- Видео 17
- Просмотров 7 931
Murray Cupholder
Добавлен 28 дек 2023
Learn to be done. Not angry, not bothered, just done. Protect your peace at any cost.
Видео
FA 122; My new fastest plane ever built (again)
Просмотров 84914 часов назад
FA 122; My new fastest plane ever built (again)
Albatross 1B; My fastest plane ever built | KSP
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.16 часов назад
Albatross 1B; My fastest plane ever built | KSP
I'm small, so i made a motivational note.
Просмотров 533 месяца назад
songs: okay discord.com/channels/1271416604625731687/1271416604625731690
Karen Space Program
Просмотров 534 месяца назад
songs: Carnival Kurfuffle | Cuphead OST Make This Right | Furi OST Bad Piggies Main soundtrack OKAY | 13ounce
Hunting Moose and White Tailed Deer with the 30-06! | Hunting season, Roblox
Просмотров 5285 месяцев назад
Hunting Moose and White Tailed Deer with the 30-06! | Hunting season, Roblox
'K'rash test ejection seat in KSP!
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Songs: Bright Future, Antonov Hardbass, Quick
Reciprocating Steam engine! Plane Crazy Tutorial
Просмотров 1195 месяцев назад
Reciprocating Steam engine! Plane Crazy Tutorial
Hey, I wanna compete with you! Mind if I give it a shot with my "Speedy Cruiser"? For now, I used that White Turbo Ramjet engine in KSP, the max I got was 1590 m/s, without cheats, My plane burned due to Overheating, but I didn't see that issue in yours!!! Could you let me know how U made this?
so, i built this plane, left it for 2 years, made the videos, thought how i could make it faster, and put two RAPIER engines, 12 radiators, and 10 thermoplants on it. competition is most welcome. i'd love to see what you come up with!
@@MurrayCupholder Ooh, okay! Also I kinda realised your design looks quite to be similar as NASA's and Boom technologies' X-59 supersonic aircraft, I just love that design, a super sharpened pencil with thin long rings! Something I made with aluminium foil when I was 5 years old! My first ever "plane", but then I started making paper airplane when I saw a Qantas 787!
@@MurrayCupholder Also, Good Luck, we shall start the "Competition" of *_Who is gonna make the fastest Plane!?_* As soon as all the Christmas and New Year Cheers are done. I am already ready, BRACE YOURSELF, You might have to make something better! (I am serious about this, lol)
So, funny thing is, I made an a airplane in KSP that would usually go unto 1590m/s, until it just burned, due to heating! I haven't tried any radiators, but do you think I should upload a video about it?
Maybe. But, I recommend filling one section to the bream with radiators. Make sure they’re active before you put move them into the body to cover them. But your plane sounds very good!
@@MurrayCupholder Ok, so I also tried a variant of my airplane that uses the rapier engine, (in air-breathing mode), and it miraculously went 1798 m/s first try! I did this technique where I slowly gained some height and speed, then I wiped the nose down a bit very gently and then raised it up again! I basically tried to maintain my height while also letting gravity pick up some more speed! I then changed the rapier engine mode to the Closed cycle mode, and WOOOHOOO IT WENT SO FAST I ESCAPED THE ATMOSPHERE AND WENT TO ORBIT! I ALMOST COLLIDED WITH DUNA! Also, I think you're plane's overall shape must affect the plane's speed a lot! Mine's is almost like a thick needle, and I made sure the Air goes around it like a bullet! Shall I make a video about it? Also, why don't you make a Christmas KSP Video? I am doing one!
@@NASA2officials a Christmas special, you say? I like that idea. I will do it. Cheers.
@@MurrayCupholder Yes, a Christmas special! Currently I am making a Music Video in KSP for the Song "All I want for Christmas Is You" By Mariah Carey. I decide to use my Fastest Airplane, the one I mentionedd where it went like 1790 m/s! Also... CHEERS!
Is more a limitation of the physics engine of the game, not so much of the airplane: I did a recent test were I flew around Kerbin in a "Rutan Proteus" like airplane, it averaged 1350m/s, with a Sr-71 style it went up to 1400 something. The thing is that you fly high to have less drag, but then there is less oxygen, if you fly faster you get more oxygen, but around 1400 seems to be a hard limit. Else would be to umbalanced to go to space I belive, it is fun to try and test, thou
In my latest vid, I crushed that. But, the physics engine is definitely a problem.
cool but ive made a plane that can go 1500m/s witch is mach 4 but 1 wrong move and it will go boom
I like the persistance Keep it up
From my past of making the fastest air-breathing airplane I could, I've learned that rapiers and an sr-71 style body (go figure) have allowed me to reach speeds of up to 1,750 m/s with aerodynamic heating being the main bottleneck I've encountered. May have to play around with using a fairing for a nosecone like you did, keep up the good work!
damn
@Bob78 I did it. Thanks for this incredible knowledge.
If you use air breathing rapier engines you can probably go a little bit faster. They take a lot longer to accelerate, and properly start outputting thrust at ~450m/s. I have often found it best to climb to a high altitude at subsonic speeds, then dive to unlock the increased thrust, and then you can accelerate to 1600m/s or more.
Thanks, mate. I’ll test this on Current planes, if not use a new design entirely. If you know a good design to shove it on, lemme know.
The air breathing mode on a rapier engine can actually go a little bit faster, and its still a jet engine. All the ramjet planes I have tried can only get up to around 1400m/s but I have got air breathing rapiers up to around 1600m/s and it could probably go faster still.
