Видео

change of climate caused them to walk further distances for food

One of the most interesting academics alive today

Any evidence of homo erectus in the Americas?✌️❤️🇬🇧

Very poor volume. Seems the lecturer is NOT wearing a Mike. I have to stop as it’s tough to hear.

Here is what I see has happened to many who have been seduced by Darwinism. You were taught certain fundamental truths as a youth. You were instructed in the sciences, in mathematics, physics, geography, history and biology by teachers whom you respected as a youth, whom you admired and looked up to. And because as an impressionable youth you admired, respected and looked up to these people, and much of what they taught you was true, when they introduced the Darwinian theory of evolution to you, sort of slipping it in with algebra, chemistry, biology and astronomy - the classical sciences, then you accepted it also without reservation, you didn't question it, you swallowed it whole since these people were your mentors and you trusted them, almost revered them. Usually it was introduced to you in science class with some Disney like animation showing lightening striking an ancient pond, then cells emerging, then fish swimming in a sea before they crawled out onto land and lost their scales and became amphibians that became reptiles that became birds and mammals that became monkeys that became humans. It was all very skillfully done, and there was usually very little actual science involved; you were told a story, much like a Sunday school Noah's Ark story, only this story left out God of course, and because it was in science class it must have been true. It never occurred to you that your teachers who told you that evolution was a fact as real as the Laws of Gravity might have themselves been deceived in their youth when they were in science class, and then they introduced that very same deception into your life, all with the very best of intentions. So you accepted evolution as being as legitimate as all of the other sciences, your teachers certainly wouldn't lie to you, and then over the course of time it became your Weltanschauung. As time progressed and you grew older, a sort of intellectual pride clouded your worldview, and also affected, or more precisely infected your understanding of earth's history, of man's origin; and you became too sophisticated to believe in the straight, literal truth of Genesis. In your youthful hubris you substituted Darwin for Moses. Over the course of time Darwinism became more entrenched in your mind. It became a dogma; it was your world view through which you interpreted reality. Part of this springs from Hellenism, the Greek philosophy that is the cornerstone of much of modern thought.

Absolutely fantastic 🎂

Don be silly...do you believe your cat is evolved from something else?...someone created different beings at different ages of time...

Dr. Chris Stringer lectures through his research has answered a lot of questions for me. Looking forward to more light on the fossil records. The decline of Neanderthals could have been suffering from male sterility which caused females to interbreed with Homo Sapiens, and this along perhaps the scarcity of food and climate change.

16:10 There were not vast forest in Germany though where this ape was found.

WHAT.....................We arent from Adam and Eve??????????????????/ lol

MTDNA HAPLOGROUP L0 L1 L2 L3 ALL IN AFRICA YDNA HAPLOGROUP A AND B , IS ALSO IN AFRICA.

human is not a physical trait.

New name, art least for me... New aspects and insights... Great! Thanks! Might it be that some evolution did really happen by hybridization of different subspecies/ tribes that independently had developed different traits and, in a secondary step, these traits were merged, and developed into really new traits that one wouldn't have imagined before? A similar principle how plant engineering uses F1b hybrids to generate a desired set of traits that wouldn't be achieved through continuous breeding...

39:59 something similar happening now as illegal migrants from Sub-Sahara Africa come to Europe. Physical and cognitive differences between the species. It is not good for the more sophisticated Europeans…

'Economic physiology' is a polite term for Poindexter.

Why not include America?

A bibliographer not a field archaeologist.

Interesting questions and illuminating studies. Thank you.

All those head shapes are still around seen them all in town today variations still all around 😊

"The origin of our species" -- Created by unobservable genius.

Apes and humans split ftom a common ancestor. We know this from the genes. But what caused us to separate.? And , in turn , become bipedal. I believe it was when we chose to stop living in trees. When we chose , instead , to live in caves. We did not stop using trees. We still climbed up for food and to temporarily escape predators. But when we had our food...and when the predators gave up and went off to pursue easier meals...we would climb down and go to our caves. Where were could huddle safely in large groups. Large enough to drive off even the worst predators. That's what separated us. And it worked so well....we still live in caves today. ( yes...We build..our caves now. But that's just progress.) Cave dwelling in large... safety in numbers...groups. That's what separated us. And started us on the path to today.

We'd first have to agree on what a "species" is.

Chris is really interesting, & knowledgeable.The commentator is freaking awful for radio. Cambridge (or whoever is doing this broadcast) surely has someone who doesn’t sound half dead?

