Видео

You have no idea what you are talking about man...

plenty of rotation to get it done in less than 70 strokes, you must be one of those one swing fits all guys, lol!

@@upstairsgolf3765 Anybody can shoot under 70..I do it with one arm tied behind my back.. When you drive it 370 on average--then we talk

@@giomusah2155 370 is impressive, you must have a lot of “rotation” lol! Good luck with your long drives.

@@creelgolf you should probably send back the money you won from Gio on pinseeker. Sounds like he is still a little bit upset about it.

I have 9 foot ceilings. Mat is roughly 1.5 inches. My unit is around 8.6 feet from ball which is under recommended height and it works fine. I’m am a shorter guy and don’t have issues at all with ceiling height.

Yes, I used the foresight stickers.

EYE XO, with the ease of adding cameras and then the playback of impact position is great for people trying to improve. Uneekor’s software is really good. I will say that the quad reads dynamic Lie and dynamic loft better but all other data points are similar.

@@creelgolf Thanks! I'm liking the idea of the playback as well

It's great on putting. Only issue I've ever had was shot lofted over 35 or so degrees with an open lob wedge. Black wedge solved that problem. Eye XO is great.

Your welcome!! Thanks for watching!

The video was to focus on ball data which was done. Maybe I can do one one club data at some point. You must remember each unit is calibrated to read specific sticker shape and pattern. This means comparing units at same time may or may not give accurate comparisons. The EYEXO tends to pick up some club data with shiny headed clubs which is why you saw club data on Uneekor, but it is not accurate unless Uneekor stickers are on club head. The hybrid was only Club in demonstration that had stickers but I did not compare club data due to that was not purpose of video. You can always Hit mute next time you watch my videos.

Thank you!!

Check out my channel, I did one with hybrid, 3 wood and driver. Thanks for watching David.

Good idea. Integration with third party software is a problem with quad, very frustrating actually. I’m at PGA show now and looking forward to seeing the new updated package for the Mevo + in action. Also I think Uneekor is announcing something new today.

@@creelgolf Exciting times! I have a tandem garage area that I'm hoping to eventually turn into a golf simulator/practice area. It's about 12' wide x 20' long x 9.5' high. Just researching all the options now, but I'll look forward to hearing more about the Mevo+ Pro package and the announcement from Uneekor. Thanks again for your insightful videos!

@@cthoesen Your welcome! I hope to have my hands on Mevo+ with upgrade soon for review.

Thanks for watching! My screen is 9’ wide and 9’ tall. I use regular prov1x balls with not markings, which is main reason I went with EYEXO over QED version. To accommodate left and right handed golfers you need 14-15 feet width. My room is around 12.5 feet wide and I can’t have a lefty hit in my bay the way I have it set up. I have 12 feet ball to screen. You can get away with 9-10 feet ball to screen. EYEXO is great unit for sims with limited space.

the slow motion cameras are cameras that I purchase thru Uneekor directly. The cameras on that are zoomed into club are the cameras internally in the Uneekor system. In OBS I add the window for each camera on the Uneekor software and crop out the edges to make it look cleaner. The camera that is realspead is a Gopro 10 I believe. Lots of open windows, lol.

The v1 boditrak Seems to work well with v1 on iOS and with my desktop paired with the already impressive v1 software. I recorded on iPad then in my movie editor added to OBS recording and synced the timing. Swing catalyst is out of my price range, I would have to see technology to better understand that price tag.

Yes, Uneekor uses 1 square reflector on heel and 1 long rectangle reflector on toe to gather club data.

Thank you! The boditrak V1 pressure mat has changed the way I teach, it has helped my students swing better much faster than any drill I have used in past. It’s something a player can feel and grasp instantly. Of course there is other things we work on but this pressure mat really gets my students swinging better by the time they leave without a million swing thoughts.

I have not. I will admit it feels a little tight but no one has ever hit ceiling. It does take a few swings to get comfortable!