You got it.
hypersonic pencil 👍
pencil with wings
Have you tried Ferram AeRospace (FAR)? It's a mod for aerodynamics that makes plane design much, much more realistic. If you put it together right, you can build planes that can reach up to 1600m/s or possibly even 1700m/s, although I've never gotten that far. With FAR, wing sweep, fuselage shape, all sorts of stuff affect how well a plane flies in various conditions in ways that just don't exist in stock KSP.
no, i have not. thanks for the info! could you pin me a link?
@@MurrayCupholder It won't let me. Just search it with Google or something, the KSP forum post about it should be the top result and you can get it there.
@@MurrayCupholder It won't let me. Just search the name, it's easy to find.
i'm very proud of this aircraft. none other like i've ever built. Watch my latest videos!
You can just build a smaller one that can reach 1050m/s with postburner
Less drag u have more is the speed that u can achive, so smaller wings are perfect for supersonic jets
@ I did exactly that on the exact same plane, but I got worse results, at 700 meters per second being its speed cap.
Depends on the type of engine and the type of intake
Maybe u could place on this Albatros the structural intake that has better aerodinamics and try to get like delta wing D that are long and thin
Just use vector engine its better also you can use fairings and engine plates (if you have making history) to get completely rid of all drag theres a video somewhere on how to do it
Vector doesnt have enough isp for planes, hes trying to go for long flights
unfortunately, i dont have any mods for engine plates, or any means to get them, but that would work. i did see that vid.
@@escoosy1763but then, with no drag, you could orbit Kerbin at 10 kilometers above sea level.
@@MurrayCupholder Oh i forgor about that But arent rapiers better for that?
@@escoosy1763 you’ll see in the next video, which is uploading when this message is sent.
for more speed angle the wings and try the f12 menu, helps notice drag and lift
Sweep angle has no affect in KSP
unfortunately, @OneMoreDesu is correct. but good insight.
@@MurrayCupholder so your telling me that if i took the giganitc wings and used those, it would be the same as using the concord wings, assuming they both produced the same ammount of lift and produced the same center of lift?
yep. that's KSP for you.
nice
Yo the discord didn't work
64 likes and 0 dislikes is fun
Indeed.
Wooooo weeee partner
make sure to eat water😁👍
Dont let one good day distract you from the failure you have become
Yeah, you get it.
😂
a lil' funny that's not funny
i actually listened it for the whole hour
The fact that you felt the need to state it makes it less believable
@@RUclips-Channn ok buddy
@@dinking127.2 Y'know, what? good 4 u.
best masterpiece on whole internet
Woooooooooooe
Im a engnier i solve prolomes
masterpiece
Bro’s built like a 1X1 Lego brick
Watch to the end to get a reward. Reward: Exists
i got that :)
Um, when are you going to see my planes?
i will soon. a few days, maybe.
also, where would i put your nickname since i dont have the links?
@@MurrayCupholder i also forgot to mention that the name "HMJ" is specified as "(High Maneuverability Jet)"
@@MurrayCupholder i guess o cant reply with the links, why dont we talk on dc?
@@fabianprocruzpeo8289 dc?
1 like, pack this shit up bro
Stare at that and tell me you’d do any different. 🫡
Most logical anti-furry argument:
i've been playing TF-2 for a while now, but i'm not particularly good at it, so... no more videoes on TF-2. (TT﹏TT)
Do you know the range of this weapon
for game specs: unlimited
@@MurrayCupholderit’s not you will miss if you shoot too far
@@Johnyboy8879 i haven't had a problem with that before, but thanks for the info.
this took 4 weeks to edit... X_X
Love your editing style! really reminds me of martin :D
Blueberry 1 sounds had a fate a lot like Obama prism two
i apologise if my style of video editing is similar to someone elses. i can change if you so desire. thanks for the feedback!
@@MurrayCupholder didn't say i wanted it to change, it's really cool :) hope you keep making vids
@@wafflewarrior3782 will do, mate!
Where is the DC link?
this looks like a video a commentary youtuber would make
Yes.
My first KSP video is short by all means. i'm soon to release a voice-over video on KSP in the near future. release date: 20/08/2024
That's a pretty slick looking desktop pic
Can you do a video about some of my planes? I would like to hear some feedback, i posted them on Steam Workshop
Will do, mate! just gotta get a link if that's alright :)
@@MurrayCupholder ok! Sorry for replying late
@@MurrayCupholder can you see the links?
Unfortunately not. I’ll take your name and build from there to see if it works.
@@MurrayCupholder hhhmmmmm, how strange. My nickname is Einsteniumbasedslushi
super skibidi my sigma
0:52 when subsonic at sea level the panther in wet mode has more thrust than the airbreathing mode of the rapier while weighing less and having a higher isp, it's only at very high speeds or altitudes that the rapier is better. If comparing rocket engines, they all have a much lower isp at sea level compared to jet engines and the closed cycle rapier is not very good compared to other engines, e.g. the vector engine has a higher isp, a bigger gimbal range and over 5x the thrust in the same form factor, while only weighting twice as much
yes, it does. but me, having a combined 3.5 brain cells, only figured out the afterburning turbofan was more poweful after i published the video. so i am estupido.
id rather hear the actual game sounds itself than this music
sims 3 rock band career aah music
mate, if you dont like what i do, go away. :)
I love the music
he isnt saying he hates you, he just said the game actual sounds are better than the music, chill, its just a opnion
Press ']'
i refuse.