Видео

@@kellyslow5506 It fits snugly under the CD-ROM drive. The server gets moved ocassionally and the fan has never budged.

@@Warning56kb Ok, thank you. I have a T420 with no CD-ROM drive installed. I do have two of them. Maybe it's time to install it! I really liked this video.

@@kellyslow5506 Thank you for the kind words!

You can download a Windows 10 ISO and then within Rufus select "Windows To Go" under Image Option. Once installed onto the USB you'll be able to run Windows directly from the USB. I know the Windows To Go feature was disabled after a certain version of Win 11 Pro, so you might have to find a slightly older version of 11 Pro.

@@abefre2296 Thank you for the kind words! I saw plenty of videos breezing through using Rufus, but none that ever explained all the options available, so thought I would make one that did. Thank you again!

@@miro_kauppinen Nice! I loved the Core 9xx CPUs. Had a couple of them back in 2008-09 or so. Damn good CPUs for overclocking as well.

Thank you for the kind words!

@@tinostarks Just 2.4W and 0.2A for all four.

You're very welcome!

The flagship should be around $500-600, mid-tier $350-450, and the entry level models $200-300.

@@DIYElectronicCircuits Thank you! Can wait to have some more free time from work to crank out some more

Unfortunately no. It just redirects to a different device not available within the BIOS.

@@jameysummers1577 Thank you! 😁 Like you said all of the commanfs and regedits still work, but this makes it sooo much easier. Especially if you do a lot of installs.

Odd to comment that you did not watch, yet commentented about the video. If you 'did' watch you would see that your comment was covered in the very title and is more than just a "couple of options". Funny, because at first you said "couple of options" and then realized there's more to it and then said "some". Next time, actually watch or read the thing you want to comment about. It saves you the embarrassment. 🤣

Rufus unfortunately doesn't tackle the 'unsupported CPU' issue'.

They never completely avoided the belts, just did not go through the intense regions. That's what the very video is about. The problem with the 'type' of radiation in the belts is thebeffexts on digitial equipment. Analog equipment used during thr Apollo program was not affected in the same way.

@@Warning56kb they've never even came close to the belts, because they had to avoid it twice, which wasn't easy task and impossible to achieve. they said that they didn't go back to the moon because of lack of money, what a joke, going back to the moon shouldn't cost a lot of money because they already know how to get there, so no research needed, no need for spaceship engineering, no need for anything else, everything was already know and mastered

@kermosrujji9475 That's a negative. They flew THROUGH THE OUTER REGION OF THE BELTS. That includes both the inner AND outer Van Allen Belts. How do we know this? By no other than Dr James Van Allen himself as well as NASA. We did not go back to the moon because there were no more missions. The missions were accomplished, done, over, finito. The hilarious part about your argument is that if they kept going back for zero reason, you'd then be complaining that they kept wasting money on going back for no reason. 🤣🤣 Where do the mission approvals come from? THE PRESIDENT. Where does the money come from? CONGRESS. Without Congress funding NASA, things don't happen. Fact. Knowing HOW to get there is DRASTICALLY changed when EVERY SINGLE BIT of equipment you're using has CHANGED and functions DIFFERENTLY. The NEW equipment has to be RIGIROUSLY tested. Tou don't just make new equipment and go "yUp! sHe's GooD tUh gO! tRuSt mEe!🥴" 🤣 If you're so concerned with this, actually do some research on what the old equipment consisted of and what the NEW equipment is and how it is drastically different. That COMPOUNDED by the fact that every Apollo mission was a single-shot mission where 99.9% of the rocket is destroyed in the process, and the new goals are reusability with the only waste being that of fuel. Knowledge is power. 🙂

I fully agree. It was a travesty to have lost the original media it was saved on, but all of the data was copied and backed up in many ways. The other downside to not having it is that we cannot up-scale it using modern processing techniques for unprecedented resolution and clarity, which everyone would love to see.

ZFS is designed to work directly with raw, unformatted disks. It manages redundancy, error correction, and data integrity by itself. PERC RAID controllers, on the other hand, abstract disks into virtual drives, obscuring the physical disk layout. Using ZFS on top of a PERC RAID can result in redundancy managed by both the RAID controller and ZFS, causing inefficiency and even potential data corruption. This obscuring ZFS from the underlying drives (that make up the virtual drive) prevents ZFS from using its advanced features like checksumming and healing, preventing ZFS from fully managing the disks' health and status. ZFS is highly resilient against disk failures, and it expects to handle disk errors directly. When using a PERC RAID controller, the controller itself manages disk failures and can report inaccurate information to ZFS, undermining ZFS’s ability to ensure data integrity. If wanting to utilize ZFS it's recommended to run the RAID controller in JBOD mode or as an HBA, allowing the controller to pass control over to ZFS without any abstraction.