I also have a 9' ceiling and I'm 5'10 and haven't had any issue hitting a driver.

both are awesome units! It comes down to budget and what purpose the unit is going to be used for!

Thanks for watching and looking out! I went back and watched video! I was hitting an 8 iron on the 170 yard shot around the 9 minute mark. All shots had 6500 to 7100 spin (no misreads). If you Go back and watch I actually show bottom of club and e6 has me as hitting a 5 wood on that particular shot. The shot I believe your referring to is a lob wedge or 58* that I was using in my last series of shots. The spin was in 11000-12000 range I believe. E6 auto caddie picks random clubs in bottom left of screen but has no impact on distance/spin outcome. The EYEXO uses its own algorithm based of ball data alone for each shot not the club selection from E6 3rd party software. Thanks again for watching and hope you are playing PinSeeker! It’s a blast.

No difference, the purpose of d-plane is to illustrate how the spin axis and horizontal launch is created for each shot. I think it is necessary to understand what is happening at impact so a player can correctly self diagnose a shot. From experience most players put blame on swing path when the cause is club face angle (FTT) or unsolid contact. When players focus on correcting wrong thing then the problem gets worse. Sorry for confusion but no difference here , spin axis is a result of the the D-plane. In the 3D model in video you can see a blue line that runs through ball, that represents spin axis. Hope this clears things up!

Thanks Glenn. This is definitely something a player needs to get on a few times a year to keep their game in check. It is best to get on a mat when you are hitting the ball good so you can see what your trace looks like with your irons and woods when playing well. Now when you are hitting it bad the first thing I would check is if my current foot trace against my good ball striking foot trace.

Thanks Vaughan! Definitely worth having. I had to get one so I could keep up with you on the PinSeeker leaderboard ; ) Let me know if you’r seriously considering purchasing, I can shoot you the contact info.

@@creelgolf Haha I was thinking about getting one to keep up with you on the leader board. I have been having some issues with the Mevo plus latest firmware update. I have been getting some misreads( ball travels 30 percent short, on a clean strike) and some shots with extreme amount of spin. Its been making it frustrating past few days. Going to try resetting everything and re updating.

I am reading that a lot of folks are having problems with the update. have you reached out to their support team?

FTT will be measured at first touch so gear effect will not change the FTT data. X3 is being updated to show impact position to help see a better story. Not sure how well it will measure impact but we will see.

Thank you. That is great. Means the FTT number is being measured directly (somehow). Makes sense that the next upgrade to X3 is to show impact location like Trackman is now doing. Won’t see that on Mevo + but that is ok.

@@Dan-ld3mj so these units use radar signals which have the ability to bend around objects like a club face. I compare it to a cell phone signal, say if your behind a wall but the signal still is there. This radar works the same. The fusion technology which will use the camera inside the unit to help the Radar readings separate the data between the club head, ball and any debris (divots) from one another at impact and post impact. There is a lot of activity at impact that can sometimes cause misreads and this update will help units capture better data throughout bag. The impact location on the trackman is not great and from what I see, most people don't use it. I imagine the same for my X3 unit but I am eager to see if its worth the hype. According to Flightscope the Mevo+ is close to as powerful as the X3 units. 2 main differences is the X3 is full flight tracking and the Mevo+ is limited flight tracking which means only first 40 to 50 yards of flight is tracked and rest is calculated where the X3 will read until ball lands if uninterrupted. The other thing is the X3 self levels which is key to accurate readings. I imagine one day they will upgrade the housing to the Mevo+ so that it can self level but they may not if they continue to keep a higher end unit.

@@Dan-ld3mj thanks for clarifying. I’ve been told different in past! Another reason quad may be more reliable for club data. If center strike I imagine it would be very accurate but off center hits my guess is it maybe slightly off but still reliable.

