Видео

As the evidence piles up, Subir inches ever closer to a Nobel Prize.

Neutron decay cosmology. A homeostatic universe maintained by the reciprocal processes of electron capture at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids. Gravity gathers mass to event horizons. All matter is made neutrons at event horizons because of electron capture. Neutrons drop kinetic energy off as mass for event horizon Neutron takes an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space where the quantum basement is lowest and easiest to penetrate. Neutron out in deep void Decays into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, proton electron soup, Dark matter. The decay from neutron 0.6fm⁴ to 1m³ of hydrogen gas is a volume increase of 10⁴⁵. Expansion. Dark energy. In time this amorphous hydrogen stabilizes and coalesces and tasks towards event horizons. Neutron decay cosmology is inevitable. No new particles. Respect for the Dark matter which exists curving space to cause cosmological red shift.

Excellente conférence ! Super intervenant, super PowerPoint

phoronomy Term used by Kant in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786) for the study of the motions of bodies, without regard to forces or the nature of the bodies themselves: kinematics. Leibniz invented the word in the 1680s to denote the doctrine of the “laws of nature,” whereby he meant the dynamical principles of collision theory.

Great talk - following....

Thank you. Excellent presentation- clear, thoughtful, insightful, and useful. My hats off to Tejinder for organizing this OSMU series. It is so refreshing to see well prepared PPT graphics (vs. the eclectic scribbling of tedious chalk talks).

Thank you. Excellent presentation- clear, thoughtful, insightful, and useful. My hats off to Tejinder for organizing this OSMU series. It is so refreshing to see well prepared PPT graphics (vs. the eclectic scribbling of tedious chalk talks).

Its cosmic!😅

#WOLFram #AVram

Could time be a non-zero number that when squared is zero? Or could 3+1 space time be a minimal hyperbolic geometry. Sorry, tool little sleep and too much rum. I'll go away now.

2 views in 1 hour you fell off

If you are going to get rid of the quantum gravity renormalization problem by adding those 36 fields that have no particles, I assume you have to make some assumptions about how those fields interact with the Standard Model fields. Isn't that a significant addition to the Standard Model? I don't understand how to judge simplicity of a model so I can't tell if that is better than, say, string theory with whatever number of dimensions and topology required to make things work. Oppenheim's post-quantum gravity approach doesn't add new particles or dimensions AFAICT but the equations are complex enough to need new tricks to fit on a page that I haven't seen before. It is an objective collapse scheme. Does your story have wave functions objectively collapsing? If not, what do you think should be done about the measurement problem?

Did I just witness a very historic moment in human history?

Curious to see how this work relates to the PhD thesis of Cohl Furey.

What the hell is this gobledeegook

The comment about Inertia is very good!

Great stuff, guys! Does anyone have the first talk by Penrose? I bookmarked it for later, but it disappeared from youtube. Not sure if it was your channel, or someone else's.

Who has questions for Basil? Please drop them here. We're having a lay conversation about these ideas.

Fellow South African expat here University of Cape Town mechanical engineering degree living in Portland Oregon USA. Physics has been my hobby for 30 years. Thank you Neil for all you have done for theoretical physics. Baie lekker:)

I don't speak french and it's so frustrating right now

Where is osmu 2024 talk 1 by Roger Penrose?

Sehr unterhaltsam und interessant danke

You are our pride and honor

Excellent ! And so respectful of the questioners. Class act !

When I think of octonions I think of cohl furey. I learned of them shortly before cohl did her phd and really went over lectures on them to become comfortable with them. I am glad she has not given up on this line of inquiry.

How much I love you MR Professor Streicher .Never seen anybody like you in Mathematik ❤❤

It’s going to take some time to unpick all this but if this survives tests of the neutrino masses, the sheer scope and power of this is beyond jaw-dropping. Right now it seems to me bigger than Einstein’s entire career

just modify the roots of one however you like, quaternions that serve as the gamma matrices for the dirac equation for example just needs a root of one that squares to positive one but multiplies different in different orders when multiplied by roots of -1.

the issue is that minkowsky space for Lorentz invariant physics is just identical to euclidian space with a different basis for transformations. a sort of pretend version that works because the physics is Lorentz invariant, it looks like it is different because people don't understand coordinate systems very well. if you never change coordinate systems the two are identical as long as the physics in euclidian space has a notion of physical time dilation and length contraction. people get stuck up on time being the same for everyone, rather than time being a physical cycle of some system, and so the difference seems to be something about the space, when it has nothing to do with the metric of the space at all, only what metric allows you to be lazy in describing the physical systems in it.

