Видео

Thank you. Your cinematography, from what little I have seen of it, it's intriguing and stands out immediately the characteristic feature of your own vision :)

@@TheDavveponken That's very kind of you to say so :) Thank you and happy new year :)

@@peterpetrus5484 Thank you. I don't use any external battery, but I think you can try with this www.ebay.it/itm/123092455590?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=Zkgep5JxT4e&sssrc=4429486&ssuid=C28ZFdpaTqC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

Grazie Baltazar. L'Helios è un piccolo gioiello e, in effetti, il suo bokeh può ricordare quello di un'ottica anamorfica. Confido sempre in un progetto insieme. Un abbraccio.

Thank you :) In my opinion the BMCC 2.5k it's better but, to be honest, on RUclips the difference is not very noticeable. I still have to figure out how to make a better upload. However, as I specified in the description, it's an imprecise comparison because the footage is not from the same day. Anyway, I'm almost sure that the BPCC4k, in terms of character, has something less than the other two.

I appreciate your kind comments :) Personally I think that the bmcc 2.5k has a special character and it is the winner. The Eos M, used at 1080p is magical, it suffers from aliazing but given his small size, it is the one that you can always put in your backpack. The Bmcc 4k it is sharper and the least organic in my opinion. I never tried the bmcc 4k production so I wouldn't know.

@@emanueleserraino This is interesting, because many people choose Canon M because of the form factor in order to create an installation that looks like a 16mm movie camera. But I think that if you attach a convenient handle to the bmcc 2.5k from below, and put an optical eyecup on the monitor, you will get an interesting and stylish film camera.

@@IlyaPodnebesmiy It looks like a cool idea, I never thought about it :) Thank you.

Hello, that's so kind of you:) Is the uinion of the three I guess. I would add also the camera movements and the Raw development. That said, apart from aliazing, Magic Lantern on the Eos M is phenomenal.

Yes, also 3200 I believe :)

@@hhankx Hello, I've used just a K&F adapter from Canon EF to Micro 4:3 :)

@@stranstudioHappy to hear you enjoyed it. It is thanks to the beautiful woman :)

I'm glad you liked that, thank you :)

Thanks for your kind words, that's nice of you to say :)

Bontà tua Baltazar, grazie, me ne rallegro :)

Thank you, that's great to hear :) . I believe that the BMCC 2.5k it's a gem; not only beacause It makes a truly characteristic image, but also for the weight/ form factor :)

@@emanueleserraino I totally agree! Keep going. You have a great eye!

Ne sono felice Alex, grazie, saluti da Roma :)

Aw, thank you very much Alex, I appreciate your valuable support:)

Grazie, ne sarei felice :)

@@emanueleserrainoscriviamoci!

@@trent1847 Hello, It's captured mostly with a 16mm focused on infinity. The aperture, since I was trying to retain the details in the sun, was quite small; that means more depth of field. Hope It makes sense :)

That's great to hear, thank you :)

Glad you like it, thank you :) It's shot on a Blackmagic Cinema Camera 2.5k :)

@@emanueleserraino thank you! Did you know Where can I find this camera ?

@@ediolo7260 Definitely on eBay :)

@@emanueleserraino Thanks man, u r the best!

Muchas gracias Cristian :)

I reconfirm the hope that you can see it soon :) Thank you Alex, I'm gratefull for your words :)

That's kind of you to say Yuvi, thank you :)

Thank you Ethan, I'm glad you enjoyed it :)

Thank you Alex, you are always kind :)

Ciao, lieto ti sia stato utile. Assolutamente si e non c'è, una volta compreso, metodo migliore. Qui ruclips.net/video/N4fFXEA3dVY/видео.html spiego come fare la fusione e, sebbene non si tratti d' interni, il procedimento è analogo. Buona serata :)

@@emanueleserraino ti ringrazio ancora. Buona serata!

Thank you very much:) I've captured quite a lot of footage wich I hope to share soon. I love the feeling of using this camera wich, from my personal experience, compared to the new sisters, gives a richer and e softer image, as well as being much heavier; so easier to use both handheld and on a Steadycam. Mine is the Ef version :)

Una luna in fase crescente di qualche anno fa. Il Colore è quello tipico degli ultimi istanti in cui tramonta e dei primi in cui sorge. Qui tramontava :)

Thank you very much :) Congratulation on your delicate works :)

@@emanueleserraino You’re welcome ☺️ & thank you!!

Gracias, sí, he utilizado un poco de estabilización en DaVinci; el ISO oscila entre 1600 para escenas nocturnas y 100 durante el día :)

@@emanueleserraino 1600? Casi no se ve ruido en las zonas obscuras. Supongo que aplicaste reducción de ruido en DaVinci. Buen trabajo!

Necesariamente :) Gracias.

I really appreciated that Archel :)

Hope you found it usefull :)

That's great to hear, thanks :)

Thank you, I'll try do a tutorial :)

Here is a short explanation :) ruclips.net/user/shortsIPhQqFpeN-I

Too kind of you, the audio is far from perfect :)

@@emanueleserrainothis is about the Vibe, how u wanna see or how u wanna listen

Thank you :) It's all shot with the M except for the scene captured at 1:32. I haven't tried the crop mood yet, it's Danne's build :)

Wow thanks. I love the tones. What was your grade in davinci like?@@emanueleserraino

@@jimmyzjam Basically I've applied the Davinci film lut Kodak 2383 via CST serial node (to the cinema dng files), then I color graded from there. I'll try to share a simple tutorial in the future :)

@@jimmyzjam ruclips.net/user/shortsIPhQqFpeN-I

Hello, is recorded at 24 fps and 1/50 shutter speed.

Glad you liked it :)

I'm sorry, I can't access anymore to the project file of this video. Anyway, concerning the night scenes, I think I used 2 frames and Motion Estimation set to "Better"; Temporal Treshold around 10 for both Chroma and Luma Channels. Lastly, in the Spatial Treshold tab, I unlinked the Chroma and Luma channels so as to increase only the Chroma slider and reduce the noise in the colors while preserving the image sharpness.

Ciao, il peso di 6d più 17-40 è pressappoco lo stesso (90 g in più). Non so se hai già avuto modo di provarla, ma questa steadycam è assolutamente in grado di reggerne il peso. Puoi tranquillamente aggiungere un microfono ed un monitor esterno e rendere il sistema ancor più pesante/stabile.

@@emanueleserraino grazie mille per l'info!

@@Tirso425 Di nulla, scusa il ritardo, mi era sfuggita la tua domanda :)

Thank you :) I used a tripod with a fluid head.

Thanks so much, I'm glad you liked the colors :) The music is a masterpiece of Maurice Jarre , the main theme of Lawrence of Arabia.

Thank you Paolo. I used a Steadycam as a beginner :)

I raised it up to 1600 in the last scenes.

Thank you :) It works pretty well and it's reliable.

Grazie Antonio. Quel 40 indica l'apertura del diaframma e qui riuscivo a raggiungere un' apertura così piccola attraverso l'innesto di due moltiplicatori di focale sul teleobiettivo.

Hi Joshua, :) I like it primarily because the files are lighter and more manageable. In order to minimize the aliasing and moire you need to use very wide apertures. Alternatively I suggest you to use the 5k frtp mode which is cleaner but it can give some troubles while panning with the camera :)