@@Dan-ld3mj I may do a video just to test this out on center and off center hits between the quad and FlightScope’s x3. This will let us know if there is a real difference between the two technologies. Glad you dug into this a little more

I believe Angle of Attack is more critical to understand but it is important to understand low point to get desired AOA. Depending on how steep or shallow you attack the ball determines your alignment to compensate which not many people don’t understand. Alignment is so important! Every club has a slight different AOA so alignment must change along with that. They all work together, the more you can understand how they tie together all this info the easier it is to diagnose why a shot does what it does. I am actually trying to build a model to demonstrate the overall picture that speaks about H plane, swing path, low point, Angle of Attack, face angle. To demonstrate an overall picture!! Thanks for watching

Thank you!!

wood comparison is up!

Glad I could help! Keep in mind there is not a perfect launch monitor but some are better than others for sure. Its all about what to realistically expect from each unit and then decide which you want based on the pros and cons of each. Your doing the right thing in researching. Let me know if you have specific questions. Thank you for watching

@@creelgolf thank you. My room is 12’ wide 9’ high and about 18’ deep I was looking at either the eye xo or the new GC 3. I Mostly want it for sim play with family and friends my Man cave . Struggling Since I have one lefty in the family but he’s not around too often. Really looking for a great sim ease of play and great graphics Also trying to figure out the whole striking mat situation and would like to have the ability to putt

With the width of your room it will be hard to accommodate a lefty with the EYEXO due to a hitting zone that you must stay in for unit to read. With 12 foot wide room the lefty and righty will hit on opposite sides of mat which EYEXO can not accommodate. For EYEXO to work the golfer must hit out of a zone 12" wide so 1 foot. If lefty is part of the equation then the GC3 floor unit may be best bet since you can move from one side to the other which is not fun either! I also have a 9 foot ceiling which puts my EYEXO unit below recommended height which is between 9 and 10 feet. On a 9 foot ceiling the unit will be around 8.5 feet from floor to unit but again it works fine for the most part. I did have to manually focus my cameras in the unit to read properly since my unit is closer than recommended. The Graphics will be based on computer you get and pay attention to graphics card and recommendations for the software you intend to use. Don't go cheap on computer or projector if graphics are a priority. I use CCE mat and putt of the edge of it with not issues. I love the mat but others hate it.

@@creelgolf thank you for the advice. I think the GC3 is the best bet and was leaning that way since the lefty playing is a rare occurrence. I have a pretty stout gaming / video editing computer with the latest graphics card I ca use Any advice on impact screens and projectors ? Especially for a DIYer. I’m planning on maximizing screen space by installing as wide as possible and adding some type of wall impact solution like foam instead of using prebuilt enclosures . I actually have 9’4” to ceiling from floor and most likely leaning towards a short throw projector but unsure on placement from Screen

@@jdegid get a projector that has lense shift capability and placement is then more forgiving.

If I can get my hands on one I will do a comparison. I imagine if woods are accurate then the irons and wedges should be due to slower swing and ball speed. I will see if I can find someone locally with one. Thanks for watching.

im going to compare my skytrak with the eye xo soon :)

@@3o1Golf that would be great to see. I don’t know anyone with a skytrak so I am curious how it stacks up.

@@3o1Golf will be interested to see that. Does your Skytrak have the latest update for spin decay?

Be good to see for mid iron and driver too if poss

They both read H launch, ball speed and total roll distance very closely. EYEXO does not give spin data or skid data like the quad does. The EYEXO also will not read the putter head data like the Quad does. For playing games both work great but if you’re looking for path, lie, face angles along with more detailed ball data then quad is the best out there.

Thanks for watching.

Thanks! It Was All Luck!

You to RT, thanks for watching. I look forward to seeing your name on the leaderboard!!

You want to hit up as much as possible while keeping optimal spin. I hit up 4.5-6 degrees with 2k spin. This allows me to carry on average 280 with 295-305 total. This is with 107 swing speed and 162 ball speed. If I hit down on ball my spin would spike up and carry would be around 250 range with same swing speed. Key to more distance is hitting up with proper technique. May need a shaft adjustment with new impact position but well worth it. Don’t need