 etc, etc, etc!) ... again, interesting lecture... also I think Edward Teller's video about attending an Einstein lecture will help guide aspiring physics majors into an accurate perspective to 'Einstein's later General Relativity' - which is dramatically different from Einstein's pre-1915 discoveries of Special Relativity - I am afraid that too many in academia are unaware of this reality ....

It’s incredible that a Penrose’s yawn gets millions of views in days, while this talk has gotten 3k in two years…

Very interesting. Thank you.

This is soooo good. But why oh why does Turok not yet recognize there are no "complex numbers"? It's all the even subalgebra of a higher Clifford geometric algebra. So there is always a _real_ 4D spacetime algebra interpretation for all the "imaginaries" in QM. Typically either rotation symmetry (spacelike bivectors), or Lorentz symmetry (timelike bivectors), or conformal symmetry (the pseudoscalar). To get a chiral standard Model you need complex Lie groups, but that's just saying the scalar+bivector algebra is inequivalent to the vector and trivector algebra (which are not closed sub-algebras).

Prof. Roy Kerr, you are a Living Legend of Physics and Cosmology, I hope you know it.

He’s such a treasure of mathematic and pragmatic genius.

Thank you prof. Kerr for speaking some sense! A Nobel prize for geodesic incompleteness is a fckin fiasco

Chur Roy chur kiwi ⛳

Thank you for the presentation, it is educational and inspiring 🙂

The so called theories are nothing but lies. It seem there is no such thing as Dark Matter. This video is nothing but click bate.

WOW. WOW WOW Dr Neil Turok knows what the Universe is. I can now pass on satisfied in my quest to know what the Universe is, what the amazing Dr Neil Turok has found.

This webinar is outdated. JWST showed us that Einstein's equations do not describe the Universe. In other words, galaxies' angular size is consistent with Euclidean Space and follows the Tolman Test. Interpretation of angular sizes using L-CDM or Einstein's equations leads to absurd conclusions (galaxies with a surface brightness 600 times larger than the brightest galaxy in our neighborhood. So, Einstein's equations do not describe Universe. Universe description does not require Dark Energy or Dark Matter. Higgs's mechanism for inertia creation is also useless. The description of Electromagnetism (in the Lagrangian on the Feynman path integral) is wrong. It does not consider expansion. Gravitation is also wrong since it does not include epoch dependence. So, everything is wrong. I would add to that the fact that HU already explained other phenomena without the need for Dark Matter, so the Lagrangian is wrong. Follow this link to learn some Physics, and feel free to ask questions. www.quora.com/I-was-wandering-about-how-one-result-of-conventional-cosmology-the-black-hole-among-so-many-others-to-name-just-one-more-say-the-dilation-of-time-fits-in-the-HUT-perspective/answer/Marco-Pereira-1

this autoplayed and i thought it was Mr. Plinkett

This is amazing. Mind blowing.

May as well be Checkov. Both reading from the same fantasy worlds script for people who only repeat and never bother to discover.

Stfu about the medals and awards

Dr. Turok said that LIGOS would never succeed in detecting gravity waves. What are his thoughts now after LIGOS successfully detected gravity waves emitted from two colliding neutron stars?

What a fascinating talk. I’ve never understood the Wheeler one electron universe model so well. This was an excellent talk.

muito bom....😊

It's stunning that this talk that is mind-blowing has only ONE comment! haha. I discovered this video via the published paper first. I couldn't access the published paper so I found the video talk. thanks

Gênio do Brasil e do mundo 🌎

Gerard, luister nou even. Why do we keep talking about 'quantum gravity'? We define 'gravity' as the contraction of spacetime (caused by the presence or more correctly, the SPEED of mass). If so then obviously a grid that is NOT governed by spacetime, cannot have gravity since there is no spacetime grid to contract. So then why do you think that the subatomic quantum realm (e.g. the area between an atom's nucleus and outer electron orbit) is governed by spacetime to begin with? Have we EVER seen a motion in this area consistent with spacetime as the the grid? If not, then accept that in the quantum world the grid is NOT defined by spacetime, hence there can be no contraction of spacetime, hence no gravity. Simple.

Great lecture. Thank you Professor Wald.

Obrigada por postar.

1h35 engraçado como eles não escondem que o problema deles é com a energia. Tipo, se os chineses florestassem metade dos desertos pra tirar o CO2 que eles emitem, o discurso contra o carvão chinês iria continuar.

To imagine white holes exist as macro objects is to misunderstand the manifold. Black holes are artifact of gravity which gathers towards unity/singularity. White holes, themselves, are diffuse. Singular points of emergent neutrons are each lowest energy point of space to fill the gap in manifold created by that same neutron crossing/contacting event horizon. Neutron decay cosmology. Inevitable?

Que espetáculo a palestra da Professora Angela Olinto !!! Essa grande mulher orgulha o Brasil !!! Francisco Carlos Andrade

A great man, thanks for upload x

Mano, que honra receber uma palestra do Professor Weinberg

Professor Antônio Ferreira, sempre contribuindo para o saber científico! Gratidão 🙏🏻

Mas que maravilha! 👏👏👏👏

Gracias! 🌸 Desde Saltillo, en México!

RIP legend! Eloquently delivered

R.I.P.

Can the speed of light be explained from a condensed matter perspective ?

I was that student. After a vicious response, i instantly managed to quantise length in my mind. ruclips.net/video/sDBAmU2jg5E/видео.html

pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Kerr

Grande palestra. Aprendi muito! O grande problema é que quando assisto a estas palestras eu fico deprimido.

Excelente!

very inspiring!!

Excelente a palestra da prof. Thaísa Bergmann. Inspiradora, deveria ser vista não só por todos os nossos alunos de física, mas tambem por alunos do Ensino Fundamental e Médio. Muitos se fascinariam. Parabéns!

Professor que avança no debate por temas que vão além das fronteiras da Física. Um polímata brasileiro.

Parabéns pela aula, querida amiga. Sou seu fã de carteirinha.

Parabéns... Professora 👏

Dude i'm so excited. Love Professor Turok!!

Livro de recomendado para vocês *Máfia Verde* : o Ambientalismo a Serviço do Governo Mundial Autor: Lorenzo Carrasco

Excelente.

Fantastic!