didn't say anything about qft yet, but essentially qft has to be somewhat modified anyway and it only really makes sense to do that with respect to the gravitational physics, and there vacuum currents that decide what constitutes a preferred direction in any given situation.

the thing to appreciate at the foundations, with no real content to the physics, is that if you break Lorentz symmetry slightly you kind of need a preferred reference frame to make sense of it, and so minkowsky spacetime makes less sense in that case than euclidian. a preferred direction without breaking the symmetry is just an artifact in a sense. when it comes to gravitational physics the notion of a preferred background becomes more important, because there is a concrete difference between moving through space and a scalar speed of light relative to other places, so the geometry is not quite the same if you treat the two as equivalent in euclidian space, they are almost the same, but not quite. it is different with respect to gravitational potentials and time dilation with or without length contraction, once your preferred direction is a direction of relative motion with respect to vacuum structure, then you are pretty much forced into a certain background vacuum current, the gradient energy in gr is not the same as the energy involved in the current, not exactly so it is a complicated picture. but in the end the notion of a preffered direction based on local rest frames with respect to the vacuum is necessary, but it is not the same in all cases, not all inertial frames are the same a rest frame with respect to the vacuum current is not the same as free fall, because you can start at 0 velocity at any height, and then you start with a definite current and so on. this is not so simple, but at the end of the day it is alright, it is the right way to go to make progress in unification in my opinion.

Eigenwertumkrempelung ;)

I am really curious to know how he got this particular vacuum state from the analytic expansion correspond to right handed neutrinos other than hand /cherry picking?

For neutrino mass to represent the results of the gravity of dark matter would be astonishing. Very interesting

The by opponents alleged ‚engineered composition of ‚RMOND is rather the acknowledgement of the relevance of the history of the universe and the various different structures emerged in this history and therefore taking this processual nature of cosmological structure producing appropriately into account

@8:31 your Minimal model only needs to reach up to the Standard Model or say "SM+", it does not have to go all the way to Nature. Less work to do.

Interpolate between any discrete symmetries/transforms, there is the continuous. Nature does not care about simplicity. Simplicity is no law of nature. Note, quantum mechanics is _more continuous_ than classical mechanics, not less --- we can prepare a system in superpositions smoothly from pure states to pure states. Can't do that in classical mechanics.

Bro is griefing us in Math I for computer science

You have countless people claiming that their theory is the better physical theory of the world. Who do you want to prefer? Doesn't everyone have the same chance of acceptance, provided there are no obvious errors, contradictions or inconsistencies revealed in their work?

Well knock me over with a feather Professor Sir Roger Penrose! Sacred Geometry wrote large, Euclid must be smiling down on you and your propositions. If your pictures say an infinite number of complex mathematical words...

Nope nevermore

Thanks!

This is a very exciting advance from NF's conjectures of just a year ago.

This guy is a huge 🚩🚩🚩 The presentation was 90% review, 9% rambling opinion and conjecture, 1% showing results with no real utility. Don't invite these Quantum Gravity Research people to future talks, they're discrediting to the broader community. This guy was particularly argumentative. The lack of academic standards of rigor and decorum at QGR is showing.

Great conversation. There will be a big surprise for everyone soon. Base Twelve Mathematics - surprisingly - will save the day in terms of revealing a geometry which is currently not available to us in base ten. The geometry of the Universe is in base twelve and gives rise to a type of geometry which is able to accommodate the empty space inside of everything, and the base twelve version of Pi which emerges from this geometry has different characteristics from what we think Pi is. It gives rise to a geometric structure within the circumference of the circle which eventually solves the problem of infinity by giving structure to the smallest of the small, as well as access to the environment in which it resides. It will open up many avenues for exploration, and eventually lead us through the journey from quantum to the stars.

It's a shame someone hadn't put a mic a bit closer to the presenter... I think this is something I might have watched.

Inflationary guys can't get pass their fact that the theory has more holes than swiss cheese and after so many years of trying the theory still has more inputs than product....and the crazy eternal inflation rabbit hole.

25:16 Terrible timing on the interruption -- I don't think this stable neutrino point ever really gets made... gawl dang can't people understand when history is being made in a lecture!!?!!?!!

If live in a flat universe, how thick is this flat space? I'm guessing that its thickness is time itself.

Isn't this wolframs physics?