@@Warning56kb Thanks I understand. Both servers running fine for a few years now so I leave it this way for now. I planning to buy a newer server to upgrade the old ones. I will investigate and test how to use Proxmox and ZFS bypassing the raid controllers 👍

@@Bus2000 You're very welcome!

@MadJackChurchill1312 Yeah, because the video is about WHAT each option is and does in Rufus. Guess bro never heard of a tutorial or how to fast forward. 🤣 But thank you for the engagement and view time. Cheers! 🙂

@@johnburk360 Well said! It's going to be a killer platform. With Battlemage Intel is increasing the Ray Tracing Unit width from 2 traversal pipelines to 3, meaning even less performance loss when RT is on. Intel is also shifting from SMD8 to SMD16 with Battelmage which means compatability with games will MASSIVELY improve along with no longer having to manually tune each game (hence the major jumps in performance with specific games with each driver release). Driver development will come much faster as a consequence. Execute Indirect being on die will also be yet another major jump for Battlemage. No longer having to be emulated in software means many titles that utilize it (Unreal Engine 5 titles for example) will mean an imporvement in Execute Indirect by easily an order of magnitude (x10+).

I think it would still give you a fit, but try this. Open a command prompt as an administrator as run: bcdedit /set hypervisorlaunchtype off

That's odd. I've yet to run across a client that wouldn't install 24H2 using Rufus. Command prompt works fine, but if you install on numerous devices Rufus saves a ton of time since the configurations are saved.

What was the problem you were running into?

Thank you! Have to tried to re-download it and extract & run again? It may be as simple as corruption.

@@Warning56kb Hi! Yes, It finally finished, now I'm having issues with it communicating, says please flash the proxmark3 with the same version as the client. I'm stumped bud.

@@Charlesbjarvis Ah! Thankfully that's an easy one. You'll just need to flash the image. Within proxspace and the Proxmark showing as connect, run: ./pm3-flash-bootrom After that type: ./pm3-flash-fullimage That should get the two sync'd.

@@Warning56kb You are the man! It works! Thank you for your help sir, much appreciated!

@@Charlesbjarvis You're very welcome!

That's actually not too bad for an R730XD! I would definitely opt for that over the T320. Little bit better hardware a step up in CPUs (and RAM capacity). But, that then puts you in the position of having a large (deep) 2U server on your hands.

@@Warning56kb I ended up making my own server. It has a ryzen 9 3900x, RX 6700xt, asrock rack x470d4u, 128gb ECC ram, x2 2TB enterprise SSDs for VMs, x1 1TB NVME for Proxmox.

@@adityaramadhan6474 Still works with 24H2!

@@AHC248 It does!

@@majorhemroid 🤣🤣🤣

@@CampbellMorkham It's still bypassable. Used it on two machines with 24H2 earlier today. Still trying to figure out the specific situations where it'll prevent bypassing. Possibly attempts to bypass using the command console during install?

​@@Warning56kbkeen to know how you managed that with the official 24H2 ISO released this week and Rufus 4.5 (latest)

@@CampbellMorkham You just load the ISO like normal in the video and check the boxes. People were also telling me I couldn't do it with 23H2.

​@@Warning56kbI normally just tick the first box, I'll try again with the disable automatic bitlocker ticked.

​@@Warning56kbStill no-go upgrading from 23H2 to 24H2 with a Rufus created USB stick. I can see many on Redit, and other socials with the same problem.

@@remixedcat They're pushing it, but IMO still worth it if you can get one cheap enough. Most likely after having one for a few months and getting familiar with it an iDRAC, you'll be craving a 13th or 14th Gen.

@@Warning56kb looks like an r730 might be my best bet then??

100%.

@@Warning56kb cool

@@antonydandrea Well said. That's part of the reason for the extensive testing they're doing now. That and the radiation-sensitive modern digital equipment vs the now ancient Apollo era equipment.

Space travel isn't possible.....

@@Menibor1 🤣

@@marioanaya4494 de nada!