Adverse environmental or other conditions would more severely affect a smaller population of Neanderthals. In the USA, hybrids of African and Caucasian Americans are regarded as Black, resulting in a relative increase in the proportion of African Americans in the population. If Neanderthal Sapiens hybrids were considered as Sapiens instead of Neanderthals (possibly shunned by pure Neanderthals), regardless of level of admixture, then Sapiens would have increased as a proportion of the population. What is your opinion that a common ancestor of Sapiens and other Homo species migrated out of Africa, evolved into the separate species, followed by Sapiens migrating back to Africa?

Brow ridges are for protection.... duh

Brilliant presentation by an educated PhD professor, who have devoted his life to homo sapiens and hominin evolution. S.P. Let me WARN you, never EVER take your history lessons from Facebook, Twitter, RUclips, etc etc the internet. These Social media platforms, forums, and reviews, NOW are full of FAKE news, people, experts, stories, pictures, graphs, Ai, conspiracy theorists, gossip and words of other people's mouths, deniers, mentally damaged people, nut cases, stalkers, the uneducated, semi educated partial book readers, Supremacists of ALL human races, colour, Religion etc, click baiting cash grabbers, attention seekers, Trolls, Arguments/Debates/Anger, even Politicians BS, from every countries; thanks to the Good and Bad of technology(Even a trained monkey/Dog probably can log on line, type and press send, nowadays). Always, go to the Professors, PHD, Masters degree educated people for serious information, or source from top established Universities around the world and take social media as a joke, some good tips/information, for a laugh; to pass your day.🇬🇧

Unfortunately very poir sound on my Samsung Galaxy who's speaker is not the best.😅

From primates to the homo genus there is a direction of convergence ✌️❤️🇬🇧

Macaques have a distinct separate lineage and are represented by native Chinese people today, not everything about humans is Africa exclusive in origin, you can see this with genetic data, you don’t need fossils to see this, science is dumb with holding this obvious information available to see in genetics. With blood samples from Chinese people and macaques and you cannot miss the evolutionary heritage between the two. Basic science investigation. Africa exclusive human evolution is complete bollocks. Global warming is global not Africa exclusive. Unqualified people with imagination could guess this, scientists do your jobs, prove it not parrot fashion confirmation bias repeated.✌️❤️🇬🇧

The biodiversity of modern people is the result of a variety of hominid gene pools making it through to modern times, the home genus is a convergence of a variety of former different hominids, ✌️❤️🇬🇧 7:06

Speciation -- interbreeding is all you need to know. People may look strange, but if we interbreed, we're all "us". Anyway, we have absorbed the Neandertals anyway. This morphological test smacks too much of Linnaeus. We now don't have to rely on often misleading morphology but can use ancient DNA. Which seems to show that there is no "them" and "us" with the Neandertals. At least for people outside Sub-Saharan Africa, Stringer's h. sapiens and Neandertals are both ancestral groups -- whatever we think they look like.This view of the Neandertals fits well with Stringer's idea of a composite ancestry. Why exclude the Neandertal conrtibution?

no reason whhy they couldnt they were human and interbred

What a wonderful presentation.

Please do something with the sound….

Humans are the spirit of the earth. All plants and animals are humans who lost their spiritual development thus could not shape shift back into the humans form. Status quo(the mess we are in) science is slowly moving to these as the common ancestor of chimps and humans is looking like an upright walker. Chimps followed their emotions or luciferin urges thus lost the human form/temple that God Acts though in a free way as long as one developes.

Having seen volcanologist Clive Oppenheimer's reconstruction of the impact of the Campi Flegrei supereruption in Italy, dated 39,280 +/- 110 years ago, I think his hypothesis for the disappearance of the Neanderthals needs to be taken more seriously.As si recall, the ash plume travelled up into Scandinavia and as far east as Ukraine.

Interesting that we were gradually losing a brow ridge while we were gradually gaining a jaw. Do we have a clear understanding of the selective pressures of both?

Have the studies been done on homosapien fossils that show a pattern of more shared DNA with Neanderthals and Dinisovans the further we go back in time -- and also showing no shared DNA in the homosapien fossils we think precede our interbreeding with these other hominids?

Exceptionally excellent layman friendly lecture

26:43... Too bad there's not a preserved fossil of a roll in the hay 😊

Excellent 24:28

Ty 💓

Attacking Putin should guarantee him more grant funding

bad production quality but extremely interesting presentation and material

cant hear the speaker

I think if you morph Homo floresiensis (The Hobbit) with the Jebel Irhoud, you get the biggening's of Homo Sapiens. What do you all think? Also, the first Homo Sapiens could have had similar IQs to that of the native Australians. Lower IQs, but still very capable in their environment. SPHEREMOTOR, the future of electricity.

The sound on this video is awful!

Watched all of it

I fill my freezer with scavenged road kill venison every winter for years now.

The difference between hominids is not that much, even though the output is dramatically varied, it seems to rest on the development of culture and the frontal lobe