Видео

Thank you very much, i'd learn a lot... very enlightening !

@t=8:46 "Computationally these things are a night mare." LOL fudge, I'm trying to learn how to sim this. There are now some incredible 3D sims for just detonation waves in a square tube, but they took 10,000,000 CPU core hours per sim to produce. I recently found a paper that reduced 2D sims down to 1600 core hours by separating the 3D injection flow field and producing a probability density function of it. Very cool work.

Hi sir, Do you need a professional youtube thumbnail designer,?

Very insightful presentation, thank you very much, Alison Ferris

This is very interesting. Thank you for sharing. Is there a way to join these webinars live?

Electrolyte hydrogen and oxygen from water. 0 carbon electrical to maniacal. The by product can be condensed back to water and reused just like a air conditioner. A simple spark timing adjustment is all that's needed to convert a gasoline engine to run it. It creates 50% increase in MPG and 50 more HP than gasoline. Been doing it 6 years.

"Promosm"

Kelly, That was a brilliant presentation that demonstrated some of the facts that I was interested in regarding EV vs. the ICE for an essay that I'm writing. Thank you!

F1 engine produce over 850hp and with the hybrid system more that 1000Hp!

Thank you very much, best from Aachen

Smart idea to introduce hydrogen to mitigate NOx production, I guess by limiting the air nitrogen effect??

How did you induce detonation at stoichiometric mixtures and low pressure?

I didn’t get it if TJI require totally earlier spark advance ( in comparison with pure electric spark ignition) angle dew to some delay of building up a pressure in the pre chamber and forming the igniting jets or totally later spark advance angle , dew to the faster completion of the combustion process after the igniting jets has leaved the pre chamber ? Also wasn’t mentioned what’s the favourite type of materials for machining the pre chamber cap? I suppose lower thermal conductivity metals or even ceramics would be better but wanted to hear this by the lecturer . However , thanks for the info!

ruclips.net/video/6Xvwsiw7EmI/видео.html

How to calculate the surface temperature of different material at different speeds in mach of a hypersonic aircraft?

can I have the pdf of this presentation?

Thank you for this amazing beginner/base introduction to this topic.

This was a really wonderful webinar. I would like to join your group after getting motivated through this webinar.

Its safe its gext gen submersibles its blah blah genocide

I call it combustion air but its plasma feed gas . Because it takes 1000 years

Then add more power dumby or smaller particles. Its anwmergency we need clean energy yesterdays wtf

And probably ozone as a plasma feed gas . Right ?

So with a very basic idea of combustion hotter flame smaller particles. You need a big welder and tiny nanoparticles. Safire .

The Safire experiment

terrific presentation, I salute your ambitious and responsible effort

World need to do more research on biofuel and ethanol production, and need more research on ethanol ice engine

I have already watched this atleast 50 times. So good. Thank you Wolfgang !

its great thanks for informations

agreed, no wonder we stop the development of it. as multisolution in future with synfuel and hybrid that would be great in electrification era. if you get the logics electric motor is already on 90% efficiencies they still developed it, why we stop combustion engine that still on 30-40% (with hybridisation) efficiencies only in sake of tailpipe emission.

your videos are very good and have a wide message thank you

true, engine never die. with hybridization and synfuel

nuclear fission had the insane amount of energy, saw that 1 pellet can hold up to 140 galon of gas energy amounts. however radioactive waste aftertreatment, fuel system+complexity, maintanance engine/fuel-cell/electrical reactor component cost, and safety is my consideration. my ideas is develop newtype of free-polution carbon-neutral liquid fuel with true P/R/HCCI+another novel engine tech with electrified tech that would be better.

Nice talk.

Great webinar, thank you for presentation Li Qiao 👏🏻

Thank you for the interesting lecture, that is sad that a lot of People are just fanatics of a new "green" deal and they have no idea about the reality...

this is incredibly valuable!

No sound here

Can you list some other ways of reducing instability

This is a place for engineers I see.. Excellent and so perhaps anyone here knows please if it would be possible to use a organic Rankine cycle turbine with hypercritical CO2 or better perhaps liquid nitrogen to capture energy from waste heat. I am not thinking as first preference at a real organic low T boiling point fluid or even at ammonia as working fluid but at liquid nitrogen because in such case, once the gas leaves the turbine, it could be dumped in the atmosphere. Further,, it would also be possible to mix clean warm exhaust directly with liquid nitrogen while otherwise a heat transfer is needed with some loss, I guess and as already said also a recondensation and recollecting of the organic fluid which makes the installation more expensive and complex. This (of course not found by me) LN concept seems at first impression so simple that it should even work at small scale with perhaps a turbine of teflon. You will ask where that liquid nitrogen then comes from and yes, this is the weak point. We first need a cheaper way to liquefy air/nitrogen I think. Perhaps it is possible to use the rotation of a wind mill to mechanically compress the air which would make it then easier to liquefy I guess. Long ago, ammonia was used for cooling and I even don't know it also couldn't be used in some interesting way to pre-cool the air.

precursors technology will work for unstable rockets..

Totally awesome work. Praying for God to put ease in all your affairs, reward you and guide your heart. Thanks so much for sharing the presentation.

Great talk, thanks a lot

Thanks a lot for your presentation

Thanks for great presentation

Thanks a lot for your presentation

Thanks a lot, great talk

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, renders the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change.

Thanks for uploading the webinars, this talks are simply amazing!

May I please ask will you upload the recording of Prof. Jackie Chen lecture on 13th of Feb 2021? Many thanks

Hey , is there any chances of hydrogen ic engine comeback in the future